+1! Tommy is great addition to Cinder core team.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Sean McGinnis [sean.mcgin...@gmx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 4:07 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Proposing TommyLikeHu for Cinder
with snapshots
Cool. That's the way which I desire mostly. Here is the bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1670541 and I'll update the patch ASAP.
Thanks very much for your explanation and suggestion.
2017-03-06 22:43 GMT+08:00 yang, xing
<xing.y...@dell.com<mailto:xing.y...@de
' status dividually
and easily.
When create a backup from a large snapshot, such as larger than 1 TB, It will
costs few hours generally. It's really a problem that the volume is not
available for such a long time.
2017-03-03 22:43 GMT+08:00 yang, xing
<xing.y...@dell.com<mailto:xing.y...@de
In the original backup API design, volume_id is a required field. In the CLI,
volume_id is positional and required as well. So when I added support to
backup from a snapshot, I added snapshot_id as an optional field in the request
body of the backup API. While backup is in process, you
.
Thanks,
Xing
From: yang, xing
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:33 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [cinder] generic volume groups and consistency groups
Hi everyone,
Generic volume groups
] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph
Does it mean that ceph as a backend for this feature is supposed to
provide an API which allows to specify the name of each cloned image?
V.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:17 PM, yang, xing <xing.y...@dell.com> wrote:
> The new image name should be volume-uuid if
List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Jason Dillaman
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph
Does it mean that ceph as a backend for this feature is supposed to
provide an API which allows to specify the name of each cloned image?
V.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:17 PM, yang, xing
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Jason Dillaman
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph
How are the names chosen for those new cloned images?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:04 AM, yang, xing <xing.y...@dell.com> wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
eate
>> consistency group from a snap shot.
>> Does it mean that an image can be a member of several consistency groups?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> V.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:21 AM, yang, xing <xing.y...@dell.com> wrote:
>>> You cannot remove a v
if the image doesn't exist anymore?
[Xing] You cannot delete the image (volume) if there is still a snapshot.
Thanks,
Victor.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:02 AM, yang, xing <xing.y...@dell.com> wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> Please see my answers inline below.
>
> In Newton, we added suppo
From: yang, xing [xing.y...@dell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 10:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Jason Dillaman
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph
Hi Victor,
Please see my answers inline below.
In Newton, we added
+1.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Tom Barron [whui...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 8:09 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [manila] propose adding gouthamr to manila core
I hereby propose that we add Goutham Pacha
Hi Victor,
Please see my answers inline below.
In Newton, we added support for Generic Volume Groups. See doc below. CGs
will be migrated to Generic Volume Groups gradually. Drivers should not
implement CGs any more. Instead, it can add CG support using Generic Volume
Group interfaces.
+1. Tom will be an excellent addition to the core team!
Thanks,
Xing
From: Ben Swartzlander [b...@swartzlander.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 2:42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev]
] [cinder] Volume Drivers unit tests
Thank you Xing,
The issue is related both to VNX and VMAX EMC drivers
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
http://blog.e0ne.info/
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:00 PM, yang, xing
<xing.y...@emc.com<mailto:xing.y...@emc.com>> wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for send
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for sending this out. Regarding the issue in the EMC VNX driver unit
tests, it is tracked by this bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1578986. The driver was recently
refactored so this is probably a new issue introduced by the refactor. We are
investigating this
+2, very well deserved! Scott will be a great addition to the core team.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Sean McGinnis [sean.mcgin...@gmx.com]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 1:27 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Scott
+1. Michal will be a great addition to the core team.
Thanks,
Xing
> On May 3, 2016, at 2:19 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I would like to nominate Michał Dulko to the Cinder core team. Michał's
> contributions with both code reviews [0] and code
>
> Thanks
> Dilip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: yang, xing [mailto:xing.y...@emc.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 12:42 PM
> To: Dilip Sunkum Manjunath
> Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org; itzdi...@gmail.com
Hi Dilip,
I see. If thin_provisioning is true and max_over_subscription_ratio is valid,
the scheduler will treat it as thin provisioning. We do not prevent driver
from reporting both thin and thick support to be true. However, I think we
need to make a change.
I suggest that you have one
Hi Dilip,
Can you please clarify your question? If a driver reports both
thin_provisioning and thick_provisioning to True and reports free_capacity
based on thin provisioning , and you want to provision a thick volume, the
scheduler won’t block it and it fail when the driver tries to create
A late +1. Congrats Patrick! Welcome to the core team.
Xing
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 01:04:58AM +0100, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>> Patrick has been a strong contributor to Cinder over the last few releases,
>> both
XIO.py is not for the XtremIO driver. It should be
cinder/volume/drivers/EMC/xtremio.py.
Thanks,
Xing
On Feb 4, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Steve Searles
> wrote:
Hello everyone, I am attempting to add the EMC XtremIO driver that is included
with
Hi Wang Hao,
Here¹s a Cinder spec in review on replicating a group of volumes:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229722/
It is a not an easy problem to solve. Not that we should rush on this
problem, but we should start thinking about how to solve this as some
backends can only replicate a CG
Hi Eric,
Please see my replies inline below.
Thanks,
Xing
On 9/16/15, 1:20 PM, "Eric Harney" <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote:
>On 09/15/2015 04:56 PM, yang, xing wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> Regarding the default max_over_subscription_ratio, I initially
Hi Eric,
Regarding the default max_over_subscription_ratio, I initially set the
default to 1 while working on oversubscription, and changed it to 2 after
getting review comments. After it was merged, I got feedback that 2 is
too small and 20 is more appropriated, so I changed it to 20. So it
Hi Mike,
No problem.
Thanks,
Xing
On Aug 21, 2015, at 1:37 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:27 PM, yang, xing xing.y...@emc.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
I’m wondering if you can consider approving the following blueprints. They
were submitted late
+1
On 8/13/15, 3:13 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core.
Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openst
Hi Chen,
You can ask if OpenStack Infrastructure team can set up CI for this driver.
They have set up CI's for a few Cinder drivers based on open source storage
systems.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Li, Chen [mailto:chen...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:48 AM
To: OpenStack Development
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ask for help on supportting the 3-rd
party CI for HDFS driver
On 2015-06-10 14:39:46 + (+), yang, xing wrote:
You can ask if OpenStack Infrastructure team can set up CI for this
driver. They have set up CI's
Here's a cinder spec that proposes to add support for Brocade Virtual Fabrics
support:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144389/
Cisco already has vSAN support.
Thanks,
Xing
From: liuxinguo [mailto:liuxin...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
Hi Valeriy,
VNX can support creating a share from snapshot using a different share network.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Valeriy Ponomaryov [mailto:vponomar...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:38 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev]
Hi Igor,
We can support extending a share without loss of connectivity, but we don’t
support shrinking.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Jason Bishop [mailto:jason.bis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 8:14 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re:
Definitely +1!
Thanks,
Xing
-Original Message-
From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 7:34 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core
This is long overdue, but it gives me great pleasure to
+1 to both.
From: Ben Swartzlander [mailto:b...@swartzlander.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 2:23 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Two nominations for Manila Core Reviewer Team
I would like to nominate Thomas Bechtold to
+1
On Apr 2, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.org wrote:
Clinton Knight (cknight on IRC) has been working on OpenStack for the better
part of the year, and starting in February, he shifted his focus from Cinder
to Manila. I think everyone is already aware of his
+1
-Original Message-
From: Ben Swartzlander [mailto:b...@swartzlander.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 3:04 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Igor Malinovskiy for core team
Igor (u_glide on IRC) joined the
Hi Ruijing,
I've already created another etherpad for replication and CG integration. It
is referenced at the end of the replication etherpad that Ronen created. I can
move the content to the replication one if that is easier.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-replication-cg
I can help
As Mike said, allowing deletion of a single volume from a CG is error prone.
User could be deleting a single volume without knowing that it is part of a CG.
The new Modify CG feature for Kilo allows you to remove a volume from CG and
you can delete it as a separate operation. When user
+1
On Jan 21, 2015, at 8:11 PM, John Griffith
john.griffi...@gmail.commailto:john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Avishay Traeger
avis...@stratoscale.commailto:avis...@stratoscale.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Mike Perez
Hi Phil,
Do you have a libvirt volume driver on the Nova side for DRBD? Regarding
getting consistency group information to the Nova nodes, can you help me
understand the steps you need to go through?
1. Create a consistency group
2. Create a volume and add volume to the group
Repeat the
Hi,
The document you referenced is for the VNX Direct Driver. If you use the VNX
Direct driver, you need the “thin provisioning license” to create thin LUNs.
If you are only creating thick LUNs, you can skip this license. You need the
VNX Snapshot license to create a snapshot in Cinder.
Yes, VNX snapshot should work with thick LUN.
Thanks,
Xing
From: mad Engineer [mailto:themadengin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 4:31 PM
To: yang, xing
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] cinder and EMC VNX storage
Thank you Xing ,
can snapshot work
Hi John,
Thank you so much for all the help you’ve given me and all the hard work you’ve
been doing to bring Cinder to where it is today. I hope that you keep your
promise by not going anywhere and still getting involved in Cinder!
Thanks!!
Xing
From: John Griffith
Thanks John! Thanks everyone!
Xing
From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 2:19 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination
On Wed, Aug 27,
Hi Jim,
Can you please re-enable EMC XIO CI account? The problem has been addressed.
Thanks!
Xing
-Original Message-
From: cor...@inaugust.com [mailto:cor...@inaugust.com] On Behalf Of James E.
Blair
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:10 PM
To: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org
Cc:
Hi Jim,
Sure. We will correct the configuration and ask you to enable it later.
Thanks,
Xing
On Aug 15, 2014, at 6:07 PM, James E. Blair cor...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
I have disabled the above CI system because it is in violation of the
following policies:
* Include a public link to
Thanks Sergey!!
Xing
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Lukjanov [mailto:slukja...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 9:25 AM
To: yang, xing
Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Service Accounts for CI System
I've updated emails for your
: Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:00 AM
To: yang, xing
Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Service Accounts for CI System
Done, account is ready.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:12 AM, yang, xing xing.y...@emc.com wrote:
Thanks Sergey!
Here's a request to create a service
Hi Deepak,
I suggest that these two issues to be fixed in the current patch for the
glusterfs driver first. Then open another bug to fix them in other drivers in
a different patch.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Deepak Shetty [mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 7:01 AM
To:
Hi All,
We are in the process of setting up CI systems for EMC Cinder drivers. We have
4 products: VMAX, VNX, ViPR, and XIO. We need to have 4 CI systems, one for
each product.
We are requesting the following service accounts:
emc-vmax-ci
emc-vnx-ci
emc-vipr-ci
Another request will be sent
//DcKN6uEJFZkdSbJIioZQ7Tsqd8McbmuHaCqp4suj7jkntvU+LgMEuqDDB+eEx/b69sF/WwTpFo7ZXOtMx5TUWUDpxTeWKAi5SIdIUQY7DzWlOw==
Thanks,
Xing
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Lukjanov [mailto:slukja...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:31 AM
To: yang, xing
Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org
Thanks Ben! It's my pleasure to join the Manila core team!
Xing
-Original Message-
From: Swartzlander, Ben [mailto:ben.swartzlan...@netapp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:46 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Welcome Xing Yang to the
Hi Dharmit,
You can't remove those from Nova. If you remove them, attach volume won't work
anymore. Attach volume still goes through Nova.
Thanks,
Xing
-Original Message-
From: Dharmit Shah [mailto:dharmit@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8:03 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: Takashi Natsume [mailto:natsume.taka...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 6:07 AM
To: yang, xing; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: [Openstack] multipath - EMC vs NetApp
Hello Xing and all,
We tried to set up iSCSI multipath with EMC VNX5300.
However
Hi Carlos,
We are working on this issue and will keep you informed.
Thanks,
Xing
From: Carlos Alvarez [mailto:cbalva...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 1:19 PM
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack] multipath - EMC vs NetApp
Hi All.
I recently added a EMC V-Max
56 matches
Mail list logo