Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:22:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591671/ has landed, we need > someone to propose the backports of the constraint updates to all of the > existing stable branches. Done:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] help with tempest plugin jobs against stable/queens

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:37:18 +0900 Eric K wrote > I'm adding jobs [1] to the tempest plugin to run tests against > congress stable/queens. The job output seems to show stable/queens > getting checked out [2], but I know the test is *not* run against > queens because it's using

[Openstack-operators] oracle rac on openstack: openfiler as shared storage

Hi Please advise me on how to get an openfiler image suitable for openstack. I would use it for a "shared storage" for oracle rac, with asm, installation. Thank you! ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] tempest test conditioning on release version

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:40:57 +0900 Eric K wrote > Anyone have an example handy of a tempest test conditioning on service > release version (because new features not available in past versions)? > Seems like it could get pretty messy and haphazard, so I'm curious to > see best

[openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] help with tempest plugin jobs against stable/queens

I'm adding jobs [1] to the tempest plugin to run tests against congress stable/queens. The job output seems to show stable/queens getting checked out [2], but I know the test is *not* run against queens because it's using features not available in queens. The expected result is for several tests

[openstack-dev] [First Contact] [SIG] [PTL] Project Liaisons - Please update list

Greetings new and continuing PTLs! Now that the PTL elections are over may I ask those of you who haven't done so already to head on over to the First Contact SIG Project Liaison list [0] and make sure you details, especially timezone has been filled out? We of the First Contact SIG are striving

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][mox][python3][goal] need help with mox3 and python 3.6

Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-08-14 16:26:09 -0500: > On 14/08/18 15:45, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > The python 3.6 unit test job has exposed an issue with mox3. It looks > > like it might just be in the test suite, but I can't tell. > > > > I'm looking for one of the folks who

[openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] tempest test conditioning on release version

Anyone have an example handy of a tempest test conditioning on service release version (because new features not available in past versions)? Seems like it could get pretty messy and haphazard, so I'm curious to see best practices. Thanks lots! Eric Kao

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][mox][python3][goal] need help with mox3 and python 3.6

On 14/08/18 15:45, Doug Hellmann wrote: The python 3.6 unit test job has exposed an issue with mox3. It looks like it might just be in the test suite, but I can't tell. I'm looking for one of the folks who suggested we should just keep maintaining mox3 to help fix it. Please go ahead and take

[openstack-dev] [oslo][mox][python3][goal] need help with mox3 and python 3.6

The python 3.6 unit test job has exposed an issue with mox3. It looks like it might just be in the test suite, but I can't tell. I'm looking for one of the folks who suggested we should just keep maintaining mox3 to help fix it. Please go ahead and take over the relevant patch and include

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers: what to do?

Hi Julia, Thanks for bringing this up. On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 2:41 PM Julia Kreger, wrote: > Greetings fellow ironicans! > > As many of you might know an openstack/ironic-staging-drivers[1] > repository exists. What most might not know is that it was > intentionally created outside of ironic's

[Openstack] [Scientific] Scientific SIG meeting Aug 15 1100UTC

The next Scientific SIG meeting will an IRC on Meeting August 15th 2018: 2018-08-15 1100 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting Agenda is as follow: 1. PTG Topics 2. CFP: HPC Advisory Council Spain Conference - 21st September http://hpcadvisorycouncil.com/events/2018/spain-conference/ 3.

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-08-13 18:30:02 -0400: > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2018-08-13 16:17:30 -0500: > > On 18-08-13 20:28:23, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > On 2018-08-13 19:16, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > > On 2018-08-13 18:40, Petr Kovar wrote: > > > > > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] Speaker Selection Process: OpenStack Summit Berlin

Hi Hongbin, Please see below for some general notes... Hongbin Lu wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:53 AM Jimmy McArthur > wrote: Greetings! The speakers for the OpenStack Summit Berlin will be announced August 14, at 4:00 AM UTC. Ahead of that, we

Re: [openstack-dev] Speaker Selection Process: OpenStack Summit Berlin

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:53 AM Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Greetings! > > The speakers for the OpenStack Summit Berlin will be announced August 14, > at 4:00 AM UTC. Ahead of that, we want to take this opportunity to thank > our Programming Committee! They have once again taken time out of their >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

Hello! The error you hit can be resolved by adding launchpadlib to your tox.ini if I recall correctly.. also, if you'd like, I can run a test migration of puppet's launchpad projects into our storyboard-dev db (where I've done a ton of other test migrations) if you want to see how it looks/works

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

Hello! The error you hit can be resolved by adding launchpadlib to your tox.ini if I recall correctly.. also, if you'd like, I can run a test migration of puppet's launchpad projects into our storyboard-dev db (where I've done a ton of other test migrations) if you want to see how it looks/works

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][requirements][cycle-with-intermediary][cycle-trailing] requirements is going to branch stable/rocky at ~08-15-2018 2100Z

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:13:13AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: > This is to warn and call out all those projects that do not have a > stable/rocky branch yet. > > If you are in the folloing list your project will need to realize that > your master is testing against the requirements/constraints

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][oslo][release] FFE request for castellan

> On 08/10/2018 10:15 AM, Ade Lee wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to request a feature freeze exception to get the following > > change in for castellan. > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575800/ > > > > This extends the functionality of the vault backend to provide > > previously

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][heat][congress] gabbi<1.42.1 causing error in queens dsvm

From: Rabi Mishra Date: Monday, August 13, 2018 at 10:10 PM > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Eric K wrote: >> It appears that gabbi<1.42.1 is causing on error with heat tempest >> plugin in congress stable/queens dsvm job [1][2][3]. > I wonder why you're enabling heat-tempest-plugin in the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Self signed CA/CERTS

I’ll try to check the certificate format and make the appropriate change if required or let you know if I’ve got something specific regarding that topic. Kind regards, G. Le mar. 14 août 2018 à 19:52, Flint WALRUS a écrit : > Hi Michael, thanks a lot for your quick response once again! > Le

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][heat][congress] gabbi<1.42.1 causing error in queens dsvm

On 8/13/18, 11:03 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: >On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 04:10:30PM -0700, Eric K wrote: >> It appears that gabbi<1.42.1 is causing on error with heat tempest >> plugin in congress stable/queens dsvm job [1][2][3]. The issue was >> addressed in heat tempest plugin [4], but the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Self signed CA/CERTS

Hi Michael, thanks a lot for your quick response once again! Le mar. 14 août 2018 à 18:21, Michael Johnson a écrit : > Hi there Flint. > > Octavia fully supports using self-signed certificates and we use those > in our gate tests. > We do not allow non-TLS authenticated connections in the code,

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] ansible roles in tripleo

Hey folks, Like Alex mentioned[0] earlier, we've created a bunch of ansible roles for tripleo specific bits.  The idea is to start putting some basic cookiecutter type things in them to get things started, then move some low-hanging fruit out of tripleo-heat-templates and into the appropriate

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Reminder about the weekly Cinder meeting ...

Okay, thanks. There's no Sigyn in openstack-oslo so I think we're good. :-) On 08/14/2018 10:37 AM, Jay S Bryant wrote: Ben, Don't fully understand why it was kicking me.  I guess one of the behaviors that is considered suspicious is trying to message a bunch of nicks at once.  I had tried

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][oslo][release] FFE request for castellan

On 08/10/2018 10:15 AM, Ade Lee wrote: Hi all, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception to get the following change in for castellan. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575800/ This extends the functionality of the vault backend to provide previously uninmplemented functionality, so it

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][requirements][cycle-with-intermediary][cycle-trailing] requirements is going to branch stable/rocky at ~08-15-2018 2100Z

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: .. snip .. > ansible-role-container-registry > ansible-role-redhat-subscription > ansible-role-tripleo-modify-image > instack-undercloud > os-apply-config > os-collect-config > os-net-config > os-refresh-config > paunch >

[Openstack-operators] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

Hello all incredible Puppeters, I've tested setting up an Storyboard instance and test migrated puppet-ceph and it went without any issues there using the documentation [1] [2] with just one minor issue during the SB setup [3]. My goal is that we will be able to swap to Storyboard during the

[openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

Hello all incredible Puppeters, I've tested setting up an Storyboard instance and test migrated puppet-ceph and it went without any issues there using the documentation [1] [2] with just one minor issue during the SB setup [3]. My goal is that we will be able to swap to Storyboard during the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to debug no valid host failures with placement

Folks- The patch mentioned below [1] has undergone several rounds of review and collaborative revision, and we'd really like to get your feedback on it. From the commit message: Here are some examples of the debug output: - A request for three resources with no aggregate or trait

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Self signed CA/CERTS

Hi there Flint. Octavia fully supports using self-signed certificates and we use those in our gate tests. We do not allow non-TLS authenticated connections in the code, even for lab setups. This is a configuration issue or certificate file format issue. When the controller is attempting to

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][ptg] PTG etherpad planning.

Dear community, We are approaching the PTG in Denver, and I want to remind everybody to make sure you are ready for it! I've created the etherpad [1] where you can add any topic you want to discuss, if you haven't done so already. If you are not able to attend the PTG, please mention it on

[openstack-dev] [releases][requirements][cycle-with-intermediary][cycle-trailing] requirements is going to branch stable/rocky at ~08-15-2018 2100Z

This is to warn and call out all those projects that do not have a stable/rocky branch yet. If you are in the folloing list your project will need to realize that your master is testing against the requirements/constraints from stein, not rocky. Any branching / tests you do will need to keep

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Reminder about the weekly Cinder meeting ...

That bot is indeed missing from the channel Amy (spotz) On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-08-13 16:29:27 -0500 (-0500), Amy Marrich wrote: > > I know we did a ping last week in #openstack-ansible for our meeting no > > issue. I wonder if it's a length of names

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Reminder about the weekly Cinder meeting ...

On 8/13/2018 5:44 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-08-13 16:29:27 -0500 (-0500), Amy Marrich wrote: I know we did a ping last week in #openstack-ansible for our meeting no issue. I wonder if it's a length of names thing or a channel setting. [...] Freenode's Sigyn bot may not have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Reminder about the weekly Cinder meeting ...

Ben, Don't fully understand why it was kicking me.  I guess one of the behaviors that is considered suspicious is trying to message a bunch of nicks at once.  I had tried reducing the number of people in my ping but it still kicked me and so I decided to not risk it again. Sounds like the

[OpenStack-Infra] [goal][python3] starting zuul migration for Documentation team repositories

The Zuul project settings for the Documentation repositories has begun. Please do not approve any changes to openstack-infra/project-config/zuul.d/projects.yaml for the following repositories: - openstack/constellations - openstack/contributor-guide - openstack/docs-specs -

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][osc] FFE osc-lib 1.11.1 release

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2018-08-14 15:28:07 +1000: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:11:53AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: > > > Maybe it'd be better to figure out what's using that removed method and > > those would need the update? > > Given we have per-project deps in rocky only those

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstackdocstheme 1.21.2

Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2018-08-13 16:17:30 -0500: > On 18-08-13 20:28:23, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > On 2018-08-13 19:16, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > On 2018-08-13 18:40, Petr Kovar wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is a request for an FFE to release openstackdocstheme

[openstack-dev] [nova]Notification subteam meeting cancelled

Hi, There won't be notification subteam meeting this week. Cheers, gibi __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 05:41:20PM +0900, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Hi All, > > Rocky release is few weeks away and we all agreed to release Tempest plugin > with cycle-with-intermediary. Detail discussion are in ML [1] in case you > missed. > > This is reminder to tag your project tempest

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][Edge][FEMDC] Edge clouds and controlplane updates

On 8/13/18 9:47 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: Hello, I'd like to get some feedback regarding the remaining work for the split controlplane spec implementation [1] Specifically, while for some services like nova-compute it is not necessary to update the controlplane nodes after an edge cloud is

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers: what to do?

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings fellow ironicans! > > As many of you might know an openstack/ironic-staging-drivers[1] > repository exists. What most might not know is that it was > intentionally created outside of ironic's governance[2]. > > At the time it was

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-33

HTML: https://anticdent.org/tc-report-18-33.html ## Dead, Gone or Stable [Last week](https://anticdent.org/tc-report-18-32.html) saw plenty of discussion about how to deal with projects for which no PTL was found by election or acclaim. That discussion continued this week, but also stimulated

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers: what to do?

Inline On 08/13/2018 08:40 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: Greetings fellow ironicans! As many of you might know an openstack/ironic-staging-drivers[1] repository exists. What most might not know is that it was intentionally created outside of ironic's governance[2]. At the time it was created ironic

[Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Self signed CA/CERTS

Hi guys, I continue to work on my Octavia integration using Kolla-Ansible and I'm facing a strange behavior. As for now I'm working on a POC using restricted HW and SW Capacities, I'm facing a strange issue when trying to launch a new load-balancer. When I create a new LB, would it be using CLI

[Openstack-operators] Berlin Summit Schedule Live!

The schedule for the Berlin Summit is live! Check out 100+ sessions, demos, and workshops covering 35+ open source projects in the following Tracks: • CI/CD • Container Infrastructure • Edge Computing

[openstack-dev] Berlin Summit Schedule Live!

The schedule for the Berlin Summit is live! Check out 100+ sessions, demos, and workshops covering 35+ open source projects in the following Tracks: • CI/CD • Container Infrastructure • Edge Computing

Re: [openstack-dev] [rpm-packaging] Step down as a reviewer

- Original Message - > Dear rpm-packaging team, > > I was lucky to help doing reviews for the rpm-packaging OpenStack > project for the last couple of release cycles. I learned a lot during > this time. > > I will change my role at SUSE at the end of the month (August 2018), so > I

[openstack-dev] [edge][glance][nova][starlngx]: Edge sessions on the PTG

Hi, We will have a whole day discussion on edge on the Tuesday of the PTG [1] where we plan [2] to have discussions on image handling, Nova, Keystone and StarlingX. If you are interested in any of these please add your name to the name lists. Also if you have some ideas to discuss during the

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][heat][congress] gabbi<1.42.1 causing error in queens dsvm

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 04:10:30PM -0700, Eric K wrote: > It appears that gabbi<1.42.1 is causing on error with heat tempest > plugin in congress stable/queens dsvm job [1][2][3]. The issue was > addressed in heat tempest plugin [4], but the problem remains for > stable/queens jobs because the