Re: [Openstack-operators] Openstack zun on centos???

Hi Edoardo, It looks you gets your answer from others. I just want to add a few more comments. We (the Zun team) would like to have CentOS included in our installation guide and I have created a ticket for that: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zun/+spec/installation-guide-for-centos . It will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [ZUN] [kuryr-libnetwork]

Hi Rania, See if this helps: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-November/136547.html Best regards, Hongbin On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 7:27 AM Rania Adouni wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I was trying to create container but I just ended up by this error : > *Docker internal

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Failed to create Container

2018 à 02:34, Rania Adouni a > écrit : > >> Hi Hongbin, >> Yes the version of kuryr-lib is :0.8.0 , So I think I should remove it ! >> I should remove only the kuryr-lib ! if you have some command they can >> help me to unisntall it , it will be nice to provide it . >

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Failed to create Container

Hi Rania, The config option 'driver' was recently renamed, so I guess the problem is the version of kuryr-lib is not right. The Pike release of Zun is matched to kuryr-lib 0.6.0 so you might want to confirm the version of kuryr-lib. $ sudo pip freeze | grep kuryr If the version is not right,

[openstack-dev] [neutron] os-ken report for last week

Hi all, I am used to report the os-ken related progress in the neutron team meeting. After switching to winter time, I am not able to attend the meeting at Tuesday 1400 UTC. I sent out the report in the ML instead. Below is the progress in last week. * The os-ken 0.2.0 is released:

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun][zun-ui] How to get "host" attribute for image

Shu, It looks the 'host' field was added to the DB table but not exposed via REST API by mistake. See if this patch fixes the issue: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611753/ . Best regards, Hongbin On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:50 PM Shu M. wrote: > Hi folks, > > I found the following commit to

[openstack-dev] [kolla-ansible][zun] Request to make another release for stable/queens

Hi Kolla team, I have a fixup on the configuration of Zun service: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591256/ . The fix has been backported to stable/queens and I wonder if it is possible to release kolla-ansible 6.2.0 that contains this patch. The deployment of Zun service needs this patch to work

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][octavia] Containerize the amphora-agent

e as setting up for full > containerization. > We should discuss further on IRC next week maybe, if we can find a good > time. > Sure. Feel free to ping me if you see me online. My IRC nick is hongbin and you will find me in #openstack-zun or #openstack-dev > > --Adam > &g

[openstack-dev] [kolla][octavia] Containerize the amphora-agent

Hi all, I am working on the Zun integration for Octavia. I did a preliminary research and it seems what we need to do is to containerize the amphora agent that was packaged and shipped by a VM image. I wonder if anyone already has a containerized docker image that I can leverage. If not, I will

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report week August 20th - August 26th

Hi all, I was the bugs deputy for the week of August 20th - August 26th. Here's the summary of the bugs that were filed: Critical: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1788185 Functional tests neutron.tests.functional.agent.l3.test_ha_router failing 100% times. Miguel Lavalle is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 3:15 PM Eric Fried wrote: > This is great information, thanks Hongbin. > > If I'm understanding correctly, it sounds like Zun ultimately wants to > be a peer of nova in terms of placement consumption. Using the resource > information reported by nova, neutron, etc., you

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:25 AM Chris Dent wrote: > > 5. In OpenStack we have a tradition of the contributors having a > strong degree of self-determination. If that tradition is to be > upheld, then it would make sense that the people who designed and > wrote the code that is being extracted

Re: [openstack-dev] Speaker Selection Process: OpenStack Summit Berlin

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:53 AM Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Greetings! > > The speakers for the OpenStack Summit Berlin will be announced August 14, > at 4:00 AM UTC. Ahead of that, we want to take this opportunity to thank > our Programming Committee! They have once again taken time out of their >

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Change of code review policy

Hi all, I would like to announce a change on the code review process in Zun. Traditionally, the code review policy requires *two* +2 to approve a patch. Now, it changes to require only *one* +2 to approve. This change is trying to speed up the code review process and accelerate the merging of

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Octavia][Congress] The usage of Neutron API

Hi folks, Neutron has landed a patch to enable strict validation on query parameters when listing resources [1]. I tested the Neutorn's change in your project's gate and the result suggested that your projects would need the fixes [2][3][4] to keep the gate functioning. Please feel free to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Zun UI questions

have issues. Second install still had the wrong IP > showing as the Keystone URI, I'll try s fresh machine install next. > > Thanks for all your help! > > Amy (spotz) > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > >> Hi Amy, >> >> Today, I created a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Zun UI questions

---+ > > root@zunui:~# openstack appcontainer list > > Unauthorized (HTTP 401) (Request-ID: > req-e44f5caf-642c-4435-ab1d-98feae1fada9) > > root@zunui:~# zun list > > ERROR: Unauthorized (HTTP 401) (Request-ID: > req-587e39d6-463f-4921-b45b-29576a00c242) &

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Zun UI questions

n for a non-enabled build according to the > quickstart doc. I don't mind doing a patch to fix kuryr-libnetwork to bring > it up to the current requirements. I don't however know where to start > troubleshooting the 401 issue. On a different machine I have decstack with > Zun but no zun-

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Technical Committee Update for 3 July

> > Discussions about affiliation diversity continue in two directions. > Zane's proposal for requirements for new project teams has stalled a > bit. The work Thierry and Mohammed have done on the diversity tags has > brought a new statistics script and a proposal to drop the use of the > tags in

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun][zun-ui] Priorities of new feature on Zun UI

Hi Shu, Thanks for the raising this discussion. I have filled my opinion in the etherpad. In general, I am quite satisfied by the current feature set provided by the Zun UI. Thanks for the great work from the UI team. Best regards, Hongbin On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:18 AM Shu M. wrote: > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack-Zun Service Appears down

gt; zun-compute is running > > The eth0 network card has standard configuration of an OVSBridge. > > When I create a new container it also creates taps and patch ports on the > compute node. Now I am going to try to use kuryr script to test what > happens with "bridged" and "h

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack-Zun Service Appears down

HI Muhammad, Here is the code (run in controller node) that decides whether a service is up https://github.com/openstack/zun/blob/master/zun/api/servicegroup.py . There are several possibilities to cause a service to be 'down': 1. The service was being 'force_down' via API (e.g. explicitly

[openstack-dev] [Zun][Octavia] OpenStack Zun as Octavia driver

Hi all, We are planning a feature about Zun integration in Octavia [1]. At highest level, the idea is to have Zun to provide docker containers for Octavia to host their software-based load balancing backend. An immediate benefit is to speed up the Octavia's gate so that they can run more test

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Relocate jobs from openstack/zun to openstack/zun-tempest-plugin

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 7:02 PM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: > Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@gmail.com> writes: > > > The goal of those patches is to move the job definitions and playbooks > from > > openstack/zun to openstack/zun-tempest-plugin.

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Relocate jobs from openstack/zun to openstack/zun-tempest-plugin

Hi all, I have a series of patches for moving gate jobs from openstack/zun to openstack/zun-tempest-plugin: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:relocate-zun-jobs+(status:open+OR+status:merged) Moving forward those patches will incur a period of time that our gate will have no tempest tests

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Team meeting canceled on 2018-05-22

Hi all, Due to OpenStack Vancouver Summit, we canceled the weekly team meeting at 2018-05-22. Updated Meeting schedule can be found at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zun#Meetings . Best regards, Hongbin __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Add Deepak Mourya to the core team

Hi all, This is an announcement of the following change on the Zun core reviewers team: + Deepak Mourya (mourya007) Deepak has been actively involving in Zun for several months. He has submitted several code patches to Zun, all of which are useful features or bug fixes. In particular, I would

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report

availability zones with filters. Hongbin Lu is working on a fix. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1768990 In Progress. External bridge is not re-configured if it is removed and re-created. Slawek Kaplonski is working on it. Best regards, Hongbin

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Announce change of Zun core reviewer team

Hi all, I would like to announce the following change on the Zun core reviewers team: + Ji Wei Ji Wei has been working on Zun for a while. His contributions include blueprints, bug fixes, code reviews, etc. In particular, I would like to highlight that he has implemented two blueprints [1][2],

[openstack-dev] [Zun][k8s] AWS Fargate and OpenStack Zun

-comparing-serverless-container-hongbin-lu/ Best regards, Hongbin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi

[openstack-dev] [Zun][Kolla][Kolla-ansible] Verify Zun deployment in Kolla gate

Hi Kolla team, Recently, I saw there are users who tried to install Zun by using Kolla-ansible and reported bugs to us whenever they ran into issues (e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1766151). The increase of this usage pattern (Kolla + Zun) made me think that we need to have CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Queens for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

Corey, Thanks for the information. Would you clarify what is "working packages from the community"? Best regards, Hongbin On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Queens for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

Hi Corey, What are the requirements to include OpenStack Zun into the Ubuntu packages? We have a comprehensive installation guide [1] that are using by a lot of users when they were installing Zun. However, the missing of Ubuntu packages is inconvenient for our users. What the Zun team can help

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] zun-api error

, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Murali B <mbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hongbin Lu, > > After I run the etcd service up and tried to create container I see the > below error and my container is in error state > > Could you please share me if I need to change any configuration in n

[openstack-dev] [zun] zun-api error

Hi Murali, It looks your zunclient was sending API requests to http://10.11.142.2:9511/v1/services , which doesn't seem to be the right API endpoint. According to the Keystone endpoint you configured, the API endpoint of Zun should be http://10.11.142.2:9517/v1/services

Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

Hi Chris, I can help with the Zun session. Best regards, Hongbin On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In advance of the Vancouver Summit, I'm leading an effort to publish a > community produced white-paper on OpenStack and container

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Removal inactive cores

Hi all, This is an announcement about change of Zun's core team membership. The people below were removed from the Zun's core reviewer team due to their inactiveness at the last 180 days [1]. This change was voted by the existing core team and was unanimously approved. I would like to thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [api-wg][api][neutron] How to handle invalid query parameters

Hi all, Please disregard the email below since I used the wrong template. Sorry about that. The email with the same content was re-sent in a new thread http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128022.html . Best regards, Hongbin From: Hongbin Lu Sent: March-07-18 4:02 PM

[openstack-dev] [api-wg][api][neutron] How to handle invalid query parameters

Hi all, This is a follow-up for the discussion in Dublin PTG about how Neutron API server should handle invalid query parameter [1]. According to the feedback, I sent this ML to seek advice from API-WG in this regards. As a brief recap, we were discussing how Neutron API server should behave

[openstack-dev] [api-wg][api][neutron] How to handle invalid query parameters

Hi all, This is a follow-up for the discussion in Dublin PTG about how Neutron API server should handle invalid query parameter [1]. According to the feedback, I sent this ML to seek advice from API-WG in this regards. As a brief recap, we were discussing how Neutron API server should behave

[openstack-dev] [docs] About the convention to use '.' instead of 'source'.

Hi all, We have contributors submit patches [1] about switching over from 'source' to '.'. Frankly, it is a bit confused for reviewers to review those patches since it is unclear what are the rationals of the change. By tracing down to the patch [2] that introduced this convention,

[openstack-dev] [zun][kuryr][kuryr-libnetwork][neutron] Gate breakage due to removal of tag extension

Hi all, Zun's gate is currently broken due to the removal of tag extension [1] at neutron side. The reason is that Zun has a dependency on Kuryr-libnetwork and Kuryr-libnetwork relies on the tag extension that was removed. A quick fixup is to revert the tag extension removal patch [2]. This

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Meeting cancel

Hi team, We won't have team meetings in the next two weeks. This is because next week is Lunar New Year and the next next week is the PTG. We will resume the weekly team meeting at Mar 6, 2018. Please find the schedule in: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zun#Meetings . Happy holiday everyone!

[openstack-dev] [osc][python-openstackclient] Consistency of option name

Hi all, I was working on the OSC plugin of my project and trying to choose a CLI option to represent the availability zone of the container. When I came across the existing commands, I saw some inconsistencies on the naming. Some commands use the syntax '--zone ', while others use the syntax

[openstack-dev] [Zun] PTL non candidacy

Hi all, Just let you know that I won't run for Zun PTL for Rocky because we already have a good PTL candidate: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541187/ I am happy to see that we are able to circulate the PTL role and this is an indication that our project become mature and our community is

[Openstack-operators] [nova][neutron] Extend instance IP filter for floating IP

Hi all, Nova currently allows us to filter instances by fixed IP address(es). This feature is known to be useful in an operational scenario that cloud administrators detect abnormal traffic in an IP address and want to trace down to the instance that this IP address belongs to. This feature

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Extend instance IP filter for floating IP

Hi all, Nova currently allows us to filter instances by fixed IP address(es). This feature is known to be useful in an operational scenario that cloud administrators detect abnormal traffic in an IP address and want to trace down to the instance that this IP address belongs to. This feature

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][libnetwork] Release kuryr-libnetwork 1.x for Queens

Hi Kuryr team, I think Kuryr-libnetwork is ready to move out of beta status. I propose to make the first 1.x release of Kuryr-libnetwork for Queens and cut a stable branch on it. What do you think about this proposal? Best regards, Hongbin

Re: [openstack-dev] [api-wg] [api] [cinder] [nova] Support specify action name in request url

I remembered there are several discussions about action APIs in the past. This is one discussion I can find: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/109136.html . An obvious alternative is to expose each action with an independent API endpoint. For example: * POST

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Containers in privileged mode

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:41 AM, João Paulo Sá da Silva < joao-sa-si...@alticelabs.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > I created the BP: https://blueprints.launchpad. > net/zun/+spec/add-capacities-to-containers . > Thanks for creating the BP. > > > About the clear containers, I’m not quite sure how

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Containers in privileged mode

Please find my reply inline. Best regards, Hongbin On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:06 PM, João Paulo Sá da Silva < joao-sa-si...@alticelabs.com> wrote: > Thanks for your answer, Hongbin, it is very appreciated. > > > > The use case is to use Virtualized Network Functions in containers instead > of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Containers in privileged mode

Hi Joao, Right now, it is impossible to create containers with escalated privileged, such as setting privileged mode or adding additional caps. This is intentional for security reasons. Basically, what Zun currently provides is "serverless" containers, which means Zun is not using VMs to isolate

[openstack-dev] [Zun] PTL on vacation for 3 weeks

Hi team, I will be on vacation during Dec 11 - Jan 2. Madhuri Kumari (cc-ed) kindly agreed to serve the PTL role while I am away. Wish everyone have a happy holiday. Best regards, Hongbin __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Questions about Caas with Magnum

As a record, if magnum team doesn't interest to maintain the CoreOS driver, it is an indication that this driver should be spitted out and maintained by another team. CoreOS is one of the prevailing container OS. I believe there will be a lot of interests after the split. Disclaim: I am an author

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Change in Zun core team

hard work justified his qualification as a core reviewer in Zun. This change was approved unanimously by the existing core team. Below are the core team members who supported this change: Hongbin Lu Shunli Zhou Kien Nguyen Kevin Zhao Madhuri Kumari Namrata Sitlani Shubham Sharma Best regards

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Client long description on PyPi

Hi Zigo, According to https://github.com/pypa/warehouse/issues/2170 , it is impossible to update the description manually. I will release a new version of python-zunclient to get the description updated. Best regards, Hongbin > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Goirand

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova docker replaced by zun?

> > The project was shut down for that reason so that no one would > mistakenly assume there was any maintenance or support on it. If you or > others want to revive the project, that would be fine, as long as we > can identify 2 individuals who will step up as maintainers. &

[openstack-dev] [zun][neutron] About Notifier

Hi Neutron team, I saw neutron has a Nova notifier [1] that is able to notify Nova via REST API when a certain set of events happen. I think Zun would like to be notified as how Nova is. For example, we would like to receive notification whenever a port assigned to a container has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] vPTG schedule

Hi Toni, The time of a few proposed sessions look inconsistent with the etherpad. Could you double check? On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > Hi fellow Kuryrs! > > It's that time of the cycle again where we hold our virtual project team >

[openstack-dev] [infra] Unable to add member to Zun core team

Hi Infra team, I tried to add Kien Nguyen kie...@vn.fujitsu.com to the Zun's core team [1], but gerrit prevented me to do that. Attached file showed the error. Could anyone provide suggestion for this? Best regards, Hongbin [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun][unit test] Any python utils can collect pci info?

, be aware of this > series [1] and do it via the new privsep mechanisms. > > [1] > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+bra > nch:master+topic:hurrah-for-privsep > > On 09/17/2017 09:41 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > > Hi Shunli, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s][deployment][kolla-kubernetes][magnum][kuryr][zun][qa][api] Proposal for SIG-K8s

Hi Chris, Sorry I missed the meeting since I was not in PTG last week. After a quick research on the mission of SIG-K8s, I think we (the OpenStack Zun team) have an item that fits well into this SIG, which is the k8s connector feature:

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun][unit test] Any python utils can collect pci info?

Hi Shunli, I am not aware of any prevailing python utils for this. An alternative is to shell out Linux commands to collect the information. After a quick search, it looks xenapi [1] uses “lspci -vmmnk” to collect PCI device detail info and “ls /sys/bus/pci/devices//” to detect the PCI device

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose change of the core team

Hi all, I propose the following change of the Zun core reviewer team. + Kien Nguyen (kiennt2609) - Aditi Sharma (adi-sky17) Kien has been contributing to the Zun project for a few months. His contributions include proposing high-quality codes, providing helpful code reviews, participating

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Queens PTL candidacy

Hi all, I nominated myself to be a candidate of Zun PTL for Queens. As the founder of this project, it is my honor to work with all of you to build an innovative OpenStack container service. OpenStack provides a full-featured data center management solution which includes multi-tenant security,

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun][unit test] Could anyone help one the unittest fail?

Hi Shunli, Sorry for the late reply, I saw you uploaded a revision of the patch and got the gate pass. I guess you have resolved this issue? Best regards, Hongbin From: Shunli Zhou [mailto:shunli6...@gmail.com] Sent: July-25-17 10:20 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun][api version]Does anyone know the idea of default api version in the versioned API?

Hi all, Here is a bit of the context. Zun has introduced API micro version in the server [1] and the client [2]. The micro version needs to be bumped in server side [3] as long as a backward-incompatible change is made. In client side, we currently hard-code the default version. The client

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] "--nets network=..." usage question

Hi Greg, This parameter has just been added to the CLI and it hasn’t been fully implemented yet. Sorry for the confusion. Here is how I expect this parameter to work: 1. Create from neutron network name: $ zun run --name ctn-ping --nets network=private … 2. Create from neutron network uuid: $

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] "--image-driver glance" doesn't seem to work @ master

Hi Greg, I created a bug to record the issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zun/+bug/1703955 . Due to this bug, Zun couldn’t find the docker image if the image was uploaded to glance under a different name. I think it will work if you can upload the image to glance with name “cirros”. For

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] sandbox and clearcontainers

Hi Surya, First, I would like to provide some context for folks who are not familiar with the sandbox concept in Zun. The "sandbox" is for providing isolated environment for one or multiple containers. In docker driver, we used it as a placeholder of a set of Linux namespaces (i.e. network,

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Some general ZUN use case / drivers type questions

...@windriver.com] Sent: July-11-17 2:13 PM To: Hongbin Lu; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Some general ZUN use case / drivers type questions Thanks Hongbin, another quick question, is ZUN integrated with FUXI for Container mounting

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Some general ZUN use case / drivers type questions

...@windriver.com] Sent: July-11-17 10:24 AM To: Hongbin Lu; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Some general ZUN use case / drivers type questions Hey Hongbin, is there a way to display ZUN’s resource usage ? i.e. analogous to nova’s “nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Some general ZUN use case / drivers type questions

. [1] https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/placement.html Best regards, Hongbin From: Waines, Greg [mailto:greg.wai...@windriver.com] Sent: July-07-17 11:00 AM To: Hongbin Lu; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Some general ZUN use

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Some general ZUN use case / drivers type questions

to the team and keep the discussion open. [1] https://www.slideshare.net/hongbin034/clipboards/zun-deployment Best regards, Hongbin From: Waines, Greg [mailto:greg.wai...@windriver.com] Sent: July-07-17 7:05 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Hongbin Lu Subject: Re

Re: [openstack-dev] [zun] Some general ZUN use case / drivers type questions

simple default COE provided by ZUN itself. [Hongbin Lu] Yes. Zun aims to support containers in VMs, baremetal, or COEs in long term. A clarification is Zun doesn’t aim to become a COE, but it could be used together with Heat [1] to achieve some container orchestration equivalent functionalities

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Upgrade from 'docker-py' to 'docker'

Hi team, We have recently finished the upgrade from 'docker-py' to 'docker'. If your devstack environment run into errors due to the incompatibility between the old and new docker python package (such as [1]), you could try the commands below: $ sudo pip uninstall docker-py docker-pycreds

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose addition of Zun core team and removal notice

t; > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose addition of Zun core team > > and removal notice > > > > > > > > +1 for me. > > > > Thx! > > > > > > > > On 20 June 2017 at 13:50, Pradeep Singh <ps4openst...@

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][all][tc] A proposal to rearchitect Trove

gt; separate > > from the underlying infrastructure APIs like Cinder/Nova/Neutron. > > > > This is similar to Kevin's k8s Operator idea, which I support but in > a > > generic fashion that isn't specific to k8s. > > > > In the same way that k8s abstracts the underlying infra

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose addition of Zun core team and removal notice

Hi all, I would like to propose the following change to the Zun core team: + Shunli Zhou (shunliz) Shunli has been contributing to Zun for a while and did a lot of work. He has completed the BP for supporting resource claim and be closed to finish the filter scheduler BP. He showed a good

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuxi][kuryr] Where to commit codes for Fuxi-golang

:26, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Please consider leveraging Fuxi instead. Is there a missing functionality from rexray? [Hongbin Lu] From my understanding, Rexray targets on the overcloud use cases and assumes that containers are running on

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuxi][kuryr] Where to commit codes for Fuxi-golang

Please consider leveraging Fuxi instead. Kuryr/Fuxi team is working very hard to deliver the docker network/storage plugins. I wish you will work with us to get them integrated with Magnum-provisioned cluster. Currently, COE clusters provisioned by Magnum is far away from enterprise-ready. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Create subnetpool on dynamic credentials

, but if possible I would prefer to avoid adding complexity to an already complex part of the code. andrea On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 2:54 AM Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi QA team, I have a proposal to create subnetpool/subnet pair on dynamic

[openstack-dev] [fuxi][stackube][kuryr] IRC meeting

Hi all, We will have an IRC meeting at UTC 1400-1500 Tuesday (2017-05-23). At the meeting, we will discuss the k8s storage integration with OpenStack. This effort might cross more than one teams (i.e. kuryr and stackube). You are more than welcomed to join us at #openstack-meeting-cp tomorrow.

[openstack-dev] [qa] Create subnetpool on dynamic credentials

Hi QA team, I have a proposal to create subnetpool/subnet pair on dynamic credentials: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466440/ . We (Zun team) have use cases for using subnets with subnetpools. I wanted to get some early feedback on this proposal. Will this proposal be accepted? If not, would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Proposal a change of Zun core team

Hi all, Thanks for your vote. According to the feedback, I adjusted the core team membership accordingly. Welcome Feng Shengqin to the core team. https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1382,members Best regards, Hongbin From: shubham sharma [mailto:shubham@gmail.com] Sent: May-02-17

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][devstack][kuryr][fuxi][zun] Consolidate docker installation

> > Nice. +1 in theory :) the etcd one i have a WIP for the etcd/DLM, > please see here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445432/ > > -- Dims > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> > wrote: > > Hi devstack team, > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [all] systemd in devstack by default

Hi Sean, I tried the new systemd devstack and frankly I don't like it. There are several handy operations in screen that seems to be impossible after switching to systemd. For example, freeze a process by "Ctrl + a + [". In addition, navigating though the logs seems difficult (perhaps I am not

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Proposal a change of Zun core team

Hi all, I proposes a change of Zun's core team memberships as below: + Feng Shengqin (feng-shengqin) - Wang Feilong (flwang) Feng Shengqin has contributed a lot to the Zun projects. Her contribution includes BPs, bug fixes, and reviews. In particular, she completed an essential BP and had a

[openstack-dev] [Zun] project on-board schedule

://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18693/zun-project-onboarding Best regards, Hongbin From: joehuang Sent: April-26-17 2:31 AM To: Kendall Nelson; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Hongbin Lu Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] project on-board schedule Thank

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Zun Mascot

Hi team, Please review the mascot below and let me know your feedback if any. We will discuss/approve the mascot at the next team meeting. Best regards, Hongbin From: Heidi Joy Tretheway [mailto:heidi...@openstack.org] Sent: April-21-17 6:16 PM To: Hongbin Lu Subject: Re: Zun mascot follow-up

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [daisycloud-core] [requirements] [magnum] [oslo] Do we really need to upgrade pbr, docker-py and oslo.utils

Zun required docker-py to be 1.8 or higher because older version of docker-py didn't have the API we need. Sorry if it caused difficulties on your side but I don't think it is feasible to downgrade the version for now since it will affect a ton of other projects. Best regards, Hongbin On Thu,

[openstack-dev] [qa][devstack][kuryr][fuxi][zun] Consolidate docker installation

Hi devstack team, Please find my proposal about consolidating docker installation into one place that is devstack tree: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452575/ Currently, there are several projects that installed docker in their devstack plugins in various different ways. This potentially

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Document about how to deploy Zun with multiple hosts

Kevin, I don’t think there is any such document right now. I submitted a ticket for creating one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zun/+bug/1675245 There is a guidance for setting up a multi-host devstack environment: https://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/guides/multinode-lab.html . You

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][osc] What name to use for magnum commands in osc?

namespacing, > but it isn't. The Volume API commands are one example of this, nearly > every resource there includes the word 'volume' but not because that is > the API name, it is because that is the correct name for those > resources ('volume backup', etc). [Hongbin Lu] I might provid

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][osc] What name to use for magnum commands in osc?

Zun had a similar issue of colliding on the keyword "container", and we chose to use an alternative term "appcontainer" that is not perfect but acceptable. IMHO, this kind of top-level name collision issue would be better resolved by introducing namespace per project, which is the approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Project On-Boarding Rooms

Zun team could squeeze the session into 45 minutes and give the other 45 minutes to another team if anyone interest. Best regards, Hongbin From: Kendall Nelson [mailto:kennelso...@gmail.com] Sent: March-16-17 11:11 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Choose a project mascot

: February-16-17 10:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Choose a project mascot I was thinking about falcon(light, powerful and fast), or dolphins or tiger. On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Choose a project mascot

...@gmail.com] Sent: February-16-17 10:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Choose a project mascot I was thinking about falcon(light, powerful and fast), or dolphins or tiger. On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Hongbin Lu <hong

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun]Use 'uuid' instead of 'id' as object ident in data model

Gordon & Qiming, Thanks for your inputs. The only reason Zun was using 'id' is because the data model was copied from other projects and those projects are using 'id', but I couldn't think of a reason why they were using 'id' at the first place. By aggregating the feedback so far, I think it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Choose a project mascot

at 12:29 AM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Zun team, OpenStack has a mascot program [1]. Basically, if we like, we can choose a mascot to represent our team. The process is as following: * We choose a mascot from the natural world, which can

  1   2   3   4   5   >