Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul Error for commits

Goutham, Add ‘recheck’ as a comment. It will retrigger the jenkins jobs. Thank you, Abhishek From: Goutham Pratapa [mailto:pratapagout...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 5:14 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul

[openstack-dev] [nova] What is the goal of AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation filter?

Hi all, As of now in the current master AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation filter returns True even if image property is not present in the host aggregate metadata. Example: (1) Set below required config options in nova.conf under 'filter_scheduler' section:

Re: [Openstack] question about OpenStack Python glance API -- list share image by tenant.

Hi Zhihao, Have you tried, glance image-list -visibility=shared Hope this will help. Thank you, Abhishek Kekane From: zhihao wang [mailto:wangzhihao...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:08 AM To: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org; openstack Subject: [Openstack] Fw:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (09/08-09/14)

Hi Brian, Thanks a lot for appreciation. It was a great opportunity for me to work along with you, jokke and other peoples on glance pike cycle. A huge learning platform for me. It is my pleasure to be a part of glance core. Thank you, Abhishek Kekane From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] confirming Abhishek Kekane for glance core

Hi Brian, Thanks a lot for appreciation. It was a great opportunity for me to work along with you, jokke and other peoples on glance pike cycle. A huge learning platform for me. It is my pleasure to be a part of glance core. Thank you, Abhishek Kekane From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][rally] Disabling Glance Testing in Rally gates

--file gentoo_root.img --disk-format iso --container-format bare After this I was able to create image without any issue. So another workaround is to set socket-timeout to higher value in /etc/glance/glance-uwsgi.ini file. Thank you, Abhishek Kekane From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][rally] Disabling Glance Testing in Rally gates

Someone has reported this issue in glance recently. Please refer, https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1703856 I think it is same kind of failure which Andrey was mentioning. As mentioned in the bug temporary solution is to enable the v1 api using the v1 parameter, --location instead of using

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:01 PM To: Kekane, Abhishek Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state Hello, as far as I know from the Openstack survey there is a very small number

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

Hi Saverio, Thank you for reply. Currently we are using Ocata release for Openstack. Please let me know if you get any update. Thank you, Abhishek -Original Message- From: Saverio Proto [mailto:ziopr...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:52 PM To: Kekane, Abhishek Cc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

Hi Saverio, Thank you for reply. Currently we are using Ocata release for Openstack. Please let me know if you get any update. Thank you, Abhishek -Original Message- From: Saverio Proto [mailto:ziopr...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:52 PM To: Kekane, Abhishek Cc

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

Hi Operators, Could you please let me know your opinion on below scenario? It will help me to proceed my work. Thank you, Abhishek -Original Message- From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 2:52 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

Hi Operators, Could you please let me know your opinion on below scenario? It will help me to proceed my work. Thank you, Abhishek -Original Message- From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 2:52 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

n real world scenario? 2. If yes is there any way to cleanup unused (*_resize) instance files from the source compute node other than cleaning up it manually? 3. Should we add support of evacuating of resized instances in nova? Please let me know your opinions about the same. Thank you, Abhishek

Re: [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

n real world scenario? 2. If yes is there any way to cleanup unused (*_resize) instance files from the source compute node other than cleaning up it manually? 3. Should we add support of evacuating of resized instances in nova? Please let me know your opinions about the same. Thank you, Abhishek

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] stepping down from glance core and other related groups

Hi Nikhil, I am very thankful for support and guidance you have provided to me and other new members. Hoping to work with you again in near future. All the best for your future activities. Cheers, Abhishek Sent from OWA on Android From: Nikhil Komawar

Re: [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

28, 2017 8:54 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state On 06/28/2017 05:50 AM, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > In masakari, we are setting an instance to an error state if the > vmstate is resized

[openstack-dev] [masakari][nova] Allow evacuation of instances in resized state

Hi Devs, Masakari [1] provides Virtual Machine High Availability (VMHA) service for OpenStack clouds by automatically recovering the KVM-based Virtual Machine(VM)s from failure events such as VM process down, provisioning process down, and nova-compute host failure. It also provides API

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

Thank you all for your positive responses. I will definitely put 100% efforts to justify my selection as core. Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane -Original Message- From: Brian Rosmaita [mailto:rosmaita.foss...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:47 PM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Mike Fedosin for glance core

+1, agree with Nikhil. Abhishek From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 6:04 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Mike Fedosin for glance core This is great news. Always +2 for

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][openstack-ansible] Moving on

Thank you, Steve for your help. Hope to see you back. . All the best ☺ Abhishek From: Steve Lewis [mailto:steve...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 9:26 AM To: OpenStack Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance][openstack-ansible] Moving on It is clear to me now that I won't be able to work on

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo.utils] Bug-1680130 Check validation of UUID length

Hi All, As per suggested by Doug, this is what we will implement. Add new method (format_canonical_uuid()) in oslo_utils.uuidutils module which will return valid uuid and then all other projects which are using is_uuid_like() method needs to call this method to get valid uuid. This approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo.utils] Bug-1680130 Check validation of UUID length

Hi All, As per suggested by @jay_pipes's if val.count('-') not in (0, 4): raise TypeError It is not sufficient solution because "is_uuid_like" returns only True or False. For example, If user passes uuid like "urn:----" or

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini Chandrasekar for Glance core

Sorry for wrong auto-correction :) Congratulations Dharini, All the best. . Abhishek From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 8:39 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini Chandrasekar

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini Chandrasekar for Glance core

Congratulations Sharing. . All the best. Abhishek Sent from OWA on Android From: Brian Rosmaita Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 8:56:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini

Re: [openstack-dev] Sabari Murugesan stepping down from Glance core

Nice work Sabari, Thank you for your efforts and help you provided. Hope to see you back in the list. All the best, Abhishek -Original Message- From: Brian Rosmaita [mailto:rosmaita.foss...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 4:32 AM Cc: Sabari Murugesan; OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [ python-novaclient][ python-glanceclient][ python-cinderclient][ python-neutronclient] Remove x-openstack-request-id logging code as it is logged twice

not true. you need to either do "keystoneauth1 >= 2.18.0" or "keystoneauth1 > 2.17.0" and we prefer the ">=" notation i think. Thanks, Dims On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com> wrote: > Hi Dims, > > T

Re: [openstack-dev] [ python-novaclient][ python-glanceclient][ python-cinderclient][ python-neutronclient] Remove x-openstack-request-id logging code as it is logged twice

client][ python-neutronclient] Remove x-openstack-request-id logging code as it is logged twice On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com<mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com>> wrote: Hi Dims, Thank you for reply. I will propose a patch soon.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ python-novaclient][ python-glanceclient][ python-cinderclient][ python-neutronclient] Remove x-openstack-request-id logging code as it is logged twice

oned have "keystoneauth1>=2.17.0", 2) i do not see a review request to bump the minimum version in global requirements for keystoneauth1 to "keystoneauth1>=2.18.0" (https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/requirements+is:open) Can you please file one? Thanks, Dims On Fr

[openstack-dev] [ python-novaclient][ python-glanceclient][ python-cinderclient][ python-neutronclient] Remove x-openstack-request-id logging code as it is logged twice

Hi Devs, In the latest keystoneauth1 version 2.18.0, x-openstack-request-id is logged for every HTTP response. This keystoneauth1 version will be used for ocata. The same request id is also logged in 'request' method of SessionClient class for python-novaclient, python-glanceclient,

Re: [openstack-dev] Spain Visa for Indian contributors

Sep 15, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com<mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com>> wrote: Hi All, I have got invitation letter in spanish. Those who requires this letter in spanish, send mail to eventv...@openstack.org<mailto:eventv...@openstack.org>

Re: [openstack-dev] Spain Visa for Indian contributors

amire...@gmail.com>> wrote: That's good. Please share the appropriate link/url to openstack visa team. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com<mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com>> wrote: Hi, Yes it’s request from embassy than for Indi

Re: [openstack-dev] Spain Visa for Indian contributors

. Thanks Swami On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com<mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com>> wrote: Hi Janki, I will keep you posted about this. Mean time sent mail to ‘eventv...@openstack.org<mailto:eventv...@openstack.org>’ to explain yo

Re: [openstack-dev] Spain Visa for Indian contributors

applying from India can request to have the letter in Spanish too. Let me know how you proceed further. It would help me while applying. Thanks Janki On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com<mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com>> wrote: Hi John,

Re: [openstack-dev] Spain Visa for Indian contributors

Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Spain Visa for Indian contributors On that page they seem to list a contact email: eventv...@openstack.org Hopefully they can help with the issue. John On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.

Re: [openstack-dev] Spain Visa for Indian contributors

on the Visa process at: https://www.openstack.org/summit/barcelona-2016/travel/#visa Not sure if you have already read that information. They talk about the steps needed to get an invitation letter. Good luck! On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com>

[openstack-dev] Spain Visa for Indian contributors

Hi Devs, Stackers, While applying visa from Pune (India), I came to know that Invitation letter is required in Spanish language and its mandatory. Has anyone from India has faced similar kind of issue while applying for visa? If not please let me know from which city you have applied for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Glance PTL non-candidacy

Hi Nikhil, Thank you for your support, guidance and hard work as Glance PTL. I have enjoyed working with you and glad to know that you will be there to help :) Thank you, Abhishek -Original Message- From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Reconciling flavors and block device mappings

From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griffi...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 10:21 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Reconciling flavors and block device mappings On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Ed Leafe

[openstack-dev] [nova] Fix evaluation of host disk usage by volume-backed instances

Hi Nova developers, This is about the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200870/19 We would like to fix this issue in Newton and back port it to Mitaka. Reason: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS supports Mitaka release. If we wait for this fix until Ocata release (~April 2017), then Ubuntu team might need

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Nova] Significance of Error Vs Failed status

Hi Operators, Could you please provide your opinion on below mail. I need to discuss this in coming nova meeting (12 May, 2016). Thank you, Abhishek Kekane From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:22 AM To: openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] [Nova] Significance of Error Vs Failed status

Hi All, In Liberty release, we had upstream [1] a security fix to cleanup orphaned instance files from compute nodes for resize operation. To fix this security issue, a new periodic task '_cleanup_incomplete_migrations’ was introduced that runs on each compute node which queries for deleted

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects

-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:35 PM To: openstack-operators Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects

-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:35 PM To: openstack-operators Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes

-Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: 24 March 2016 17:21 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes On 24/03/16 05:42 +, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: >

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes

Hi Glance Team, I have registered a blueprint [1] for blocking subtractive schema changes. Cinder and Nova are already supporting blocking of subtractive schema operations. Would like to add similar support here. Please let me know your opinion on the same. [1]

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects

-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: 15 March 2016 19:29 To: openstack-operators Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of 2016-03-15

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects

Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of 2016-03-01 06:17:15 +: > Hi Devs, > > Considering return request-id to caller specs [1] is implemented in > python-*client, I would like to begin discussion on how these request-ids > will be logged in cross-projects. In logging work-group

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects

Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of 2016-03-01 06:17:15 +: > Hi Devs, > > Considering return request-id to caller specs [1] is implemented in > python-*client, I would like to begin discussion on how these request-ids > will be logged in cross-projects. In logging work-group

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance Mitaka: Passing the torch

Thanks for all your leadership, Flavio! Really appreciated all help from you! Abhishek -Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: 09 March 2016 19:45 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance Mitaka: Passing the torch

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects

: [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects On 01.03.2016 07:17, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Considering return request-id to caller specs [1] is implemented in > python-*client, I would like to begin discussion on how these request-ids > will be

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects

: [openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects On 01.03.2016 07:17, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Considering return request-id to caller specs [1] is implemented in > python-*client, I would like to begin discussion on how these request-ids > will be

[openstack-dev] [all][log] Ideas to log request-ids in cross-projects

Hi Devs, Considering return request-id to caller specs [1] is implemented in python-*client, I would like to begin discussion on how these request-ids will be logged in cross-projects. In logging work-group meeting (11-Nov-2015) [2] there was a discussion about how to log request-id in the log

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][clients] Enable hacking in python-*clients

hishek > [1] > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-neutronclient/tree/tox.ini#n26 > [2] > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-openstackclient/tree/tox.ini#n15 > [3] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-novaclient/tree/tox.ini#n24 From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][clients] Enable hacking in python-*clients

-Original Message- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:a...@suse.com] Sent: 19 January 2016 15:19 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][clients] Enable hacking in python-*clients On 2016-01-19 10:44, Abhishek Kekane wrote: >> Hi

[openstack-dev] [all][clients] Enable hacking in python-*clients

Hi Devs, As of now all OpenStack projects has hacking checks which take cares about OpenStack guidelines issues are caught while running PEP8 checks using tox. There are no such checks in any of the python-*client. IMO its worth to enable hacking checks in python-*clients as well which will

[openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

Hi Devs, I have submitted a cross-project specs [1] for returning request-id to the caller which was approved. For implementation we have submitted patches in python-cinderclient [2] as per design in cross-project specs. However we have found one issue while implementing this design in

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller

-Original Message- From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] Sent: 10 December 2015 12:56 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller -Original Message- From

[openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller

Hi Devs, We are adding support for returning 'x-openstack-request-id' to the caller as per the design proposed in cross-project specs: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-specs/specs/return-request-id.html Problem Description: Cannot add a new property of list type to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller

:33 +0000, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > >Hi Devs, > > > > > > > >We are adding support for returning ‘x-openstack-request-id’ to the > >caller as per the design proposed in cross-project specs: > > > >http://specs.openstack.org/opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller

:09:10 -0430: >> On 09/12/15 11:33 +0000, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: >>> Hi Devs, >>> >>> >>> >>> We are adding support for returning ?x-openstack-request-id? to the caller >>> as >>> per the design proposed in cross-project s

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][cinder][neutron]How to make use of x-openstack-request-id

Hi Tan, Most of the OpenStack RESTful API returns `X-Openstack-Request-Id` in the API response header but this request id is not available to the caller from the python client. When you use --debug option from command from the command prompt using client, you can see

[Openstack-operators] [nova] Improve performance of unshelve api

Hi Operators, I have added a nova-specs [1] which talks about improving performance of unshelve api which we want to implement during Mitaka release. We have following use cases for the same. 1. User wants unshelving instance to be faster irrespective of how the instance is booted (EBS volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduate cliutils.py into oslo.utils

on it!! Abhishek On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Kekane, Abhishek <abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > Sent: 16 November 2015 21:46 > To: openstack-dev > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo]

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduate cliutils.py into oslo.utils

-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: 16 November 2015 21:46 To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduate cliutils.py into oslo.utils Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of 2015-11-16 07:33:48 +: > Hi, > > As apiclient is

[openstack-dev] [cross-project] Return request-id to caller - Step 1

Hi Devs, As per mentioned in cross-project specs [1] 'Proposed Change' section, I would like to proceed with adding 'request-id' attribute to base exception class. request-id is most needed when api returns anything >= 400 error code. As of now python-cinderclient, python-keystoneclient and

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduate cliutils.py into oslo.utils

Hi, As apiclient is now removed from oslo-incubator, to proceed with request-id spec [1] I have two options in mind, 1. Use keystoneauth1 + cliff in all python-clients (add request-id support in cliff library) 2. apiclient code is available in all python-*clients, modify this

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduate apiclient library

Hi Devs, In the Mitaka design summit session [1], it was decided to create a new library apiclient with completely new code (Metadata classes) and copy only code from oslo-incubator/openstack/common/apiclient that is needed by all python clients libraries. We have done extensive analysis to

[openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage space count for Nova

Hi Devs, Nova shared storage has issue [1] for counting free space, total space and disk available least which affects hypervisor stats and scheduler. I have created a etherpad [2] which contains detail problem description and possible solution with possible challenges for this design. Later I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage space count for Nova

Hi Jay, Thank you for the update. Abhishek Kekane -Original Message- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 September 2015 15:48 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage space count for Nova On 09/30/2015 03:04 AM, Kekane

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

Hi Sean, Author of specs is Eric Harney, If he is ok with it then I will submit the patch for moving specs to Mitaka. Thank you, Abhishek Kekane -Original Message- From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] Sent: 29 September 2015 17:47 To: OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [cinder] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

Hi Devs, The cinder-specs [1] for snapshot and cloning NFS backend submitted by Eric was approved in Kilo but due to nova issue [2] it is not implemented in Kilo and Liberty. I am discussing about this nova bug with nova team for finding possible solutions and Nikola has given some pointers

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

] [cinder] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:26:06AM +, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > Hi Devs, > > The cinder-specs [1] for snapshot and cloning NFS backend submitted by Eric > was approved in Kilo but due to nova issue [2] it is not implemented in Kilo &

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Hi, There is a bug for this, you can add murano projects to this bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1259292 Thanks, Abhishek Kekane -Original Message- From: Bulat Gaifullin [mailto:bgaiful...@mirantis.com] Sent: 24 September 2015 13:29 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] incubator move to private modules

Hi All, I am working on "Returning request-id to caller". Please refer, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156508 To implement this specs in cross-projects it is also required to move oslo-incubator to private modules. IMO moving oslo-incubator/openstack as a private module

Re: [Openstack] Need help to find code which populates compute_nodes table in nova database

Hi Mahendra, openstack-dev mailing list is proper mailing list to ask this question. There are many locations which are populating compute_nodes records, one of them is hypervisor-stats. Please check https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/hypervisors.py#L91

Re: [openstack-dev] New PyCharm License

Hi Andrew, My launchpad id is abhishek-kekane Thank you, Abhishek From: Andrew Melton [andrew.mel...@rackspace.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:54 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] New

Re: [openstack-dev] Pycharm License for OpenStack developers

Thank you Michal, Abhishek -Original Message- From: Dulko, Michal [mailto:michal.du...@intel.com] Sent: 16 September 2015 15:23 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Pycharm License for OpenStack developers > From: Kek

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

AM, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: Hi Devs, There is an NFS backend driver for cinder, which supports only limited volume handling features. Specifically, snapshot and cloning features are missing. Eric Harney has proposed a feature of NFS driver snapshot [1][2][3], which was approved

[openstack-dev] [nova] Mitaka nova-specs is open?

Hi Nova Devs, I have submitted a nova-specs for liberty but as it is not approved I have moved it under liberty/backlog. Now mitaka specs directory is added in nova-specs. Should it be ok to move nova-specs from specs/liberty/backlog/approved to specs/mitaka/approved directory? Please let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

Hi Devs, I have modified the cross-project specs for request-id based on this analysis and submitted same for review. Please refer, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156508/17/specs/return-request-id.rst and give your valuable feedback on the same. Thank you in advance. Abhishek Kekane

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

Hi Devs, There is an NFS backend driver for cinder, which supports only limited volume handling features. Specifically, snapshot and cloning features are missing. Eric Harney has proposed a feature of NFS driver snapshot [1][2][3], which was approved on Dec 2014 but not implemented yet. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

driver would be great ! [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149037/ Jordan On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Kekane, Abhishek abhishek.kek...@nttdata.commailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com wrote: Hi Devs, There is an NFS backend driver for cinder, which supports only limited volume handling

[openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

Hi Devs, X-Openstack-Request-Id. We have analysed python-cinderclient, python-glanceclient, python-novaclient, python-keystoneclient and python-neutronclient to check the return types. There are 9 ways return values are returned from python clients: 1. List 2. Dict 3. Resource class object 4.

[openstack-dev] Recall: [Nova] [Liberty] Approval dates for non-priority specs

Kekane, Abhishek would like to recall the message, [Nova] [Liberty] Approval dates for non-priority specs . __ Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [Liberty] Approval dates for non-priority specs

Hi Nova Devs, I have submitted a nova spec [1] for improving unshelve api performance. It's not listed under the liberty priorities, in spec also I have set project priority as None and in Launchpad blueprint [2] also milestone target is None. As per nova liberty schedule, June 23-25, 2015 were

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Approval dates for non-priority specs

Hi Nova Devs, I have submitted a nova spec [1] for improving unshelve api performance. It's not listed under the liberty priorities, in spec also I have set project priority as None and in Launchpad blueprint [2] also milestone target is None. As per nova liberty schedule, June 23-25, 2015 were

[openstack-dev] Recall: [Nova] [Liberty] Approval dates for non-priority specs

Kekane, Abhishek would like to recall the message, [Nova] [Liberty] Approval dates for non-priority specs . __ Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

on Solution 1 On 5/28/15 2:14 AM, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: Hi Devs, Thank you for your opinions/thoughts. However I would like to suggest that please give +1 against the solution which you will like to propose so that at the end it will be helpful for us to consolidate the voting

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

with while adopting a cross project solution. If our logs follow certain prefix and or suffix style across projects, that would help a long way. Personally: +1 on Solution 1 On 5/28/15 2:14 AM, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: Hi Devs, Thank you for your opinions/thoughts. However I would like

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

. Abhishek Kekane From: Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 00:31 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Kekane, Abhishek

[openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

Hi Devs, Each OpenStack service sends a request ID header with HTTP responses. This request ID can be useful for tracking down problems in the logs. However, when operation crosses service boundaries, this tracking can become difficult, as each service has its own request ID. Request ID is not

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Add request_utils module in oslo-incubator

Hi Devs, Earlier request_utils module was removed from oslo-incubator [1] as it was not used. Now we want to use this module for logging request-id across openstack-services [2]. I have submitted a patch [3] to add request_utils module back to oslo-incubator. If anyone has suggestions please

[openstack-dev] [nova]: Doubts regarding Cells V2 deployment

Hi Devs, I have couple of questions regarding cells V2. Once cells V2 is implemented then there will be no concept on non-cell deployment which means there will be one cell at least (by default). 1. How the deployment with multiple availability zones done with cells V2? 2. How the availability

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Unshelve Instance Performance Optimization Questions

Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Unshelve Instance Performance Optimization Questions Hi, On 11 March 2015 at 06:35, Kekane, Abhishek abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com wrote: In case of start/stop API’s cpu/memory are not released/reassigned. We can

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Unshelve Instance Performance Optimization Questions

(not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Unshelve Instance Performance Optimization Questions Hi, On 11 March 2015 at 06:35, Kekane, Abhishek abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com wrote: In case of start/stop API’s cpu/memory are not released/reassigned. We can modify these API’s to release

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Unshelve Instance Performance Optimization Questions

/ Please let me know your opinion, whether we can modify start/stop API’s as an alternative to shelve/unshelve API’s. Thank You, Abhishek Kekane From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] Sent: 24 February 2015 12:47 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Unshelve Instance Performance Optimization Questions

You, Abhishek Kekane From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] Sent: 24 February 2015 12:47 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Unshelve Instance Performance Optimization Questions Hi Duncan, Thank you

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Resuming of workflows/tasks

Hi Michal, 1. Need of distributed lock to avoid same task being resumed by two instances of a service. Do we need tooz to do that or is there any other solution? Tooz library is already being used in ceilometer to manage group membership.

[openstack-dev] [nova] Unshelve Instance Performance Optimization Questions

Hi Devs, Problem Statement: Performance and storage efficiency of shelving/unshelving instance booted from image is far worse than instance booted from volume. When you unshelve hundreds of instances at the same time, instance spawning time varies and it mainly depends on the size of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-cinderclient] Return request ID to caller

Hi Devs, This change is not backward compatible and to do not break OpenStack services which are using cinder-client, we need to first make provision in these consumer services to handle cinder-client return type change. To make this cinder-client change backward compatible we need to do

  1   2   >