Folks,
as you may remember, we were about to merge some changes to the blueprint spec
template to make our specifications in Fuel more specific regarding different
components and subsystems.
That time we decided to move the changes to 8.0, so new specs in 8.0 will have
to follow the new
Hi
I am testing the feasibility of federated token to access another federated
resource.
For this purpos, I setup three devstack kilo instances as:
kilo1 (IdP) - kilo2 (SP / IdP) - kilo3 (SP)
1. get a federated scoped token for a project in kilo2.
2. using this federated token, get
Hi all,
A couple of notes for API docs this week. One is, the spec to enable RST
builds to developer.openstack.org/api-guide/service merged. The plan is
completely documented here:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/liberty/api-site.html
I'm trying to work through the best way
On 8/13/15, 4:58 PM, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015, at 03:13 AM, Tom Cammann wrote:
Hi Team,
Wanted to let you know why we are having consistent functional test
failures in the gate.
This is being caused by Nova returning No valid host to heat:
Hi, all,
I got following error message while running nodepoold with nodepoold
-d $DAEMON_ARGS
2015-08-21 20:18:00,336 ERROR nodepool.NodePool: Exception cleaning up
leaked nodes
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/nodepool/nodepool/nodepool.py, line 2399, in
Hi Thai,
From your example, option 1 seems closer to the *current pattern* not
option 2. :) Where the user define a list of action separately from the
table presentation (HTML template) rather than embedding it in the HTML.
And if the user wants to extend it, they just add it to the list of
On 8/13/15, 6:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-08-13 19:38:07 +0800 (+0800), Kai Qiang Wu wrote:
I did talked to infra, which I think it is resource issue, But
they thought it is nova issue,
[...]
No, I said the error was being raised by Nova, so was not an error
coming
在 2015年8月21日,上午9:48,Anne Gentle annegen...@justwriteclick.com 写道:
Hi all,
A couple of notes for API docs this week. One is, the spec to enable RST
builds to developer.openstack.org/api-guide/
http://developer.openstack.org/api-guide/service merged. The plan is
completely documented
Hi all,
This issue has already been resolved.
Thanks.
Xiexs
From: Xie, Xianshan [mailto:xi...@cn.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 9:51 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Can`t find Project ID
Hi, all,
I got
Hi,
In our EC2-API project we use tempest job with regex
tempest.thirdparty.boto.
And I didn't find any job that runs tempest against cloud with swift3
plugin.
I think that this is a good idea to add to swift3 project pipeline tempest
job.
It will check functionality of swift3 plugin in real
On 18 August 2015 at 17:13, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 August 2015 at 13:08, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com
wrote:
HI
Hi, I'd like to make sure I understand. Is it the case that ideally,
if we
could go back in time, we'd like to change the client so it
Hi, all,
I got following error message while running nodepoold:
2015-08-21 20:18:00,336 ERROR nodepool.NodePool: Exception cleaning up leaked
nodes
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/nodepool/nodepool/nodepool.py, line 2399, in periodicCleanup
Hi Everyone,
I attended the ops mid cycle summit on Tuesday and Wednesday and here are brief
notes on the feedback I heard related to nova. Please feel free to add your
comments or correct me if I got anything wrong.
Large Deployments Session [1]:
- There's a Neutron spec [2] for adding the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 8/19/2015 12:18 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
In doing [1] [2], some suggestions raised that those kind of change need
microversion bump which is fine
however, another concern raised on whether we need combine a
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com wrote:
Let me wrote down what I’m analyse about this(I’m not good at this…and this
spend another hour for me...):
When OverQuota isn’t catched by API layer, we will get response as below:
{computeFault: {message: Unexpected API
在 2015年8月21日,上午3:09,Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com 写道:
On 08/20/2015 02:08 PM, melanie witt wrote:
On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com wrote:
So user may wrote client like this:
if response.status == 500 and ‘OverQuota’ in response.message:
…..
I thought we're
在 2015年8月21日,上午10:14,Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com 写道:
在 2015年8月21日,上午3:09,Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com 写道:
On 08/20/2015 02:08 PM, melanie witt wrote:
On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com
mailto:hejie...@intel.com wrote:
So user may wrote
All,
Recently, some external dependency broke nodepool's ability to launch VMs on an
openstack provider.
If you haven't run into this yet, it's probably because you haven't restarted
nodepool.
When you do, you might get an error similar to [1]
I couldn't find the issue, but regardless, there's
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Melnik, Aleksandr S
aleksandr.s.mel...@hp.com wrote:
I work on the Cue project at HP and I’m working on auto-generating our API
documentation. I’m also keeping up with the changes and ongoing migrations
at openstack docs. The new RST work documentation looks
Kai,
This sounds like a good solution. The actual VM doesn’t need to be super large
given our present tests.
Regards
-steve
From: Kai Qiang Wu wk...@cn.ibm.commailto:wk...@cn.ibm.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Salvatore Orlando salv.orla...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Gal,
even if I've been a lurker so far, I'm interested in attending for
learning and contributing to it with my massive bug-injecting skills!
You said virtual sprint and somewhere in september - I think
On 19 August 2015 at 19:30, Alberto Geniola albertogeni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first email to the OS developer forum, so forgive me if I
misplaced the subject tags J.
Welcome!
For future posts, I hope this helps make it easier:
Hi Kye Mestery [PTL],
CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair],
CC: All,
According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the Logging API for SG and FW
rules feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team.
#link
I think that before this can be applied to SG rules which are on the VM
ports,
there needs to be another spec in FWaaS which enable defining rules on VM
ports, i am not
sure something like that currently exists. (event that there are many use
cases for such ability)
Gal.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at
I think, that if there are 4-5 patches that pass python jobs w/o any problems,
we can switch the jobs to voting. They are really simple with a very little
room for a failure so should we wait longer?
19 серп. 2015 о 19:50 Sebastian Kalinowski skalinow...@mirantis.com
написав(ла):
Indeed,
Mike,
there were indeed several issues with the new Jenkins script. It seems we fixed
them.
- Roman
20 серп. 2015 о 02:00 Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com написав(ла):
Sounds great. Thank you Roman!
I've heard complains about tests not passing for [1]. Now it's passed, so I
hope
If there will be 4-5 patches, then I do not have anything against it. I'm
just skeptic that we will have so many ;)
2015-08-20 14:05 GMT+02:00 Roman Prykhodchenko m...@romcheg.me:
I think, that if there are 4-5 patches that pass python jobs w/o any
problems, we can switch the jobs to voting.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Recently i have came across two use cases that having binding
information, or metadata
for networks can be useful. (similar to the
Hi,
Trying to get more attention to this ...
Also,
The CI will (starting next week) be commenting using the name Open
vStorage CI instead of CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Eduard Matei
eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com wrote:
Hi,
We had our
On our latest irc meeting I raised a concern about public package visibility.
Here’s the commit that caused my concerns
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213682/
We currently have «catalog» and «package definitions» pages in our dashboard.
The former contains packages that the user can add in
On 20 August 2015 at 01:42, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2015, at 16:51, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Ideas appreciated.
Instead of using the nested context managers, a way I like is to decorate a
nested function in the test and call it, for example:
def
On 19 August 2015 at 20:37, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 8/19/2015 2:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 8/19/2015 1:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 8/19/2015 12:18 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
In doing [1] [2], some suggestions raised that those kind of change need
microversion
Hi,
In case someone is still interested, 32768 is the fix. The number of PEs
must be multiple of 1024 (not sure why).
Eduard
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
After spending a few hours on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590
I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt +
LXC.
Bit thank you for raising this one.
At the Juno midcycle in
Hi,
ATM our workaround is to manually pip install futures==2.2.0 before running
stack.sh
Any idea when an official fix will be available?
Thanks,
Eduard
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Thanks for the link, Sean.
No, it doesn't seem to resolve the issue with FWaaS.
BTW, I have the following cluster:
- OpenStack Kilo (including *aaS) from the latest stable/kilo branches
- 2 networks nodes
- 1 compute node
Ubuntu 14.04, ML2+OVS, vxlan segmentation.
All nodes are KVM VMs.
So with
It looks like the additional features added, in particular the
'oslo_config_project' property, needs to be documented.
I have added some documentation into the keystonemiddleware too:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208965/
---
Mehdi Abaakouk
mail: sil...@sileht.net
irc: sileht
Hi,
Also to support some of the newer services that don't use paste i
think we should absolutely make it so that the CONF object is passed
to middleware rather than sourced globally. I think gnochhi and zaqar
both fit into this case.
For example, Gnocchi doesn't use paste, deployer adds
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:12:44PM +0300, Eduard Matei wrote:
Hi,
ATM our workaround is to manually pip install futures==2.2.0 before running
stack.sh
Yeah that's what I did. You can also add that command to tools/fixup.sh
Any idea when an official fix will be available?
We're workign
It appears to me that option 1 would be better prepared to be extensible ...
That is if a plugin needed to add an action or a column, we could make that
happen with pattern 1 (possibly after adding in a service) I'm not sure how
plugins ever add these things with pattern 2.
On Aug 20, 2015,
Sorry for the delay in following up on this but I've been on my hols
The instack ci jobs should now work, it appears to be getting hit by a
LOT of network glitches in particular downloading from the centos
infrastructure but I think to avoid more delay we should merge the
things and work on
We had a quick meeting today and covered the excellent progress Kevin
Fox is making on a Horizon plugin for the App Catalog, as well as a
brief update on whether the codebase for ask.o.o would be worth
considering as a backend for the catalog.
As always, please join us on IRC
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:48:29AM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
After thinking about this some more, I'm not actually going to address Rob's
points above. What I want to do is go back and discuss... what do people
think about having an API that allows the initial provision state
Hi Lin,Let me draw on some examples to help clarify what I mean.Option 1:table.controller.jsctrl.headers = { gettext('column 1'), gettext('column 2')};ctrl.noItemMessage = gettext('You no longer have any items in your table. You either lack the sufficient priveledges or your
On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com wrote:
So user may wrote client like this:
if response.status == 500 and ‘OverQuota’ in response.message:
…..
I thought we're not supporting that type of case. My understanding is that we
should never be returning 500 and if we are,
The requirements proposal job fails syncing to congress with this error:
'PuLP' is not in global-requirements.txt
congress team, please resolve this. Options include getting this into
global-requirements or removing it from your project.
Details:
On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen
+1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where
our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think
I'm clearly confused. When was 1.6 deleted?
Rob
Hello everyone,
this is my first thread on this mailing list, and I would like to take the
opportunity to say that it was great to see you all at the midcycle, even
if remote.
Now, to my question; I've been looking into an issue that arise when
deleting access to a share, and then momentarily
How do you configure/use keystonemiddleware for a specific identity endpoint
among several?
In an OPNFV multi region prototype I have keystone endpoints per region. I would like
keystonemiddleware (in context of glance-api) to use the local keystone for performing user token
validation.
Second or last week of September work for me
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon
toni+openstac...@midokura.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Salvatore Orlando
salv.orla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gal,
even if I've been a lurker so far, I'm interested in
Let me wrote down what I’m analyse about this(I’m not good at this…and this
spend another hour for me...):
When OverQuota isn’t catched by API layer, we will get response as below:
{computeFault: {message: Unexpected API Error. Please report this at
http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/
On 8/20/2015 5:33 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
After spending a few hours on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590
I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt +
LXC.
Bit thank you
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:27 PM, yang, xing xing.y...@emc.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
I’m wondering if you can consider approving the following blueprints. They
were submitted late:(. These are good to be used as reference
implementations for the new features, so I think it is good to have them.
Hi Mike,
No problem.
Thanks,
Xing
On Aug 21, 2015, at 1:37 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:27 PM, yang, xing xing.y...@emc.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
I’m wondering if you can consider approving the following blueprints. They
were submitted late:(. These
For the rest of the mailing list, how was it resolved? :)
Thanks,
Steve Martinelli
OpenStack Keystone Core
From: Xie, Xianshan xi...@cn.fujitsu.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 2015/08/21 01:43 AM
Hi
On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen
+1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where
our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think
I'm clearly confused. When was 1.6 deleted?
It wasn't and won't be AFAICT. But I think Jim is talking about
It was just removed from global requirements, because it was not used.
That's clearly wrong. So let's refer that and add it back.
On 21 Aug 2015 6:27 am, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote:
The requirements proposal job fails syncing to congress with this error:
'PuLP' is not in
On 08/20/2015 09:32 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
It was just removed from global requirements, because it was not used.
That's clearly wrong. So let's refer that and add it back.
Ah, that explains it, let's revert the change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215306/
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas
On 08/20/2015 02:08 PM, melanie witt wrote:
On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com wrote:
So user may wrote client like this:
if response.status == 500 and ‘OverQuota’ in response.message:
…..
I thought we're not supporting that type of case. My understanding is that we
Thanks for sorting that out. +1ed the change.
Tim
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:53 PM Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote:
On 08/20/2015 09:32 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
It was just removed from global requirements, because it was not used.
That's clearly wrong. So let's refer that and add it
On 19:53 Aug 19, John Griffith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:48 PM, taylor.ber...@solnet.co.nz wrote:
Hi everyone,
Apologises for the duplicate send, looks like my mail client doesn't
create very clean HTML messages. Here is the message in plain-text. I'll
make sure to send to the
Excellent,
Good to see this is being discussed on the Cinder side.
I'll keep looking and hopefully we hear back from Nova either in this thread or
by other means if they're prepared to go ahead with this.
Regards,
Taylor Bertie
Enterprise Support Infrastructure Engineer
Mobile +64 27 952
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:57:14PM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi
On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen
+1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where
our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think
I'm clearly confused. When was
On 08/20/2015 09:22 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 8/19/15, 19:31, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/19/2015 07:22 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
Questions in-line, but I'd appreciate a better summary
On 8/19/15, 17:50, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll start
I think it would be nice if someone were to cook up a patch to the
functional tests (integration.sh) to make sure that we are still able
to sync to that project without errors.
-Rob
On 21 August 2015 at 08:01, Tim Hinrichs t...@styra.com wrote:
Thanks for sorting that out. +1ed the change.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 06:55:12AM EDT, hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Kye Mestery [PTL],
CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair],
CC: All,
According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the Logging API for SG and
FW rules feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team.
#link
66 matches
Mail list logo