Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Document about how to deploy Zun with multiple hosts

Hongbin, I see. Thanks for your advice . I can deploy multiple compute hosts now follow the guide. Best Regards, Kevin Zhao On 23 March 2017 at 11:14, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Kevin, > > > > I don’t think there is any such document right now. I submitted a ticket > for

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

The current mechanism of microversion looks a bit strange to me. https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/c0223906280619b6eb1ffb3fa200136fd3050528/tempest/api/volume/v3/base.py#L49-L52 that means we set microversion at setUp and clear it at tearDown, but that is strange, 1) we never set

Re: [openstack-dev] Is there some way to run specific unittest in neutron?

On 22 March 2017 at 22:19, Sam wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on neutron, I add some code into ovs_neutron_agent.py, and I > extend test_ovs_neutron_agent.py. > > Is there some way to run test_ovs_neutron_agent.py or run related module > only? > > Thank you. > You should

Re: [openstack-dev] Is there some way to run specific unittest in neutron?

tox -epy27 test_ovs_neutron_agent On Mar 22, 2017 22:25, "Sam" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on neutron, I add some code into ovs_neutron_agent.py, and I > extend test_ovs_neutron_agent.py. > > Is there some way to run test_ovs_neutron_agent.py or run related module >

[openstack-dev] Is there some way to run specific unittest in neutron?

Hi all, I'm working on neutron, I add some code into ovs_neutron_agent.py, and I extend test_ovs_neutron_agent.py. Is there some way to run test_ovs_neutron_agent.py or run related module only? Thank you. __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - adjusting Monday IRC meeting time and drivers meeting time

On 22 March 2017 at 21:39, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 21 March 2017 at 02:00, Kevin Benton wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> The recent DST switch has caused several conflicts for the Monday IRC >> meeting time and the drivers meeting time. >> >> I am going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - adjusting Monday IRC meeting time and drivers meeting time

I'm okay with the revert here that you proposed: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448886/ On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 21 March 2017 at 02:00, Kevin Benton wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> The recent DST switch has caused

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - adjusting Monday IRC meeting time and drivers meeting time

On 21 March 2017 at 02:00, Kevin Benton wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The recent DST switch has caused several conflicts for the Monday IRC > meeting time and the drivers meeting time. > > I am going to adjust the Monday meeting time to 1 hour earlier[1] and the > drivers meeting

[openstack-dev] [kolla] gate unwedged - please recheck your patches

Hey folks, If you have submitted patches for kolla-ansible since Friday March 17, gerrit has likely voted -1 on them because the voting gate was broken. I recommend a recheck which should clear up your patch for review and merge. Regards -steve

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

2017-03-22 19:31 GMT-07:00 : > To have only one folder (tempest/api/volume/ ) looks really good, and, do we > plan to deem "api_version" and "microversion" as one thing? > > i.e., we will use the mechanism of microversion to skip v3 new functional > tests when the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Document about how to deploy Zun with multiple hosts

Kevin, I don’t think there is any such document right now. I submitted a ticket for creating one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zun/+bug/1675245 There is a guidance for setting up a multi-host devstack environment: https://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/guides/multinode-lab.html . You

Re: [openstack-dev] ARA - Ansible Run Analysis: Would you like to help ?

This is a question that comes up often and thus made its way to the documentation FAQ [1] :) Yes, ARA only provides playbook run recording and reporting/viewing. The web interface is 100% passive, there are no actions that can be taken like editing or retrying a playbook. In fact, it's so

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Using mistral to start a not-to-die task

Yeah, as Bob said, cron-trigger is what you are looking for. As our discussion on IRC, currently, Mistral doesn't support to execute shell command directly, my suggestion is, you could consider using http action (which is supproted by Mistral out of the box) or providing a host (physical or

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Document about how to deploy Zun with multiple hosts

Hi guys, Nowadays I want to try Zun in multiple hosts. But I didn't find the doc about how to deploy it. I wonder where is document to show the users about how to deploy zun with multiple hosts? That will be easy for development. Thanks :-)

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

To have only one folder (tempest/api/volume/ ) looks really good, and, do we plan to deem "api_version" and "microversion" as one thing? i.e., we will use the mechanism of microversion to skip v3 new functional tests when the environment only supports v2? Original Mail Sender:

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Using mistral to start a not-to-die task

Hi Gongysh: You are looking for mistral cron-triggers. See https://docs.openstack.org/developer/mistral/terminology/cron_triggers.html Bob On 3/22/2017 7:16 PM, gongys2017 wrote: Hi mistral stackers, Tacker is using the mistral as its part of system. Now we have a requirement: tacker

Re: [openstack-dev] ARA - Ansible Run Analysis: Would you like to help ?

Sounds neat, So this would be similar to what tower or semaphore also have (I would assume they have something very like ARA internally) but instead of providing the whole start/stop/inventory workflow this just provides the viewing component? David Moreau Simard wrote: Hi openstack-dev,

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > 2017-03-22 14:32 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli : > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:31 PM Sean McGinnis > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:08:23PM -0700,

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Using mistral to start a not-to-die task

Hi mistral stackers, Tacker is using the mistral as its part of system. Now we have a requirement: tacker server registers an openstack as its NFVI, and needs to ping__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

2017-03-22 14:32 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli : > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:31 PM Sean McGinnis wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:08:23PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Now we need to update Tempest for following Cinder

[openstack-dev] {neutron][gate-grenade-linuxbridge-multinode] experimenting gate-grenade-linuxbridge-multinode job

Hi neutrinos, I've been experimenting with gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-linuxbridge-multinode-ubuntu-xenial-nv job, So far I've tried forcing tempest concurrency, as depends on

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:31 PM Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:08:23PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now we need to update Tempest for following Cinder API status. > > I have an idea for restructuring and happy to see feedback about

[openstack-dev] ARA - Ansible Run Analysis: Would you like to help ?

Hi openstack-dev, There's this project I'm passionate that I want to tell you about: ARA [1]. So, what's ARA ? ARA is an Ansible callback plugin that you can set up anywhere you run Ansible today. The next time you run an ansible-playbook command, it'll automatically record and organize all the

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:08:23PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi, > > Now we need to update Tempest for following Cinder API status. > I have an idea for restructuring and happy to see feedback about that. > > Now Cinder API status is > V1: Deprecated > V2: Deprecated > V3: Current >

[openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

Hi, Now we need to update Tempest for following Cinder API status. I have an idea for restructuring and happy to see feedback about that. Now Cinder API status is V1: Deprecated V2: Deprecated V3: Current V1 API tests have been removed from Tempest side already, so we just need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 18:44 +, Taryma, Joanna wrote: > Thanks for pointing out that 2 and 3 won’t actually work, I apologize > for the confusion it could’ve created. > > > > I don’t like the option 6, because making user-messages friendlier was > the whole purpose of translation. Mixing

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

Hi, Thanks for pointing out that 2 and 3 won’t actually work, I apologize for the confusion it could’ve created. I don’t like the option 6, because making user-messages friendlier was the whole purpose of translation. Mixing languages in exception would be even worse than doing it in logs,

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][keystone][glance] WebOb

Posting a keystone update here as well. We are iterating on it in review as well as in IRC. There are a few things we're doing within keystone that raised some questions as to how we should handle some of the new changes in WebOb. I'll post another update once we make some more progress. On Wed,

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-docs] [tripleo] Creating official Deployment guide for TripleO

Thanks to these who volunteered, it's appreciated. I'm going to kick-off initial work here: 1. Create CI job that build deploy-guide on tripleo-docs repo (when required) - https://review.openstack.org/448740 2. In tripleo-docs, modify tox.ini and create initial structure for deployment guide

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][security] Encryption in Zuul v3

Darragh Bailey writes: > On 22 March 2017 at 15:02, James E. Blair wrote: > >> Ian Cordasco writes: >> >> > >> > I suppose Barbican doesn't meet those requirements either, then, yes? >> >> Right -- we don't want to require

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][keystone][glance] WebOb

Thanks a ton Brian :) On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > On 3/20/17 6:54 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Dear Keystone and Glance teams, >> >> WebOb update of u-c to 1.7.1 is stuck for a while[1]. Can you please >> prioritize reviews (keystone)

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][keystone][glance] WebOb

On 3/20/17 6:54 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Dear Keystone and Glance teams, > > WebOb update of u-c to 1.7.1 is stuck for a while[1]. Can you please > prioritize reviews (keystone) review [1] and (glance) review [2] for > this week? Hi Dims, quick update on this. We do have it prioritized,

Re: [openstack-dev] Arrivederci

Hi Ian, Nice to have known you trough Craton project. Thanks for everything you have done. All the best, Tomi > -Original Message- > From: Ian Cordasco [mailto:sigmaviru...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 2:07 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][security] Encryption in Zuul v3

On 22 March 2017 at 15:02, James E. Blair wrote: > Ian Cordasco writes: > > > > > I suppose Barbican doesn't meet those requirements either, then, yes? > > Right -- we don't want to require another service or tie Zuul to an > authn/authz system for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Moving Gnocchi out

I'm really curious about this decision too. Not so much about why the project wants to move out but more about what it plans on doing in terms of contribution (code, issue) workflow. I happen to drive a project that's not OpenStack-specific either: ARA [1]. ARA was first created in GitHub and was

Re: [openstack-dev] Arrivederci

Ian, You will be missed. Best wishes in your new endeavours, Amy (aka spotz) On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Friday 24 March 2017 will be my last day working on OpenStack. I'll remove > myself from teams (glance, craton,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

On 03/22/2017 11:44 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:10 +, Taryma, Joanna wrote: >>> However, pep8 does not accept passing variable to translation >>> functions, so this results in ‘H701 Empty

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Reminder for the team weekly meeting today 2017.03.22

Thank you all for the meeting today, please find the meeting log here http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2017/openstack_cyborg.2017-03-22-15.02.html (click full log for the fun part). Also please do help review the BPs we are now drafting

Re: [openstack-dev] [craton] Nomination of Thomas Maddox as Craton core

+1 On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > +1. Welcome to the team, Thomas > > On Mar 21, 2017 3:43 PM, "Jim Baker" wrote: > >> *I nominate Thomas Maddox as a core reviewer for the Craton project.* >> >> Thomas has shown extensive

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:10 +, Taryma, Joanna wrote: > > However, pep8 does not accept passing variable to translation > > functions, so this results in ‘H701 Empty localization string’ error. > > > > Possible options to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On 15/03/17 15:40 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-03-15 04:36:24 +0100: On 03/14/2017 06:04 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Team, > > So one more thing popped up again on IRC: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo.config_etcd_backend > > What do you

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Patrole] Nominating Felipe Monteiro for patrole core

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:32 PM BARTRA, RICK wrote: > Felipe has done a tremendous amount of work stabilizing, enabling gates, > contributing new tests, and extensively reviewing code in the Patrole > project. In fact, he is the number one contributor to Patrole in terms of >

Re: [openstack-dev] [snaps] proposing Dmitrii Shcherbakov for core review team

Will be glad to help with reviews! Thanks a lot! Best Regards, Dmitrii Shcherbakov *Dmitrii Shcherbakov * | *Canonical* Field Software Engineer dmitrii.shcherba...@canonical.com IRC (freenode): Dmitrii-Sh On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:14 PM, James Page wrote: > On Wed, 22

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: [snip] >> Please correct me if I am wrong, because I still have my container training >> wheels on. I understand the need for etcd, and

[openstack-dev] [nova] Can we deprecate the os-hosts API?

This is mostly directed at operators but I'm cross-posting to the ops and dev lists. First, does anyone use the os-hosts API and if so, for what use cases? The os-hosts and os-services APIs are very similar, and they work on the same resources (the 'services' records in the nova database).

Re: [openstack-dev] [snaps] proposing Dmitrii Shcherbakov for core review team

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 at 15:10 Corey Bryant wrote: [...] > +1 > > I have full confidence in Dmitrii. He's already a great asset to snaps > and will be great to have as a core reviewer. > And then there were three... welcome to the core reviewers team Dmitrii! Cheers

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] Boston Forum - Formal Submission Now Open!

Thanks for putting this together! But one feature gap is some means to tag topic submissions, e.g. tagging the project-specific topics by individual project relevance. That could be a basis for grouping topics, to allow folks to better manage their time during the Forum. (e.g. if someone was

Re: [openstack-dev] [snaps] proposing Dmitrii Shcherbakov for core review team

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:02 AM, James Page wrote: > Hi Snappers > > Dmitrii did some good work on the ceilometer snap and has been providing > reviews and feedback of other changes in the queue over the last few months > as well has hanging out and being a sounding

[openstack-dev] [snaps] proposing Dmitrii Shcherbakov for core review team

Hi Snappers Dmitrii did some good work on the ceilometer snap and has been providing reviews and feedback of other changes in the queue over the last few months as well has hanging out and being a sounding board/answering questions in #openstack-snaps. He's also working out how to get libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][security] Encryption in Zuul v3

Ian Cordasco writes: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, James E. Blair wrote: >> We did talk about some other options, though unfortunately it doesn't >> look like a lot of that made it into the spec reviews. Among them, it's >> probably worth

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:24:52AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:53:35PM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:35 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > >> > > >> > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

HI all, my 5 cents: - option 1) is ugly due to code/string duplication; - options 2) and 3) are not going to work for translators as others already pointed; - option 4) has a caveat that we should do it consistently - either translate all or translate none, so there won't be a mess of log

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Patrole] Nominating Felipe Monteiro for patrole core

+1 Samantha Blanco From: Ghanshyam Mann [mailto:ghanshyamm...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 7:54 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Patrole] Nominating Felipe Monteiro for

Re: [openstack-dev] Arrivederci

You'll be missed! Best of luck in your next adventure, they are very lucky to have you. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Friday 24 March 2017 will be my last day working on OpenStack. I'll remove > myself from teams (glance, craton,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:53:35PM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:35 PM, John Dickinson wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 21 Mar 2017, at 15:34, Alex Schultz wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

Hi, >> Possible options to handle that: >> >> 1) Duplicate messages: >> >> LOG.error(“”, {: }) >> >> raise Exception(_(“”) % {: }) >> >> 2) Ignore this error >> >> 3) Talk to hacking people about possible upgrade of this check >> >> 4) Pass translated text to LOG in such cases

Re: [openstack-dev] Arrivederci

On 03/22/2017 07:06 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Friday 24 March 2017 will be my last day working on OpenStack. I'll remove > myself from teams (glance, craton, security, hacking) on Friday and > unsubscribe > from the OpenStack mailing lists. > > I want to thank all of you for

Re: [openstack-dev] Arrivederci

So long, Ian, and good luck on your new job! You know it has been a pleasure working with you, and I hope we'll meet again many times. So do not get lost and take care of yourself! Best, Mike P.S. ketogenic diet doesn't work On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Luke Hinds

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > >> On 22 Mar 2017, at 00:53, Alex Schultz wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:35 PM, John Dickinson wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 21 Mar 2017, at 15:34, Alex Schultz wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:53:35PM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:35 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > > > > > > On 21 Mar 2017, at 15:34, Alex Schultz wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:45 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > >>> I've been following

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:10 +, Taryma, Joanna wrote: > However, pep8 does not accept passing variable to translation > functions, so this results in ‘H701 Empty localization string’ error. > > Possible options to handle that: > > 1) Duplicate messages: > > LOG.error(“”, {: }) > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 13:35 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 22/03/17 13:32 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > On 21/03/17 23:15 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > I've noticed that container jobs look pretty unstable lately; to > > > me, > > > it sounds like a timeout: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Arrivederci

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Friday 24 March 2017 will be my last day working on OpenStack. I'll remove > myself from teams (glance, craton, security, hacking) on Friday and > unsubscribe > from the OpenStack mailing lists. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Arrivederci

On 22/03/17 07:06 -0500, Ian Cordasco wrote: Hi everyone, Friday 24 March 2017 will be my last day working on OpenStack. I'll remove myself from teams (glance, craton, security, hacking) on Friday and unsubscribe from the OpenStack mailing lists. I want to thank all of you for the last ~3

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][osc] What name to use for magnum commands in osc?

Hi. One simplification would be: openstack coe create/list/show/config/update openstack coe template create/list/show/update openstack coe ca show/sign This covers all the required commands and is a bit less verbose. The cluster word is too generic and probably adds no useful info. Whatever it

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On 22/03/17 13:32 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 21/03/17 23:15 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hey, I've noticed that container jobs look pretty unstable lately; to me, it sounds like a timeout:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On 21/03/17 23:15 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hey, I've noticed that container jobs look pretty unstable lately; to me, it sounds like a timeout: http://logs.openstack.org/19/447319/2/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-containers-oooq-nv/bca496a/console.html#_2017-03-22_00_08_55_358973

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-docs] [tripleo] Creating official Deployment guide for TripleO

On 20/03/17 08:01 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: I proposed a blueprint to track the work done: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-deploy-guide Target: pike-3 Volunteers to work on it with me, please let me know. It'd be awesome to have some input from the containers squad

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][forum] proposing a session about future of configuration management - ops + devs wanted!

On 21/03/17 18:23 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: OpenStack developers and operators who work on deployments: we need you. http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/15 Abstract: I would like to bring Developers and Operators in a room to discuss about future of Configuration Management in

[openstack-dev] Arrivederci

Hi everyone, Friday 24 March 2017 will be my last day working on OpenStack. I'll remove myself from teams (glance, craton, security, hacking) on Friday and unsubscribe from the OpenStack mailing lists. I want to thank all of you for the last ~3 years. I've learned quite a bit from all of you.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][security] Encryption in Zuul v3

On 03/22/2017 06:10 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, James E. Blair wrote: >> David Moreau Simard writes: >> >>> I don't have a horse in this race or a strong opinion on the topic, in >>> fact I'm admittedly not very knowledgeable

[openstack-dev] Reminder -- Forum Topic Submission

Hey everyone, This is a friendly reminder that all proposed Forum session leaders must submit their abstracts at: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/ *before 11:59PM UTC on Sunday April 2nd!* Regards, TC/UC __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][security] Encryption in Zuul v3

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > David Moreau Simard writes: > >> I don't have a horse in this race or a strong opinion on the topic, in >> fact I'm admittedly not very knowledgeable when it comes to low-level >> encryption things. >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Taryma, Joanna wrote: > Hi team, > > > > As discussed on Monday, logged messages shouldn’t be translated anymore. > Exception messages still should be still translated. > > While removing usages of _LE, _LW, _LI should be fairly easy,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Jay, > > the /v3alpha HTTP API (grpc-gateway) supports watch > https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/dev-guide/apispec/swagger/rpc.swagger.json Ah, that's a great find, thanks. That means that we don't have to use

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl] Action required ! - Please submit Boston Forum sessions before April 2nd

Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 3/21/2017 4:09 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >> I have a couple questions in addition to Matt's. >> >> The keystone group is still trying to figure out what this means for us >> and we discussed it in today's meeting [0]. Based on early feedback, >> we're going to have less

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl] Action required ! - Please submit Boston Forum sessions before April 2nd

Matt Riedemann wrote: > Do we need to submit formal sessions to forumtopics.o.o for the upstream > contributor / new-comer session blocks laid out in Kendall's email? I > had assumed we already said 'yes we want a slot' and then Kendall is > going to sort that all out. Kendall being away this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl] Action required ! - Please submit Boston Forum sessions before April 2nd

joehuang wrote: > Should we submit a session for the on-boarding slot which is being arranged > by Kendall " first come first served process" ? Does this mean that the > on-boarding slot allocation need another round of selection, not the " first > come first served process" ? Kendall being

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][barbican][castellan] Proposal to rename Castellan to oslo.keymanager

I have been a fan of this from the very beginning of the project as well. I think oslo is the obvious correct place for a library that should define core interfaces for use by many openstack projects. Also, whether you have seen it or not, I have *definitely* seen real instances where people

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Reminder for the team weekly meeting today 2017.03.22

Hi Team, As agreed on the last meeting, since we start development we will change from bi-weekly meeting to weekly meeting on Wed. The time will be one hour later on ET 11:00am (UTC 1500) to facilitate more colleagues to join. The wiki is down at the moment. Please join the meeting at

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Extending Topology

Hello Ifat, I tried to see more in depth about the issues you mentioned regarding the extension of vSwitches. Due to a lot of complexity involved in generating this topology and associated effects, I believe we need to setup some baseline (e.g. adding a configuration file for specifying bridges

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

> On 22 Mar 2017, at 00:53, Alex Schultz wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:35 PM, John Dickinson wrote: >> >> >> On 21 Mar 2017, at 15:34, Alex Schultz wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:45 PM, John Dickinson wrote: I've been