+1
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 5:53 PM Juan Antonio Osorio Robles
wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>
> I would like to propose Bob Fournier (bfournie) as a core reviewer in
> TripleO. His patches and reviews have spanned quite a wide range in our
> project, his revie
.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 4:52 AM Janki Chhatbar wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> As per the discussion at PTG, I have filed a BP [1]. I will push a spec
> sometime around mid-October.
>
> [1]. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/automatic-role-generation
>
&g
Not sure which version you are using, but the service
"OS::TripleO::Services::NeutronSriovHostConfig" is responsible for
setting up VFs. Check if this service is enabled in the deployment.
One of the missing place is being fixed -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597985/
Regards,
Sa
Are you using the first-boot script [1] mapped to NodeUserData? If
yes, you could check the logs/error of the first-boot script
@/var/log/cloud-init-output.log on the overcloud nodes.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob
+1
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration in
> TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix
> (nasty and untestable third-party backends) bugs a
allow heat merging to work
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448209
Regards,
Saravanan KR
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
Could you check the log in the /var/log/cloud-init-output.log file to
see what are the first-boot scripts which are executed on the node?
Add "set -x" in the kernel-args.sh file to better logs.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Samuel Monderer
<smonde...@vason
;qemu:hugetlbfs"
user and group. So to avoid conflicts of running different group on
different roles of a TripleO deployment, I prefer to update the qemu
group as "hugetlbfs" for all the nodes of all roles, if DPDK is
enabled in the deployment.
Let us know if you see a
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Saravanan KR <skram...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> For dpdk in ovs2.8, the default permission of vhost user ports are
>> modified f
er if we can add
ansible based configuration along with docker-puppet for any new
modules going forward. But I am not sure of the direction.
Prefer the feedback before proceeding with an approach.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515269
[2] https://github.c
,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-docs/latest/install/advanced_deployment/role_specific_parameters.html
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/master/puppet/services/neutron-ovs-dpdk-agent.yaml#L59
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Giulio Fidente <gf
it is
>> > configured in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-br-ex
>> >
I am not sure if there is any difference between system and netdev
bridges in setting the routes, but you could validate by adding logs
to the ifup scripts and trace it out why the route
he
parameters, which are accepted as role-specific. The next step is to
add a validation to role-specific parameters.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506133/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517231/
__
O
As discussed in IRC, I have collated all the important discussions to
the etherpad (gdoc was not publicly shareable).
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-derive-parameters-v2
Lets continue discussion on the etherpad to finalize.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:05 AM
+1
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Of course +1, thanks for your hard work! Stay awesome.
> ---
> Emilien Macchi
>
> On Nov 9, 2017 4:58 PM, "Marios Andreou" <mandr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
n UI with user. Do you have a UI wire frame for this
workflow?
>
> 6/ Advanced deployment config - a view providing a way to review
> Environment/Roles/Services parameters, search and tweak them if needed.
>
> 7/ Deploy.
>
> I believe these steps should cover anything we shoul
, list of parameters, its types, and its default values (and
choices if present), are required
Did I miss anything?
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/master/plan-samples/plan-environment-derived-params.yaml
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Bogdan
Thanks for initiating Brent. Yes, I would participate in the networking squad.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Brent Eagles <beag...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Brent Eagles <beag...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
pleo [1]. No
additional reboot required for creating VFs.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/puppet-tripleo/blob/master/manifests/host/sriov.pp#L19
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://github
e instead.
Definitely it will be good for upgrade to keep the same uid/gid so
that existing DPDK based VMs continue to work after upgrade.
But any other specific reasons for sticking with same qemu uid/gid in
kolla containers? Do you foresee an
re
that kolla's user id (42427) is updated to the host via the host prep
tasks. Let me know if there is any other aspects to be considered.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/kolla/blob/187b1f08f586327e5c47a0bed3760a575daa1287/kolla/common/config.py#L750
[2]
https://github.c
rfaces, or re-implement the os-net-config logic in template
> to get the physical interface name. The latter one will be a repetitive work
> of os-net-config.
This patch [1] has been started by Dan Sneddon to provide the nic
number to name mapping by providing an extra option &
Thank you for your support.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Saravanan KR has shown an high level of expertise in some areas of
| NeutronL3HA
The next step is to add a warning (or rather error) message if a
deployment contains a parameter which is not part of the plan
(including custom templates). I will work on it.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
http://logs.openstack.org/77/479277/6/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb
post it when we have
it.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
>
> Best Regards,
> Don
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Saravanan KR <skram...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> DPDK is integrated with TripleO deployment during the newton cycle.
>> From
ndalone.
Another area which needs to be looked is that, should it be associated
with containers upgrade? May be OVN and ODL can be migrated as
containers only instead of baremetal by default (just a thought, could
have implications to be worked/discussed out).
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://githu
is almost at the last leg with the help from many folks.
Following are the list of patches pending:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480525/ (tripleoclient)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468989/ (tripleo-common)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471462/ (tripleo-common)
Regards,
Saravanan KR
the group, to bring
awareness on the parameter deprecation.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463949/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463941/
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
et/service, it has to brought up
individually/separately, with the dependency of openvswitch. I am
still getting familiar with the blocks around this.
I will be updating the analysis and the progress, any suggestions or
directions is more than welcome.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://review.opensta
a patch for doing it in tripleo-common [2]. The
output of this flattening will look like [3][4].
I am not sure if this is what you are expecting.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-common/blob/master/tripleo_common/actions/parameters.py#L71
[2] https://review.openstack.org
to the a
parent yam file? Why to add one extra step. May be we can provide all
options in the list and say enabled as 0 or 1. Much simpler to use.
This external tool can be an mistral action to derive the final roles
list internally.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Emilien
ec/ovs-2-6-features-dpdk
And thanks for the confirmation.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Saravanan KR <skram...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have raised 2
in deployment.
The change in the resource dependency has been updated in the commit
message.
Please provided your feedback on this approach.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/master/puppet/compute-role.yaml#L364
[2]
https://github.com/openstack
to be straight forward and minor. And the required
changes has been updated on the BP description. Please let us know if
it requires a spec.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
we will end up with the same problem, and
definitely, it actually depends on how the features will be composed
on a role. Looking forward.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Giulio Fidente <gfide...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/23/2017 11:07 AM, Saravanan KR wrote:
>&
as optional parameters
* read introspection data from Ironic DB and Swift-stored blob
I will add these comments as starting point on the spec. We will work
towards bringing down the differences, so that operators headache is
reduced to a greater extent.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9
Thanks John, I would really appreciate if you could tag me on the
reviews. I will do the same for mine too.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:03 PM, John Fulton <johfu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/11/2017 12:56 AM, Saravanan KR wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Emilie
it yet. If it
works out, I will update the etherpad.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Giulio Fidente <gfide...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 09:13 AM, Saravanan KR wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The aim of this mail is to ease the DPDK d
iables per role. For now, consider this proposal for
homogeneous cluster, if there is a value in this, I will work towards
heterogeneous clusters too.
Please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://krsacme.github.io/blog/post/dpdk-pmd-cpu-list/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/
in the overcloud image, as the "deploy steps" will be
run by the IPA itself.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/ironic-python-agent/blob/master/ironic_python_agent/extensions/image.py#L136
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Oliver Walsh <owa...@redhat.com> wro
c "deploy steps" can
configure this "tuned" setting and run the command, then it is good
enough.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota <yrobl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Saravanan
> Thanks for your comments. With this new module, I g
think for/against it.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota <yrobl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi , Dmitry
> That's what i didn't get very clear. If all the deployment steps are
> pre-imaging as that statement says, or every deploy step could be isolate
.
If anyone has a better way of doing it, you are more than welcome to suggest.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://gist.github.com/krsacme/1234bf024ac917c74913827298840c1c
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Saravanan KR <skram...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are working on SR-IOV
queue), we require an FFE (for n3). Please let us
know if you need more details.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
?
Regards,
Saravanan KR
Note: It is possible to use isolcpus via grub parameter, but it has
implications [3] on load balancing. So it is recommended to use
CPUAffinity to restrict CPUs for host process.
[1]
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-system.conf.html#CPUAffinity=
[2
ages.
As discussed on the IRC tripleo meeting, we need to ensure that the
user data with update of kernel args, does not overlap with any other
puppet configurations. Please let us know if you have any comments on
this approach.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331564/
[2]
Just to add a point, we are *still* working on dpdk. And this is not
the final code. It may grow a little. We are looking in to adaption
networking-ovs-dpdk puppet code into the agreeable format as
vswitch::dpdk. We would be glad to work with Sean in this process.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Fri
Thanks Emilien. I definitely agree with the preference for (1). It is
simpler in choosing either vswitch::ovs or vswitch::dpdk for the
deployment.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Sar
-dpdk'.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://github.com/openstack/networking-ovs-dpdk
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Saravanan KR <skram...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>
mplete yet. It is in progress.
Please let us know your views on including this new module.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-ovs-dpdk
[2] https://github.com/krsacme/puppet-dpdk
__
OpenStack D
Thanks Matthias for educating me. As there is no universal solution to
this issue, I will check if launch instance page strategy will work out
for this case.
Regards,
Saravanan KR
On 11/04/2015 03:47 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 04/11/15 09:25, Saravanan KR wrote:
There may be multiple
not trigger page refresh and respond with Operation in progress
3) If there is a mechanism to know delete in progress, do not list the
interface
To decide on the solution, it is important to know how 202 responses
should be handled. Can anyone can help with understanding?
Regards,
Saravanan KR
[1
52 matches
Mail list logo
