detail=concise is not a media type and looking at the grammar in the RFC it
wouldn’t be valid.
I think the grammar would allow for application/json; detail=concise. See the
last line in the definition of the media-range nonterminal in the grammar
(copied below for convenience):
Accept
The discussion about whether flavors should exist as-is or be decomposed is
useful and should continue. It is, however, somewhat orthogonal to the
discussion I was hoping to have on this thread :)
So coming back to the original question (now generalized away from flavors):
how should resource
Hi,
I’ve been working with the Poppy project[1] while they are designing their
APIs. Poppy has a concept of a flavor. A single flavor resource has the URI,
{base}/flavors/{flavor_id}.
Poppy APIs refer to a flavor in their request and/or response representations.
Some representations do this
If I have a proposal to make for a guideline, how do I do it? Do I simply
create a gerrit review for a file under
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/api-wg/tree/guidelines?
Shaunak
On Oct 22, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:36:27 +
, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Shaunak Kashyap
shaunak.kash...@rackspace.commailto:shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote:
If I have a proposal to make for a guideline, how do I do it? Do I simply
create a gerrit review for a file under
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/api-wg/tree/guidelines?
Yes
the meeting.
This was a face to face meeting that included discussions of processes and
architecture.
In attendance were,
- Glen Campbell, Rackspace
- Shaunak Kashyap, Rackspace
- Sam Choi, HP
- Matt Farina, HP
I want to thank everyone who came. This was a productive and good meeting
Yes, thanks Jamie for the very thorough write ups and Matt for the thoughtful
comments.
My comments are inline below. A point of clarification: I’m using “SDK authors”
to mean all of us who are building the SDK and I’m using “SDK consumers” to
mean the end-user developers who will be using the
from its source repo to the appropriate destination on
developer.openstack.org?
Thanks,
Shaunak
On Apr 28, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Shaunak Kashyap
shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote:
Thanks for your inputs, Matt and Anne
AM, Anne Gentle anne.gen...@rackspace.com wrote:
Great questions, Shaunak. Yep I've been thinking about this for a while but
not sure I have complete conclusions. More below.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Shaunak Kashyap
shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi folks,
As part
Hey PHP SDK folks (although others are welcome to chime in too),
I am thinking of adding a CONTRIBUTING.rst to the root of our repo at
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/openstack-sdk-php/tree/. My immediate,
selfish need is to have a single place where we capture any decisions around
Hi folks,
As part of working on
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-sdk-php/+spec/sphinx-docs, I’ve been
looking at http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/openstack-sdk-php/tree/doc.
Before I start making any changes toward that BP, however, I wanted to put
forth a couple of
Thanks Thierry. I’ve added the meeting to the wiki page.
Shaunak
On Mar 26, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Shaunak Kashyap wrote:
We are looking to setup a recurring IRC meeting in one of the
openstack-meeting* rooms for the
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki
Thanks for the explanation, Thomas. Appreciate it!
Shaunak
On Mar 21, 2014, at 12:37 AM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote on 21/03/2014
05:26:50:
From: Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com
To: openstack-dev
Hi,
In a Heat template, what does it mean for a resource to depend on another
resource? As in, what is the impact of creating a dependency?
I read
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/hot_spec.html#resources-section
and found this definition of the “depends_on” attribute:
Hi folks,
I am relatively new to OpenStack development as one of the developers on the
unified PHP SDK for OpenStack [1].
We were recently discussing about a mailing list for the users of this SDK (as
opposed to it’s contributors who will use openstack-dev@). The purpose of such
as mailing
Thanks for the great meeting today. Here are the action items that came out of
it:
- [Shaunak] Look into mailing list for user support. How do other OpenStack
projects do this?
- [Shaunak] Make trivial change to repo to learn OpenStack contribution process
- [Jamie] Look into PHPSpec vs. PHPUnit
PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP
On 18/02/14 14:19 +, Shaunak Kashyap wrote:
Thanks Angus and Devdatta. I think I understand.
Angus -- what you said seems to mirror the Heroku CLI usage: a) User runs
app/plan
-minimal-cli BP
On 19/02/14 08:52 +, Shaunak Kashyap wrote:
Thanks Angus but I think I have managed to get confused again :)
So let me take a step back. From a users' perspective, what is the least
number of steps they would need to take in order to have a running application
with Solum? I
From: Angus Salkeld [angus.salk...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 5:54 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP
On 17/02/14 21:47 +, Shaunak Kashyap wrote:
Hey folks,
I was reading
Hey folks,
I was reading through
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/FeatureBlueprints/CLI-minimal-implementation
and have a question.
If I’m understanding “app create” and “assembly create” correctly, the user
will have to run “app create” first, followed by “assembly create” to have a
20 matches
Mail list logo
