Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how does UEFI booting of VM manage per-instance copies of OVMF_VARS.fd ?

t enough to convince folks it could work without enough for it to actually...work. Kasyhap was looking at this recently and has this WIP specification up for further discussion of how to best clean this up: https://review

Re: [openstack-dev] TR: [tricircle]

ssage a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > > If you have r

[openstack-dev] Defining the agenda for Kubernetes Ops on OpenStack forum session @ OpenStack Summit Boston

Hi all, There will be a forum session at OpenStack Summit Boston next week on the topic of Kubernetes Ops on OpenStack on OpenStack. This session will be occurring on the Wednesday, May 10, at 1:50pm-2:30pm [1]. If you are an operator, developer, or other contributor attending OpenStack Summit

Re: [openstack-dev] [libvirt] Whether kvm supports NVIDIA VGPU

- Original Message - > From: "文峰sx-9149" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:53:41 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [libvirt] Whether kvm supports NVIDIA VGPU >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

- Original Message - > From: "Monty Taylor" > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:16:44 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud > Provider for Kubernetes > > On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chris Hoge

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

; "kubernetes-sig-openstack" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to kubernetes-sig-openstack+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to > > kubernetes-sig-openst..

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Small steps for Go

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:11:34 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-de

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Small steps for Go

- Original Message - > From: "Clint Byrum" > To: "openstack-dev" > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 1:44:19 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Small steps for Go > > Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2017-03-13 10:06:30

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tagging: rebuild config drive upon instance reboot to refresh metadata on it

- Original Message - > From: "Artom Lifshitz" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 8:11:10 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tagging: rebuild

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version

n TV so adding Sahid and Vladik who might be better placed to comment in Dan's absence. Thanks, Steve -- Steve Gordon, Principal Product Manager, Red Hat OpenStack Platform __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [OSSN-0074] Nova metadata service should not be used for sensitive information

; > Mailing List : [Security] tag on openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > OpenStack Security Group : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ossg > <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack-ossg> > Config Drive > : http://docs.openstack.org/user-guide/cli-config-drive.html > <http://docs.opens

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

- Original Message - > From: "Neil Jerram" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to its > developers, but I am seeing further

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

- Original Message - > From: "Neil Jerram" <n...@tigera.io> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Cc: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > Sent: Mon

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 > (CentOS 7.3) > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:35 PM Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Neil Jerram" <n...@tigera.io> &

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

addition of support for VMX TSC scaling. What version of qemu are you running? If you haven't already I would suggest grabbing qemu-kvm-ev from the CentOS Virt SIG repos: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ You can enable the repository using this release RPM: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Known issue with CentOS 7.3 and qemu-kvm(-ev) 2.6.0

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > To: "David Moreau Simard" <d...@redhat.com> > Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, &quo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Known issue with CentOS 7.3 and qemu-kvm(-ev) 2.6.0

- Original Message - > From: "David Moreau Simard" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , "OpenStack > Operators" > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:13:12 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Require a level playing field for OpenStack projects

ck-dev] [all][tc] Require a level playing field for > OpenStack projects > > On 2016-06-16 16:04:28 -0400 (-0400), Steve Gordon wrote: > [...] > > This is definitely a point worth clarifying in the general case, > > but tangentially for the specific case of the RHEL operati

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Require a level playing field for OpenStack projects

t; that gear for testing and being able to see and make changes to its > > proprietary source code) -- that project should probably live as an > > unofficial OpenStack project. > > > > Comments, thoughts ? > > > > -- > > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > > > ____

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] NUMA, huge pages, and scheduling

suggested to > >> me to set mem_page_size to 2048, and at that point it started assigning to > >> both NUMA nodes evenly. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks for the help!!! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

mmunity currently runs to the deeper integration between > > OpenStack and Kubernetes and one of the main aims now - to work on enabling > > OpenStack as a platform for running Kubernetes clusters; and Kubernetes as > > the underlying layer for running OpenStack workl

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][app-catalog][all] Build unified abstraction for all COEs

- Original Message - > From: "Hongbin Lu" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > -Original Message- > > From: Keith Bray [mailto:keith.b...@rackspace.com] > > Sent: April-20-16 6:13 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][kuryr] Shared session in design summit

lman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards , > > > > The G. > > > > __ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usag

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Nit-picking documentation changes

- Original Message - > From: "Jeff Peeler" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) > wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > The

Re: [openstack-dev] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday April 6th CANCELLED

- Original Message - > From: "Calum Loudon" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , > "openstack-operators" > Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday April 6th CANCELLED

Hi all, I will be on a flight during the meeting slot for Wednesday April 6th and have been unable to source someone else to run the meeting, as a result it is canceled. I would also like to highlight that at this point I believe all of the active Telco Working Group use cases have been

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Fwd: Fedora Atomic Two Week Delayed

; Thank you, > -AdamM > > [0] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312087 > [1] - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-910ddbf4c8 > ___ > cloud mailing list > cl...@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Generate atomic images usingdiskimage-builder

ment Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailin

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

stack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - > What about big tent? > > On 12:05 Mar 23, Steve Gordon wrote: > > > Did you look at the link I provided above?: > > > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-manuals/tree/doc/install-g

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > - Original Message - > > From: "Steve G

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > - Original Message - > > From: "Graham Hayes&q

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

- Original Message - > From: "Graham Hayes" <graham.ha...@hpe.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > On 23/03/2016 15:37, Steve Gordon wrote: > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

- Original Message - > From: "Mike Perez" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" > > Hey all, > > I've been talking to a variety of projects about lack of install guides. This > came from me not having a great experience with

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

ev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting > single/multiple OS distro > > Hi Stdake, > > There is a patch about Atomic 23 support in Magnum. And atomic 23 uses > kubernetes 1.0.6, and docker 1.9.1. > From Steve Gordon, I learnt they did have a two-weekly release. To me

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telco] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday Marcch 16th CANCELLED

Hi all, There will be no Telco Working Group [1] meeting for Wednesday March 16th as we will be lacking a chair. Thanks, Steve [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

hongGuanCun Software Park, > No.8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing P.R.China > 100193 > ---- > Follow your heart. You are miracle! > > > > From: Steve Gordon

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > To: "Guz Egor" <guz_e...@yahoo.com>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not > for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > ---

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-d

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] audience for release notes

> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims > > __

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Telco Working Group Meeting for February 10th 2016 - CANCELLED

Hi all, Unfortunately today's meeting of the Telco Working Group [1] is canceled, my apologies for the late notice! Thanks, Steve [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

- Original Message - > From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" <std...@cisco.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Steve, > > Comments inline > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

- Original Message - > From: "Hongbin Lu" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > I would vote for a quick fix + a blueprint. > > BTW, I think it is a general consensus that we should move

Re: [openstack-dev] [app-catalog] Add TOSCA assets to the catalog

- Original Message - > From: "Sahdev P Zala" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > Hello, > > I am looking at this blueprint > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/app-catalog/+spec/add-tosca-assets

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] New Container Networking Model - Kubernetes, Kuryr, and Neutron

- Original Message - > From: "Mohammad Banikazemi" > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > We are going to discuss CNI, the Container Network Interface at 15:00 UTC > on Tuesday (!0am EST). In particular, we like to start putting together a > plan for supporting CNI

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

k.org?subject:unsubscribe > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > ______ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage qu

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telcowg] Telco Working Group meeting cancellations - Dec 23rd, Dec 30, Jan 6

Hi all, We discussed in today's meeting and confirmed that we will skip our schedule meetings for: * December 23rd * December 30th * January 6th We will reconvene on January 13th, I will send a reminder close to that date. Thanks, Steve

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telco] Telco Working Group Meeting Reminder - Wednesday December 2nd at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt

Hi all, This week's Telco Working Group meeting [1] is on Wednesday December 2nd at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt [2]. The proposed agenda is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda Thanks, Steve [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Telco_Working_Group_meeting [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] [nfv][telco][product] Future of telco working group and weekly meeting reminder

- Original Message - > From: "Shamail" <itzsham...@gmail.com> > To: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > > Hi Steve, > > > On Nov 18, 2015, at 6:39 AM, Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all,

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telco][product] Future of telco working group and weekly meeting reminder

Hi all, Back in Vancouver [1] we began discussing the growing overlap between OPNFV requirements projects and the current mission of the telco working group. During this period the product working group, also in part focused on recording and prioritizing user stories, has also been hitting its

[openstack-dev] [nova] Backlog Specs: a way to send requirements to the developer community

- Original Message - > From: "John Garbutt" > To: maishsk+openst...@maishsk.com [SNIP] > On 14 May 2015 at 19:52, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote: > > Can we please have this as a default template and the default way to allow > > Operators to

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Meeting Reminder - November 11th - 1400 UTC

Hi all, Just a reminder this week's Telco Working Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday the 11th at 1400 UTC. As always the agenda etherpad is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda I recognize that many folks will be at OPNFV summit this week but we will see how we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Manila] Nova API to attach/detach file volume/share

t; http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > -- > Email: > - shin...@linux.com <shin...@linux.com> > Blog: > - Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource > <http://i-shinobu.hatenablog.com/> > > ___

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Etherpad for 2 PM Tuesday working session @ OpenStack Summit

Hi all, As you may or may not know we have a 40 minute working session today at 2 PM at OpenStack Summit in Sakura N-1 and N-2. I have created an etherpad for the session here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TYO-telcowg Please add use cases or projects you would like to propose to try

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] FYI telcowg-usecases is now in the openstack/ namespace on git.openstack.org

Hi all, Just an FYI as I had some questions about this, pursuant to a notice James sent out in August [1] the repository has moved from the stackforge/ namespace in git to the openstack/ namespace. Open reviews can now be found here:

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Meeting canceled

Hi all, No Telco Working Group meeting Wednesday October 20th due to proximity to the F2F in Tokyo and the lack of items to discuss. See you all next Tuesday! Thanks, Steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Meeting canceled

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, > > Hi all, > > No Telco Working Group meeting Wednesday Oc

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] It's time to update the Liberty release notes

- Original Message - > From: "Matt Riedemann" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > We need to go through the changes which were tagged for release notes > [1]. Generally this means

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][mistral] Automatic evacuation as a long running task

- Original Message - > From: "Roman Dobosz" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" > > Hi all, > > The case of automatic evacuation (or resurrection currently), is a topic > which surfaces once in a while, but it isn't yet

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nfv][telcowg] Telco Working Group meeting schedule

- Original Message - > From: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> > To: openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org, "OpenStack Development Mailing > List (not for usage questions)" > > Hi all, > > As discussed in last week's meeting [1] we hav

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telcowg] Telco Working Group meeting schedule

Hi all, As discussed in last week's meeting [1] we have been seeing increasingly limited engagement in the 1900 UTC meeting slot. For this reason starting from next week's meeting (October 6th) it is proposed that we consolidate on the 1400 UTC slot which is generally better attended and stop

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [kolla] Possible to support multiple compute drivers?

s.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] cloud-init IPv6 support

- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Benton" > > When we discussed this before on the neutron channel, I thought it was > because cloud-init doesn't support IPv6. We had wasted quite a bit of time > talking about adding support to our metadata service because I was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] cloud-init IPv6 support

- Original Message - > From: "Joshua Harlow" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , "PAUL CARVER" > > Jump on #cloud-init on freenode, smoser and I (and the other folks there) are > both pretty

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telcowg] Issues with vIMS and SBC submissions

Hi Calum, After the discussion at the end of the meeting I *believe* I have fixed the issues with these two - please review and check I didn't accidentally drop any of your changes: * SBC: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176301/ - Removed the erroneously included

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telcowg] Telco Working Group meeting canceled for Wednesday August 19th

Hi all, Due to a number of events going on this week (Operators Mid-cycle/LinuxCon/KVMForum/etc.) I am canceling the Telco Working Group meeting for the 19th. Thanks! Steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telco] Meeting canceled 2015-08-05

Hi all, I am traveling and unable to facilitate the Telco Working Group meeting this week and was unable to find a backup, as such the meeting is canceled fro 2015-08-05 (Wednesday). Thanks! Steve __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] July 15th meeting cancelled

: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Steve Gordon, RHCE Sr. Technical Product Manager, Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] July 15th meeting cancelled

Hi all, I'm unable to make the meeting today and was unable to get an alternative facilitator to run the meeting, as such it is canceled. Please note that I am still seeking comment on: [Openstack-operators] [nfv][telco] On-going management of telcowg-usecases repository

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

- Original Message - From: Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On 05/29/15 18:25, Matthew Thode wrote: On 05/29/2015 10:18 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: What about release notes? How can we now communicate some changes that require

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] PCI pass-through SRIOV

and b) your kernel has these patches, though your output does not appear to be an exact match for what we were seeing in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141399 Thanks, -- Steve Gordon, RHCE Sr. Technical Product Manager, Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform

Re: [openstack-dev] rating talks (and keynotes) at the OpenStack summit

- Original Message - From: Amrith Kumar amr...@tesora.com To: openst...@lists.openstack.org, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) I attended a talk by Mark Baker today (http://sched.co/2qbJ) entitled The OpenStack Summit Talk Selection Process is Broken and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][vmware] Minimum VC version

- Original Message - From: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, But 4.x was EOL over a year ago:

Re: [openstack-dev] [RefStackl] - http://refstack.org/ - does not resolve

- Original Message - From: Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On 2015-05-06 09:37:26 -0500 (-0500), arkady_kanev...@dell.com wrote: What are we doing to have name resolved? Meanwhile

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How are vcpu's, ram mapped with an instance

- Original Message - From: Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS abhishek.tal...@tcs.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Hi Folks, When we boot an instance and assign a flavor to it, how are the vcpu's, ram given to the instance. Actually the question is this while creating an instance

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how to handle vendor-specific API microversions?

microversions? On 03/27/2015 01:40 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com So for the case where a customer really wants some functionality, and wants it *soon* rather than waiting for it to get merged upstream, what

[openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Update to weekly meeting time commencing this week.

Hi all, Since the Paris summit the Telco Working Group has been meeting on an alternating basis at 1400 UTC and 2200 UTC. As discussed in the last two meetings due to low attendance in the 2200 UTC slot, particularly as DST has now kicked in for many participants, we are going to trial a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how to handle vendor-specific API microversions?

- Original Message - From: Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On 03/27/2015 12:44 PM, Dan Smith wrote: To quote John from an earlier email in this thread: Its worth noting, we do have the experimental flag: The first header

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how to handle vendor-specific API microversions?

- Original Message - From: Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Haven't seen any responses to this. As I see it, nova is really pushing for interoperability, but what is a vendor supposed to do when they have customers asking for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug in documentation for host aggregates and availability zones?

- Original Message - From: Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Hi, I think I've found some bugs around host aggregates in the documentation, curious what people think. The docs at

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A question about libvirt cpu mode=none configuration

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Steve Gordon, RHCE Sr

Re: [openstack-dev] Testing NUMA, CPU pinning and large pages

- Original Message - From: Adrian Hoban adrian.ho...@intel.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org -Original Message- From: Steve Gordon [mailto:sgor...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:49 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

- Original Message - From: Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org To: James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com It's certainly a lot less than you, but we have the entire system call man pages. It's an official project of the kernel:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Passthrough of PF's from SR-IOV capable devices.

- Original Message - From: Irena Berezovsky irenab@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From

Re: [openstack-dev] Testing NUMA, CPU pinning and large pages

- Original Message - From: Adrian Hoban adrian.ho...@intel.com Hi Folks, I just wanted to share some details on the Intel CI testing strategy for NFV. You will see two Intel CIs commenting: #1: Intel-PCI-CI - Yongli He and Shane Wang are leading this effort for us. - The focus

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Telco][NFV][infra] Review process of TelcoWG use cases

- Original Message - From: Anthony Veiga anthony_ve...@cable.comcast.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:17 , Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-06 12:11:40 +0100 (+0100),

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Passthrough of PF's from SR-IOV capable devices.

- Original Message - From: Przemyslaw Czesnowicz przemyslaw.czesnow...@intel.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Hi 1) If the device is a normal PCI device, but is a network card, am I still able to take

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Passthrough of PF's from SR-IOV capable devices.

Hi all, In the current SR-IOV implementation there is a check in Nova (specifically _get_device_type in nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py) that determines if a given PCI device is: - a normal PCI device, - an SR-IOV physical function (PF); or - an SR-IOV virtual function (VF). If it's a normal PCI

[openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Meeting Reminder - Wednesday 4th February 2015 @ 2200 UTC in #openstack-meeting

Hi all, Just a quick (belated) reminder that there is an OpenStack Telco Working group meeting in #openstack-meeting today @ 2200 UTC. I'm currently updating the agenda, please review and add any items here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda Thanks, Steve

Re: [openstack-dev] problems with huge pages and libvirt

- Original Message - From: Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On 2 February 2015 at 09:49, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: On 02/02/2015 10:51 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Meeting facilitator for January 28th

- Original Message - From: Marc Koderer m...@koderer.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Hi Steve, I can host it. Regards Marc Thanks Marc!

[openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Meeting reminder - Wednesday 28th @ 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt

Hi all, Just a friendly reminder that this week's OpenStack Telco Working Group meeting is tomorrow, Wednesday the 28th, at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt. Please add any items you wish to discuss to the agenda at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda Marc Koderer has

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][NFV][qa] Testing NUMA, CPU pinning and large pages

- Original Message - From: Vladik Romanovsky vladik.romanov...@enovance.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Hi everyone, Following Steve Gordon's email [1], regarding CI for NUMA, SR-IOV, and other features, I'd like to start a discussion about the NUMA testing in

[openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Meeting summary and logs - 2015-01-21

Hi all, Please find minutes and logs from this week's OpenStack Telco Working Group meeting at the locations linked below: * Minutes (HTML): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/telcowg/2015/telcowg.2015-01-21-22.00.html * Log (HTML):

Re: [openstack-dev] multi-queue virtio-net interface

- Original Message - From: Rajagopalan Sivaramakrishnan r...@juniper.net To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Hello, We are hitting a performance bottleneck in the Contrail network virtualization solution due to the virtio interface having a single queue in VMs spawned

[openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Use case documentation and review

Hi all, Based on the discussion last week during our first use case deep dive I have created etherpads for each use case and linked them from the wiki in the hope that this might provide a better mechanism for recording feedback in lieu of moving to a e.g. gerrit for these:

Re: [openstack-dev] libvirt memory ballooning [nova]

- Original Message - From: Vikash Kumar vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org All, There is blueprint for enabling libvirt memory ballooning https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-memory-ballooning in openstack nova.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][AdvancedServices][telco] Confusion about the solution of the service chaining!

- Original Message - From: Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:25 AM, lv.erc...@zte.com.cn wrote: Hi, I want to confirm that how is the project about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telco] [NFV] [neutron][advancedservices][group-based-policy] Service function chaining

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Steve Gordon, RHCE Sr. Technical Product Manager, Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Selection of Use Case to do a deep dive on for next week's meeting

Hi all, At the meeting this week we discussed selecting one of the submitted use cases to perform a deep dive on next week. I've put together a quick survey based on the items currently listed on the wiki [1]: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N9JWN76 There are two other use cases I am aware

[openstack-dev] [telco][nfv] Meeting summary and logs - 2015-01-07

Hi all, Please find minutes and logs for today's OpenStack Telco Working group meeting at the locations listed below: * Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/telcowg/2015/telcowg.2015-01-07-22.00.html * Minutes (text):

  1   2   3   >