Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Barbican container lookup fron lbaas

2015-09-21 Thread Varun Lodaya
generated using the conf file credentials will be accepted by Barbican >and the certificate will be made available to lbass. > >- Douglas Mendizábal > >[1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/barbican/api/quickstart/acls.htm >l > >On 9/19/15 12:13 AM, Varun Lodaya wrote: >

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Barbican container lookup fron lbaas

2015-09-18 Thread Varun Lodaya
Hi Guys, With lbaasv2, I noticed that when we try to associate tls containers with lbaas listeners, lbaas tries to validate the container and while doing so, tries to get keystone token based on tenant/user credentials in neutron.conf file. However, the barbican containers could belong to diffe

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - port-create with network from a different tenant does not fail

2015-02-10 Thread Varun Lodaya
fine-grained control so every single tenant can attach to a network once it is marked as shared. So if you have one tenant who wants to have another tenant attach a few servers to his/her network, the only choice is to have the admin do it via the operation you described above. On Tue,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - port-create with network from a different tenant does not fail

2015-02-10 Thread Varun Lodaya
from a different tenant does not fail You can have ports from different tenants in a network. It's an admin-only capability unless the network is marked as "shared". On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Varun Lodaya mailto:varun_lod...@symantec.com>> wrote: Adding t

[openstack-dev] [neutron] - port-create with network from a different tenant does not fail

2015-02-10 Thread Varun Lodaya
Adding the right subject line. From: Varun Lodaya mailto:varun_lod...@symantec.com>> Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 2:26 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: port-create with network f

[openstack-dev] port-create with network from a different tenant does not fail

2015-02-10 Thread Varun Lodaya
Hi, We were seeing this issue where if the user role is admin in 2 tenants A and B and he issues neutron port-create in tenant A where is in tenant B, it ends up creating that port. Ideally, it should have failed since you cannot have the port/network in different tenants. varunlodaya@ubuntu

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] LBaaS Haproxy performance benchmarking

2015-02-04 Thread Varun Lodaya
gured to handle the extra size of the overlay (GRE / VXLAN packets) otherwise you will be introducing fragmentation overhead on the tenant networks. [1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/httperf/ [2] http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/programs/ab.html Miguel Ángel Ajo On Wednesday, 4 de F

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] LBaaS Haproxy performance benchmarking

2015-02-04 Thread Varun Lodaya
Thanks Baptiste. I will try that tool. I worked with ab and was seeing really low results. But let me give httpress a shot :) Thanks, Varun On 2/3/15, 7:01 PM, "Baptiste" wrote: >On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Varun Lodaya >wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We were

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] LBaaS Haproxy performance benchmarking

2015-02-03 Thread Varun Lodaya
Hi, We were trying to use haproxy as our LBaaS solution on the overlay. Has anybody done some baseline benchmarking with LBaaSv1 haproxy solution? Also, any recommended tools which we could use to do that? Thanks, Varun __

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Pool member status 'ACTIVE' even on health check failure

2015-01-19 Thread Varun Lodaya
t;has been focused on getting the v2 API out. Which is almost complete >and plan for that to be completed for Kilo-3. If you'd like to be able >to retrieve some health stats, please list them and let us know. We'll >hopefully be able to get them in after v2 has completed. &g

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Pool member status 'ACTIVE' even on health check failure

2015-01-19 Thread Varun Lodaya
Hi All, I am trying to get LBaaS running on stable Juno. I can get all the LBaaS components correctly installed and working as expected. But I am facing some issues with the health-monitor. I am not quite sure if it’s working as expected. I have 2 ubuntu servers as members of http-pool and I ha