Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
>[Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project
>
>> an,
>>
>> I value your input, but concern still stands. Amazon's compute API
>>moves slowly in comp
;
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >
> Date: Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 4:52 AM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][
Undoubtedly, in the short term it will be painful, but I believe that in the
long run Glare will win.
Let’s hope that projects, that use Glare would also win from this decision. =)
It seems to me, that murano is currently the only one that has been actively
trying to incorporate glare into it’
52 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker]
Glare as a new Project
However, interested parties could start a project like the ec2 proj
quot;
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 2:29 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.ope
questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker]
Glare as a new Project
If glare was docker repo api compatible though, I think it would be quite
useful. then each tenant doesn't have to set one up the
pment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker]
Glare as a new Project
Replied inline.
From: Mikhail Fedosin [mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com]
Sent: August-05-16 2:10 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage ques
Replied inline.
From: Mikhail Fedosin [mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com]
Sent: August-05-16 2:10 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker]
Glare as a new Project
Thank you all for your responses
Thank you all for your responses!
>From my side I can add that our separation is a deliberate step. We
pre-weighed all pros and cons and our final decision was that moving
forward as a new project is the lesser of two evils. Undoubtedly, in the
short term it will be painful, but I believe that in
I don't have a strong opinion on the split vs stay discussion. It
does seem there's been sustained if ineffective attempts to keep this
together so I lean toward supporting the divorce.
But let's not pretend there are no costs for this.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 07:02:48PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
I think this makes sense.
"Should Artifacts be part of Glance?" is something folks have been
debating for several years now, with seemingly equal numbers on
each side.
Even though it was far from unanimous, several summits ago it was decided
to aim for a a v3 Glance API which would support all a
On 04/08/16 15:46 +, Alexander Tivelkov wrote:
I am the one who started the initiative 2.5 years ago, and was always
advocating the "let's stay in Glance" approach during numerous discussions
on "where should it belong" for all these years.
Now I believe that it is time to move forward indeed
] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker]
Glare as a new Project
> On 04 Aug 2016, at 19:34, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2016-08-04 15:55:48 +:
>>>
>>> On 04 Aug 2
> On 05 Aug 2016, at 01:02, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2016 06:40 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2016-08-04 18:14:46 -0400:
>>> On 08/04/2016 05:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2016-08-04 19:20:43 +:
> I disagree.
ck Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-
> Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project
>
> I disagree. I see glare as a superset of the needs of the image api and
> one feature I need thats image related was spec
On 08/04/2016 06:40 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2016-08-04 18:14:46 -0400:
On 08/04/2016 05:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2016-08-04 19:20:43 +:
I disagree. I see glare as a superset of the needs of the image api and one f
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2016-08-04 18:14:46 -0400:
> On 08/04/2016 05:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2016-08-04 19:20:43 +:
> >> I disagree. I see glare as a superset of the needs of the image api and
> >> one feature I need thats image relat
On 08/04/2016 05:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2016-08-04 19:20:43 +:
I disagree. I see glare as a superset of the needs of the image api and one feature I
need thats image related was specifically shot down as "the artefact api will solve
that".
You ha
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2016-08-04 19:20:43 +:
> I disagree. I see glare as a superset of the needs of the image api and one
> feature I need thats image related was specifically shot down as "the
> artefact api will solve that".
>
> You have all the same needs to version/cat
ern.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> From: Erno Kuvaja [ekuv...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 10:34 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Mu
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 11:47 AM
To: Tim Bell; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker]
Glare as a new Project
-Original Message-
From: Tim Bell
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Erno Kuvaja [ekuv...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 10:34 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker]
Glare as a new Project
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
>> On 04 Aug 2016, at 19:34, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2016-08-04 15:55:48 +:
On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:27, Mikhail Fedosin
mailto:mfedo...@
-Original Message-
From: Tim Bell
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: August 4, 2016 at 13:19:02
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker
-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker]
Glare as a new Project
On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:27, Mikhail Fedosin
mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
after 6 months of Glare v1 API development we have decided to continue our work
in a separate project in the &quo
> On 04 Aug 2016, at 19:34, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2016-08-04 15:55:48 +:
>>>
>>> On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:27, Mikhail Fedosin
>>> mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
>> after 6
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2016-08-04 15:55:48 +:
>>
>> On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:27, Mikhail Fedosin
>> mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> > > > after 6 months of Glare v1 API development we have decided to con
Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2016-08-04 15:55:48 +:
>
> On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:27, Mikhail Fedosin
> mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > > > after 6 months of Glare v1 API development we have decided to continue
> > our work in a separate project in the "openstack
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Tivelkov
wrote:
> I am the one who started the initiative 2.5 years ago, and was always
> advocating the "let's stay in Glance" approach during numerous discussions
> on "where should it belong" for all these years.
> Now I believe that it is time to move
On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:27, Mikhail Fedosin
mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
after 6 months of Glare v1 API development we have decided to continue our work
in a separate project in the "openstack" namespace with its own core team (me,
Kairat Kushaev, Darja Shkhray and the original
I am the one who started the initiative 2.5 years ago, and was always
advocating the "let's stay in Glance" approach during numerous discussions
on "where should it belong" for all these years.
Now I believe that it is time to move forward indeed. Some things remain to
be defined (first of all the
Hi all,
after 6 months of Glare v1 API development we have decided to continue our
work in a separate project in the "openstack" namespace with its own core
team (me, Kairat Kushaev, Darja Shkhray and the original creator -
Alexander Tivelkov). We want to thank Glance community for their support
du
32 matches
Mail list logo
