Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-11 Thread Victor Stinner
Le 08/03/2016 22:22, gordon chung a écrit : it seems like the main reason there are so many projects leveraging WSME is because everyone is just using Ironic or Ceilometer as the starting point for their APIs. can we officially say to all new projects who plan on copying API logic of Ironic et al

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-11 Thread Hongbin Lu
gards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: March-08-16 10:51 AM To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-03-08 11:25:48 +:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-09 Thread michael mccune
On 03/08/2016 04:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: it seems like the main reason there are so many projects leveraging WSME is because everyone is just using Ironic or Ceilometer as the starting point for their APIs. can we officially say to all new projects who plan on copying API logic of Ironic et a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from gordon chung's message of 2016-03-08 21:22:11 +: > > On 08/03/2016 6:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > > Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on > > WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally > > trying to keep things moving

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread gordon chung
On 08/03/2016 6:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on > WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally > trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed > that WSME is _not_ a web framew

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-03-08 11:25:48 +: > > Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on > WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally > trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed > that WSM

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread Davanum Srinivas
24 instances as shown by codesearch: http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=%5E(wsme%7CWSME)&i=nope&files=%5E.*requirements.txt&repos= -- Dims On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? > > Best, > -jay > > On 03/08/2016 07:10 AM, C

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? sdague and I were just talking about this and using codesearch.openstack.org the list is something like (but probably not completely accurate): aodh blazar ceilometer cerberus

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread Jay Pipes
Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? Best, -jay On 03/08/2016 07:10 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Stéphane Bisinger wrote: Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? No, that is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Stéphane Bisinger wrote: Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? No, that is the biggest reason I'm calling it unmaintained. Neither Lucas nor I have the time nor interest in being the people who

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread Stéphane Bisinger
Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? Also, do we already have clear ideas on where we want to get? While the three points are clear from a general point of view, what does each of those points really mean? Which parts

[openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

2016-03-08 Thread Chris Dent
Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed that WSME is _not_ a web framework that we should be encouraging. Though it looks