Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-24 Thread Matthew Treinish
or usage questions) > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 p

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-21 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: March 18, 2016 at 13:06:02 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining http

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > > > On 18 Mar 2016, at 17:05, Doug Wiegley wrote: > >> On Mar 18, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Cory Benfield wrote: > >> > >> Getting requests to talk over

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Cory Benfield
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 17:05, Doug Wiegley wrote: >> On Mar 18, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Cory Benfield wrote: >> >> Getting requests to talk over a Unix domain socket is not particularly >> tricky, and there are third-party libraries that hook into

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Joshua Harlow
On 03/18/2016 02:34 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/14/2016 03:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Ian, +1 to get rid of that dependency if possible. +1 for any action aiming toward removing *any* dependency. We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Cory Benfield
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 13:57, Brian Haley wrote: > > On 03/17/2016 06:04 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: Here is the non comprehensive list of usages based on what trees I happen to have checked out (which is quite a few, but not all of OpenStack for sure).

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Mar 17 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote: > We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many > dependencies, with many duplicate functionalities too. Just to name a few: > - oslo.concurrency vs lockfile You made me check, but this is not true anymore. Lockfile is not used

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Cory Benfield wrote: > >> >> On 18 Mar 2016, at 13:57, Brian Haley wrote: >> >> On 03/17/2016 06:04 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: > Here is the non comprehensive list of usages based on what trees I > happen to have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread David Lyle
; > From: Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> > > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage quest

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/14/2016 03:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Ian, +1 to get rid of that dependency if possible. +1 for any action aiming toward removing *any* dependency. We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many dependencies, with many duplicate

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Chris Dent wrote: wsgi-intercept (I maintain that) can use httplib2, http.lib or requests (and if you go back a few versions even more) so those tests could be updated to use requests and still use wsgi-intercept if that was desired. I've just released a version of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/14/2016 03:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Ian, > > +1 to get rid of that dependency if possible. +1 for any action aiming toward removing *any* dependency. We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many dependencies, with many duplicate functionalities too. Just to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/18/2016 09:31 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many >> dependencies, with many duplicate functionalities too. Just to name a few: >> - oslo.concurrency vs lockfile > > You made me check,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-19 Thread Doug Wiegley
; > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:41:02 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > >> On 03/14/2016 10:24 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: >>> >>> >>> -

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-18 Thread Brian Haley
On 03/17/2016 06:04 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: Here is the non comprehensive list of usages based on what trees I happen to have checked out (which is quite a few, but not all of OpenStack for sure). I think before deciding to take over ownership of an upstream lib (which is a large commitment

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-15 Thread Gorka Eguileor
gt; > > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > <ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Sean McGinnis
or usage questions) > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 p

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject:  [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > > > Team, > > > > fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Monty Taylor
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library On 03/14/2016 10:24 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: March 14

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > To be transparent, I've also reached out to Joe to help. My main > > motivation, though, is to bring it to the point where the &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Ian Cordasco wrote: To be transparent, I've also reached out to Joe to help. My main motivation, though, is to bring it to the point where the recommendation is to use something that is not httplib2 eventually. Not every library needs to live on forever. Makes sense. My

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/03/16 10:16 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Team, fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2 We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are using it[1]. Is there anyone willing to step up? Thanks, Dims [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 03/14/2016 10:24 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > >> And then we can (and should) also ask "Why have we been using this? &

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
; > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > > > >> Team, > >> > >> fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_h

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Sean Dague wrote: On 03/14/2016 10:24 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: And then we can (and should) also ask "Why have we been using this? How much work do cores think it would be to remove this from our global requirements?" +1. Despite volunteering to take care of it, I agree

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Sean Dague
18:50 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > >> Team, >> >> fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread gordon chung
On 14/03/2016 10:28 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Ian, > > +1 to get rid of that dependency if possible. > > Thanks, > Dims > this. i'm opening a bug to remove this from Ceilometer since it's only for a test. i wasn't even aware we had httplib2. cheers, -- gord

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Thanks Chris. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2 >> >> We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are >> using it[1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
st (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > Team, > > fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2 > > We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are > using it[1]. Is there anyo

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Davanum Srinivas wrote: fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2 We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are using it[1]. Is there anyone willing to step up? I've been thinking about asking Joe about it for a while, so will

[openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

2016-03-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Team, fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2 We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are using it[1]. Is there anyone willing to step up? Thanks, Dims [1] http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=(from%7Cimport).*httplib2=nope== -- Davanum Srinivas