Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] placement update 18-14

2018-04-09 Thread Chris Dent
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Chris Dent wrote: * Eric and I discussed earlier in the week that it might be a good time to start an #openstack-placement IRC channel, for two main reasons: break things up so as to limit the crosstalk in the often very busy #openstack-nova channel and to lend a bit of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] placement update 18-14

2018-04-09 Thread Sylvain Bauza
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > This is "contract" style update. New stuff will not be added to the > lists. > > # Most Important > > There doesn't appear to be anything new with regard to most > important. That which was important remains important.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] placement update 18-14

2018-04-08 Thread TETSURO NAKAMURA
Hi Novaers, On 2018/04/07 6:41, Eric Fried wrote: Some negotiation happened with regard to when/if the fixes for shared providers is going to happen. I'm not sure how that resolved, if someone can follow up with that, that would be most excellent. This is the subject of another thread [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] placement update 18-14

2018-04-06 Thread Eric Fried
>> it's really on nested allocation candidates. > > Yup. And that series is deadlocked on a disagreement about whether > granular request groups should be "separate by default" (meaning: if you > request multiple groups of resources, the expectation is that they will > be served by distinct

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] placement update 18-14

2018-04-06 Thread Jay Pipes
Thanks, as always, for the excellent summary emails, Chris. Comments inline. On 04/06/2018 01:54 PM, Chris Dent wrote: This is "contract" style update. New stuff will not be added to the lists. # Most Important There doesn't appear to be anything new with regard to most important. That which

[openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] placement update 18-14

2018-04-06 Thread Chris Dent
This is "contract" style update. New stuff will not be added to the lists. # Most Important There doesn't appear to be anything new with regard to most important. That which was important remains important. At the scheduler team meeting at the start of the week there was talk of working out