On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Chris Dent wrote:
* Eric and I discussed earlier in the week that it might be a good
time to start an #openstack-placement IRC channel, for two main
reasons: break things up so as to limit the crosstalk in the often
very busy #openstack-nova channel and to lend a bit of
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
>
> This is "contract" style update. New stuff will not be added to the
> lists.
>
> # Most Important
>
> There doesn't appear to be anything new with regard to most
> important. That which was important remains important.
Hi Novaers,
On 2018/04/07 6:41, Eric Fried wrote:
Some negotiation happened with regard to when/if the fixes for
shared providers is going to happen. I'm not sure how that resolved,
if someone can follow up with that, that would be most excellent.
This is the subject of another thread [2]
>> it's really on nested allocation candidates.
>
> Yup. And that series is deadlocked on a disagreement about whether
> granular request groups should be "separate by default" (meaning: if you
> request multiple groups of resources, the expectation is that they will
> be served by distinct
Thanks, as always, for the excellent summary emails, Chris. Comments inline.
On 04/06/2018 01:54 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
This is "contract" style update. New stuff will not be added to the
lists.
# Most Important
There doesn't appear to be anything new with regard to most
important. That which
This is "contract" style update. New stuff will not be added to the
lists.
# Most Important
There doesn't appear to be anything new with regard to most
important. That which was important remains important. At the
scheduler team meeting at the start of the week there was talk of
working out