On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:01:23PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Yes, it comes up often enough and as far as I'm aware reviewers
> haven't previously rejected unofficial projects who want to receive
> requirements updates. There are definitely projects who don't want
> to (or for license reasons
On 2017-08-11 08:49:18 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:22:56PM +0900, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
[...]
> > I am not sure that projects not under the TC governance can use
> > openstack/releases repo. Is the openstack/release repo for
> > projects under the governance?
>
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:46:20AM +0900, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
> Akihiro Motoki wrote on 8/10/2017 7:22 PM:
> > Tony,
> >
> > Thanks for taking care.
>
>
> >
> > > i18n I18n
> > At now, i18n repo is a part of governance but this is a project which
>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:22:56PM +0900, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Tony,
>
> Thanks for taking care.
>
> > The following repos don't seem to use the openstack/releases repo so I
> > have less information there.
>
> Most of them are projects not under the governance (so-called "hosted"
> or
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:17:23AM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 03:46:32PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > In an effort to qualify which projects are likley to be affected if
> > when we open the requirements repo I generated a list of all repos that:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:38:43PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi Tony!
>
> I hope to finish releasing Ironic stuff next week. We still have a few
> critical things to land.
Cool
> On 08/10/2017 07:46 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > In an effort to qualify which projects
Akihiro Motoki wrote on 8/10/2017 7:22 PM:
Tony,
Thanks for taking care.
i18n I18n
At now, i18n repo is a part of governance but this is a project which
has no need to cut a release,
so it always follows the master branch of the requirements
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 03:46:32PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> In an effort to qualify which projects are likley to be affected if
> when we open the requirements repo I generated a list of all repos that:
>
> 1. Subscribe to requirements management
> 2. Do not already have a
Features for tricircle pike has been freezed, and
no exception was asked until now, as you
proposed, If neutron can have branch this
week, we can cut branch earlier.
Thank you, TTX.
From: Thierry Carrez [thie...@openstack.org]
Sent: 10 August 2017 20:39
joehuang wrote:
> Tricircle plans to cut stable/pike branch on August 22nd, it has dependency
> on Neutron stable/pike creation.
That sounds a bit late to create your release branch. It doesn't give
you a lot of time to react to critical issues discovered in that
release, as August 24 is the
Hi Tony!
I hope to finish releasing Ironic stuff next week. We still have a few critical
things to land.
On 08/10/2017 07:46 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
In an effort to qualify which projects are likley to be affected if
when we open the requirements repo I generated a list of all
Tony,
Thanks for taking care.
> The following repos don't seem to use the openstack/releases repo so I
> have less information there.
Most of them are projects not under the governance (so-called "hosted"
or "unofficial" projects),
so I am not sure there is a good way to handle them.
I can
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 08:41:40AM +, joehuang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Tricircle plans to cut stable/pike branch on August 22nd, it has
> dependency on Neutron stable/pike creation.
Okay in that case can you block any reviews from the proposal-bot until
you do branch.
Yours Tony.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:29:22AM +, witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> stable/pike branches for Monasca repos are on the way
>
> https://review.openstack.org/492101
Great!
next cycle we'll have to try and match against open reviews to reduce
the noise.
Yours Tony.
Hello,
Tricircle plans to cut stable/pike branch on August 22nd, it has dependency on
Neutron stable/pike creation.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
From: Tony Breeds [t...@bakeyournoodle.com]
Sent: 10 August 2017 13:46
To: OpenStack Development
Hi Tony,
stable/pike branches for Monasca repos are on the way
https://review.openstack.org/492101
Cheers
Witek
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Breeds [mailto:t...@bakeyournoodle.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 07:47
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi All,
In an effort to qualify which projects are likley to be affected if
when we open the requirements repo I generated a list of all repos that:
1. Subscribe to requirements management
2. Do not already have a stable/pike branch
3. Do not follow the cycle-with-milestones, cycle-trailing
17 matches
Mail list logo
