I posted a fix that does not break things and supports HA.
https://review.openstack.org/154029
On 2/11/15, 5:55 PM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/02/15 15:49, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I do not think that that is a healthy solution. That effectively would
render a cluster down if
Le 11/02/2015 17:04, Gary Kotton a écrit :
I posted a fix that does not break things and supports HA.
https://review.openstack.org/154029
Just let's be clear, HA is *not* supported by Nova now.
The main reason is that compute *nodes* are considered given by the
hypervisor (ie. the virt
On 11/02/15 15:49, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I do not think that that is a healthy solution. That effectively would
render a cluster down if the compute node goes down. That would be a real
disaster. The ugly work around is setting the host names to be the same
value.
I don't think that's an
On 2/11/15, 6:35 PM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 11/02/2015 17:04, Gary Kotton a écrit :
I posted a fix that does not break things and supports HA.
https://review.openstack.org/154029
Just let's be clear, HA is *not* supported by Nova now.
That is not correct. It is actually
On 11/02/15 16:40, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 2/11/15, 6:35 PM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 11/02/2015 17:04, Gary Kotton a écrit :
I posted a fix that does not break things and supports HA.
https://review.openstack.org/154029
Just let's be clear, HA is *not* supported by
I just posted this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154907/
as an alternative fix for critical bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1419785
I've just knocked this up quickly for illustration: it obviously needs
plenty of cleanup. I have confirmed that it works, though.
Before I take it
Hi,
I do not think that that is a healthy solution. That effectively would
render a cluster down if the compute node goes down. That would be a real
disaster. The ugly work around is setting the host names to be the same
value.
This is something that we should discuss at the next summit and I
