Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

Hi Thierry, On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Shinobu Kinjo wrote: >> >> I guess, it's usable. [1] [2] [3], probably and more... >> >> The reason why still I can just guess is that there is a bunch of >> documentations!! >> It's one of great works but

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

Shinobu Kinjo wrote: I guess, it's usable. [1] [2] [3], probably and more... The reason why still I can just guess is that there is a bunch of documentations!! It's one of great works but too much. We have transitioned most of the documentation off the wiki, but there are still a number of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

I guess, it's usable. [1] [2] [3], probably and more... The reason why still I can just guess is that there is a bunch of documentations!! It's one of great works but too much. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Guide [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Project_Teams [3]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

Thx shinobu, This is a great checklist ! Re PTL election, could we use community tools for that ? On May 2, 2016 1:09 PM, "Shinobu Kinjo" wrote: Hi Team, According to Documentation team, the Tricircle project seems to close to be official (but not really official kind of)

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

Hi Team, According to Documentation team, the Tricircle project seems to close to be official (but not really official kind of) since we have standard directory structure. [1] What we need to do from here is to submit a project-config patch to publish the documentation to [2]. Once we finish

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] virtual design summit for Newton

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 10:59:48 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] virtual design summit for Newton repost for reminder From: joehuang Sent: 26 April 2016 11:40 To: Op

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] virtual design summit for Newton

repost for reminder From: joehuang Sent: 26 April 2016 11:40 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev][tricircle] virtual design summit for Newton Hello, Most of our team members in Tricircle are not able

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] virtual design summit for Newton

Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 19 This week we will discuss the object operation not implemented. IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. Agenda: # object

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Error runnig py27

thanks On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:51 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, Khayam, > > > > You can write the test case for the exception like : > http://paste.openstack.org/show/494530/ > > > > Best Regards > > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > > *From:* Khayam Gondal

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] http response code

[mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 6:46 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: lbq09008228 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] http response code This might be answer for your question. https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/blob/master

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] http response code

This might be answer for your question. https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/blob/master/tricircle/api/controllers/pod.py Cheers, S On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:37 PM, 李戈 wrote: > Hi > I read api source code recently and have a question. Do we uniform the > "http

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] http response code

Hi I read api source code recently and have a question. Do we uniform the "http response code"? such as, 404 means "Not Found". __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 19

This week we will discuss the object operation not implemented. IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. Agenda: # object operation not implemented # tempest test # Reliable aync. Job - items left # Link:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Error runnig py27

Hello, Khayam, You can write the test case for the exception like : http://paste.openstack.org/show/494530/ Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: Khayam Gondal [mailto:khayam.gon...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 8:22 PM To: joehuang Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Error runnig py27

Sorry, email went to spam. Just saw it. Following is link http://paste.openstack.org/show/494403/ On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:41 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hi, Khayam, > > > > Could you paste your whole file for test cases and the source code to be > tested in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Error runnig py27

Hi, Khayam, Could you paste your whole file for test cases and the source code to be tested in the http://paste.openstack.org/ seperatly. Please share the links, so that to find out what happened. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: Khayam Gondal [mailto:khayam.gon...@gmail.com]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Error runnig py27

Hi joehuang, by removing self it is showing following error. File "/home/khayam/tricircle/.tox/py27/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mock/mock.py", line 1206, in _importer thing = __import __ (import_path) Import Error: No module named app Ran 135 tests in 2.994s (+ 0.940s) On Thu, Apr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Error runnig py27

Hi, Khayam, @mock.patch('self.app.post_json') No “self.” needed. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: Khayam Gondal [mailto:khayam.gon...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 2:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: joehuang; Zhiyuan Cai

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Error runnig py27

Hi I am writing a test for exception . Following is my testing function. @mock.patch('self.app.post_json') def test_post_exp(self, mock_get, mock_http_error_handler): mock_response = mock.Mock() mock_response.raise_for_status.side_effect = db_exc.DBDuplicateEntry

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Hello

@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Hello Hello Team， I am lige, a openstack coder in China UnionPay and glad to join our team. thx. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 13

Hi, We have a very good discussion about cross OpenStack L2 networking https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleCrossPodL2Networking and Dynamic Pod Binding https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleDynamicPodBinding. This week we will discuss what's missing in first release of Tricircle for

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]dynamic pod binding discussion

Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: 李戈 [mailto:lgmcglm...@126.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:41 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Hello Hello Team， I am lige, a openstack coder in China UnionPay and glad to join our team. thx

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint

t Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 4:16 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Trici

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint

, April 07, 2016 4:16 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint Hi Chaoyi, Just to clarify more. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:02 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi, Shinobu, > > Thanks for yo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint

inal Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 12:44 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint > > Hi Chaoyi, > > In bluep

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] UUID Mapping

iling List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] UUID Mapping > > Hi Team, > > Can we elaborate on uuid mapping more? > As described in blueprint, it's expected to be a solution for one of > challenges. > >> The object UUID in the top layer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] UUID Mapping

to:shinobu...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 2:35 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] UUID Mapping Hi Team, Can we elaborate on uuid mapping more? As described in blueprint, it's expected to be a solution for one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint

] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 12:44 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint Hi Chaoyi, In blueprint you described for PoC, there are information of tables. [1] They seem to out-to-date. Do you think that those

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] UUID Mapping

Hi Team, Can we elaborate on uuid mapping more? As described in blueprint, it's expected to be a solution for one of challenges. > The object UUID in the top layer is different from the UUIDs in the bottom > layers. There should theoretical logic, mechanism. But I've not been able to find any

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint

Hi Chaoyi, In blueprint you described for PoC, there are information of tables. [1] They seem to out-to-date. Do you think that those information need to be up-to-date in your blueprint? If it's not necessary, it's better to move those information to different sheet or put some comment like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Asynchronous Job Management Patches

Hi, Zhiyuan, You can also add some reviewers in the patch directly. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: Vega Cai [mailto:luckyveg...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 9:16 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Hello

sPodL2Networking. > > > > You can have a look and pickup one interesting topic to work on. > > > > Best Regards > > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > > *From:* 李戈 [mailto:lgmcglm...@126.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:41 AM > *To:*

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Asynchronous Job Management Patches

Hi, I have submitted the second patch for asynchronous job management, please help to review. Here is the link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/302110/ The first patch has been merged. Link for the first patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295729/ BR Zhiyuan

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 6

ay, April 05, 2016 6:54 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 6 > > Hi Chaoyi, > > Thank you for team mtg every week. > One day, we may need to discuss about trust relationship considering se

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 6

List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 6 Hi Chaoyi, Thank you for team mtg every week. One day, we may need to discuss about trust relationship considering secure connection and no-latency issue between top and bottoms over BGP across ASs

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 6

Hi Chaoyi, Thank you for team mtg every week. One day, we may need to discuss about trust relationship considering secure connection and no-latency issue between top and bottoms over BGP across ASs, in short between DCs. Any thought would be appreciated as usual. Cheers, Shinobu On Tue, Apr 5,

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 6

Hi, We have a very good discussion about cross OpenStack L2 networking last week: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleCrossPodL2Networking Let's continue the discussion and other topics in this weekly meeting. IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Hello

/TricircleCrossPodL2Networking. You can have a look and pickup one interesting topic to work on. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: 李戈 [mailto:lgmcglm...@126.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:41 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Hello Hello Team， I

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] Hello

Hello Team， I am lige, a openstack coder in China UnionPay and glad to join our team. thx. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

or usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 11:09:38 AM Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention Hi, Shinobu, Fully agree with you that this is a dilemma situation: If we use full word, for example "availaibility_zone_aggre

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

t: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 9:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention Hi Chaoyi, Thank you for your reply. How about this: # tricircle/api/pod.py 94 aggregate = az_ag.create_ag_

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

ang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 7:40 AM > To: joehuang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

Huang ) -Original Message- From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 7:40 AM To: joehuang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention One of examples is: """

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

t;joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: > yes, good idea, could you point out or > report a bug which are not good naming. > > thanks. > > Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice > 发件人：shinobu.kj > 收件人：openstack-dev, > 时间：2016-04-02 06:21:50 > 主题:[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming co

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

Hi Team, Probably it's worth thinking of naming convention for classes, methods or whatever we define in source codes. Some names are lengthy and there might be no consistency. At the moment it's fine. But once this project gets growing, situation would become chaotic and could cause bugs. What

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] cross openstack L2 networking

...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 4:18 PM To: joehuang Cc: Yipei Niu; Vega Cai; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration Very good. Cheers, S - Original Message - From

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

lt;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, ski...@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 5:07:24 PM Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration Congratulation. A great step Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) From: Yipei Niu [mailto:newy...@gmail.com] S

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

t; -Original Message- >> From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:48 AM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Cc: Yipei Niu >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricir

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

k.neutronv2.api.API" in lib/neutron-legacy. For the unknown >>> auth_plugin error in the first mail, somebody changes the auth_plugin to >>> auth_type in lib/neutron-legacy, but the loader still searches auth_plugin >>> for configuration in nova/network/neutronv2

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

ocal.conf is disabled at first before devstack >>> installation, the devstack should use Neutron instead, not sure how clean >>> Yipei's environment is. >>> >>> I suggest Yipei to use clean virtual machines running in virtualbox, and >>> follow the readme[1] and

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Mar. 30

Hi, IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. Agenda: # Cross OpenStack L2 networking # pod scheduling # Reliable aync. Job # Link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo If you have other topics to be discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

t; >> -Original Message- >> From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:48 AM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Cc: Yipei Niu >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricirc

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:48 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Cc: Yipei Niu > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node > configuration > > Sorry for interruption. > > >> I followed the README.md in g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

ng List (not for usage questions) > Cc: Yipei Niu > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node > configuration > > Sorry for interruption. > >>> I followed the README.md in github, every thing goes well until I >>> boot virtual machi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

[mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:48 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Yipei Niu Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration Sorry for interruption. >> I followed the README.md in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

> local.conf, make sure the Neutron service is enabled and Nova-network >>> > is >>> > disabled. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > # Use Neutron instead of nova-network >>> > >>> > disable_service n-net >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

t; >> > # Use Neutron instead of nova-network >> > >> > disable_service n-net >> > >> > enable_service q-svc >> > >> > enable_service q-svc1 >> > >> > enable_service q-dhcp >> > >> > enable_service q-a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

figuration in Nova to use Neutron > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > > > > > > From: Vega Cai [mailto:luckyveg...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 2:55 PM > > To: Yipei Niu > > Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

2:55 PM > To: Yipei Niu > Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); joehuang > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node > configuration > > > > Hi Yipei, > > > > Check "network_api_class" and "use_ne

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration Hi Yipei, Check "network_api_class" and "use_neutron" options in your nova.conf. It seems that your nova API is not configured to use neutron. BR Zhiyuan On 28 March 2016 at 13:25, Yipei Niu

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

Hi Yipei, Check "network_api_class" and "use_neutron" options in your nova.conf. It seems that your nova API is not configured to use neutron. BR Zhiyuan On 28 March 2016 at 13:25, Yipei Niu wrote: > Hi, all, > > After I execute the command "nova boot --flavor 1 --image >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

Hi, all, After I execute the command "nova boot --flavor 1 --image c30b097c-b185-4f70-9fcd-09ffdaee5793 --nic net-id=a9059cde-3065-4615-859a-facd6aa66b76 --availability-zone az1 vm1", there exist some problem with the argument port. In t-ngw.log, I find that the status of port switches from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

AnyOffice 发件人：shinobu.kj 收件人：openstack-dev, 时间：2016-03-26 18:13:11 主题:Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name Hi Chaoyi, Thank you for the pointer. I'm also researching privately how we can improve RPC protocol reasonably like HTTP2. It's quite easy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

gt;> > >> >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:31 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> > wrote: > >> >> > Hi, Shinobu, > >> >> > > >> >> > This BP is a good entrance for Tricircle source code, this BP > listed > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

t; This BP is a good entrance for Tricircle source code, this BP listed >> >> > the >> >> > all basic patches building Tricircle from scratches. >> >> > >> >> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tricircle/+spec/implement-stat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

>> > > >> > Best Regards > >> > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > >> > > >> > > >> > -Original Message- > >> > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > >> > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 201

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

listed the >> > all basic patches building Tricircle from scratches. >> > >> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tricircle/+spec/implement-stateless >> > >> > Best Regards >> > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) >> > >> > >> > -----

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

oe Huang ) > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:39 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Usi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

ec/implement-stateless >> >> Best Regards >> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:39 PM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

ement-stateless > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:39 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

2:39 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved > as field name > > Hi Team, > > In the Tricircle database, there are three tables having a field name > which the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:39 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name Hi Team, In the Tricircle database, there are three tables having

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:39 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name Hi Team, In the Tricircle database, there are three tables having a field name which the MySQL (MariaDB) has

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

Hi Team, In the Tricircle database, there are three tables having a field name which the MySQL (MariaDB) has as one of the reserved keywords. [1] Table Name: aggregate_metadata instance_type_extra_specs quality_of_service_specs Field Name: key I think it would not be best practice to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

On 03/23/2016 01:33 AM, Vega Cai wrote: On 22 March 2016 at 12:09, Shinobu Kinjo > wrote: Thank you for your comment (inline for my message). On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Vega Cai

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Vega Cai wrote: > > > On 22 March 2016 at 12:09, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: >> >> Thank you for your comment (inline for my message). >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Vega Cai wrote: >> > Let

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

On 22 March 2016 at 12:09, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > Thank you for your comment (inline for my message). > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Vega Cai wrote: > > Let me try to explain some. > > > > On 22 March 2016 at 10:09, Shinobu Kinjo

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:41 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hi, Yipei, > > > > When you play Tricircle, it’s important to know that Tricircle is the > OpenStack API gateway to other OpenStack instances. In the Readme, Pod1, > Pod2 are two OpenStack instances, before trying Tricircle,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

OK. Got it. Thanks a lot for your help! Best regards, Yipei On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:41 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hi, Yipei, > > > > When you play Tricircle, it’s important to know that Tricircle is the > OpenStack API gateway to other OpenStack instances. In the Readme,

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Mar. 23

Hi, IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. Agenda: # Mitaka release preparation #Newton release features discussion # Link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

Hi, Yipei, When you play Tricircle, it’s important to know that Tricircle is the OpenStack API gateway to other OpenStack instances. In the Readme, Pod1, Pod2 are two OpenStack instances, before trying Tricircle, you can make sure the environment is normal or not by executeing command

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

Hi, Joe and Zhiyuan, I have already finished installing devstack in two nodes with tricircle. I encounter some errors when testing cross-pod L3 networking with DevStack. I followed the README.md in github, every thing goes well until I boot virtual machines with the following command: nova boot

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

Thank you for your comment (inline for my message). On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Vega Cai wrote: > Let me try to explain some. > > On 22 March 2016 at 10:09, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:22 AM, joehuang

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

Let me try to explain some. On 22 March 2016 at 10:09, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:22 AM, joehuang wrote: > > Hello, Shinobu, > > > > Yes, as what you described here, the "initialize" in "core.py" is used > for unit/function test

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

; huangzhipeng; newypei; caizhiyuan (A) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:22 AM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hello, Shinobu, > > Yes, as what you described here, the "initialize" in "core.py"

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:22 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, Shinobu, > > Yes, as what you described here, the "initialize" in "core.py" is used for > unit/function test only. For system integration test( for example, tempest ), > it would be better to use mysql like DB, this

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

Hello, Shinobu, Yes, as what you described here, the "initialize" in "core.py" is used for unit/function test only. For system integration test( for example, tempest ), it would be better to use mysql like DB, this is done by the configuration in DB part. >From my point of view, the tricircle

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Run unit/functional tests

How to run tests in /tricircle/test/functional *... . When I try to run individual tests as python test_pod.py it shows error Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_pod.py", line 22, in from tricircle.api import app ImportError: No module named tricircle.api I even tried to run

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Run unit/functional tests

git clone tricircle. cd tricircle, where you can find tox.ini run command: sudo tox -epy27 Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice 发件人：khayam.gondal 收件人：openstack-dev, 抄送：黄朝意,luckyvega.g, 时间：2016-03-17 18:13:08 主题:[Tricircle] Run unit/functional tests How to run tests in /tricircle/test/functional *... .

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Mar. 16

Hi, IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. Agenda: # Progress review of To-do list: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo # Mitaka release preparation Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

he m-l >> is mainly for development topics. Let's move it to non-maillist discussion. >> >> Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice >> *发件人：*shinobu.kj >> *收件人：*openstack-dev, >> *抄送：*openst...@lists.openstack.org, >> *时间：*2016-03-08 19:21:15 >> *主题:*Re: [o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

*发件人：*shinobu.kj > *收件人：*openstack-dev, > *抄送：*openst...@lists.openstack.org, > *时间：*2016-03-08 19:21:15 > *主题:*Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo ) > > If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me > know. > IMHO I could -;

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Interesting, maybe we can co-present on Tricircle in Linux con. For the m-l is mainly for development topics. Let's move it to non-maillist discussion. Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice 发件人：shinobu.kj 收件人：openstack-dev, 抄送：openst...@lists.openstack.org, 时间：2016-03-08 19:21:15 主题:Re: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice 发件人：shinobu.kj 收件人：openstack-dev, 抄送：openst...@lists.openstack.org, 时间：2016-03-08 19:21:15 主题:Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo ) If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me know. IMHO I could -; Cheers, S

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Thanks Khayam for the info Shinobu do you have any initial thoughts on what you would like to present ? :) On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me > know. > IMHO I could -; > > Cheers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me know. IMHO I could -; Cheers, S On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Khayam Gondal wrote: > July 13,2015 to July 15,2015 in Tokyo Japan. > http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan > > Let

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

July 13,2015 to July 15,2015 in Tokyo Japan. http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan Let me know if anyone is interested. Especially from Tricircle community. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > When? > > Cheers, > S > > On Tue, Mar 8,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

When? Cheers, S On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Khayam Gondal wrote: > Does anybody from community is attending the tokyo event. Its from Jul 13-15 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Does anybody from community is attending the tokyo event. Its from Jul 13-15 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Mar. 2

What I would like to discuss has been included :), the Reliable async, job. BR Zhiyuan On 1 March 2016 at 17:19, joehuang wrote: > Hi, > > > > If you have any topic to discuss, please reply in the M-L. > > > > IRC meeting:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >