The only thing I'd argue with here is the log level, Robert. Logstash on
the gate doesn't index trace/debug, so info or above would be far more
helpful, so that we can have a logstash query for the issue
On 25 February 2015 at 01:20, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 23
On 23 February 2015 at 13:54, Michael Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but the register_after_fork seems to apply only to
the higher level Process abstraction. If someone calls os.fork(), as is
the case now, there's no hook to use.
Hence the solution I have in place
On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 6:27:16 AM Michael Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Some comments/questions inline...
Mike Bayer wrote:
Yuriy Taradayyorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:14:30 PM Joshua
On Feb 22, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 6:27:16 AM Michael Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Some comments/questions inline...
Mike Bayer wrote:
On Feb 21, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Some comments/questions inline...
Mike Bayer wrote:
Yuriy Taradayyorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:14:30 PM Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
This feels like something we could do in
Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:14:30 PM Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
This feels like something we could do in the service manager base class,
maybe by adding a post fork hook or something.
+1 to that.
I think it'd be nice to have the
Some comments/questions inline...
Mike Bayer wrote:
Yuriy Taradayyorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:14:30 PM Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com wrote:
This feels like something we could do in the service manager base class,
maybe by adding a post fork hook or something.
+1
On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:14:30 PM Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
This feels like something we could do in the service manager base class,
maybe by adding a post fork hook or something.
+1 to that.
I think it'd be nice to have the service __init__() maybe be something
like:
Hi,
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 to fix Oslo's service module any ways, irrespective of this bug.
By the way, the Service class is a blocker point for the implementation of
asyncio and threads specs:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153298/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156711/
We may
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 09:45 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
5) Allow this sort of connection sharing to continue for a deprecation
period with apppropriate logging, then make it a hard failure.
This would provide services time to find and fix
+1 to fix Oslo's service module any ways, irrespective of this bug.
+1 to The db library shouldn't be concerned with whether or not it's
in a forked process -- that's not its job
-- dims
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at
Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
And I don't think we want the database library doing anything with this
case at all. Recovery code is tricky, and often prevents valid use cases
(perhaps the parent *meant* for the child to reuse the open connection
and isn't going to continue
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 09:45 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
Doug Hellmannd...@doughellmann.com wrote:
5) Allow this sort of connection sharing to continue for a deprecation
period with apppropriate logging, then make it a hard failure.
This would provide services time to
Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Mike Bayer wrote:
Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
And I don't think we want the database library doing anything with this
case at all. Recovery code is tricky, and often prevents valid use cases
I started https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-py-replacements with
some ideas/thoughts/notes; feel free to add any on u want (or adjust it
accordingly with better ideas).
-Josh
Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 to fix Oslo's service module any ways, irrespective of
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 01:09 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Hi,
Mike Bayer recently tracked down an issue with database errors in Cinder
to a single database connection being shared over multiple processes.
This is not something that should happen, and it turns out to cause
intermittent failures
Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 01:09 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Hi,
Mike Bayer recently tracked down an issue with database errors in Cinder
to a single database connection being shared over multiple processes.
This is not something
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 01:09 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Hi,
Mike Bayer recently tracked down an issue with database errors in Cinder
to a single database connection being shared over multiple processes.
This is not something that should happen, and it turns out to cause
Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
5) Allow this sort of connection sharing to continue for a deprecation
period with apppropriate logging, then make it a hard failure.
This would provide services time to find and fix any sharing problems
they might have, but would delay the
19 matches
Mail list logo
