Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc discussion?

2014-02-09 Thread Wangyang (Alex)
Hi everyone, Is there anyone can kindly tell me how to join your conference? ^^ -邮件原件- 发件人: balaj...@freescale.com [mailto:balaj...@freescale.com] 发送时间: 2014年2月10日 15:11 收件人: Isaku Yamahata; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

2014-02-09 Thread Bartosz Górski
+1 On 02/09/2014 11:38 PM, Steve Baker wrote: I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a sound hazing to get multi-engine into heat. http://russe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc discussion?

2014-02-09 Thread balaj...@freescale.com
Hi Isaku Yamahata, We are at UTC+5.30.[IST] Regards, Balaji.P > -Original Message- > From: i y [mailto:yamahat...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Isaku Yamahata > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:36 PM > To: P Balaji-B37839; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions) > Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc discussion?

2014-02-09 Thread Isaku Yamahata
What's your timezone? 18.00UTC doesn't work for me because my timezone is UTC+9 and it's 3:00AM. thanks, On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:43:05AM +, "balaj...@freescale.com" wrote: > Hi Isaku Yamahata, > > Is it possible to move the below time slot a little earlier like 18.00UTC? > > Regards, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc discussion?

2014-02-09 Thread balaj...@freescale.com
Hi Isaku Yamahata, Is it possible to move the below time slot a little earlier like 18.00UTC? Regards, Balaji.P > -Original Message- > From: i y [mailto:yamahat...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Isaku Yamahata > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >

Re: [openstack-dev] How to write a new neutron L2 plugin using ML2 framework?

2014-02-09 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 03:49:46AM +, "Yang, Yi Y" wrote: > Hi, All Hi. > I want to write a new neutron L2 plugin using ML2 framework, I noticed > openvswitch and linxubridge have been ported into ML2 framework, but it seems > many code is removed compared to standalone L2 plugin, I gues

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc discussion?

2014-02-09 Thread Isaku Yamahata
As the first patch for service vm framework is ready for review[1][2], it would be a good idea to have IRC meeting. Anyone interested in it? How about schedule? Schedule candidate Monday 22:00UTC-, 23:00UTC- Tuesday 22:00UTC-, 23:00UTC- (Although the slot of servanced service vm[3] can be resuled

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova]improvement-of-accessing-to-glance

2014-02-09 Thread Eiichi Aikawa
Hi, all, Thanks for your comment. Please let me re-explain. The main purpose of our blueprint is to use network resources more efficiently. To complete this purpose, we suggested the method of using 2 lists. We think, as I wrote before, by listing near glance API servers and using them, the tot

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 services?

2014-02-09 Thread Isaku Yamahata
I'm interested in it. My timezone is JST(UTC+9). thanks, On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 05:19:35PM -0500, Paul Michali wrote: > I'd like to see if there is interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 > services. The goal is to strive for consistency across vendor plugins/drivers > and across servic

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using Python-Neutronclient from Python - docstrings needed?

2014-02-09 Thread Rajdeep Dua
Yes, We would be interested in doing that. Please let me know which is the right group/ team for this? On Monday, February 10, 2014 10:34 AM, "Collins, Sean" wrote: Do you have plans to submit these back upstream? It would be a great first start, perhaps we could add these as examples und

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using Python-Neutronclient from Python - docstrings needed?

2014-02-09 Thread Collins, Sean
Do you have plans to submit these back upstream? It would be a great first start, perhaps we could add these as examples underneath the JSON request/reponse in http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-networking.html Sean M. Collins From: Rajdeep Dua [dua_rajd...@yahoo.c

[openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting 2/11 - Cancel this week

2014-02-09 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Let's cancel the meeting this week, some of us (me for sure) will be tied up at the Icehouse mid-cycle meetup. -- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstac

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Policy Issue

2014-02-09 Thread ZhiQiang Fan
Hi, I noticed that the Ceilometer project has no strict policy control, the /etc/ceilometer/policy.json only has one single rule 'context_is_admin', and for each specific resource operation, it will invoke acl.get_limit_to and v2._verify_query_segregation to forbid non-admin role operate other ten

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread Anita Kuno
On 02/06/2014 09:52 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > Howdy! > > My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to > support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly > for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with > Icehouse. In particular, our at

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Possible Hyper-V false CI failures

2014-02-09 Thread Alessandro Pilotti
Hi guys, On 10 Feb 2014, at 03:59 , Jay Pipes wrote: > On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 18:17 -0700, Christopher Yeoh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I think the hyper-v CI system is sometimes failing with this message >> incorrectly: >> >> "This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Possible Hyper-V false CI failures

2014-02-09 Thread Jay Pipes
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 18:17 -0700, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > Hi, > > > I think the hyper-v CI system is sometimes failing with this message > incorrectly: > > "This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current > state of the repository. Please rebase your change and upload a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Support for multiple provider networks with same VLAN segmentation id

2014-02-09 Thread Robert Kukura
On 02/09/2014 12:56 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Vinay Bannai wrote: > >> Hello Folks, >> >> We are running into a situation where we are not able to create multiple >> provider networks with the same VLAN id. We would like to propose a solution >> to remove this restr

[openstack-dev] Call for Testing: PetiteCloud's support for linux as a Cloud Foundation Layer

2014-02-09 Thread Aryeh Friedman
PetiteCloud is a Free Open Source and Open Knowledge Cloud Foundation Layer Tool that is designed to make OpenStack more stable and robust. See http://www.petitecloud.org for more details. We have recently added support for Linux (Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS) as a host, we have had a FreeBSD production m

[openstack-dev] [nova] Possible Hyper-V false CI failures

2014-02-09 Thread Christopher Yeoh
Hi, I think the hyper-v CI system is sometimes failing with this message incorrectly: "This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of the repository. Please rebase your change and upload a new patchset." I only mention it because its the second time I've seen it.

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

2014-02-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
+1 From: Steve Baker [sba...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:38 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. His reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread Michael Still
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:10 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: > Kyle Mestery wrote: > >>So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the >>OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party >>vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of any fu

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Feb 9, 2014, at 4:10 PM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: > Kyle Mestery wrote: > >> So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the >> OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party >> vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of any

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

2014-02-09 Thread Clint Byrum
Curse you Randall for taking first post! +1 Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2014-02-09 14:47:39 -0800: > Very +1 > > Original message > From: Steve Baker > Date:02/09/2014 4:41 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nom

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

2014-02-09 Thread Randall Burt
Very +1 Original message From: Steve Baker Date:02/09/2014 4:41 PM (GMT-06:00) To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. His reviews are valuable and prolif

[openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

2014-02-09 Thread Steve Baker
I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a sound hazing to get multi-engine into heat. http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-60.tx

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Kyle Mestery wrote: >So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the >OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party >vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of any functional >testing would open an entirely new can of worms h

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] User Signup

2014-02-09 Thread Soren Hansen
I've just taken a look at the feedback in the whiteboard. If it's ok, I'd like to take this discussion back to the mailing list. I find the whiteboards somewhat clumsy for discussions. Akihiro Motoki points out that all services should work without the dashboard. Keystone already exposes an API to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] Removing simple_tenant_usage and os-instance_usage_audit_log from V3 API

2014-02-09 Thread Russell Bryant
On 02/09/2014 01:39 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joe Gordon > wrote: > > Hi All, > > I would like to propose removing the simple_tenant_usage and > os-instance_usage_audit_log extensions from the nova V3 API (while >

Re: [openstack-dev] question about storage policies for Swift

2014-02-09 Thread Luse, Paul E
Hi Gil, Thanks for the question. I'll start with a quick status update and encourage anyone interested to participate in the activates listed below as well. IRC is a great place to bring up questions/discussion topics as well: -We're currently tracking outstanding activates on a Trel

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] Removing simple_tenant_usage and os-instance_usage_audit_log from V3 API

2014-02-09 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to propose removing the simple_tenant_usage and > os-instance_usage_audit_log extensions from the nova V3 API (while > keeping them in V2). Both of these are pre ceilometer extensions to > generate rudimentary usage info

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Support for multiple provider networks with same VLAN segmentation id

2014-02-09 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Vinay Bannai wrote: > Hello Folks, > > We are running into a situation where we are not able to create multiple > provider networks with the same VLAN id. We would like to propose a solution > to remove this restriction through a configuration option. This approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Feb 6, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > Howdy! > > My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to > support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly > for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with > Icehouse. In particular,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 services?

2014-02-09 Thread Alan Kavanagh
Hi Paul Yes I would be interested in this as I believe its an area we have not got around to so far in Neutron. /Alan From: Paul Michali [mailto:p...@cisco.com] Sent: February-03-14 5:20 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Inter

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Can heat automatically create a flavor as part of stack creation?

2014-02-09 Thread Alex Glikson
Heat template orchestrates user actions, while management of flavors is typically admin's job (due to their tight link to the physical hardware configuration, unknown to a regular user). Regards, Alex From: "ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe)" To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" , Date: 09

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Gate broken

2014-02-09 Thread Gary Kotton
Thanks for fixing this. From: Qiu Yu mailto:unic...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Saturday, February 8, 2014 9:44 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:o

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Can heat automatically create a flavor as part of stack creation?

2014-02-09 Thread Robert Collins
In principle yes. You need: - to write a module to orchestrate the nova flavor API. - to configure your policy rules in the cloud in question to let the heat engine user create flavors -Rob On 9 February 2014 20:49, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) wrote: > Hello, > > > > I am wondering if instead of be