So, I have this review [1] which attempts to add support for OpenDaylight
to devstack. What this currently does, in Patch 7, is that it uses the
extras functionality of devstack to program the OVS on the host so that
OpenDaylight can control it. On teardown, it does the reverse. Simple and
So if we make backwards incompatible changes we really need a major
version bump. Minor versions don't cut it, because the expectation is
you have API stability within a major version.
I disagree. If the client declares support for it, I think we can very
reasonably return new stuff.
If we
Hi ,
We are using packstack based openstack installation. I am working on
providing HA support for Openstack services and dependent 3rd part services
like mysql etc . I will be using DRBD and pacemaker based HA functionality.
Is there any support for installing DRBD based installation using
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:29:02 -0800
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
So I was thinking about this and Ken'ichi has basically said pretty
much the same thing in his reply to this thread. I don't think it
makes client moves any easier though - this is all about lowering
our maintenance
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Could you please explain in more details what causes pain in adding
additional requirement to clients (in most cases when client is used inside
other openstack projects it's there already)?
My IMHO is
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:04:38 -0600
Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote:
This thread is many messages deep now and I’m busy with a conference
this week, but I wanted to carry over my opinion from the other “v3
API in Icehouse” thread and add a little to it.
Bumping versions is
Again, just another quick response, but if we can find a way to merge v2 into
the current v3 code, so that we don't have dual maintenance, that would be
really nice.
On Feb 26, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:04:38 -0600
Chris Behrens
Hi, Sean and the team:
Do we have a list of code reviews and a list of BPs submitted by Neutron IPv6
sub-team targeting at Icehouse 3? Would appreciate everybody’s help to compose
a list so we won’t overlook anything, especially the deadline is next Friday.
Thanks!
Shixiong
Shixiong Shang
As a learning exercise, I was trying to extract the intend behind the DSL and
current code. Giving that many things are still moving, I filled up the blanks
with imagination. Here is my understanding on where you are going:
GCB, Ben,
Thanks for volunteering to help.
GCB, reminded me that we should be doing this for python-novaclient in
addition to nova itself. So that being said, as I see it here are the
steps moving forward:
Note: as previously mentionedin this thread there already is a team
working on syncing
thanks, Vincent
I already noticed that the critical bug is caused by a wrong backport, just
in the
0001-enable-sql-metadata-query.patchhttps://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/Cloud:OpenStack:Havana/openstack-ceilometer/0001-enable-sql-metadata-query.patch?expand=1line
124, session.flush()
Hi Eugene,
1) In order to allow real multiple 'vips' per pool feature, we need the
listener concept.
It's not just a different tcp port, but also a protocol, so session persistence
and all ssl-related parameters should move to listener.
Why do we need a new 'listener' concept? Since as Sam
I wanted to take a moment first to thank all the reviewers who have been
getting up early // staying late to join in these review sessions -- I
believe they've been tremendously helpful in unblocking a lot of work over
the last two weeks. Thanks!!
I also want to remind folks that we have another
I don’t think that duplicating the information in Climate is a really good
idea. Why don’t let Keystone manage the tenant dates information? Moreover, we
can also add that to Horizon.
Then, during Lease creations, Climate should query Keystone to get the tenant
dates.
What do you think?
From:
Yes, PCI devices like GPU or HBA are common resources, admin/user do not need
to specify which device to which VM. So current PCI passthrough function can
meet user scenarios.
But USB devices have different user scenarios. Take USB key or USB disk as
example, admin/user may need the content in
Hi,
I want to add the domain of my email address onto the
stackalytics default_data.json file.
I have made the necessary additions, and created patch-1.
Can someone with the credentials approve and merge?
(my ID is fukuday)
Thanks in advance,
Yuko
Hi Fukuda san,
You will probably receive an automated message like this soon, but:
stackforge/stackalytics uses Gerrit for code review, and does not accept
pull requests on github.
To commit your change, you will need to follow the instructions on the
OpenStack Gerrit Workflow:
Hi,
I'm Masaru Nomura, an MSc student studying computing. My main interests are
OS, VM and programming languages. I'm quite interested in working on an
Oslo project (Implement a re-usable shared library for vmware).
I've finished reading guide.md (thanks Cabrera, it's helpful to fill in
gaps
Hi Tim,
I'm not sure if we can put resource monitor and adjust to solver-scheduler
(Gantt), but I have proposed this to Gantt design [1], you can refer to [1]
and search jay-lau-513.
IMHO, Congress does monitoring and also take actions, but the actions seems
mainly for adjusting single VM
Tom,
Thanks for the link tips,
I'll try with these instructions.
Best regards,
Yuko
-Original Message-
From: Tom Fifield [mailto:t...@openstack.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:16 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stackalytics] Pull
On 2014年02月26日 18:40, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
So the problem here is what we consider a bug becomes a feature from
a user of the API point of view. Eg they really shouldn't be passing
some data in a request, but its ignored
On 25/02/14 00:08, Robert Collins wrote:
Today we had an outage of the tripleo test cloud :(.
tl;dr:
- we were down for 14 hours
- we don't know the fundamental cause
- infra were not inconvenienced - yaaay
- its all ok now.
Looks like we've hit the same problem again tonight, I've
o
Hi Masaru,
Please get in touch with Arnaud (cc'ed). He has graciously stepped up as a
mentor. You can also talk to people on #openstack-vmware and
#openstack-Oslo IRC channels. Take a look at the code so far as well -
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.vmware
Thanks,
Dims
On Feb 26, 2014 9:26
On 2/25/2014 7:46 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/12/2014 1:57 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 1/17/2014 8:34 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:32:19AM -0500, David Kranz wrote:
On 01/16/2014 10:56 PM,
-Original Message-
From: Alex Xu [mailto:x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of the Nova API
On 2014年02月26日 18:40, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014 7:37 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 2/25/2014 7:46 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/12/2014 1:57 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 1/17/2014 8:34 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Fri,
Hi all,
The [state-management] project team holds a weekly meeting in
#openstack-meeting on thursdays, 2000 UTC. The next meeting is tommorow,
2014-02-27!!!
As usual, everyone is welcome :-)
Link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StateManagement
Taskflow:
On 02/26/2014 08:25 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 11:47 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple
LDAP, mix of
Hi all,
I found my ovs-agent has missed some tunnels on br-tun. I have l2-pop
enabled, if some fdb entries is added while the agent is down, can it be
added back once the agent is back ?
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi,
As best I can tell, all other services now use this syntax for
configuring database connections:
[database]
connection = sqlite:///etc,omg
whereas glance appears to still use
[DEFAULT]
...
sql_connection = sqlite:///etc,omg
Is there a plan to switch to the former during Icehouse
Only problem here is that we'll remove admin climate user in the future and
will use only trusts, so how you'll get needed info?
I think we may keep info unduplicated only in one case: use trust from
admin user who marked tenant as reservable to get needed info later.
In this case storing needed
Hi Jay, Tim, Sylvain,
It is an important topic of run time monitoring and policies for management of
compute/storage resources. I agree this is the kind of solution that we should
learn from Vmware DRS.
Regarding how the Solver Scheduler fits in, we initiated this effort to address
complex
Hi team,
When I tell peopleI about Mistral I always have a hard time explaining why we
use term “event” for declaring ways to start workflows. For example, take a
look at the following snippet:
Workflow:
...
events:
execute_backup:
type: periodic
tasks:
On 02/26/2014 04:50 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
So if we make backwards incompatible changes we really need a major
version bump. Minor versions don't cut it, because the expectation is
you have API stability within a major version.
I disagree. If the client declares support for it, I think we can
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 03:38:25 +
Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote:
v3: This is the total new api. it's with CamelCase fixing, stronger
input vaildation, api policy checks, and task api.
v2.1: This is based on v3, we transform the v2 request into v3
request(then they
Howdy! I’m a Product Manager for Cloud Servers at Rackspace, and wanted to add
a bit to what Behrens is saying.
At Rackspace, we’ve experienced something like this (if you squint and look at
it sideways) in the operation of our non-OpenStack cloud (“first gen Cloud
Servers”) alongside our
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:50:46 -0800
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
I disagree. If the client declares support for it, I think we can very
reasonably return new stuff.
If we take what we have today in v2 and call that 2, then we could
make novaclient send this header:
Accept:
On 26 Feb 2014, at 22:54, Dmitri Zimine d...@stackstorm.com wrote:
Based on the terminology from [1], it's not part of the model, but the
language that describes the model in the file.
Sorry, I’m having a hard time trying to understand this phrase :) What do you
mean by “model” here? And
As the follow up action of IPv6 sub-team meeting [1], I created a new
blueprint [2] to store both IPv6 LLA and GUA address on router interface
port.
Here is what it's about:
Based on the two modes (ipv6-ra-mode and ipv6-address-mode) design[3], RA
can be sent from both openstack controlled
Hi everyone,
Over in Ironic Land we're looking at removing XML support from ironic-api
(i.e. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1271317)
I've been looking, but I can't seem to find an easy way to modify the
accepted content_types.
Are there any wsgi / WSME / Pecan experts out there who can
Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote on 02/26/2014 03:28:04 PM:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Thanks for the further updates. I have just one question about
those. One way to do both unit testing and system (integration)
testing is to: git
Hi Gary,
I notice a new blueprint is opened last night by somebody, which is very
similar with my question.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/driver-specific-snapshot
Could you please have a quick look and share your position for this
blueprint? Thanks!
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:20 PM,
According to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1270726
We might have several API node and lot of compute nodes in a cloud,
for example, nova configuration assume instance_name_template should be
same in all nodes; otherwise there is
a potential issue as the bug indicated. I analyzed and I
Hi Youcef,
The point is to be able to share IP address, it really means that two
VIPs(as we understand them in current model) need to reside within same
backend (technically they need to share neutron port).
We decided not to expose any 'colocation hint' (like loadbalancer_id) in
the API, so we
I am out of the office until 04/03/2014.
I am out of office. If required, please contact my manager Dalit Naor
(da...@il.ibm.com).
Note: This is an automated response to your message [openstack-dev]
[Trove] datastore version-specific disk-image-builder element sent on
27/02/2014
On 26 Feb 2014, at 16:30, Dmitri Zimine d...@stackstorm.com wrote:
My understanding, correct me if I'm missing the intention:
Action are defined as code, aka REST_API or SEND_EMAIL.
These are base actions, they are analogous to function definitions.
Tasks is a set of parameters for
Michael Davies mich...@the-davies.net writes:
Hi everyone,
Over in Ironic Land we're looking at removing XML support from ironic-api
(i.e. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1271317)
I've been looking, but I can't seem to find an easy way to modify the
accepted content_types.
Are
Looking into it now.
On 27 Feb 2014 15:56, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote:
On 25/02/14 00:08, Robert Collins wrote:
Today we had an outage of the tripleo test cloud :(.
tl;dr:
- we were down for 14 hours
- we don't know the fundamental cause
- infra were not inconvenienced
Hi all,
I posted review for cinder backup bugs.
It raises inproper exceptions like 'list() got an unexpected keyword
argument 'search_opts''
when we try to show backup which doesn't exist.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74880/
Moreever, I plan to add filter options to backup list.
Below is
On 27 Feb 2014, at 08:11, Dmitri Zimine d...@stackstorm.com wrote:
As a learning exercise, I was trying to extract the intend behind the DSL and
current code. Giving that many things are still moving, I filled up the
blanks with imagination. Here is my understanding on where you are going:
On 27 February 2014 15:55, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote:
On 25/02/14 00:08, Robert Collins wrote:
Today we had an outage of the tripleo test cloud :(.
tl;dr:
- we were down for 14 hours
- we don't know the fundamental cause
- infra were not inconvenienced - yaaay
- its all ok
On 27 February 2014 20:35, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
'
Checking new instance connectivity next.
DHCP is functional and no cloud-init errors, so we should be fully up.
-Rob
Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud
101 - 152 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
