Hello all,
I am wondering how to get the auth token from a user request passed down
to the context so it can potentially be used by the plugin or driver?
Thank you
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
+1
From: Arnaud Legendre alegen...@vmware.commailto:alegen...@vmware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, July 18, 2014 at 12:52 AM
To: OpenStack List
Agreed.
And we should keep records for each release.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
As we approach Juno-3, a number of specs have been correctly marked as
abandoned since they are not expected to be ready in time for the release.
Is there a mechanism to
Hello Robert,
In the etherpad, I mention that any of the plugin calls (including the
initiate_order() one) could result in the certificate being generated.
As for handling the certificate order synchronously vs asynchronously however,
we are striving to minimize the amount of 3rd party
Is there any documentation about these RPC messages? Or de we need to use
examples as guide?
Once again, thank you Paul.
http://dana.i2cat.net http://www.i2cat.net/en
Julio C. Barrera Juez [image: View my profile on LinkedIn]
http://es.linkedin.com/in/jcbarrera/en
Office phone: (+34) 93 357
All issues should be resolved, and CI is passing. Please start testing.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Andrew, we have extended system tests passing with our current pacemaker
corosync code. Either it is your environment or some bug we cannot
Hi folks,
I'd like to implement port-forwarding for router in l3-agent node, and
meanwhile I noticed the related blueprint[1] has been there for long.
Unfortunately, the code review[2] has been abandoned. Is there any latest news
about this blueprint? AFAIK, this functionality is very
Thanks Thomas,
By cinder spec. you mean a cinder blueprint ?
Where I can submit such a proposition ?
Thanks,
On 07/17/2014 05:20 PM, openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org wrote:
You're far from the only person trying to achieve that result, there's
plenty of interest in it, and a few
Hello, Phillip.
Currently, Neutron did not pass the token to the context. But Nova/Cinder did
that. It's easy to do that, just 'copy' from Nova/Cinder.
1. How Nova/Cinder did that
class NovaKeystoneContext(wsgi.Middleware)
///or CinderKeystoneContext for cinder
auth_token =
Hey all,
I want to bridge my private VM network with an external network which I
have created, I was thinking of manually creating a veth pair with one peer
interface inside the dhcp namespace of the VM network and the other in the
root namespace and then create a tunnel to my external gateway.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:13:13PM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/17/2014 02:31 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
It kind of helps. It's still implicit in that you need to look at what
features are enabled at what version and
Hi, ma li,
And, do you target a flexible port-forwarding (like [1], which does
mirroring) or something like DNAT (as in the [2])?
If the latter, suggest you contact the bp owner to see if can work together.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/6
[2]
I'd like to let folks know that I've just had a very productive meeting
with Deutsche Telekom at the QA/Infra meetup in Germany.
As a consumer of OpenStack compliant third-party products, they
recognize the need to become more involved in understanding the current
third-party process as well as
I don't know what you mean by side effects, if the fact that it (lvmdriver-2)
doesn't work is not a problem for you. You will also continue to get entries in
the log informing you the driver is uninitialised.
The volume group needs to be on the same host as the cinder-volume service - so
it
Hi team,
I would like to put your attention on https://review.openstack.org/89893
This spec targets to isolate access within the filters to only Scheduler
bits. This one is a prerequisite for a possible split of the scheduler
into a separate project named Gantt, as it's necessary to remove direct
Hi julio
There are not many documents currently. The only one on neutron I can
find is http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/devref/index.html.
From what you described, I suggest you have a look of the neutron.
services.vpn code as an example.
And from my experience, those
Hi,
I¹m working on the following use-case:
I have a stack template containing a custom resource - my_res - that upon
handle_create invokes creation of another set of resources [r1, r2, r3,
...] (not expressed in the template). These newly created resources are
not associated with the stack. The
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:02:33AM +, Dimitri Mazmanov wrote:
Hi,
I¹m working on the following use-case:
I have a stack template containing a custom resource - my_res - that upon
handle_create invokes creation of another set of resources [r1, r2, r3,
...] (not expressed in the template).
On 18/07/14 11:20, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:02:33AM +, Dimitri Mazmanov wrote:
Hi,
I¹m working on the following use-case:
I have a stack template containing a custom resource - my_res - that
upon
handle_create invokes creation of another set of
The good news is that the head of the queue was merged last night, so
it's now only 15 deep :) Even better, the next 3 patches all have +2s
already, so fingers cross they'll go in some time soon.
The rest mostly have +1s, but a couple are currently sitting naked.
Having +1s bumps them up the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 14/07/14 17:03, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
On 14/07/14 15:54, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/07/14 19:20, Clark Boylan
wrote:
Before we get too far ahead of ourselves
I'd like to using iptables for port-forwarding, because it is simple and
straightforward.
I didn't notice the Tap-as-a-Service before, and it seems interesting.
Thanks,
Li Ma
- Original Message -
From: Baohua Yang yangbao...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
Hi List,
I just proposed a new bp @
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/cert-based-access-type
Looking for your feedback/comments.
thanx,
deepak
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi Nova Cores,
I would like to ask for spec approval deadline exception for:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95805/2
This feature allows using DPDK enabled Open vSwitch with Openstack.
This is an important feature for NFV workloads that require high performance
network I/O.
If the spec is
On 7/17/2014 5:48 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 18/07/14 00:44, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
mailto:sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/07/14 09:25, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley
Hello All,
My name is Mika Ayenson and I have to privilege to intern at Johns Hopkins -
Applied Physics Lab. I'm really excited to release the latest proof of concept
Re-Heat Re-Heat is a JHUAPL developed tool for OpenStack users to help them
quickly rebuild their OpenStack environments via
Hi Nova Cores,
I would like to ask for spec approval deadline exception for:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99615/
This feature allows using ScaleIO protocol volumes created using cinder in nova.
This is required for supporting the EMC ECS platform.
The spec was submitted in June, and has
Hello everybody,
I would like to request a spec proposal extension for instance tasks,
described in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86938/ . This has been a
long discussed and awaited feature with a lot of support from the community.
This feature has been intertwined with the fate of the
Hello All,
My name is Mika Ayenson and I have to privilege to intern at Johns Hopkins -
Applied Physics Lab. I’m really excited to release the latest proof of
concept “Re-Heat” Re-Heat is a JHUAPL developed tool for OpenStack users to
help them quickly rebuild their OpenStack
Hi,
I would like to propose this spec for an exception:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95328/
The original idea was to add FreeBSD support for the network driver
(linux_net) so it was possible to run Nova on FreeBSD with libvirt/qemu
driver.
The preparation for that would require linux_net
On 7/17/2014 9:01 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
Elastic recheck is a great tool. It leaves me messages like this:
===
I noticed jenkins failed, I think you hit bug(s):
check-devstack-dsvm-cells: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1334550
gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:06:45AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 7/17/2014 9:01 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
Elastic recheck is a great tool. It leaves me messages like this:
===
I noticed jenkins failed, I think you hit bug(s):
check-devstack-dsvm-cells:
Dolph,
Donagh McCabe wrote:
I'm toying with the idea that Swift would know what projects were needed to
use an X-Service-Token.
I decided to write that up in the spec. For anyone interested, see
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105228/
I think domain-level role assignments that are
Hi Zang,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Zang MingJie zealot0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all:
While resolving ovs restart rebuild br-tun flows[1], we have found
several l2pop problems:
1. L2pop is depending on agent_boot_time to decide whether send all
port information or not, but the
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:12 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
yamam...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
if you are wondering why ofagent CI (Neutron Ryu) reported a failure
(non-voting) for your review recently, you can probably safely ignore it.
sorry for inconvenience.
the CI has been fixed recently.
Why is this blueprint dropped?
We really like it to be in the code base.
It has been submitted to Icehouse and has been ready for review for more than 2
months.
The code is ready for review and we have been using it for a while internally.
Thanks,
Arkady
Arkady Kanevsky, Ph.D.
Director of SW
Hi,
Images that can be used for package deployment have to be tagged in glance in
order to enable the UI to filter the list of images to present to a user (and
potentially preselect). Currently the tags are defined in the dashboard code
(images/forms.py) which makes things very inflexible; if
Hello All,
My name is Mika Ayenson and I have to privilege to intern at Johns
Hopkins - Applied Physics Lab. I’m really excited to release the
latest proof of concept “Re-Heat” Re-Heat is a JHUAPL developed tool
for OpenStack users to help them quickly rebuild their
Hi everyone,
At the last cross-project/release meeting we discussed the need to track
yet-unapproved specs in milestone release plans.
There are multiple cases where the spec is not approved yet, but the
code is almost ready, and there is a high chance that the feature will
be included in the
Hi, all
The comment in of plug_vifs in ComputeDriver indicates that this method is
responsible for plugging the vif into network,
but when working with neutron, this work has alreay been done by agents in the
compute node.
Actually, I noticed that plug_vifs in LibvirtDriver did nothing in
Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com wrote on 07/17/2014 02:06:13 AM:
There are 4 resources related to neutron load balancing.
OS::Neutron::LoadBalancer is probably the least useful and the one
you can *not* use, as it's only there for compatibility with
Excellent! Thank you for the response, I figured it was possible, just
concerned me to why everything else made it to context except for the
token.
So to be clear, you agree that it should at least be passed to context and
because its not could be deemed a bug?
Thank you
On 7/18/14 2:03 AM,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
yamam...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:12 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
yamam...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
if you are wondering why ofagent CI (Neutron Ryu) reported a failure
(non-voting) for your review recently, you can probably safely
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last cross-project/release meeting we discussed the need to track
yet-unapproved specs in milestone release plans.
There are multiple cases where the spec is not approved yet, but the
code is
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
I'd like to let folks know that I've just had a very productive meeting
with Deutsche Telekom at the QA/Infra meetup in Germany.
As a consumer of OpenStack compliant third-party products, they
recognize the need to become
Dear git-harry,
My confuse is why I can successfully create volume on both controller node and
compute node, but it still has error message in cinder-volume.log?
The below is my environment,
Controller node:
Install cinder-api, cinder-schedule, cinder-volume
Create cinder-volume-1
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-07-18 09:12:21 -0700:
Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com wrote on 07/17/2014 02:06:13 AM:
There are 4 resources related to neutron load balancing.
OS::Neutron::LoadBalancer is probably the least useful and the one
you can *not* use, as
Hi Nova cores,
I would like to request a spec proposal extension for Solver Scheduler
described here in this spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96543/.
This blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/solver-scheduler
has been discussed for a long time now since HKG summit,
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 07/18/2014 12:56:32 PM:
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-07-18 09:12:21 -0700:
...
OK, let's work with these. My current view is this: supposing the
Convergence work delivers monitoring of health according to a member's
status in
I will also sponsor this.
Vish
On Jul 17, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
As requested from the #openstack-meeting for Nova, I'm posting my
nova-spec exception proposal to the ML.
Spec:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103797/3/specs/juno/virtio-scsi-settings.rst
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-07-18 10:38:32 -0700:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 07/18/2014 12:56:32 PM:
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-07-18 09:12:21 -0700:
...
OK, let's work with these. My current view is this: supposing the
Convergence
What are you trying to use the token to do?
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Phillip Toohill
phillip.tooh...@rackspace.com wrote:
Excellent! Thank you for the response, I figured it was possible, just
concerned me to why everything else made it to context except for the
token.
So to be
With OVS, plug_vifs is responsible for attaching the VM interface to the
integration bridge. The neutron agent is then responsible for setting up
the flows to direct traffic to the appropriate network.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Peng Gu gp_st...@163.com wrote:
Hi, all
The comment in of
- Original Message -
From: Arkady Kanevsky arkady_kanev...@dell.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Why is this blueprint dropped?
We really like it to be in the code base.
It has been submitted to Icehouse and has been ready for review for more than
2 months.
The code is
Greetings all stackers,
I propose that we add Daniel Krause[1] to the taskflow-core team[2].
Daniel has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in
helping prove taskflow out (by being a user as well) and helping with the
review load. He has provided quality reviews and is
It was for more of a potential use to query another service. Don't think well
go this route though, but was curious why it was one of the only values not
populated even though there's a field for it.
From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.commailto:blak...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development
I suspect it was just excluded since it is authenticating information and
there wasn't a good use case to pass it around everywhere in the context
where it might be leaked into logs or other network requests unexpectedly.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Phillip Toohill
While the long term fix is a bump up in the requirements, a workaround
suggested for the 3rd party CI systems is to force an upgrade of alembic
before running devstack. This will allow the setup to work so that patch
isn't a high priority.
--
Kevin Benton
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Kyle
On Jul 18, 2014 8:40 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last cross-project/release meeting we discussed the need to track
yet-unapproved specs in milestone release plans.
There are multiple cases where the spec is not approved yet, but the
code is almost
On Jul 18, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Greetings all stackers,
I propose that we add Daniel Krause[1] to the taskflow-core team[2].
Daniel has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in
helping prove taskflow out (by being a user as
From: pranesh.b...@hotmail.com
To: openstack-...@openstack.org
Subject: [Oslo][TaskFlow] Proposal for new core reviewer(daniel krause)
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 02:19:55 +0530
+1
Pranesh
On 07/18/2014 11:38 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last cross-project/release meeting we discussed the need to track
yet-unapproved specs in milestone release plans.
There are multiple cases where the spec is not approved yet, but the
code is almost ready, and there is a
Hey Kyle (and anyone else that may know the answers to my questions),
There are several blueprints that don't have Juno milestones attached to them
and was wondering if we could assign them so the broader community is aware of
the work the LBaaS folks are working on. These are the blueprints
Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose the following driver feature parity blueprint spec for an
expection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105042
This blueprint introduces rescue instance support in the Nova Hyper-V
driver for feature parity with other drivers.
The Hyper-V Nova driver is
Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose the following driver blueprint spec for an expection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102190
Currently, the Hyper-V driver only allows attaching volumes via iSCSI.
The purpose of this blueprint is to add support for attaching volumes
hosted on a SMB share.
The
Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose the following Hyper-V driver feature parity blueprint spec
for an expection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104630
The Nova Hyper-V driver is currently not implementing host power actions as
specified
in the driver interface.
The actions that can be
Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose the following Nova blueprint spec for an expection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105034
Nova keypairs are mostly used by Linux guests to handle user authentication via
SSH public key authentication without incurring in the management and security
overhead
I'm requestion a spec freeze exception for online schema changes.
https://review.openstack.org/102545
This work is being done to try to minimize the downtime as part of
upgrades. Database migrations have historically been a source of long
periods of downtime. The spec is an attempt to start
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Jorge Miramontes
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey Kyle (and anyone else that may know the answers to my questions),
There are several blueprints that don't have Juno milestones attached to
them and was wondering if we could assign them so the broader
Did someone test the concurrency of nova's resize? i found it has poor
concurrency, i do not know why. I found most the failed request is rpc timeout.
I write the resize test for nova is boot-resize-confirm-delete.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
These implement the Haproxy driver without an agent. It's a WIP right now
until tests are complete and a few more issues are resolved, but its functional
for the most part.
We split it up into two reviews:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108173/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108174/
If
71 matches
Mail list logo
