Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal new hacking rules

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:30:59AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui < > sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:00:11PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui < > > > s

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal new hacking rules

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 05:23:28PM -0500, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 04:15:07PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 11/21/2014 01:52 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:15:49PM +0100, jordan pittier wrote: > > >> Hey, > > >> I am not a Nova developer but

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal new hacking rules

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:52:50PM -0500, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:15:49PM +0100, jordan pittier wrote: > > Hey, > > I am not a Nova developer but I still have an opinion. > > > > >Using boolean assertions > > I like what you propose. We should use and enforce the asser

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel master monitoring

Hi, monasca looks overcomplicated for the purposes we need. Also it requires Kafka which is Java based transport protocol. I am proposing Sensu. It's architecture is tiny and elegant. Also it uses rabbitmq as transport so we won't need to introduce new protocol. -- Best regards, Sergii Golovat

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Plugins improvement

Hello All, Current implementation of plugins in Fuel unpacks plugin tarball into /var/www/nailgun/plugins/. If we implement deployment part of plugin using puppet there is a setting puppet_modules: This setting should specify path to modules folder. As soon as main deployment part of plugin is imp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel master monitoring

I proposed monasca-agent in a previous mail in this thread. P. On 11/21/2014 04:48 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: How about this? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Monasca Kevin * * *From:* Dmitriy Shulyak *Sent:* Friday, November

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug day

Hi again, I'd like to share some results of the bug day we've conducted on 2014-11-21. Stats: - 73 New bugs - 795 Open bugs - 285 In-progress bugs

[openstack-dev] [tempest] How to run tempest tests

Sorry for my previous message with wrong subject Hi all, By reading the tempest documentation page [1] a user can run tempest tests by using whether testr or run_tempest.sh or tox. What is the best practice? run_tempest.sh has several options (e.g. ./run_tempest.sh -h) and it is my preferred

[openstack-dev] [tempest]

Hi all, By reading the tempest documentation page [1] a user can run tempest tests by using whether testr or run_tempest.sh or tox. What is the best practice? run_tempest.sh has several options (e.g. ./run_tempest.sh -h) and it is my preferred way, currently. Any thought? BR, Angelo [1] htt

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] scheduling a review day

On 21/11/14 14:13 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Nov 21, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 21/11/14 12:07 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: We have a bit of a backlog in the Oslo review queue. Before we add a bunch of new reviews for Kilo work, I’d like to see if we can clear some of the

<    1   2