On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>
>>> need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
>>> it is just a sign that the project needs to focus o
Hi all,
I was working on spec[1] and prototype[2] to make Cinder to be able to resume
workflows in case of server or service failure. Problem of requests lost and
resources left in unresolved states in case of failure was signaled at the
Paris Summit[3].
What I was able to prototype was to res
On 02/24/2015 01:28 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>
need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think t
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > >need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
> > >it is just a sign that the p
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> >need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
> >it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources
> >to the teams impacted in
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources
to the teams impacted in that way.
What are the mechanisms whereby the project provides more r
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Was:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html
>
> There has been frustration with our current 6 month development cadence.
> This is an attempt to explain those frustrations and propose a very rough
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I was writing this mail for the past few days, but the nova thread
today prompted me to finish it off & send it :-)
Thanks for doing this. I think you're probably right that the current
release cycle has many negative impacts on the development pr
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Here's another thought: is the big-bang integrated 6-month fixed release
> cycle useful any more? Can we talk about using more of a moving train model
> that doesn't have these long freeze cycles? At least for some of the
> projects, I th
Hi Boris,
this idea is about the JSON files for each Murano application, which can be
used in Murano functional tests or in Rally tests with Rally jobs for each
commit to Murano engine and Murano applications repositories.
I like the idea to configure Rally jobs for Murano repositories and then
a
On 24/02/15 08:57 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 24/02/15 04:38 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose the following members to become part of the Glance core
team:
Ian Cordasco
Louis Taylor
Mike Fedosin
Hemanth Makkapati
Please, yes!
Actually - I hope this doesn't c
Agreed. It causes two problems:
1) 9 month delays in getting code into a release
2) Some projects consider something to be breakable, from a back
compatibility point of view, until it has made a formal release, which
means anybody cutting releases from anything other than final/stable is
facing th
On 24/02/15 04:38 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose the following members to become part of the Glance core
team:
Ian Cordasco
Louis Taylor
Mike Fedosin
Hemanth Makkapati
Please, yes!
They have been contributing significant numbers of high quality reviews in the
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
