Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] oslo_config and wsgi middlewares

2015-08-07 Thread Joshua Harlow
Michael Krotscheck wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:08 AM Mehdi Abaakouk sil...@sileht.net mailto:sil...@sileht.net wrote: Yes, but you can't use oslo.config without hardcode the loading the middleware to pass the oslo.config object into the application. Yes, and that is intentional,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova][ci] Tintri Cinder CI failures after Nova change

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/6/2015 3:30 PM, Skyler Berg wrote: After the change cleanup NovaObjectDictCompat from virtual_interface [1] was merged into Nova on the morning of August 5th, Tintri's CI for Cinder started failing 13 test cases that involve a volume being attached to an instance [2]. I have verified

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Nova][Cinder] glance_store and glance

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 3:56 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: Hi, Flagged Nova and Cinder into this discussion as they were the first intended adopters iirc. I don't have big religious view about this topic. I wasn't huge fan of the idea separating it in the first place and I'm not huge fan of keeping it

[openstack-dev] [nova] python-novaclient support microversions now

2015-08-07 Thread Alex Xu
Hi, All, Currently we have microversions support in python-novaclient now! It’s time to submit microversions client support if your nova api server side patch merged. There is example how to add specific microversion in client https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136458/

[openstack-dev] [Heat] creating a stack with a config_drive

2015-08-07 Thread Maish Saidel-Keesing
I have been looking for a working example to create Heat stack with a config_drive attached. I know it is possible to deploy a nova instance with the CLI [1] I see that OS::Nova::Server has a config_drive property that is a Boolean value [2] What I cannot find is how this can be used. Where

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] creating a stack with a config_drive

2015-08-07 Thread Randall Burt
config_drive: true just tells the instance to mount the drive. You pass data via the user_data property. Original message From: Maish Saidel-Keesing Date:08/07/2015 8:08 AM (GMT-06:00) To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] creating a stack with a config_drive

2015-08-07 Thread Maish Saidel-Keesing
On 08/07/15 16:22, Randall Burt wrote: config_drive: true just tells the instance to mount the drive. You pass data via the user_data property. Thanks Randall that is what I was thinking. But I am confused. When booting an instance with nova boot, I can configure a local file/directory to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] OS::Neutron::Port fails to set security group by name, no way to retrieve group ID from Neutron::SecurityGroup

2015-08-07 Thread jason witkowski
Thanks for the replies guys. The issue is that it is not working. If you take a look at the pastes I linked from the first email I am using the get_resource function in the security group resource. I am not sure if it is not resolving to an appropriate value or if it is resolving to an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] creating a stack with a config_drive

2015-08-07 Thread Randall Burt
The drive will contain the user data. Its an alternative to the metadata service and isn't a normal drive. Its created, mounted, and populated by Nova. Original message From: Maish Saidel-Keesing Date:08/07/2015 8:35 AM (GMT-06:00) To: Randall Burt ,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Puppet] [kolla] Deploying OpenStack with Puppet modules on Docker with Heat

2015-08-07 Thread Ryan Hallisey
I have a few questions: * when do you run puppet? before starting the container so we can generate a configuration file? We would run puppet before starting the container that way puppet can generate the config and the container absorb it. * so iiuc, Puppet is only here to generate

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [aodh] upgrade path

2015-08-07 Thread gord chung
On 07/08/2015 3:49 AM, Chris Dent wrote: Despite our conversation in the meeting yesterday[1] I still remain a bit confused about the upgrade path from alarming-in-ceilometer to alarming provided by aodh and the availability of the older code in released liberty. Much of my confusion can

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] change of day for API subteam meeting?

2015-08-07 Thread Anne Gentle
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Friday's have been kind of a rough day for the Nova API subteam. It's already basically the weekend for folks in AP, and the weekend is right around the corner for everyone else. I'd like to suggest we shift the meeting to

[openstack-dev] [nova] installation of requirements not possible because of wrong pip version

2015-08-07 Thread Christian Berendt
According to requirements.txt we require pip=6.0. Trying to install the requirements for nova with pip 6.1.1 is not possible at the moment because of the following issue: $ virtualenv .venv $ source .venv/bin/activate $ pip install -r requirements.txt You are using pip version 6.1.1, however

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] installation of requirements not possible because of wrong pip version

2015-08-07 Thread Christian Berendt
On 08/07/2015 10:52 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I don't know why Nova has a requirement expressed on pip, since requirements.txt is evaluated by pip its too late. Does Nova actually consume pip itself? pip is not listed in the requirements.txt file of nova. pip is listed in the global

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] installation of requirements not possible because of wrong pip version

2015-08-07 Thread Robert Collins
Pip is listed there because we used to use pip from within pbr. We could raise the pip version in global requirements safely I think. On 8 Aug 2015 09:58, Christian Berendt christ...@berendt.io wrote: On 08/07/2015 10:52 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I don't know why Nova has a requirement

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API improvement plan

2015-08-07 Thread Anne Gentle
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Anne Gentle annegen...@justwriteclick.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On the plane home from the Nova midcycle meetup I spent a chunk of time reading our API docs that are now in tree:

[openstack-dev] [nova] [oslo] troubling passing of unit tests on broken code

2015-08-07 Thread Mike Bayer
Just a heads up that this recently merged code is wrong: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192760/14/nova/tests/unit/db/test_migrations.py,cm and here it is failing tests on my local env, as it does on my CI, as would be expected, there's a lot more if I keep it running:

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][neutron] How to give nested VM access to outside network?

2015-08-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/04/2015 01:44 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Can you try answer 1 of [1]? I've never tried it, but I heard from folks who configured it like that. With this masquerading, your vm should be able to reach your 192.x network. But as it's NAT it won't work the other way round (e.g. establish a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-07 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 5 Aug 2015, at 1:34 am, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Philipp Marek wrote: If we end up using a DLM then we have to detect when the connection to the DLM is lost on a node and stop all ongoing operations to prevent data corruption. It may not be trivial to do, but we will

[openstack-dev] ][third-party-ci]Running custom code before tests

2015-08-07 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, I managed to get the jobs triggered, i read https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers but i can't figure out where to put the code for pre_test_hook so i can setup my backend. Thanks, -- *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* www.cloudfounders.com |

[openstack-dev] What's Up, Doc? 7 August 2015

2015-08-07 Thread Lana Brindley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, Welcome to August! Today we can finally announce that the Cloud Admin Guide is now completely converted to RST! I have been doing a fair bit of 'behind the scenes' work this week, focusing mainly on Training Guides and our docs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][AODH] Timeout Event Alarms

2015-08-07 Thread Ryota Mibu
Hi, Sorry for my late response and my absent in weekly meetings... I'm not sure whether I captured your idea correctly, but I prefer the second approach now. I agreed the point Igor and liusheng mentioned that the second approach enables end users to have configurable expire-time. In

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Nova][Cinder] glance_store and glance

2015-08-07 Thread Kuvaja, Erno
Hi, Flagged Nova and Cinder into this discussion as they were the first intended adopters iirc. I don't have big religious view about this topic. I wasn't huge fan of the idea separating it in the first place and I'm not huge fan of keeping it separate either. After couple of cycles we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] OS::Neutron::Port fails to set security group by name, no way to retrieve group ID from Neutron::SecurityGroup

2015-08-07 Thread TIANTIAN
1) OS::Neutron::Port does not seem to recognize security groups by name -- https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/stable/kilo/heat/engine/resources/openstack/neutron/port.py#L303 https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/stable/kilo/heat/engine/clients/os/neutron.py#L111

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr] Removing fip namespace when restarting L3 agent.

2015-08-07 Thread Korzeniewski, Artur
Bug submitted: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1482521 Thanks, Artur From: Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com] Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2015 5:18 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr] Removing fip

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [aodh] upgrade path

2015-08-07 Thread Julien Danjou
On Fri, Aug 07 2015, Chris Dent wrote: If someone installs aodh on a machine that already has ceilometer on it and turns off ceilometer-alarm-notifier and ceilometer-alarm-evaluator (in favor of aodh-notifier and aodh-evaluator) will they be able to run those aodh services against their

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] OS::Neutron::Port fails to set security group by name, no way to retrieve group ID from Neutron::SecurityGroup

2015-08-07 Thread Kairat Kushaev
Hello Jason, Agree with TianTian. It would be good if you provide more details about the error you have. Additionally, it would be perfect if you'll use heat IRC channel: #heat or ask.openstack.org to resolve such kind of questions. Best regards, Kairat Kushaev Software Engineer, Mirantis On

[openstack-dev] [CI] nodepool.DiskImageUpdater: Broken pipe error

2015-08-07 Thread Xie, Xianshan
Hi, everyone, The Broken pipe errors were encountered as follows, when I ran nodepoold command: 2015-08-08 12:31:27,360 INFO nodepool.DiskImageUpdater: Uploading dib image id: 6755 from /opt/nodepool_dib/dpc-1439004811 for

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [aodh] upgrade path

2015-08-07 Thread Chris Dent
Despite our conversation in the meeting yesterday[1] I still remain a bit confused about the upgrade path from alarming-in-ceilometer to alarming provided by aodh and the availability of the older code in released liberty. Much of my confusion can probably be resolved by knowing the answer to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [aodh] upgrade path

2015-08-07 Thread Chris Dent
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Julien Danjou wrote: On Fri, Aug 07 2015, Chris Dent wrote: If someone installs aodh on a machine that already has ceilometer on it and turns off ceilometer-alarm-notifier and ceilometer-alarm-evaluator (in favor of aodh-notifier and aodh-evaluator) will they be able to

[openstack-dev] [glance][api][tc] Response when a illegal body is sent

2015-08-07 Thread Bunting, Niall
Excerpts from Ian Cordasco's message of 2015-07-24 11:22:33 -0700: On 7/24/15, 13:16, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Ian Cordasco's message of 2015-07-24 08:58:06 -0700: On 7/23/15, 19:38, michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/23/2015 12:43 PM, Ryan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Nova][Cinder] glance_store and glance

2015-08-07 Thread Jesse Cook
I largely agree with the points made in the messages by Nikhil and Erno. A few additional points. One of the biggest use cases that I heard for glance_store (true, false, or otherwise) was that Glance is a bottleneck and an unnecessary proxy to the stores and consumers should be able to interface

[openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Deprecating config-internal

2015-08-07 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
James and Dan, During the ansible-multi spec process that James Slagle reviewed, there was a serious commitment by the Kolla core team to maintain config-internal, pretty much for the tripleo use case. We didn’t want to leave our partner projects in the lurch and at the time Ryan/Ian’s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Nova][Cinder] glance_store and glance

2015-08-07 Thread Jesse Cook
On 8/7/15, 8:46 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:56 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: Hi, Flagged Nova and Cinder into this discussion as they were the first intended adopters iirc. I don't have big religious view about this topic. I wasn't huge fan of the idea

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Deprecating config-internal

2015-08-07 Thread Dan Prince
On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 14:21 +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: James and Dan, During the ansible-multi spec process that James Slagle reviewed, there was a serious commitment by the Kolla core team to maintain config-internal, pretty much for the tripleo use case. We didn’t want to

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Heat] [kolla] Deploying containerized services with Heat

2015-08-07 Thread Jeff Peeler
This email is loosely related to the recent thread of docker, puppet, and Heat here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/071492.html I'd really like to get some feedback about work done to use Heat for deploying Kolla containers. Ultimately, the hope is to use this

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Heat] [kolla] Deploying containerized services with Heat

2015-08-07 Thread Jeff Peeler
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:31:52AM -0400, Jeff Peeler wrote: [1] https://github.com/jpeeler/kolla/tree/694df62d47cf6d930bf04231386c917f5cb4da58 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178840/ [3] https://github.com/jpeeler/kolla/commits/master If it's not obvious, please note that links 1 and 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova][ci] Tintri Cinder CI failures after Nova change

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 8:38 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/6/2015 3:30 PM, Skyler Berg wrote: After the change cleanup NovaObjectDictCompat from virtual_interface [1] was merged into Nova on the morning of August 5th, Tintri's CI for Cinder started failing 13 test cases that involve a volume being

[openstack-dev] [nova] Bug *Review* Day - Liberty

2015-08-07 Thread Markus Zoeller
As freshly crowned bug czar I'd like to advertise the bug review day which takes place next Wednesday, August the 12th [1]. The bug triage day last week did a good job to set the priorities of undecided bugs [2]. We can use [3] to get an overview of the current reviews for bugs. When [4] is

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Deprecating config-internal

2015-08-07 Thread Ryan Hallisey
- Original Message - From: James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 11:20:59 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Deprecating config-internal On Fri,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Deprecating config-internal

2015-08-07 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 8/7/15, 8:08 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 14:21 +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: James and Dan, During the ansible-multi spec process that James Slagle reviewed, there was a serious commitment by the Kolla core team to maintain config-internal,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

2015-08-07 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi Nik, some comments inline, but tl;dr I am strongly against returning the glance_store library to the Glance source repository. Explanations inline... On 08/07/2015 01:21 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: Hi, During the mid-cycle we had another proposal that wanted to put back the glance_store

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] oslo_config and wsgi middlewares

2015-08-07 Thread Michael Krotscheck
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:08 AM Mehdi Abaakouk sil...@sileht.net wrote: Yes, but you can't use oslo.config without hardcode the loading the middleware to pass the oslo.config object into the application. Yes, and that is intentional, because the use of global variables of any sort is bad.

[openstack-dev] [nova] change of day for API subteam meeting?

2015-08-07 Thread Sean Dague
Friday's have been kind of a rough day for the Nova API subteam. It's already basically the weekend for folks in AP, and the weekend is right around the corner for everyone else. I'd like to suggest we shift the meeting to Monday or Tuesday in the same timeslot (currently 12:00 UTC). Either works

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] change of day for API subteam meeting?

2015-08-07 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/07/2015 12:48 PM, Sean Dague wrote: Friday's have been kind of a rough day for the Nova API subteam. It's already basically the weekend for folks in AP, and the weekend is right around the corner for everyone else. I'd like to suggest we shift the meeting to Monday or Tuesday in the same

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Do we have test coverage goals?

2015-08-07 Thread Chris Dent
The recent split of the unit and functional tests in ceilometer shows some interesting test coverage data. With just what are now called the unit tests coverage is a meek 58%. With both the unit and functional (what used to be the standard coverage run) the coverage is a still kind of meek 84%.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr] Removing fip namespace when restarting L3 agent.

2015-08-07 Thread Oleg Bondarev
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Korzeniewski, Artur artur.korzeniew...@intel.com wrote: Bug submitted: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1482521 Ok, here is the fix: https://review.openstack.org/210539 Thanks! Oleg Thanks, Artur *From:* Oleg Bondarev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] The state of collaboration: 7 weeks

2015-08-07 Thread Jay Pipes
Dmitry, just a quick note to say I'm very pleased to see the progress from the Fuel team in collaborating with the Puppet OpenStack upstream team. Great to see puppet-librarian-simple starting to reduce the duplication and forking of Puppet modules in Fuel. Kudos. Best, -jay On 08/03/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Deprecating config-internal

2015-08-07 Thread James Slagle
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 14:21 +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: James and Dan, During the ansible-multi spec process that James Slagle reviewed, there was a serious commitment by the Kolla core team to maintain

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] installation of requirements not possible because of wrong pip version

2015-08-07 Thread Robert Collins
I don't know why Nova has a requirement expressed on pip, since requirements.txt is evaluated by pip its too late. Does Nova actually consume pip itself? On 8 Aug 2015 8:31 am, Christian Berendt christ...@berendt.io wrote: According to requirements.txt we require pip=6.0. Trying to install the

[openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker Since things are especially fun the last two days I figured it was time for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Puppet] [kolla] Deploying OpenStack with Puppet modules on Docker with Heat

2015-08-07 Thread Emilien Macchi
On 08/05/2015 02:33 PM, Ryan Hallisey wrote: Tagging kolla so the kolla community also sees it. Pardon the top posting. -Ryan - Original Message - From: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:29:13 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] To always use or not use domain name?

2015-08-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/05/2015 07:48 PM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: On 06/08/15 10:16, Jamie Lennox wrote: - Original Message - From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2015 1:03:55 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] To always use

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker Since things are especially fun the last

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login

2015-08-07 Thread Adam Young
On 08/06/2015 07:09 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Lance Bragstad lbrags...@gmail.com mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com mailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 5,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [aodh] upgrade path

2015-08-07 Thread gord chung
On 07/08/2015 3:49 AM, Chris Dent wrote: Despite our conversation in the meeting yesterday[1] I still remain a bit confused about the upgrade path from alarming-in-ceilometer to alarming provided by aodh and the availability of the older code in released liberty. Much of my confusion can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] What are problems of Distributed SNAT?

2015-08-07 Thread Miyagishi, Takanori
Hi, Brian Haley This is a huge increase in IP consumption from today though, which is only [number of tenants], I'm not sure most deployers have [tenants * compute nodes] IPs at their disposal. And in the worst-case this becomes Assign a Floating IP to all VMs. Before suggest my proposal, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-08-07 Thread Dan Prince
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 16:54 -0400, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote: One more side effect is that I think it also means we no longer have the capability to test arbitrary Zuul refspecs for projects like Heat, Neutron, Nova,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] glance_store and glance

2015-08-07 Thread Nicolas Trangez
On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 01:21 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: 3. ease of addition of newer drivers for the developers -- drivers are only being removed since. The OpenStack team at Scality developed a Glance Store driver for RING, currently out-of-tree to get to a first fully-working version (

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova][ci] Tintri Cinder CI failures after Nova change

2015-08-07 Thread Skyler Berg
As Matt found, it the problem was with out of date requirements. Going forward I would advise any third party CI that is not spinning up a new VM for every job to purge all python packages after each run. This will make devstack reinstall everything, avoid this type of problem. Though the problem

[openstack-dev] [murano] Questions on creating and importing HOT packages

2015-08-07 Thread Vahid S Hashemian
Hello, These two subjects have probably been discussed already, but I couldn't find any info on them, so very much appreciate if someone could clarify. Why is the HOT template that is fed to package-create command renamed to template.yaml? Any issue with keeping the original name? Why HOT

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] 7.0 Soft Code Freeze in action

2015-08-07 Thread Eugene Bogdanov
Hello everyone, I'd like to inform you that Soft Code Freeze[1] for 7.0 release is now officially effective. Since now on we stop accepting fixes for Medium priority bugs and focus on Critical and High priority bugs. There are plenty of them now, we need your help with fixing them so we

[openstack-dev] [tc][ptl] ATC passes for big tent projects wont be generated if repos are predictively listed

2015-08-07 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Hey folks, I just wanted to give a heads up to fellow new members to the big tent (and the TC) that don’t have the correct repo listed today in the projects.yaml file in the governance repo that according to fungi [1] those projects contributors will not receive ATC passes. According to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [oslo] troubling passing of unit tests on broken code

2015-08-07 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Mike, I edited my nova tox.ini like so: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412245/ and it seems to be working for me: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412246/ -- dims On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: Just a heads up that this recently merged code is wrong:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] change of day for API subteam meeting?

2015-08-07 Thread Alex Xu
在 2015年8月8日,上午12:48,Sean Dague s...@dague.net 写道: Friday's have been kind of a rough day for the Nova API subteam. It's already basically the weekend for folks in AP, and the weekend is right around the corner for everyone else. I'd like to suggest we shift the meeting to Monday or

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 5:27 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 7:41 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/7/2015 5:27 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] change of day for API subteam meeting?

2015-08-07 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Nice idea :-) 2015年8月8日(土) 9:05 Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com: 在 2015年8月8日,上午12:48,Sean Dague s...@dague.net 写道: Friday's have been kind of a rough day for the Nova API subteam. It's already basically the weekend for folks in AP, and the weekend is right around the corner for everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [oslo] troubling passing of unit tests on broken code

2015-08-07 Thread Mike Bayer
On 8/7/15 8:00 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Mike, I edited my nova tox.ini like so: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412245/ and it seems to be working for me: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412246/ OK I can see why the gate passes, the error is exposed only by Alembic 0.8, because the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [oslo] troubling passing of unit tests on broken code

2015-08-07 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Mike, Sounds great! +1 to fix the code. -- dims On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: On 8/7/15 8:00 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Mike, I edited my nova tox.ini like so: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412245/ and it seems to be working for me:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Merge back of QoS and pecan branches

2015-08-07 Thread Kyle Mestery
As we're beginning to wind down Liberty-3 in a few weeks, I'd like to present the rough, high level plan to merge back the QoS and pecan branches into Neutron. Ihar has been doing a great job shepherding the QoS work, and I believe once we're done landing the final patches this weekend [1], we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl] ATC passes for big tent projects wont be generated if repos are predictively listed

2015-08-07 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-08-07 23:35:33 + (+), Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: I just wanted to give a heads up to fellow new members to the big tent (and the TC) that don’t have the correct repo listed today in the projects.yaml file in the governance repo that according to fungi [1] those projects

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Mid-cycle sprint summary

2015-08-07 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi all, We just finished up a great 2 day sprint focusing on a new distributed architecture for Congress. Details can be found in the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-liberty-sprint Here's the summary. 1. Architecture. Each datasource driver will run in its own process;