Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] acceptance: run WSGI for API services

On 14/08/15 09:45 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: So far we have WSGI support for puppet-keystone & pupper-ceilometer. I'm currently working on other components to easily deploy OpenStack running API services using apache/wsgi instead of eventlet. I would like to propose some change in our beaker t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 4 November 2015 at 15:00, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/04/2015 09:49 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >>> On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tem

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 4 November 2015 at 14:49, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> >>> On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi stackers, Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Question about Microsoft Hyper-V CI tests

Hi, Since the response code was 503 (Service Unavailable) it might have been a timeout/problem in our CI, we usually debug failed builds and recheck if necessary. I rechecked https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236210/ and it was successful on the same patchset. Going to take a look at https://revi

[openstack-dev] [all][keystone][release][docs] cross-project liaison update

In Tokyo the Keystone team decided to make a few changes to its cross-project liaisons - Lance Bradstag will be the new Docs liaison - I'll be taking over Morgan's duties as the Release liaison The following folks will continue to act as liaisons: - Brant Knudson for Oslo - David Stanek

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 11/04/2015 09:49 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi stackers, Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool that works with

[openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.config][oslo.service] Dynamic Reconfiguration of OpenStack Services

Hi guys, Unfortunately I haven't been on Tokio summit but I know that there was discussion about dynamic reloading of configuration. Etherpad refs: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cross-project-dynamic-config-services , https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-oslo-security-logging In this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Question about Microsoft Hyper-V CI tests

I noticed the same failure in the neutron-dsvm-tempest test for the Neutron DVR HA change, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/143169 I have not yet been able to determine the cause. Thanks, —N. On Nov 3, 2015, at 3:57 PM, sla...@kaplonski.pl wrote: Hello, I'm now w

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi stackers, Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, Images,

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][aodh][gnocchi] no (in person) mid-cycle for Mitaka

hi all, after discussions on the usefulness of a Telemetry mid-cycle, we've decided to forego having an in-person mid-cycle for Mitaka. to avoid rehashing already discussed items, see: same reasons as Glance[1]. much thanks to jasonamyers for offering a venue for a Telemetry mid-cycle. that

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] [infra] speeding up gate runs?

On 11/04/2015 06:47 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > I was spot checking the grenade multinode job to make sure it looks like > it was doing the correct thing. In doing so I found that ~15minutes of > it's hour long build time is compiling lxml and numpy 3 times each. > > Due to our exact calculations by u

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Mitaka priorities

Hi folks, I posted a review to add our Mitaka priorities to our specs repo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241223/ Ruby made a good point that not everyone was at the summit and she'd like buyoff on the patch from all cores before we land it. I tend to agree, so I ask that cores that were not i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Infra] "gate-neutron-lbaasv1-dsvm-api" blocking patch merge

> > On 04/11/15 12:48, Mohan Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Jenkins blocking patch merge due to " > > gate-neutron-lbaasv1-dsvm-api > > dsvm- > api/f631adf/>" > > > > > failures which is unrelated to patch-set changes . > > > > Patc

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: >> Hi stackers, >> >> Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool >> that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, >> Images, ..) in the next way: >> >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ironic] How to proceed about deprecation of untagged code?

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:44:36AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/03/2015 11:40 PM, Gabriel Bezerra wrote: > >Hi, > > > >The change in https://review.openstack.org/237122 touches a feature from > >ironic that has not been released in any tag yet. > > > >At first, we from the team who has written t

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-powervm] Please createnetworking-powervm on PyPI

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Andrew Thorstensen wrote: > Hi Kyle, > > My team owns the networking-powervm project. When we moved from the > StackForge to OpenStack namespace we changed the name from neutron-powervm > to networking-powervm. There is no reason for the PyPI project to have a >

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova] Handling lots of GET query string parameters?

> On 4 Nov 2015, at 13:13, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > Regarding Jay's proposal, this would be tantamount to defining an API action > for retrieving instances, something currently being discussed here [1]. > The only comment I have is that I am not entirely surely whether using the > POST ver

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

Sure, thanks! And suggest add the time and channel information at the kuryr wiki page. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Baohua Yang wrote: > >> +1, Antoni! >> btw, is our weekly meeting still on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi stackers, Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, Images, ..) in the next way: >>> resource = api.resouce_do_some_stuff() >>> while api.reso

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Baohua Yang wrote: > +1, Antoni! > btw, is our weekly meeting still on meeting-4 channel? > Not found it there yesterday. > Yes, it is still on openstack-meeting-4, but this week we skipped it, since some of us were traveling and we already held the meeting on Fri

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ironic] How to proceed about deprecation of untagged code?

On 11/03/2015 11:40 PM, Gabriel Bezerra wrote: Hi, The change in https://review.openstack.org/237122 touches a feature from ironic that has not been released in any tag yet. At first, we from the team who has written the patch thought that, as it has not been part of any release, we could do ba

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

+1, Antoni! btw, is our weekly meeting still on meeting-4 channel? Not found it there yesterday. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > Hi Kuryrs, > > Last Friday, as part of the contributors meetup, we discussed also code > contribution e

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

Hi Kuryrs, Last Friday, as part of the contributors meetup, we discussed also code contribution etiquette. Like other OpenStack project (Magnum comes to mind), the etiquette for what to do when there is disagreement in the way to code a blueprint of fix a bug is as follows: 1.- Try to reach out s

Re: [openstack-dev] Troubleshooting cross-project comms

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Has anyone considered using #openstack-dev, instead of a new meeting > >> room? #openstack-dev is mostly a ghost town at this point, and deciding > >> that instead it would be the dedicated cross project space, i

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova] Handling lots of GET query string parameters?

Regarding Jay's proposal, this would be tantamount to defining an API action for retrieving instances, something currently being discussed here [1]. The only comment I have is that I am not entirely surely whether using the POST verb for operations which do no alter at all the server representation

Re: [openstack-dev] Troubleshooting cross-project comms

Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Has anyone considered using #openstack-dev, instead of a new meeting >> room? #openstack-dev is mostly a ghost town at this point, and deciding >> that instead it would be the dedicated cross project space, including >> meetings support, might be interesting. +1 Origina

[openstack-dev] [requirements] [infra] speeding up gate runs?

I was spot checking the grenade multinode job to make sure it looks like it was doing the correct thing. In doing so I found that ~15minutes of it's hour long build time is compiling lxml and numpy 3 times each. Due to our exact calculations by upper-constraints.txt we ensure exactly the right ver

Re: [openstack-dev] Troubleshooting cross-project comms

+1000 Sean On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/28/2015 07:15 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I wanted to write up some of the discussion points from a cross-project >> session here at the Tokyo Summit about cross-project communications. The >> etherpad is here: >> ht

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Infra] "gate-neutron-lbaasv1-dsvm-api" blocking patch merge

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/11/15 12:48, Mohan Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > Jenkins blocking patch merge due to " > gate-neutron-lbaasv1-dsvm-api > " > > failures which is unrelated to patch-se

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-powervm] Please createnetworking-powervm on PyPI

Hi Kyle, My team owns the networking-powervm project. When we moved from the StackForge to OpenStack namespace we changed the name from neutron-powervm to networking-powervm. There is no reason for the PyPI project to have a different name and we were planning to publish an update shortly wit

Re: [openstack-dev] Troubleshooting cross-project comms

On 10/28/2015 07:15 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to write up some of the discussion points from a cross-project > session here at the Tokyo Summit about cross-project communications. The > etherpad is here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-crossproject-comms > > One it

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Logging - filling up my tiny SSDs

On 11/02/2015 10:36 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:12:10PM EST, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Sean, >> >> I typically switch off screen and am able to redirect logs to a specified >> directory. Does this help? >> >> USE_SCREEN=False >> LOGDIR=/opt/stack/logs/ > > It's not tha

[openstack-dev] [murano] Visibility consistency for packages and images

Hi all, Ekaterina Chernova suggested last week to discuss the matter of visibility consistency for murano packages and glance images, following my bug report on that subject [1]. The general idea is to make sure that if a murano package is public, it should be really available for all projects, w

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

From: "mest...@mestery.com" mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 7:09 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutro

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova] Handling lots of GET query string parameters?

On 11/03/2015 05:45 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03 2015, Jay Pipes wrote: > >> My suggestion was to add a new POST /servers/search URI resource that can >> take >> a request body containing large numbers of filter arguments, encoded in a >> JSON >> object. >> >> API working group, wha

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Thanks Dims, +2 On 11/03/2015 07:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative: > > https://review.openstack.org/241040 > > Thanks, > Dims > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >> Thanks robert, >> >> I've started

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Infra] "gate-neutron-lbaasv1-dsvm-api" blocking patch merge

Hi, Jenkins blocking patch merge due to " gate-neutron-lbaasv1-dsvm-api " failures which is unrelated to patch-set changes . Patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237896/ Please help to resolve this issue . Reg

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Default PostgreSQL server encoding is 'ascii'

Hi, folks! Recently I've been working on this bug [1] and have found that default encoding of database server used by FUEL infrastructure components (Nailgun, OSTF, etc) is ascii. At least this is true for environment set up via VirtualBox scripts. This situation may (and already does returning to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

In terms of adding this into master, we can go for a spec-less blueprint in Nova. Reach out to me on IRC if I can help you through the process. Thanks, johnthetubaguy PS We are working on making this easier in the future, by using OS VIF Lib. On 4 November 2015 at 08:56, Michał Dubiel wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

+1 - the below sums up my impressions from the summit which I was good with. Look forward to seeing what Angus the guys come up with. -Paul On 02/11/15 17:02, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey folks, We had an informal vote at the mid cycle from the core reviewers, and it was a majority vote, s

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Implementation and policy of keystone

Hi, Adam, I see. I will check the policy that was determined in the summit. Thanks and Regards, --- Toshiya Shiga > -Original Message- > From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 1:06 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Resigning TelcoWG core team

I'm sorry to hear that , Marc. Thanks for your efforts and best wishes for the future. Calum Calum Loudon Director, Architecture +44 (0)208 366 1177   METASWITCH NETWORKS THE BRAINS OF THE NEW GLOBAL NETWORK www.metaswitch.com -Original Message- From: Marc Koderer [mailto:m...@kod

Re: [openstack-dev] Is there any incubating Data Backup projects?

Hi Thomas, As per your quest the binaries have been removed as per: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241325/ Thanks, Fausto -Original Message- From: Thomas Goirand [mailto:z...@debian.org] Sent: 31 October 2015 16:36 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Sub

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

I am fine with this! -Original Message- From: Sean M. Collins [mailto:s...@coreitpro.com] Sent: 04 November 2015 14:28 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers On Tue, Nov 0

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Plugins] Calamari plugin project has been moved on Openstack workspace

Hi all, we have moved on https://github.com/openstack/fuel-plugin-calamari the Calamari plugin project for Fuel (7.0 and 6.1). The user guide is available at: https://github.com/openstack/fuel-plugin-calamari/blob/master/doc/source/user-guide.rst The specification url is available at: https://g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Handling of 202 response code

On 04/11/15 09:25, Saravanan KR wrote: > There may be multiple solutions: > 1) Waiting for the synchronous and then respond > 2) Do not trigger page refresh and respond with Operation in progress > 3) If there is a mechanism to know delete in progress, do not list the > interface > > To decide on

[openstack-dev] [infra][dsvm] openstack packages pre-installed dsvm node?

Hey When choosing nodes to run a gate job, is there a liberty-trusty node? The liberty core services is installed and well setup. It is helpful for development on non-core projects and saves much time. -- Gareth Cloud Computing, OpenStack, Distributed Storage, Fitness, Basketball OpenStack cont

[openstack-dev] [watcher] weekly meeting #5

Hello! Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, today at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#11.2F4.2F2015_Agenda: Feel free to add any items you'd like to discuss. Thanks, Antoine

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Infra] Neutron gate issues

Hi, At the moment the neutron gate is broken due to LBaaSv1 issues. This is meant to be deprecated in favor of LBaaSV2 (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239863). Is there any chance that we can get that approved? Thanks Gary _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam

> From: Michael Davies [mailto:mich...@the-davies.net] > Sent: November 04, 2015 00:36 > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Michael Still wrote: > > > I'd be interested in being involved with this, and I know Paul > Murray is interested as well. > > I went to make a doodle, but then

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

Sean M. Collins wrote: Hi Ihar, This sounds good. I actually had a draft e-mail that I've been saving until I got back, that may be relevant. Some contributors met on Friday to discuss the packet classification framework, mostly centered around just building a reusable library that can be shar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Question about Microsoft Hyper-V CI tests

Sławek Kapłoński wrote: It is strange for me because it looks that error is somewhere in create_network. I didn't change anything in code which is creating networks. Other tests are fine IMHO. So my question is: should I check reason of this errors and try to fix it also in my patch? Or

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:08:26PM EST, Vikram Choudhary wrote: > Thanks for all your efforts Sean. > > I was actually thinking a separate IRC for this effort would be great and > will help all the interested people to come together and develop. > > Any thoughts on this? Unless it becomes super

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

Ok, I see. Thanks for all the answers. Regards, Michal On 3 November 2015 at 22:50, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 11/3/2015 11:57 AM, Michał Dubiel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with >> vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has suppor

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Handling of 202 response code

Hello, How are the HTTP status code 202 response (from nova) is handled in Horizon to know the asynchronous operation is completed? Background: I am working on Bug #1506429 [1] where invoking 'Detach Interface' initiates the detaching and refreshes the page. But the interface which is detach

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Enabling and Reading notifications

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Pratik Mallya wrote: > Hello, > > I was looking for guidance as to how to enable notifications in heat and > if there is already a tool that can read those events? Looking through the > code, it gives somewhat conflicting information as to the extent to which > no

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] new change management tools and processes for stable/liberty and mitaka

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 03:03:29PM +1300, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Thanks for posting this. I'm working on this for Zaqar now and there is a > question. As for the stable/liberty patch, where does the "60fdcaba00e30d02" > in [1] come from? Thanks. > > [1] > https://review.openstack.or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] SR-IOV subteam

That's good to know. Thank you! Shinobu - Original Message - From: "Moshe Levi" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 4:56:05 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] SR-IOV subteam Maybe we can you use the pci- passthrough

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 11/03/2015 11:45 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic mailto:bo...@pavlovic.me>> wrote: Hi stackers, Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes

<    1   2