[openstack-dev] Code review request

2013-09-03 Thread Peter Liljenberg
Hi, Could someone review this (Added SBT builder supporthttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/44685/ ). https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44685/ /Peter ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] Code review

2013-09-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/09/13 08:28 +0200, Peter Liljenberg wrote: Hi, Could someone review this (Added support for JaCoCo plugin Publisher). https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44705/ /Peter Hi, When asking for Code Reviews, pls, tag the email subject with the project in matter. Cheers, FF -- @flaper87

[openstack-dev] Confused about GroupAntiAffinityFilter and GroupAffinityFilter

2013-09-03 Thread Simon Pasquier
Reposting to openstack-dev as I got no answer on the general mailing list. Message original Sujet: [Openstack] Confused about GroupAntiAffinityFilter and GroupAffinityFilter Date : Mon, 2 Sep 2013 11:19:58 +0200 De : Simon Pasquier simon.pasqu...@bull.net Organisation :

Re: [openstack-dev] Questions related to live migration without target host

2013-09-03 Thread Alex Glikson
I tend to agree with Jake that this check is likely to conflict with the scheduler, and should be removed. Regards, Alex From: Guangya Liu j...@unitedstack.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 03/09/2013 02:03 AM Subject:[openstack-dev] Questions related to live

[openstack-dev] Reminder: Project release status meeting - 21:00 UTC

2013-09-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Today in the project/release status meeting, we are one day away from the dreaded FeatureFreeze. We'll look into havana-3 project roadmaps and check what can still make it in the next day, what might require a feature freeze exception, and what is likely to be deferred. The almost feature complete

Re: [openstack-dev] Code review

2013-09-03 Thread Peter Liljenberg
Ah, Will do! Thx! /Peter On 3 September 2013 08:56, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/09/13 08:28 +0200, Peter Liljenberg wrote: Hi, Could someone review this (Added support for JaCoCo plugin Publisher).

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Murano v0.2.5 release planning

2013-09-03 Thread Denis Koryavov
Hello folks, Development process for Murano v0.2 is finished. Thus, today I would like to start discussion about the next version of Murano v0.2.5 (while we are fixing bugs in v0.2 and polishing our documentation). Here is our ROADMAP [1]. As you can see, I already created a section for Murano

Re: [openstack-dev] Confused about GroupAntiAffinityFilter and GroupAffinityFilter

2013-09-03 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Hopefully I will be able to address your questions. First lets start with the group anti-affinity. This was added towards the end of the Grizzly release cycle as a scheduling hint. At the last summit we sat and agreed on a more formal approach to deal with this and we proposed and developed

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack Folsom + Quantum + XenServer 6.1.0 + Windows VM

2013-09-03 Thread Mate Lakat
Hi Dbarros, Could you look at this blog post: http://blogs.citrix.com/2013/06/14/openstack-networking-quantum-on-xenserver-from-notworking-to-networking/ I would not expect Grizzly to work with XenServer + Quantum without some extra patches. Let me know if you have further questions: Mate On

Re: [openstack-dev] Confused about GroupAntiAffinityFilter and GroupAffinityFilter

2013-09-03 Thread Simon Pasquier
Hello, Thanks for the reply. First of all, do you agree that the current documentation for these filters is inaccurate? My test environment has 2 compute nodes: compute1 and compute3. First, I launch 1 instance (not being tied to any group) on each node: $ nova boot --flavor m1.tiny --image

[openstack-dev] Cinder Backup documentation - to which doc it should go?

2013-09-03 Thread Ronen Kat
I noticed the complains about code submission without appropriate documentation submission, so I am ready to do my part for Cinder backup I have just one little question. Not being up to date on the current set of OpenStack manuals, and as I noticed that the block storage admin guide lost a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Instance naming in IG/ASG and problems related to UpdatePolicy

2013-09-03 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi Winson, On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:23:18PM +, Chan, Winson C wrote: Regarding the last set of comments on the UpdatePolicy, I want to bring your attention to a few items. I already submitted a new patch set and didn't want to reply on the old patch set so that's why I emailed. Sorry

[openstack-dev] [Nova] review request for bp improve-block-device-handling

2013-09-03 Thread Nikola Đipanov
Hi folks, I'd greatly appreciate if we could get the remaining two patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the upcoming freeze this Wednesday. Both patches have been up for a long time and have seen a number of revisions and several +2 already. The patches in question are:

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Backup documentation - to which doc it should go?

2013-09-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi Ronen, The best place for your documentation is in the OpenStack Bloc Storage guide [1]. If you need help with OpenStack manuals, we have a dedicated wiki page [2]. Please let us know if you need support. Regards, [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Backup documentation - to which doc it should go?

2013-09-03 Thread Ronen Kat
Hi Emilien, I have looked at the block guide - the master branch it is mostly empty, most of the content was moved to the OpenStack configuration reference. Any suggestion on relation what should be in the configuration reference vs. the block admin guide - which is now practically empty.

[openstack-dev] [savanna] Fwd: Change in stackforge/savanna-extra[master]: Add diskimage-creating script, elements for mirrors

2013-09-03 Thread Matthew Farrellee
Long weekend here in the US, so I didn't get a chance to comment before this was merged, so... Re Oozie - How did you create the oozie-3.3.2.tar.gz? Re sudo image-cache - That's not the case for me, the wget is run without sudo. How are you running disk-image-create? Re DIB_work - it's best

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Backup documentation - to which doc it should go?

2013-09-03 Thread Anne Gentle
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Ronen Kat ronen...@il.ibm.com wrote: Hi Emilien, I have looked at the block guide - the master branch it is mostly empty, most of the content was moved to the OpenStack configuration reference. Any suggestion on relation what should be in the configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] Fwd: Change in stackforge/savanna-extra[master]: Add diskimage-creating script, elements for mirrors

2013-09-03 Thread Ivan Berezovskiy
Hi, 1.We used mvn to create tar.gz and I'll add documentation for that. 2. The command is simple: parameter1='some_value1' ... parameterN='some_valueN' disk-image-create element1 ... elementM -o image_name. Some files in ~/.cache/image-create/ are owned by root (for example, it is file

Re: [openstack-dev] Confused about GroupAntiAffinityFilter and GroupAffinityFilter

2013-09-03 Thread Simon Pasquier
I've done a wrong copypaste, see correction inline. Le 03/09/2013 12:34, Simon Pasquier a écrit : Hello, Thanks for the reply. First of all, do you agree that the current documentation for these filters is inaccurate? My test environment has 2 compute nodes: compute1 and compute3. First, I

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Smokestack] Review 40296 hit by Torpedo

2013-09-03 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, We are removing the schema autogeneration capability from Neutron [1]. The patch however did not pass Torpedo tests on Smokestack; looking at the logs it seems Firestack deploys Neutron but the db is empty, which is consistent with firestack leveraging schema auto-generation capabilities.

[openstack-dev] Clarification of XenServer versions

2013-09-03 Thread Bob Ball
I've received a number of questions recently about XenServer and XCP and how they are different - particularly now that XS 6.2 has been released - so thought I should try and get the answers all in one place. XenServer: As of XS 6.2, it was announced that it will be fully open sourced[1] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Documentation and patches

2013-09-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Anne Gentle wrote: Nova is the overall winner (cough) with 110 doc bugs followed by keystone with 26. 110 doc bugs indicates a serious need. Ouch. Teams, please follow through on docs and see how you can help. https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bugs/?field.tag=nova

Re: [openstack-dev] Questions related to live migration without target host

2013-09-03 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
I made a comment on the review, but don't we still need this check if we do live migration with a target host? Vish On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Guangya Liu j...@unitedstack.com wrote: Greetings, There is an issue related to live migration without target host might want to get more

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] cluster scaling on the 0.2 branch

2013-09-03 Thread Jon Maron
Found an error in the HDP validation code affecting the node count of the additional (new) node group. Looked at the savanna core code and realized the nature of the way the node groups were being scaled up (both existing and additional) and that pointed me to the issue. -- Jon On Aug 30,

[openstack-dev] Hyper-V meeting

2013-09-03 Thread Peter Pouliot
Hi All, Today's Hyper-V meeting agenda will be the following. * Current review backlog * Puppet Hyper-V module status Best, Peter J. Pouliot, CISSP Senior SDET, OpenStack Microsoft New England Research Development Center One Memorial Drive,Cambridge, MA 02142

[openstack-dev] Hyper-V Meeting Minutes

2013-09-03 Thread Peter Pouliot
Hi everyone, Here are the minutes from today's Hyper-V meeting. Meeting ended Tue Sep 3 17:01:15 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-03-16.01.html Minutes

[openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] VMwareAPI sub-team reviews update 2013-09-03

2013-09-03 Thread Shawn Hartsock
Feature freeze is on the 5th! Let's try and get these last few reviews through ASAP! To that end, here's the reviews first in priority order based on blueprint ... then again in order based on up/down votes. If there's something that needs discussion and you're stuck, feel free to reach out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] REST API proposal

2013-09-03 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Done Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Savanna Technical Lead Mirantis Inc. On Sep 3, 2013, at 21:53, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/30/2013 04:37 AM, Nikolay Starodubtsev wrote: Hi, everyone! We have created a proposal for Climate REST API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] REST API proposal

2013-09-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/30/2013 04:37 AM, Nikolay Starodubtsev wrote: Hi, everyone! We have created a proposal for Climate REST API https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U36k5wk0sOUyLl-4Cz8tmk8RQFQGWKO9dVhb87ZxPC8/ And we like to discuss it with everyone. If you enable commenting on the proposal, then we can put

Re: [openstack-dev] Neutron + Grenade (or other upgrade testing)

2013-09-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/27/2013 01:20 PM, Maru Newby wrote: On Aug 26, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: Is anyone working on/planning on adding support for neutron to grenade? Or is there any other automated upgrade

[openstack-dev] Recent Keystone OpenLDAP install documentation

2013-09-03 Thread Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
Hello, I am looking for recent OpenLDAP installation and configuration documentation to use with Keystone Havana H2. Please let me know if you have a pointer to some. Regards, Mark Miller ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Coffman, Joel M. joel.coff...@jhuapl.eduwrote: We have fully implemented support for transparently encrypting Cinder volumeshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/encrypt-cinder-volumesfrom within Nova (see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30976/), but

[openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Coffman, Joel M.
We have fully implemented support for transparently encrypting Cinder volumeshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/encrypt-cinder-volumes from within Nova (see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30976/), but the lack of a secure key manager within OpenStack currently precludes us from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Documentation and patches

2013-09-03 Thread Anne Gentle
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Anne Gentle wrote: Nova is the overall winner (cough) with 110 doc bugs followed by keystone with 26. 110 doc bugs indicates a serious need. Ouch. Teams, please follow through on docs and see how you can help.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Coffman, Joel M.
How can someone use your code without a key manager? Some key management mechanism is required although it could be simplistic. For example, we've tested our code internally with an implementation of the key manager interface that returns a single, constant key. I think the underlying issue is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Need help with HBase backend

2013-09-03 Thread Thomas Maddox
Hey Stas, Were you ever able to get any answers on this? :) Thanks! -Thomas On 8/12/13 9:42 AM, Thomas Maddox thomas.mad...@rackspace.commailto:thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote: Happens all of the time. I haven't been able to get a single meter stored. :( From: Stas Maksimov

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Coffman, Joel M. joel.coff...@jhuapl.eduwrote: How can someone use your code without a key manager? Some key management mechanism is required although it could be simplistic. For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an implementation of the key

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Bhandaru, Malini K
The issue here is the key manager, barbican, under development is in incubation. Folks can download and use barbican. The barbican team has worked deligently to produce the system. In fact, folks can download and use and vote for Joel's patch to be merged. And do give us feedback on barbican.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][heat] Question re deleting trusts via trust token

2013-09-03 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I have a question for the keystone folks re the expected behavior when deleting a trust. Is it expected that you can only ever delete a trust as the user who created it, and that you can *not* delete the trust when

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 09/03/2013 05:41 PM, Coffman, Joel M. wrote: How can someone use your code without a key manager? Some key management mechanism is required although it could be simplistic. For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an implementation of the key manager interface that returns a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 09/03/2013 06:26 PM, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: The issue here is the key manager, barbican, under development is in incubation. Folks can download and use barbican. The barbican team has worked deligently to produce the system. In fact, folks can download and use and vote for Joel's

[openstack-dev] [keystone][heat] Question re deleting trusts via trust token

2013-09-03 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi, I have a question for the keystone folks re the expected behavior when deleting a trust. Is it expected that you can only ever delete a trust as the user who created it, and that you can *not* delete the trust when impersonating that user using a token obtained via that trust? The reason

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security groups with OVS instead of iptables?

2013-09-03 Thread Ravi Chunduru
It is possible to enforce security groups on OVS provided you have Openflow Controller instead of neutron agent managing the OVS switches. On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Scott Devoid dev...@anl.gov wrote: +1 for an answer to this. The reference documentation suggests running Neutron OVS

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Need help with HBase backend

2013-09-03 Thread Stas Maksimov
Hi Thomas, Not yet, sorry. But working on it (in parallel!), was having a bit of an issue setting up a new env with devstack. Will update you as soon as I have some results. Thanks, Stas On 3 September 2013 23:00, Thomas Maddox thomas.mad...@rackspace.comwrote: Hey Stas, Were you

[openstack-dev] Join the online meeting for moderators of Ask OpenStack

2013-09-03 Thread Stefano Maffulli
We are holding an online meeting for all the people that use Ask OpenStack. On Thursday Sept. 5 from 6PM to 7PM Pacific Time on IRC freenode.net #openstack-community The main intention is to share best practices and in the long term improve the objective of Ask OpenStack: to provide the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Bryan D. Payne
How can someone use your code without a key manager? Some key management mechanism is required although it could be simplistic. For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an implementation of the key manager interface that returns a single, constant key. That works for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Bryan D. Payne bdpa...@acm.org wrote: How can someone use your code without a key manager? Some key management mechanism is required although it could be simplistic. For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an implementation of the key

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] key management and Cinder volume encryption

2013-09-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:44 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Bryan D. Payne bdpa...@acm.org wrote: How can someone use your code without a key manager? Some key management mechanism is required although it could be simplistic.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][heat] Question re deleting trusts via trust token

2013-09-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Dolph Mathews's message of 2013-09-03 16:12:00 -0700: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I have a question for the keystone folks re the expected behavior when deleting a trust. Is it expected that you can only ever delete a trust

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Wait a minute... I thought we were going to remove Alembic until Icehouse-1?

2013-09-03 Thread Jay Pipes
So I went to do the work I said I was going to do at last week's Ceilometer meeting -- translate the 2 Alembic migrations in the Ceilometer source into SA-migrate migrations -- and then rebased my branch only to find 2 more Alembic migrations added in the last few days: