Hi,
Could someone review this (Added SBT builder
supporthttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/44685/
).
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44685/
/Peter
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 03/09/13 08:28 +0200, Peter Liljenberg wrote:
Hi,
Could someone review this (Added support for JaCoCo plugin Publisher).
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44705/
/Peter
Hi,
When asking for Code Reviews, pls, tag the email subject with the
project in matter.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Reposting to openstack-dev as I got no answer on the general mailing list.
Message original
Sujet: [Openstack] Confused about GroupAntiAffinityFilter and
GroupAffinityFilter
Date : Mon, 2 Sep 2013 11:19:58 +0200
De : Simon Pasquier simon.pasqu...@bull.net
Organisation :
I tend to agree with Jake that this check is likely to conflict with the
scheduler, and should be removed.
Regards,
Alex
From: Guangya Liu j...@unitedstack.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 03/09/2013 02:03 AM
Subject:[openstack-dev] Questions related to live
Today in the project/release status meeting, we are one day away from
the dreaded FeatureFreeze. We'll look into havana-3 project roadmaps and
check what can still make it in the next day, what might require a
feature freeze exception, and what is likely to be deferred. The almost
feature complete
Ah,
Will do!
Thx!
/Peter
On 3 September 2013 08:56, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/09/13 08:28 +0200, Peter Liljenberg wrote:
Hi,
Could someone review this (Added support for JaCoCo plugin Publisher).
Hello folks,
Development process for Murano v0.2 is finished. Thus, today I would like
to start discussion about the next version of Murano v0.2.5 (while we are
fixing bugs in v0.2 and polishing our documentation).
Here is our ROADMAP [1]. As you can see, I already created a section for
Murano
Hi,
Hopefully I will be able to address your questions. First lets start with
the group anti-affinity. This was added towards the end of the Grizzly
release cycle as a scheduling hint. At the last summit we sat and agreed
on a more formal approach to deal with this and we proposed and developed
Hi Dbarros,
Could you look at this blog post:
http://blogs.citrix.com/2013/06/14/openstack-networking-quantum-on-xenserver-from-notworking-to-networking/
I would not expect Grizzly to work with XenServer + Quantum without some
extra patches.
Let me know if you have further questions:
Mate
On
Hello,
Thanks for the reply.
First of all, do you agree that the current documentation for these
filters is inaccurate?
My test environment has 2 compute nodes: compute1 and compute3. First, I
launch 1 instance (not being tied to any group) on each node:
$ nova boot --flavor m1.tiny --image
I noticed the complains about code submission without appropriate
documentation submission, so I am ready to do my part for Cinder backup
I have just one little question.
Not being up to date on the current set of OpenStack manuals, and as I
noticed that the block storage admin guide lost a
Hi Winson,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:23:18PM +, Chan, Winson C wrote:
Regarding the last set of comments on the UpdatePolicy, I want to bring your
attention to a few items. I already submitted a new patch set and didn't
want to reply on the old patch set so that's why I emailed.
Sorry
Long weekend here in the US, so I didn't get a chance to comment before
this was merged, so...
Re Oozie - How did you create the oozie-3.3.2.tar.gz?
Re sudo image-cache - That's not the case for me, the wget is run
without sudo. How are you running disk-image-create?
Re DIB_work - it's best
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Ronen Kat ronen...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Emilien,
I have looked at the block guide - the master branch it is mostly empty,
most of the content was moved to the OpenStack configuration reference.
Any suggestion on relation what should be in the configuration
Hi,
1.We used mvn to create tar.gz and I'll add documentation for that.
2. The command is simple: parameter1='some_value1' ...
parameterN='some_valueN' disk-image-create element1 ... elementM -o
image_name.
Some files in ~/.cache/image-create/ are owned by root (for example, it is
file
I've done a wrong copypaste, see correction inline.
Le 03/09/2013 12:34, Simon Pasquier a écrit :
Hello,
Thanks for the reply.
First of all, do you agree that the current documentation for these
filters is inaccurate?
My test environment has 2 compute nodes: compute1 and compute3. First, I
Hi,
We are removing the schema autogeneration capability from Neutron [1].
The patch however did not pass Torpedo tests on Smokestack; looking at the
logs it seems Firestack deploys Neutron but the db is empty, which is
consistent with firestack leveraging schema auto-generation capabilities.
I've received a number of questions recently about XenServer and XCP and how
they are different - particularly now that XS 6.2 has been released - so
thought I should try and get the answers all in one place.
XenServer:
As of XS 6.2, it was announced that it will be fully open sourced[1] and
Anne Gentle wrote:
Nova is the overall winner (cough) with 110 doc bugs followed by
keystone with 26. 110 doc bugs indicates a serious need.
Ouch.
Teams, please follow through on docs and see how you can help.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bugs/?field.tag=nova
I made a comment on the review, but don't we still need this check if we do
live migration with a target host?
Vish
On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Guangya Liu j...@unitedstack.com wrote:
Greetings,
There is an issue related to live migration without target host might want
to get more
Found an error in the HDP validation code affecting the node count of the
additional (new) node group. Looked at the savanna core code and realized the
nature of the way the node groups were being scaled up (both existing and
additional) and that pointed me to the issue.
-- Jon
On Aug 30,
Hi All,
Today's Hyper-V meeting agenda will be the following.
* Current review backlog
* Puppet Hyper-V module status
Best,
Peter J. Pouliot, CISSP
Senior SDET, OpenStack
Microsoft
New England Research Development Center
One Memorial Drive,Cambridge, MA 02142
Hi everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's Hyper-V meeting.
Meeting ended Tue Sep 3 17:01:15 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-03-16.01.html
Minutes
Feature freeze is on the 5th! Let's try and get these last few reviews through
ASAP! To that end, here's the reviews first in priority order based on
blueprint ... then again in order based on up/down votes. If there's something
that needs discussion and you're stuck, feel free to reach out
Done
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
On Sep 3, 2013, at 21:53, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/30/2013 04:37 AM, Nikolay Starodubtsev wrote:
Hi, everyone!
We have created a proposal for Climate REST API
On 08/30/2013 04:37 AM, Nikolay Starodubtsev wrote:
Hi, everyone!
We have created a proposal for Climate REST API
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U36k5wk0sOUyLl-4Cz8tmk8RQFQGWKO9dVhb87ZxPC8/
And we like to discuss it with everyone.
If you enable commenting on the proposal, then we can put
On 08/27/2013 01:20 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
Is anyone working on/planning on adding support for neutron to grenade? Or is
there any other automated upgrade
Hello,
I am looking for recent OpenLDAP installation and configuration documentation
to use with Keystone Havana H2. Please let me know if you have a pointer to
some.
Regards,
Mark Miller
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Coffman, Joel M. joel.coff...@jhuapl.eduwrote:
We have fully implemented support for transparently encrypting Cinder
volumeshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/encrypt-cinder-volumesfrom
within Nova (see
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30976/), but
We have fully implemented support for transparently encrypting Cinder
volumeshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/encrypt-cinder-volumes
from within Nova (see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30976/), but the lack
of a secure key manager within OpenStack currently precludes us from
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Anne Gentle wrote:
Nova is the overall winner (cough) with 110 doc bugs followed by
keystone with 26. 110 doc bugs indicates a serious need.
Ouch.
Teams, please follow through on docs and see how you can help.
Hey Stas,
Were you ever able to get any answers on this? :)
Thanks!
-Thomas
On 8/12/13 9:42 AM, Thomas Maddox
thomas.mad...@rackspace.commailto:thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote:
Happens all of the time. I haven't been able to get a single meter stored. :(
From: Stas Maksimov
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Coffman, Joel M. joel.coff...@jhuapl.eduwrote:
How can someone use your code without a key manager?
Some key management mechanism is required although it could be simplistic.
For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an implementation of the
key
The issue here is the key manager, barbican, under development is in incubation.
Folks can download and use barbican. The barbican team has worked deligently to
produce the system.
In fact, folks can download and use and vote for Joel's patch to be merged.
And do give us feedback on barbican.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question for the keystone folks re the expected behavior when
deleting a trust.
Is it expected that you can only ever delete a trust as the user who
created it, and that you can *not* delete the trust when
On 09/03/2013 05:41 PM, Coffman, Joel M. wrote:
How can someone use your code without a key manager?
Some key management mechanism is required although it could be
simplistic. For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an
implementation of the key manager interface that returns a
On 09/03/2013 06:26 PM, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote:
The issue here is the key manager, barbican, under development is in
incubation.
Folks can download and use barbican. The barbican team has worked deligently
to produce the system.
In fact, folks can download and use and vote for Joel's
Hi,
I have a question for the keystone folks re the expected behavior when
deleting a trust.
Is it expected that you can only ever delete a trust as the user who
created it, and that you can *not* delete the trust when impersonating that
user using a token obtained via that trust?
The reason
It is possible to enforce security groups on OVS provided you have Openflow
Controller instead of neutron agent managing the OVS switches.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Scott Devoid dev...@anl.gov wrote:
+1 for an answer to this.
The reference documentation suggests running Neutron OVS
Hi Thomas,
Not yet, sorry. But working on it (in parallel!), was having a bit of an
issue setting up a new env with devstack.
Will update you as soon as I have some results.
Thanks,
Stas
On 3 September 2013 23:00, Thomas Maddox thomas.mad...@rackspace.comwrote:
Hey Stas,
Were you
We are holding an online meeting for all the people that use Ask OpenStack.
On Thursday Sept. 5 from 6PM to 7PM Pacific Time on IRC freenode.net
#openstack-community
The main intention is to share best practices and in the long term
improve the objective of Ask OpenStack:
to provide the
How can someone use your code without a key manager?
Some key management mechanism is required although it could be
simplistic. For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an
implementation of the key manager interface that returns a single, constant
key.
That works for
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Bryan D. Payne bdpa...@acm.org wrote:
How can someone use your code without a key manager?
Some key management mechanism is required although it could be
simplistic. For example, we’ve tested our code internally with an
implementation of the key
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:44 PM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Bryan D. Payne bdpa...@acm.org wrote:
How can someone use your code without a key manager?
Some key management mechanism is required although it could be
simplistic.
Excerpts from Dolph Mathews's message of 2013-09-03 16:12:00 -0700:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question for the keystone folks re the expected behavior when
deleting a trust.
Is it expected that you can only ever delete a trust
So I went to do the work I said I was going to do at last week's
Ceilometer meeting -- translate the 2 Alembic migrations in the
Ceilometer source into SA-migrate migrations -- and then rebased my
branch only to find 2 more Alembic migrations added in the last few days:
46 matches
Mail list logo
