[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] cinder-manage volume reattach is broken

2014-04-21 Thread Ray Chen
Hi All, As this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1167931) says, we have to do sth: 1) Just remove 'reattach' in file 'cinder/bin/cinder-manage'. I didn't find any reference to this call. it's om to remove it. 2) If we keep it, 'reattach' function in cinder-manage will be moved to

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] cinder-manage volume reattach is broken

2014-04-21 Thread Ray Chen
Is there any use case for reattach? On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ray Chen chenrano2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, As this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1167931) says, we have to do sth: 1) Just remove 'reattach' in file 'cinder/bin/cinder-manage'. I didn't find any

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Updates to the template for Neutron BPs

2014-04-21 Thread Mandeep Dhami
Just for clarification. Jenkins link in the description puts the generated HTML in the section Juno approved specs even tho' the blueprint is still being reviewed. Am I looking at the right link? Regards, Mandeep On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.comwrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-21 Thread Prasad Vellanki
Aaron One use case is that tenant would like to put all the servers in a single broadcast domain (thus single IP/subnet domain). The servers can include the 3 tier servers (web database and application server). Why would he do that - Because it is simpler. Then the tenant would like to put

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Updates to the template for Neutron BPs

2014-04-21 Thread Kevin Benton
Yes. It shows up in the approved section since it's just a build of the patch as-is. The link is titled gate-neutron-specs-docs in the message from Jenkins. -- Kevin Benton On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.comwrote: Just for clarification. Jenkins link in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Updates to the template for Neutron BPs

2014-04-21 Thread Mike Scherbakov
That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst, if spec is in juno/ folder, then contents shows it as approved one. Once merged, it means approved, right? So it is going to be Ok after merge.

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] review request 66006

2014-04-21 Thread ZhiQiang Fan
Hi, Ceilometer dev cores, There is a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66006/, which is backported from 59669, aims at fixing bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1257232 in havana branch, but it is blocked by Alan Pevec Feb 11 Patch Set 4: Do not merge 2013.2.2 freeze

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Updates to the template for Neutron BPs

2014-04-21 Thread Mandeep Dhami
Got it. Thanks. Regards, Mandeep On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.comwrote: That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst, if spec is in juno/ folder,

[openstack-dev] 答复: [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources?

2014-04-21 Thread Huangtianhua
I plan to register a blueprints in nova for record this. Can I? -邮件原件- 发件人: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年4月20日 21:06 收件人: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org 主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources? On Sun,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

2014-04-21 Thread Oleg Bondarev
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi all, While investigating possible options for Nova-network to Neutron migration I faced a couple of issues with libvirt. One

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

2014-04-21 Thread Timur Nurlygayanov
+1 Ruslan, congratulations! On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote: Ruslan, welcome to the Murano core team :)! On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Anastasia Kuznetsova akuznets...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Stan Lagun

[openstack-dev] [murano] Murano bug scrub 04/23/14

2014-04-21 Thread Timur Nurlygayanov
Hi all, We have many new bugs in Murano and I suggest to conduct the meeting and discuss all bugs, assign these bugs to developers and set the mailstones. Let's schedule this meeting on 04/23/14, at 16:00 UTC, im #murano IRC. Thank you! -- Timur, QA Engineer OpenStack Projects Mirantis Inc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-21 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi, (2014/04/17 21:29), CARVER, PAUL wrote: Akihiro Motoki wrote: To cope with such cases, allowed-address-pairs extension was implemented. http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/allowed_address_pair_ext_ops.html Question on this in particular: Is a tenant permitted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

2014-04-21 Thread Ruslan Kamaldinov
Thank you, guys :) Ruslan On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Timur Nurlygayanov tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 Ruslan, congratulations! On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote: Ruslan, welcome to the Murano core team :)! On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer]support direct alarm_evaluator db access

2014-04-21 Thread Nobuyoshi Nihongi
Hi Liu sheng, We're also investigating alarm_evaluator performance. We observed that alarm_evaluator spends half of the time for calling ceilometerclient while evaluating alarms. Allowing alarm_evaluator directly access db will greatly improve the performance if you have many alarms. Best

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migration to packages, step 1/2

2014-04-21 Thread Dmitry Pyzhov
How does it impact development process? If I change code of, let's say, shotgun, and then run make iso, will I get an ISO with my code of shotgun? What about other packages, sources of which I did not touch (let's say nailgun) ? Everything is packaged, with two exceptions: *astute* and

[openstack-dev] [nova] qemu1.7.1 vs qemu-kvm

2014-04-21 Thread Arindam Choudhury
Hi, As per I understand, onwards qemu 1.3 release all qemu-kvm features have been merged into upstream QEMU. So, if I use qemu 1.7.1 and use the -enable-kvm flag, the VM will use all kvm capabilities. I have a Openstack Grizzly deployment with nova-network and I want to use qemu 1.7.1. So, I

[openstack-dev] [ironic]problem deploying ironic with devstack

2014-04-21 Thread Gopi Krishna Saripuri
I'm trying to deploy ironic with devstack. I'm following the instructions @ http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/dev/dev-quickstart.html#deploying-ironic-with-devstack. It is failing to start nova-scheduler and failing with below error. 2014-04-21 08:01:13.005 INFO nova.virt.driver

[openstack-dev] [ironic] How to use ironic-python-agent ?

2014-04-21 Thread Ramakrishnan G
Hi, This is regarding the new teeth agent that is proposed in Ironic. I understand that the teeth agent is still under development, but is there some document available on how I can include the teeth agent in my ramdisk, so that I can get it handshaked with the ironic driver. I just checked the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

2014-04-21 Thread Akihiro Motoki
(2014/04/21 18:10), Oleg Bondarev wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.commailto:mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.commailto:obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi all, While investigating

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] cinder-manage volume reattach is broken

2014-04-21 Thread Ray Chen
Hi All, As this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1167931) says, we have to do sth: 1) Just remove 'reattach' in file 'cinder/bin/cinder-manage'. I didn't find any reference to this call. it's om to remove it. 2) If we keep it, 'reattach' function in cinder-manage will be moved to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] How to use ironic-python-agent ?

2014-04-21 Thread Alexander Gordeev
Hi, You may want to take a look at: https://github.com/openstack/ironic-python-agent/blob/master/imagebuild/coreos/README.md https://github.com/openstack/ironic-python-agent/blob/master/imagebuild/coreos/oem/run.sh#L5-L10 It uses its own build scripts and builds image based on coreos

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Glance] How about managing heat template like flavors in nova?

2014-04-21 Thread Randall Burt
We discussed this with the Glance community back in January and it was agreed that we should extend Glance's scope to include Heat templates as well as other artifacts. I'm planning on submitting some patches around this during Juno. Adding the Glance tag as this is relevant to them as well.

Re: [openstack-dev] [SWIFT] Delete operation problem

2014-04-21 Thread taurus huang
Please provide the log file: /var/log/swift/swift.log AND /var/log/keystone/keystone.log On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Sumit Gaur sumitkg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I using jclouds lib integrated with Openstack Swift+ keystone combination. Things are working fine except stability test.

[openstack-dev] [sahara] Re: Change in openstack/sahara-image-elements[master]: Add inject hadoop native libs to vanilla hadoop 2

2014-04-21 Thread Matthew Farrellee
On 04/10/2014 08:25 AM, Dmitry Mescheryakov (Code Review) wrote: Dmitry Mescheryakov has posted comments on this change. Change subject: Add inject hadoop native libs to vanilla hadoop 2 .. Patch Set 2: Looks good to me, but

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread mar...@redhat.com
Hi, I think both PTL candidates mentioned process improvements wrt contributions and reviews in their candidacy announcements. As a new Neutron dev I have seen that it is easy for reviews to go unnoticed, especially when they are stand-alone bug fixes that aren't part of a particular blueprint

[openstack-dev] [qa] branchless tempest and havana

2014-04-21 Thread David Kranz
Now that the branchless tempest idea is gaining steam, we have to address this issue along with how we handle releases that are not longer supported upstream. The current state of running master tempest against stable havana can be seen in the bottom two jenkins entries at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I think both PTL candidates mentioned process improvements wrt contributions and reviews in their candidacy announcements. As a new Neutron dev I have seen that it is easy for reviews to go unnoticed,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Chris K
Hi Marios, Just my two cents. I have found these Review Jam's to be quite useful. Ironic has been able to accomplish quite a bit having this style of review, and I believe been able to provide good concise reviews back to the Devs. Chris Krelle On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread mar...@redhat.com
On 21/04/14 18:29, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I think both PTL candidates mentioned process improvements wrt contributions and reviews in their candidacy announcements. As a new Neutron dev I have seen that it is

Re: [openstack-dev] Why does my Windows 7 VM running under Linux' KVM not use all the virtual processors?

2014-04-21 Thread Ben Nemec
This is a development list, and this sounds like a usage question so I would suggest that you ask on the users list instead: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Thanks. -Ben On 04/18/2014 09:36 PM, shenwei9008 wrote: I hava a problem that in windows 7 VM about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Reviews wanted for new TripleO elements

2014-04-21 Thread Ben Nemec
Please don't make review requests on the list. Details here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html Thanks. -Ben On 04/20/2014 02:44 PM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote: Hi all, Can I please ask for some reviews on the following:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] review request 66006

2014-04-21 Thread Ben Nemec
The best way to resolve this is to contact Alan directly on either IRC or email. Nobody else can remove his -2. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html Thanks. -Ben On 04/21/2014 01:56 AM, ZhiQiang Fan wrote: Hi, Ceilometer dev cores, There is a patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] qemu1.7.1 vs qemu-kvm

2014-04-21 Thread Ben Nemec
This is a development list and your question sounds like a usage one. I suggest you ask it on the users list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Thanks. -Ben On 04/21/2014 05:34 AM, Arindam Choudhury wrote: Hi, As per I understand, onwards qemu 1.3 release all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Mandeep Dhami
+1 On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:54 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.comwrote: On 21/04/14 18:29, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I think both PTL candidates mentioned process improvements wrt contributions and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Ghe Rivero
+1 for the alternate slots. Ghe Rivero El 21/04/2014 17:57, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com escribió: On 21/04/14 18:29, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I think both PTL candidates mentioned process

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi, Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members made themselves focus on reviews and be available on IRC channel one or more day(s) of each week (as possible as they can). The number of neutron reviews has increased compared to that time and I am afraid one or two days reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi folks I'm +1 for Review Hour on IRC because it shorten communication round trip time. As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but we can improve it Best Nachi 2014-04-21 9:20 GMT-07:00 Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com: Hi, Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Fawad Khaliq
+1 excellent idea! Fawad Khaliq (m) +1 408.966.2214 On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi folks I'm +1 for Review Hour on IRC because it shorten communication round trip time. As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but we can improve it Best Nachi

[openstack-dev] [oslo] nominating Victor Stinner for the Oslo core reviewers team

2014-04-21 Thread Doug Hellmann
I propose that we add Victor Stinner (haypo on freenode) to the Oslo core reviewers team. Victor is a Python core contributor, and works on the development team at eNovance. He created trollius, a port of Python 3's tulip/asyncio module to Python 2, at least in part to enable a driver for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Mandeep Dhami
If scaling becomes the issue, you can always do review at sub-team level with at least two cores in each review meeting (say neutron-parity, ML2, Services, LBaaS, etc). But probably best to start with one meeting and hit that scale issue first. Regards, Mandeep On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:20 AM,

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Meeting Monday April 21st at 20:00 UTC

2014-04-21 Thread Douglas Mendizabal
Hi Everyone, The Barbican team is hosting our weekly meeting today, Monday April 21, at 20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt Meeting agenda is avaialbe here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican and everyone is welcomed to add agenda items You can check this link

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread mar...@redhat.com
On 21/04/14 19:20, Akihiro Motoki wrote: Hi, Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members made themselves focus on reviews and be available on IRC channel one or more day(s) of each week (as possible as they can). The number of neutron reviews has increased compared to

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday April 22nd at 19:00 UTC

2014-04-21 Thread Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting tomorrow, Tuesday April 22nd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] How to add a property to the API extension?

2014-04-21 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Alex, thanks for your answer very much. --jyh -Original Message- From: Alex Xu [mailto:x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 7:06 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Christopher Yeoh Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] How to add a property

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] nominating Victor Stinner for the Oslo core reviewers team

2014-04-21 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: I propose that we add Victor Stinner (haypo on freenode) to the Oslo core reviewers team. Victor is a Python core contributor, and works on the development team at eNovance. He created trollius, a

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

2014-04-21 Thread Collins, Sean
You know the drill - fill in anything you wish to discuss. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_April_21st -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-php] Questions about user-facing documentation

2014-04-21 Thread Anne Gentle
Great questions, Shaunak. Yep I've been thinking about this for a while but not sure I have complete conclusions. More below. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi folks, As part of working on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL re-encryption scenario question

2014-04-21 Thread Eichberger, German
Hi, Despite there are some good use cases for the re-encryption I think it’s out of scope for a Load Balancer. We can defer that functionality to the VPN – as long as we have a mechanism to insert a LoadBalancer as a VPN node we should get all kind of encryption infrastructure “for free”. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

2014-04-21 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:56 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com wrote: On 21/04/14 19:20, Akihiro Motoki wrote: Hi, Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members made themselves focus on reviews and be available on IRC channel one or more day(s) of each week (as

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Service VMs

2014-04-21 Thread Kyle Mestery
For the upcoming Summit there are 3 sessions filed around Service VMs in Neutron. After discussing this with a few different people, I'd like to propose the idea that the Service VM work be moved out of Neutron and into it's own project on stackforge. There are a few reasons for this: 1. There is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service VMs

2014-04-21 Thread Mark McClain
On Apr 21, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: For the upcoming Summit there are 3 sessions filed around Service VMs in Neutron. After discussing this with a few different people, I'd like to propose the idea that the Service VM work be moved out of Neutron and

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources?

2014-04-21 Thread Jay Pipes
Absolutely. Feel free. On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Huangtianhua huangtian...@huawei.comwrote: I plan to register a blueprints in nova for record this. Can I? -邮件原件- 发件人: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年4月20日 21:06 收件人: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org 主题:

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources?

2014-04-21 Thread Vijay B
Hi Tianhua, Jay, A blueprint has already been submitted in this regard: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZqW7qeyHTm9AQt28GUdfv46ui9mz09UQNvjXiewOAys/edit# We've been working to implement a generic tagging framework where tags are a first class resource and other resources can be associated

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources?

2014-04-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 13:15 -0700, Vijay B wrote: Hi Tianhua, Jay, A blueprint has already been submitted in this regard: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZqW7qeyHTm9AQt28GUdfv46ui9mz09UQNvjXiewOAys/edit# We've been working to implement a generic tagging framework where tags

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-21 Thread Dmitry Pyzhov
We use postgresql 8 on master node right now. At some point we will have to migrate to 9th version. And database migration can became painful part of master node upgrade at that point. At the moment part of our developers use psql9 in their environments and see no issues. Should we enforce

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 00:55 +0400, Dmitry Pyzhov wrote: We use postgresql 8 on master node right now. At some point we will have to migrate to 9th version. And database migration can became painful part of master node upgrade at that point. At the moment part of our developers use psql9 in

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Performance tests of ceilometer-collector and ceilometer-api with different backends

2014-04-21 Thread Ilya Tyaptin
Hi team! In light of discussions about ceilometer backends, we decided to test performance of different storage backends with collector and api services because these services depend on backends availability. For the collector testing we are using not completely real data, we are generating

[openstack-dev] OpenStack/GSoC - Welcome!

2014-04-21 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Hi Team, Please join me in welcoming the following students to our GSoC program [1]. Congrats everyone. Now the hard work begins :) Have fun as well. Artem Shepelev Kumar Rishabh Manishanker Talusani Masaru Nomura Prashanth Raghu Tzanetos Balitsaris Victoria Martínez de la Cruz -- dims [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][sahara] Merging Sahara-UI Dashboard code into horizon

2014-04-21 Thread Matthew Farrellee
On 04/17/2014 03:06 PM, Chad Roberts wrote: Per blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/merge-sahara-dashboard we are merging the Sahara Dashboard UI code into the Horizon code base. Over the last week, I have been working on making this merge happen and along the way some

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service VMs

2014-04-21 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: For the upcoming Summit there are 3 sessions filed around Service VMs in Neutron. After discussing this with a few different people, I'd like to propose the idea that the Service VM work be moved out of Neutron and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL re-encryption scenario question

2014-04-21 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Eichberger, German's message of 2014-04-21 11:51:05 -0700: Hi, Despite there are some good use cases for the re-encryption I think it’s out of scope for a Load Balancer. We can defer that functionality to the VPN – as long as we have a mechanism to insert a LoadBalancer as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-21 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
+++ We already use PostgreSQL 9 on some of our dev boxes, and Nailgun works fine in fake mode and unit tests, so the risk of upgrading it now is minimal. I agree with Dmitry P. that it will cost us more to postpone it and make that upgrade a part of Fuel upgrade. -DmitryB On Mon, Apr 21, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-21 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
+MAX_ULONG :-) On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote: +++ We already use PostgreSQL 9 on some of our dev boxes, and Nailgun works fine in fake mode and unit tests, so the risk of upgrading it now is minimal. I agree with Dmitry P. that it will

Re: [openstack-dev] [NEUTRON] [IPv6] [VPNaaS] - IPSec by default on each Tenant router, the beginning of the Opportunistic Encryption era (rfc4322 ?)...

2014-04-21 Thread Collins, Sean
Have you considered filing a blueprint for this? It'd be good to keep this on the radar. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Neutron -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [nova] wrap_instance_event() swallows return codes....on purpose?

2014-04-21 Thread Chris Friesen
Hi all, In compute/manager.py the function wrap_instance_event() just calls function(). This means that if it's used to decorate a function that returns a value, then the caller will never see the return code. Is this a bug, or is the expectation that we would only ever use this wrapper

[openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-dotnet] High level architecture and extension doc

2014-04-21 Thread Foley, Wayne
Hello All, For anyone interested in the Microsoft .NET side of things... The .NET SDK project has a high level architecture document with details on our design for extensibility. If anyone is interested, the doc can be found here:

[openstack-dev] [qa] Selecting Compute tests by driver/hypervisor

2014-04-21 Thread Daryl Walleck
I nearly opened a spec for this, but I'd really like to get some feedback first. One of the challenges I've seen lately for Nova teams not using KVM or Xen (Ironic and LXC are just a few) is how to properly run the subset of Compute tests that will run for their hypervisor or driver. Regexes

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-dotnet] High level architecture and extension doc

2014-04-21 Thread Alessandro Pilotti
Hi Wayne, Thanks for sharing this! Alessandro On 22/apr/2014, at 01:41, Foley, Wayne wayne.fo...@hp.commailto:wayne.fo...@hp.com wrote: Hello All, For anyone interested in the Microsoft .NET side of things… The .NET SDK project has a high level architecture document with details on our

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL re-encryption scenario question

2014-04-21 Thread Stephen Balukoff
German: I'm hearing from a lot of different sources / organizations on this list that re-encryption at the load balancer is a must-have feature. And I was already part of previous discussions on SSL functionality. ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL ) Also, even if the load

Re: [openstack-dev] [NEUTRON] [IPv6] [VPNaaS] - IPSec by default on each Tenant router, the beginning of the Opportunistic Encryption era (rfc4322 ?)...

2014-04-21 Thread Kevin Benton
This is interesting. How is key distribution handled when I want to use OE with someone like Google.com for example? On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, I here thinking about IPSec when with IPv6 and, one of the first ideas/wishes of

[openstack-dev] [nova] Looking for experienced guide to understand libvirt driver

2014-04-21 Thread Scott Devoid
Hi folks! I am working to add Sheepdog as a disk backend for the libvirt driver. I have a blueprint started and an early version of the code. However I am having trouble working my way thorough the code in the libvirt driver. The storage code doesn't feel vary modular to start with and my changes

[openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron] 2 NICs on Instance Creation not working

2014-04-21 Thread Hopper, Justin
So we are trying to create an instance (Precise Cloud Image) via nova with two NICs. It appears that the second Interface does not get configured. Does the Image Itself need to contain the configuration for the 2nd Interface or is this something the Neuton/Nova should take care of us

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron] 2 NICs on Instance Creation not working

2014-04-21 Thread Kevin Benton
Are the two NICs on the same or different networks? Currently there is a limitation of Nova that does not permit two NICs to be attached to the same Neutron network. -- Kevin Benton On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Hopper, Justin justin.hop...@hp.comwrote: So we are trying to create an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron] 2 NICs on Instance Creation not working

2014-04-21 Thread Hopper, Justin
They are on separate Networks. Justin Hopper Software Engineer - DBaaS irc: juice | gpg: EA238CF3 | twt: @justinhopper From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Monday, April 21, 2014 at

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta

2014-04-21 Thread Robert Collins
I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? Anyhow - please put comments in the etherpad and help select the sessions we'll do during the summit. I think we need to ensure

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Selecting Compute tests by driver/hypervisor

2014-04-21 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:52:39PM +, Daryl Walleck wrote: I nearly opened a spec for this, but I'd really like to get some feedback first. One of the challenges I've seen lately for Nova teams not using KVM or Xen (Ironic and LXC are just a few) is how to properly run the subset of

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][Cold Migration] What about enable cold migration with taraget host

2014-04-21 Thread Jay Lau
Just uploaded a nova-specs for review related to this topic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88755/ Can any of you help review and show your comments if any? 2014-01-13 22:56 GMT+08:00 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com: Thanks Russell, will add this to V3 api ad leave V2 API as it is. Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service VMs

2014-04-21 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: For the upcoming Summit there are 3 sessions filed around Service VMs in Neutron. After discussing this with a few different people,

[openstack-dev] 答复: 答复: [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources?

2014-04-21 Thread Huangtianhua
Thanks very much. I have register the blueprints for nova. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/add-tags-for-os-resources The simple plan is: 1. Add the tags api (create tags/delete tags/describe tags) for v3 api 2. Change the implement for instance from “metadata” to “tags”

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service VMs

2014-04-21 Thread Yongsheng Gong
+1 for its own project for service VM. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: For the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-21 Thread Brandon Logan
Hello Eugene! Are you talking about seeing the code in a simplified approach for a single create call using the current API objects, or one that uses objects created based on the proposal? I was experimenting over the weekend on getting a single create call in the current API model. I was able

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova and LVM thin support

2014-04-21 Thread Luohao (brian)
Just for live snapshot, my understanding is the instance state will not be saved. From: Cristian Tomoiaga [mailto:ctomoi...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:20 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova and LVM thin support Hello everyone, Before

[openstack-dev] [gantt] scheduler sub-group meeting agenda 4/22

2014-04-21 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Sorry for the late notice but I can't make it this week (I got called for jury duty). If people want to hang out on the IRC channel (#openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC) the list of things I wanted to go over was: 1) Open action items a. The wiki page is there

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron] 2 NICs on Instance Creation not working

2014-04-21 Thread Aaron Rosen
Hi, I'm guessing the scripts inside your guest is only setup to configure dhcp on the first interface. See /etc/network/interfaces Best, Aaron On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Hopper, Justin justin.hop...@hp.comwrote: They are on separate Networks. Justin Hopper Software Engineer -

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] scheduler sub-group meeting agenda 4/22

2014-04-21 Thread Sylvain Bauza
No worries, I'll handle it. -Sylvain Le 22 avr. 2014 06:29, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com a écrit : Sorry for the late notice but I can't make it this week (I got called for jury duty). If people want to hang out on the IRC channel (#openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC) the list of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL re-encryption scenario question

2014-04-21 Thread Carlos Garza
On Apr 21, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Eichberger, German german.eichber...@hp.commailto:german.eichber...@hp.com wrote: Hi, Despite there are some good use cases for the re-encryption I think it’s out of scope for a Load Balancer. We can defer that functionality to the VPN – as long as we have a

Re: [openstack-dev] 退出邮件列表

2014-04-21 Thread Li Ma (Nick)
Hi xueyan, You can do it by yourself via the following link: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Li Ma - Original Message - From: l adolphxue...@163.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: 星期一, 2014年 4 月 21日 上午 10:56:08 Subject: [openstack-dev]