Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][pbr][requirements] Broken requirements?

2015-03-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2015-03-23 13:16:05 +0100: The translation jobs [1] are failing since a requirements job merged [2] with: error in setup command: 'install_requires' must be a string or list of strings containing valid project/version requirement specifiers

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-23 Thread ClaytonLuce, Timothy
Mike, Did not see a response to this request. Please respond, we can discuss in the Cinder Core meeting this week. -Original Message- From: ClaytonLuce, Timothy [mailto:timothy.claytonl...@netapp.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:27 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] 'Subgroup' for broker-less ZeroMQ driver

2015-03-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Li Ma's message of 2015-03-23 18:23:39 +0800: Hi all, During previous threads discussing about zeromq driver, a subgroup may be necessary to exchange knowledge and improve efficiency of communication and development. In this subgroup, we can schedule a given topic or just

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
Timothy You are very welcome to add it to the meeting agenda if you feel it should be discussed - the agenda is open and managed on the wiki. On 23 March 2015 at 15:15, ClaytonLuce, Timothy timothy.claytonl...@netapp.com wrote: Mike, Did not see a response to this request. Please respond,

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Using KMIP with Barbican

2015-03-23 Thread Utkarsh Simha
Hello! I was wondering how it is possible to use an external Key Management Server with Barbican? I have configured the barbican-api.conf file for the KMIP Plugin and also set enabled_crypto_plugins to kmip_plugin, but it says CryptoPluginNotFound Any help is appreciated! Thank you :) --

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Cancelling today's team meeting - 03/23/2015

2015-03-23 Thread Renat Akhmerov
We’re cancelling today’s meeting since some key members won’t present. Thanks Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [glance][pbr][requirements] Broken requirements?

2015-03-23 Thread Andreas Jaeger
The translation jobs [1] are failing since a requirements job merged [2] with: error in setup command: 'install_requires' must be a string or list of strings containing valid project/version requirement specifiers requirements.txt now contains oslo.policy~=0.3.1 # Apache-2.0. Is this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need release announcements for all the things?

2015-03-23 Thread Kuvaja, Erno
-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 3:07 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need release announcements for all the things? On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 06:57 AM, Thierry

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how to handle vendor-specific API microversions?

2015-03-23 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: Hi, I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I noticed something that may be problematic. The way microversions are handled, there is a monotonically increasing MAX_API_VERSION value in

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Removing udp_port field from 'ml2_vxlan_endpoint' table

2015-03-23 Thread Romil Gupta
Hello everyone, There is regarding the following bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1373359 May I know what is the significance of having the '*udp_port'* field in the *'ml2_vxlan_endpoints*' table in Neutron DB, Do we have any plans in future that we could use this field for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-23 Thread John Belamaric
On 3/22/15, 8:05 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.ukmailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: Seems to me that an address pool corresponds to a network area that you can route across (because routing only works over a network with unique addresses and that's what an address pool does for you).

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPAM reference driver status and other stuff

2015-03-23 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Comments inline. Salvatore On 23 March 2015 at 15:41, John Belamaric jbelama...@infoblox.com wrote: On 3/20/15, 8:31 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: As the IPAM driver is called in NeutronDbPluginV2, this call happens while another transaction is typically in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPAM reference driver status and other stuff

2015-03-23 Thread John Belamaric
On 3/23/15, 11:03 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com wrote: Whether is a big deal or a failure it depends on one's expectation. If the expectation is to enable external IPAM backends, then I agree that this is not a big deal. However, my expectation (and I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [TripleO] [Ironic] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-23 Thread Miguel Ángel Ajo
Looking at project Calico, I don’t know if what they do is similar to what the people from triple-o ironic do with the neutron-dhcp-agent. I believe we should ask them before deprecation. I added their tags to the subject. AFAIK TripleO/Ironic was patching neutron-dhcp-agent too. For

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit downtime on 2015-03-21

2015-03-23 Thread trinath.soman...@freescale.com
Hi- The Issue is resolved. Its an update to the NEW IP address of Gerrit. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 -Original Message- From: trinath.soman...@freescale.com [mailto:trinath.soman...@freescale.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 11:57 AM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how to handle vendor-specific API microversions?

2015-03-23 Thread John Garbutt
On 21 March 2015 at 18:12, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: Hi, I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I noticed something that may be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how to handle vendor-specific API microversions?

2015-03-23 Thread Chris Friesen
On 03/21/2015 12:12 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: Hi, I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I noticed

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Third Party CI

2015-03-23 Thread Asselin, Ramy
All vendors working on cinder third party ci are encouraged to attend the 3rd party ci meetings. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty This is a great place to ask questions, report issues, and share solutions. Ramy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPAM reference driver status and other stuff

2015-03-23 Thread John Belamaric
On 3/20/15, 8:31 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com wrote: As the IPAM driver is called in NeutronDbPluginV2, this call happens while another transaction is typically in progress. Initiating a separate session within the IPAM driver causes the outer

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need release announcements for all the things?

2015-03-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
Kuvaja, Erno wrote: [...] This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list. There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of those I think we should not get rid of. One area where we could work to remove noise would be to move new core

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need release announcements for all the things?

2015-03-23 Thread Russell Bryant
On 03/23/2015 10:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Kuvaja, Erno wrote: [...] This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list. There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of those I think we should not get rid of. One area where we could work

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-23 Thread John Belamaric
On 3/21/15, 9:10 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com wrote: If we feel a need for specifying the relative position of gateway address and allocation pools when creating a subnet from a pool which will pick a CIDR from its prefixes, then the integer value

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Removing udp_port field from 'ml2_vxlan_endpoint' table

2015-03-23 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi romil, I think the main purpose of this DB field is to maintain the compatibility in dataplane between OVS and LinuxBridge which, by default, don't use the same UDP port for VXLAN. It might be useful for a cloud admin which wants to run some nodes with LB and some others with OVS. I feel like

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] swagger-codegen generated code for python-k8sclient

2015-03-23 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
From: Madhuri Rai madhuri.ra...@gmail.commailto:madhuri.ra...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 at 1:53 AM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-23 Thread liuxinguo
I request the same consideration for Huawei 18000 iSCSI driver and 18000 FC driver. May I also add it to the meeting agenda? · I promise Huawei Volume CI will become stable and reporting stably before March 31. Our CI will be moved to a more better environment tomorrowapp:ds:tomorrow

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][pbr][requirements] Broken requirements?

2015-03-23 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 03/23/2015 02:12 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2015-03-23 13:16:05 +0100: The translation jobs [1] are failing since a requirements job merged [2] with: error in setup command: 'install_requires' must be a string or list of strings containing valid

Re: [openstack-dev] Multi Region Designate

2015-03-23 Thread Anik
Yes this sounds interesting too. In fact the geo diverse failover mentioned in the “copper” proposal can easily be considered as an extension global DNS namespace that I am talking about.  Lets see if we get any response from openstack-dev mailer. Regards,Anik From: joehuang

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Revert objects: introduce numa topology limits objects

2015-03-23 Thread Dan Smith
I am really sorry it got in as I have -1ed it several times for the same reason (I _really_ hate using the -2 hammer - we're all adults here after all). I guess that I should take some blame as a reviewer on that patch, but only after this mail do I read some of your comments as fundamentally

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Prefix delegation and user facing API thoughts

2015-03-23 Thread John Belamaric
On 3/18/15, 9:12 PM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote: My hope is that either the new IPAM subsystem for subnet allocations would provide this, or that a small API extension could paper over some of the sharper edges. In IPAM we have added this concept of a subnet request. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] swagger-codegen generated code for python-k8sclient

2015-03-23 Thread Hongbin Lu
Hi Madhuri, Amazing work! I wouldn't concern the code duplication and modularity issue since the codes are generated. However, there is another concern here: if we find a bug/improvement of the generated code, we probably need to modify the generator. The question is if the upstream will accept

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-23 Thread Jay Pipes
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 05:05:17PM -0700, Ian Wells wrote: On 22 March 2015 at 07:48, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/20/2015 05:16 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: To clarify a bit, we obviously divide lots of things by tenant (quotas, network listing, etc). The difference is that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][pci-passthrough] Error: An object of type PciDevicePoolList is required here

2015-03-23 Thread Jay Pipes
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:58:00PM +, Moshe Levi wrote: Hi, In the latest master nova code I am keep getting this error An object of type PciDevicePoolList is required here My nova.conf contains pci_passthrough_whitelist. When I tried to launch vm after devstack installation the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Sahara] Is it possible to do instance scale for a node in a living cluster ?

2015-03-23 Thread Andrew Lazarev
Hi Chen, 1. resize the master node. Using command like “nova resize”, to add more cpu memory and other resources for this single instance. Instance reside is not supported on Sahara level. But you can always do that on nova level. Sahara doesn't use any specific information about flavor

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Updating 'scheduled_at' field of nova instances in the database.

2015-03-23 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18:28AM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: All the VM information is stored in the instances table. This includes all the time related field like scheduled_at, launched_at etc. After upgrading to Juno, I have noticed that my 'scheduled_at' field is not getting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-23 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I think that moving the discussion in whether a pool represents a tenant's routable address space, or whether we need a new (another?!) API entity do deal with it probably does not really fall within the scope of this thread. I am pretty sure Carl will soon push a specification for address scope

[openstack-dev] [glance] reminder to check 'Author' of patch set when reviewing

2015-03-23 Thread stuart . mclaren
A quick reminder for Glance cores to check if the 'Author' changes between patch sets. When someone other than the original submitter uploads a new patch set they should, if appropriate, add themselves as a co-author rather than replace the original patch author. (It's the 'Author' rather than

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit downtime on 2015-03-21

2015-03-23 Thread trinath.soman...@freescale.com
Hi- I get this error from my CI Zuul debug Log. 2015-03-23 12:16:45,618 ERROR gerrit.GerritWatcher: Exception on ssh event stream: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/zuul/lib/gerrit.py, line 64, in _run key_filename=self.keyfile) File

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Updating 'scheduled_at' field of nova instances in the database.

2015-03-23 Thread Deepthi Dharwar
On 03/23/2015 09:00 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18:28AM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: All the VM information is stored in the instances table. This includes all the time related field like scheduled_at, launched_at etc. After upgrading to Juno, I have noticed that my

[openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting agenda 3/25

2015-03-23 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC (9:00AM MDT) 1) Patch status - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking 2) Vancouver design summit - start thinking about what we want to discuss -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Microversions. And why do we need API extensions for new API functionality?

2015-03-23 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:52:14PM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:14:21 -0400 Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/09/2015 03:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 03/08/2015 08:10 AM, Alex Xu wrote:

[openstack-dev] [oslo] stable-maint for oslo.vmware

2015-03-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
Gary pinged me on IRC earlier today and I missed him, so I’m sending this to the list in case someone else wants to volunteer. It sounds like there are some stable branch changes for oslo.vmware that need attention. Does someone on the oslo.vmware team want to volunteer to be on a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][TaskFlow] Proposal for new core reviewer (min pae)

2015-03-23 Thread Joshua Harlow
Will do, And of course, the more reviews the better (and I'm grateful for those that have put in some time; in there busy day lives to make it possible). Keep it up as it's always appreciated :) -Josh Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-03-23 10:40:09 -0700:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Microversions. And why do we need API extensions for new API functionality?

2015-03-23 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] I don't want it suppressed. I want the use of API extensions and the extension framework(s) to be completely dropped for all future API-affecting work. [...] Perhaps controversial, but would it be worthwhile to propose to the Defcore

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] swagger-codegen generated code for python-k8sclient

2015-03-23 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
From: Hongbin Lu hongbin...@gmail.commailto:hongbin...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 at 8:37 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need release announcements for all the things?

2015-03-23 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Russell Bryant's message of 2015-03-23 07:51:43 -0700: On 03/23/2015 10:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Kuvaja, Erno wrote: [...] This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list. There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-23 Thread Mike Perez
On 13:15 Mon 23 Mar , ClaytonLuce, Timothy wrote: Mike, Did not see a response to this request. Please respond, we can discuss in the Cinder Core meeting this week. Which request? I already responded to your message:

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] swagger-codegen generated code for python-k8sclient

2015-03-23 Thread Adrian Otto
On Mar 23, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote: From: Hongbin Lu hongbin...@gmail.commailto:hongbin...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Microversions. And why do we need API extensions for new API functionality?

2015-03-23 Thread Jay Pipes
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:52:14PM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:14:21 -0400 Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/09/2015 03:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 03/08/2015 08:10 AM, Alex Xu wrote: Thanks for Jay point this out! If we have agreement on this and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Prefix delegation and user facing API thoughts

2015-03-23 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
Following discussion on IRC, a patch is now up to add this config option. Reviews appreciated. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166973/ Cheers, John On 23/03/2015 18:11, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, John Davidge (jodavidg) jodav...@cisco.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need release announcements for all the things?

2015-03-23 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: One area where we could work to remove noise would be to move new core reviewers nomination/suggestion threads out of the ML. They are mostly useless IMHO (only +1s), and PTLs are empowered to make the call anyway.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Microversions. And why do we need API extensions for new API functionality?

2015-03-23 Thread Jay Pipes
Sorry for the delay in responding all. Comments inline. On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:04:59PM -0700, melanie witt wrote: On Mar 9, 2015, at 13:14, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: So possibly another way to think about this is our prior signaling of what was supported by Nova was signaled by

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

2015-03-23 Thread Anita Kuno
On 03/23/2015 03:59 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI deadlines in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that you're required to have a CI by the end of

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Applying patch in bug #1414725 while string freeze in place

2015-03-23 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Please direct this query to documentation and i18n lists [1, 2, 3] and include the response (if any) as a comment on the review so that the core reviewers are aware. Thanks for bringing this up and helping in contributing to the project! [1]

[openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

2015-03-23 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI deadlines in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that you're required to have a CI by the end of Kilo [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. This should've

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-23 Thread Van Leeuwen, Robert
I think there are valid reasons to not use namespaces: * Fewer moving parts == less can potentialy fail * Troubleshooting is easier due to less places to look / need no familiarity with namespaces tools * If I remember correctly setting up a namespace can get really slow when you

[openstack-dev] [nova] Revert objects: introduce numa topology limits objects

2015-03-23 Thread Nikola Đipanov
I'd really like the following commit reverted: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137817/ I am really sorry it got in as I have -1ed it several times for the same reason (I _really_ hate using the -2 hammer - we're all adults here after all). My reasoning for it is quite simple and is outlined

Re: [openstack-dev] Multi Region Designate

2015-03-23 Thread joehuang
Hi, Anik, Interesting idea. The use case is quite useful. One project called “Copper” in OPNFV also mentioned a similar use case “Geo-Diverse Load-Balanced Service Instance Deployment” here : https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases Designate may help “Geo-Diverse Load-Balanced Service

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-23 Thread Miguel Ángel Ajo
+1 for deprecation if people don’t have use cases / good reasons to keep it, I don’t know and I can’t think of any, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Miguel Ángel Ajo On Monday, 23 de March de 2015 at 2:34, shihanzhang wrote: +1 to deprecate this option At 2015-03-21

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-23 Thread Van Leeuwen, Robert
Are the setups out there *not* using the use_namespaces option? I'm curious as to why, and if it would be difficult to migrate such a setup to use namespaces. At my previous employer we did not use namespaces. This was due to a installation a few years ago on SL6 which did not have name

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-23 Thread Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Monday, 23 de March de 2015 at 8:20, Van Leeuwen, Robert wrote: Are the setups out there *not* using the use_namespaces option? I'm curious as to why, and if it would be difficult to migrate such a setup to use namespaces. At my previous employer we did not use

[openstack-dev] [nova] How to deal the rpc timeout between compute and conductor?

2015-03-23 Thread Rui Chen
Hi all: I deploy my OpenStack with VMware driver, one nova-compute connect to VMware deployment, there are about 3000 VMs in VMware deployment. I use mysql. The method of InstanceList.get_by_host rasie rpc timeout error when ComputeManager.init_host() and _sync_power_states periodic

[openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

2015-03-23 Thread Deepak Shetty
Hi all, I was wondering if there was a neat way to override the settings file present in the devstack plugin stackforge project. For eg: stackforge/devstack-plugin-glusterfs I plan to use `enable_plugin glusterfs repo` in my local to setup GlusterFS backend for openstack But I am forced to

[openstack-dev] storage node(cinder) local.conf file settings

2015-03-23 Thread Kamsali, RaghavendraChari (Artesyn)
Hi, I want to setup controller-compute-storage multi node setup, could anyone explain how to configure local.conf file for devstack for storage node(cinder) Thanks and Regards, Raghavendrachari kamsali __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [magnum] swagger-codegen generated code for python-k8sclient

2015-03-23 Thread Madhuri Rai
Hi All, This is to have a discussion on the blueprint for implementing python-k8client for magnum. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/python-k8sclient I have committed the code generated by swagger-codegen at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166720/. But I feel the quality of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] 'Chassis' element in Ironic

2015-03-23 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, In one of the Ironic IRC meetings, a discussion on whether to retain the ‘Chassis’ element in Ironic or not came up. I am interested to know whether this is still valid and a decision is to be made on whether the component is retained or not. Even tho the Chassis resource in our API is

[openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] 'Subgroup' for broker-less ZeroMQ driver

2015-03-23 Thread Li Ma
Hi all, During previous threads discussing about zeromq driver, a subgroup may be necessary to exchange knowledge and improve efficiency of communication and development. In this subgroup, we can schedule a given topic or just discuss some re-factoring stuff or bugs in irc room at a fixed time.

Re: [openstack-dev] Multi Region Designate

2015-03-23 Thread joehuang
Hi, Anik, Interesting idea. The use case is quite useful. One project called “Copper” in OPNFV also mentioned a similar use case here : https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases “a single (flat) external domain name space for floating IPs” could be the first step, multiple external domains may

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Neutron] Deprecating the use_namespaces option - Now's the time to speak up!

2015-03-23 Thread Miguel Ángel Ajo
I see you point Van, In the other hand, removing it, cleans up lot of conditional code parts (moving parts at the other side), and also the non-netns case is not tested by upstream CI, AFAIK, so it could be broken anytime and we would not notice it. Miguel Ángel Ajo On Monday, 23 de March

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit downtime on 2015-03-21

2015-03-23 Thread Gary Kotton
Please see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2015-February/002425.h tml That should explain. On 3/23/15, 8:53 AM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote: Hi- The Issue is resolved. Its an update to the NEW IP address of Gerrit. -- Trinath

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next?

2015-03-23 Thread Anita Kuno
On 03/23/2015 05:21 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:23 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: Some folks just will not respect other people's time. To pretend otherwise is a huge dis-service to folks trying their hardest to support those worthy of the support. This may be true in

[openstack-dev] [nova] proposing feature for Liberty, would this need a spec?

2015-03-23 Thread Chris Friesen
Hi, I'd like to propose (and implement) a feature for Liberty that would allow configuration of the pinning of the emulator when CPU pinning is enabled. (Currently the emulator is affined to the logical OR of all pCPUs used by the instance.) The general idea is to add an optional flavor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][TaskFlow] Proposal for new core reviewer (min pae)

2015-03-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-03-23 10:40:09 -0700: Greetings all stackers, I propose that we add Min Pae[1] to the taskflow-core team[2]. Min has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in helping prove taskflow out (by being a user via the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][TaskFlow] Proposal for new core reviewer (min pae)

2015-03-23 Thread Min Pae
I’ll take that as a prod to step up on my review contributions, and definitely will be doing so ;-) Thank you for the vote of confidence, I’m glad to be helping with what I think will be an essential part of the underlying software infrastructure for Openstack services. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][cinder][nova][neutron] going forward to oslo-config-generator ...

2015-03-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Walter A. Boring IV's message of 2015-03-23 13:49:48 -0700: Maybe we can leverage Cinder's use of the abc in the drivers.py now. We could create an OptionsVD that drivers would add and implement. The config generator could inspect objects looking for OptionsVD and then call

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

2015-03-23 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
On 03/23/2015 01:50 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 12:59 Mon 23 Mar , Stefano Maffulli wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI deadlines in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] proposing feature for Liberty, would this need a spec?

2015-03-23 Thread Michael Still
I'm not 100% sure if this would be trivial or not, but the process to find out isn't scary. We should add this to a nova meeting agenda on the wiki and talk through it during a meeting. (Noting that we're not approving specs for liberty in any form until the Kilo branch is cut, so we have some

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

2015-03-23 Thread Rochelle Grober
I’d like to suggest that the myriad wiki pages and spreadsheets for Third Party CI also be consolidated to a more manageable count. Just looking for maintainers contact, you can find information (often conflicting) in Stackalytics, on the ThirdPartyDrivers page, on the Cinder PTL’s google doc

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

2015-03-23 Thread Anita Kuno
On 03/23/2015 05:51 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: I’d like to suggest that the myriad wiki pages and spreadsheets for Third Party CI also be consolidated to a more manageable count. Just looking for maintainers contact, you can find information (often conflicting) in Stackalytics, on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Microversions. And why do we need API extensions for new API functionality?

2015-03-23 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] I don't want it suppressed. I want the use of API extensions and the extension framework(s) to be completely dropped for all future API-affecting work.

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

2015-03-23 Thread Mike Perez
On 12:59 Mon 23 Mar , Stefano Maffulli wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI deadlines in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that you're required to have a CI by the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][cinder][nova][neutron] going forward to oslo-config-generator ...

2015-03-23 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
Maybe we can leverage Cinder's use of the abc in the drivers.py now. We could create an OptionsVD that drivers would add and implement. The config generator could inspect objects looking for OptionsVD and then call list_opts() on it. That way, driver maintainers don't also have to patch

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next?

2015-03-23 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:23 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: Some folks just will not respect other people's time. To pretend otherwise is a huge dis-service to folks trying their hardest to support those worthy of the support. This may be true in general but I have yet to be convinced that this is

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

2015-03-23 Thread Patrick East
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI deadlines in August. If you post a driver for Kilo, it was communicated that you're

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][TaskFlow] Proposal for new core reviewer (min pae)

2015-03-23 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. -- dims On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-03-23 10:40:09 -0700: Greetings all stackers, I propose that we add Min Pae[1] to the taskflow-core team[2]. Min has been actively contributing to

[openstack-dev] [Keystone][FFE] ECP wrapped assertions

2015-03-23 Thread Steve Martinelli
I'd like to request an exemption for the following to go into the Kilo release. This work is crucial for: - Keystone to Keystone communication. An ECP wrapped SAML assertion will make it much easier for consumers and clients to use the K2K feature in Keystone. Currently, a client must take

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)

2015-03-23 Thread Diem Tran
Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-23 Thread Kevin Benton
How would you represent that you want the last address in a /26 network if you don't know what address range you are getting? 0.0.0.63? That seems pretty confusing when the resulting address turns out to be 192.168.10.191. It isn't a new concept to think about the network and host parts of an IP

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Invalid import in tempest v2 api tests

2015-03-23 Thread Doug Wiegley
Hi Vijay, That works because we pin the version of tempest that we run against, via tox. If you're using devstack-gate in your CI, note the two hooks found here: https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas/blob/master/neutron_lbaas/tests/contrib/ If not, you need to mimic the behavior of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] canceling meeting

2015-03-23 Thread Doug Wiegley
Hi all, Lbaas meetings are canceled until further notice, including tomorrow morning. Thanks, doug On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote: That is correct. On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:11 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: +1 For on demand

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Address Scopes (was: Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant)

2015-03-23 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:56 AM, John Belamaric jbelama...@infoblox.com wrote: On 3/22/15, 8:05 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: Seems to me that an address pool corresponds to a network area that you can route across (because routing only works over a network with unique

[openstack-dev] [glance] Applying patch in bug #1414725 while string freeze in place

2015-03-23 Thread ashish.jain14
Hello, I have submitted a patch to address the bug(https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1414725). This patch updates glance-manage documentation. Currently the documentation misses details on handling the glance-manage metadata definitions. I have submitted

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-23 Thread ClaytonLuce, Timothy
I disagree with your assertion that NetApp has ignored this for a year and we are being inconsiderate of the community. The specific drivers (FC) we are discussing were added in the Kilo-1 period, so since Dec. and are net new drivers. All other NetApp drivers have had corresponding CI in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] reminder to check 'Author' of patch set when reviewing

2015-03-23 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-03-23 15:52:35 + (+), stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: A quick reminder for Glance cores to check if the 'Author' changes between patch sets. [...] Also a quick reminder to all devs. If you stick to git commands for manipulating commits then it should be _very_hard_ to accidentally

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [UI] New design + Bootstrap 3

2015-03-23 Thread Andrew Woodward
Looks good, a couple of things: Is there a reason that the nodes near to top didn't render in the role group? Can you render a message like deployment failure, or deployment success? Can you render the networks or settings page? On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Vitaly Kramskikh

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Prefix delegation and user facing API thoughts

2015-03-23 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, John Davidge (jodavidg) jodav...@cisco.com wrote: The above blueprint outlines an admin-configurable global default pool to be used in the case of a user calling subnet-create without specifying a CIDR or subnet-pool ID. If the OpenStack environment has been

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday March 24th at 19:00 UTC

2015-03-23 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly meeting on Tuesday March 24th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][pci-passthrough] Error: An object of type PciDevicePoolList is required here

2015-03-23 Thread Moshe Levi
Jay, Thanks for the response. Here is the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1435483 -Original Message- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:46 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][neutron] Best API for generating subnets from pool

2015-03-23 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:52 AM, John Belamaric jbelama...@infoblox.com wrote: On 3/21/15, 9:10 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: If we feel a need for specifying the relative position of gateway address and allocation pools when creating a subnet from a pool which will pick a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-23 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I think the goal of subnet pools is to use these environments as units of isolations and ensure no overlapping CIDRs there. However, since there is no way to identify such environments at the API layers, API clients

[openstack-dev] [Oslo][TaskFlow] Proposal for new core reviewer (min pae)

2015-03-23 Thread Joshua Harlow
Greetings all stackers, I propose that we add Min Pae[1] to the taskflow-core team[2]. Min has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in helping prove taskflow out (by being a user via the project that he is using it in @ https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cue) and helping

  1   2   >