You could pass the cache through with a volume
As for what docker buys you, it would allow a vm (or my desktop) running centos
(as an example) to build packages for multiple distro's using the distro's own
native tools. I see that as a plus.
Thanks,
Kevin
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
There are a huge number of openstack meetings now, but I think that
each individual person will only be interested in a handful of them.
Adding the irc-meetings.ical to a calendar app really pollutes your
personal schedule,
All,
I’d like to thank everyone that came to the Vancouver Summit and our Official
Ops Meeting[1].
Since then we have officially been sanctioned[2] and made amazing progress with
true integration testing our cookbooks[3][4], including leveraging Rally[5] for
benchmarking.
Turns out after
Hello,
I would like to nominate Serge (svg on IRC) for the os-ansible-deployment-core
team. Serge has been involved with the greater Ansible community for some time
and has been working with the OSAD project for the last couple of months. He
has been an active contributor in the
+1
From: Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 5:01 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] Nominating Serge van Ginderachter to the
os-ansible-deployment core team
Hello,
On 05/28/2015 04:32 PM, Haïkel wrote:
2015-05-28 21:58 GMT+02:00 Paul Belanger pabelan...@redhat.com:
Personally, I'm a fan of mock. Is there plan to add support for it? Also,
currently containers are not being used in -infra. Not saying it is a show
stopper, but could see some initial
On 29/05/15 04:10, D'ANDREA, JOE (JOE) wrote:
[This was originally posted to openst...@lists.openstack.org by accident.
Reposting it to openstack-dev.]
Calling all Heat neophytes, aficionados, and everyone in between ...
I've often thought it would be helpful to add a Heat Template Cookbook
On 05/28/2015 09:58 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
Not sure I'm a fan of rdorpm, seems too specific to RDO and would not
foster other people using the git repo for packaging. Personally, I
simple say rpm- prefix, allowing for branches to be used for distro
specific changes.
I full agree with that.
Hi,
Sorry I missed the email…
Default template with ACL mechanism will definitely covers my use case.
Admin-only writable template is exactly what I am looking for. However, I saw
the blueprint and it is “Not started”. There is there anything I can help
implementing the ACL?
Right now I am
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-05-28 13:30:44 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
Do we already have this hidden somewhere, or would it make sense to
maybe add this as something in openstack-infra/project-config along side
the jjb definition that creates the
2015-05-28 21:58 GMT+02:00 Paul Belanger pabelan...@redhat.com:
Personally, I'm a fan of mock. Is there plan to add support for it? Also,
currently containers are not being used in -infra. Not saying it is a show
stopper, but could see some initial planning that is required for it.
Nothing
2015-05-28 10:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org:
I don't know delorean at all, but what should be kept in mind is that,
for Debian and Ubuntu, we *must* use sbuild, which is what is used on
the buildd networks.
I also started working on openstack-pkg-tools to provide such sbuild
Works for me too
From: Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:49 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend
support
That
On 05/27/2015 05:26 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 27/05/15 09:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
tl;dr:
- - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on upstream
gerrit with reviews.
- - The intention is to better share the workload,
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 05/28/2015 12:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a brief follow-up conversation with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/05/15 07:07, Steve Baker wrote:
On 29/05/15 04:10, D'ANDREA, JOE (JOE) wrote:
[This was originally posted to openst...@lists.openstack.org by
accident. Reposting it to openstack-dev.]
Calling all Heat neophytes, aficionados, and everyone in
Hello!
It's that time - hopefully everyone has recovered from the summit by
now and is getting back in the swing of things.
I'd like to take a little of everyone's time to summarize the main
points we covered while in Vancouver (and record them here for folks
who didn't make it, were in other
2015-05-27 23:26 GMT+02:00 Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com:
On 27/05/15 09:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
tl;dr:
- - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on upstream
gerrit with reviews.
- - The intention is to better
Hi Sean,
I understand and share you point of view. The best and cleaner solution
would be to have the vxlan support out of the box. Unfortunatly it is not
the case for 6.0 and I doubt this feature can be available before HCF for
6.1 (planned in the next upcoming days).
That's why in my initial
Team,
i've published 0.13.1 of oslo.vmware with the revert from Gary and so
far the Nova jobs are good.
-- dims
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
We have reverted the problematic patch (I suggest that you all add the word
balagan to your lexicons).
We didn’t have an etherpad for the discussion at the summit, so I’ve posted the
pictures I took with transcriptions on my blog at
http://doughellmann.com/2015/05/28/openstack-requirements-handling.html
I didn’t really make any attempt to add detail to the transcription, since
Robert will be
On 2015-05-28 13:30:44 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
Do we already have this hidden somewhere, or would it make sense to
maybe add this as something in openstack-infra/project-config along side
the jjb definition that creates the job/class of job somehow?
[...]
We don't (yet anyway).
+1
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Folks, I'd like to propose Assaf Muller to be a member of the Neutron core
reviewer team. Assaf has been a long time contributor in Neutron, and he's
also recently become my testing Lieutenant. His influence and
Hi! While discussing the proposed oslo.messaging driver policy[1] at the
summit, we had a question about where we should document who the
appropriate respondents are for any particular gate job.
Do we already have this hidden somewhere, or would it make sense to
maybe add this as something in
On Thursday, May 28, 2015, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a brief follow-up conversation with Doug and
I don't know AMQP very well. At the protocol level, are Exchanges, Queues, etc
things? Are fanout, durability, and other things required or optional to be
implemented?
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Gordon Sim [g...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:05 AM
On 05/28/2015 05:14 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Thats like saying you should implement a sql engine inside of
Berkeley DB since so many folks like sql... Not a good fit. If you
want AMQP, get an AMQP server. Zaqar's intentionally lighter weight
then that. Hardly any OpenStack services use but a
Hi Kunal,
I would like to participate as well.
Mon-Fri morning US Pacific time works for me.
Thanks,
Rakesh Saha
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam
vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com wrote:
We would like to participate as well.
Monday-Friday Morning US time works for me..
Hello there!
First, for those of you who hadn't been at Horizon design session where I
was telling showing the Merlin framework, here is the related etherpad
[1] and the demo slides themselves [2]. Merlin wasn't the only thing shown
at that design session, I hope that some video of HotBuilder
On 28/05/15 03:35, Jan Provaznik wrote:
On 05/28/2015 01:10 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:54, Richard Raseley wrote:
Zane Bitter wrote:
Steve is working on a patch to allow package-based updates of overcloud
nodes[1] using the distro's package manager (yum in the case of RDO,
but
On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote:
I haven’t seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we’d be
interested as well — we have done quite a bit of work on this in the
past, including dealing with the Designate team on this very subject. We
can be available most hours between 9am-6pm
On 05/28/2015 07:20 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
I don't know AMQP very well. At the protocol level, are Exchanges, Queues, etc
things? Are fanout, durability, and other things required or optional to be
implemented?
AMQP 1.0 is very different from the pre 1.0 versions. Where 0.8/0.9
focus on
Sam, Welcome to the Kolla core team!
https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/460,members
Regards
-steve
From: Daneyon Hansen (danehans)
daneh...@cisco.commailto:daneh...@cisco.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
+1
On May 28, 2015 8:44 AM, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com
wrote:
+1
Doug
On May 28, 2015, at 7:42 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Folks, I'd like to propose Assaf Muller to be a member of the Neutron core
reviewer team. Assaf has been a long time contributor in
This is great work guys. Can we add it to the wiki too? Also +2 on the
name from Emilien.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Emilien Macchi emil...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Sebastien Badia wrote:
Hi,
During the Puppet session (during the Vancouver summit), we talked
Makes sense to me. Has the Glance Artifact Repository implemented enough bits
to have Heat and/or Murano artefacts yet? Also, has there been any work on
Exporting/Importing them through some defined format (tarball?) that doesn't
depend on the artefact type?
I've been talking with the Heat
while more effort, you could write a script that took a package name, and gave
back the whole set of rpm/versions that it depended on, then write that to a
file. If the list of rpm/versions from the previous run changes, then have
puppet kick the process?
Thanks,
Kevin
+1
From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, May 25, 2015 at 11:59 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi Ben,
Those approaches are still the ones in place, and they are implemented in
the prototype. Just to recap:
Approach #1: Driver migration, optimized from same vendor, like netapp =
netapp. Driver should implement, does not require an additional DB row.
Approach #2: Generic Migration, when
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-05-28 11:24:33 -0700:
On 28/05/15 03:35, Jan Provaznik wrote:
On 05/28/2015 01:10 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:54, Richard Raseley wrote:
Zane Bitter wrote:
Steve is working on a patch to allow package-based updates of overcloud
On May 28, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 05/28/2015 12:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I
Comments/praise in-line.
On 5/28/15 11:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
TL;DR:
- In an effort to reduce useless work, in Liberty we'll switch from
trying to accurately predict what will end up in milestones to reporting
what actually landed.
Glad to hear.
- We'll also replace
I haven’t seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we’d be interested as
well — we have done quite a bit of work on this in the past, including dealing
with the Designate team on this very subject. We can be available most hours
between 9am-6pm Monday-Friday CST.
--Adam
On 28 May 2015 at 03:09, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've heard that other projects come up with actual action lists and
work assignments. I've heard Nova, Ironic, Oslo do it, and I witnessed
just that in those Oslo sessions I
On 05/28/2015 01:14 PM, Rodrigo Barbieri wrote:
For Share Migration, I am looking into integrating it with Private
Driver Storage as Valeriy mentioned. The purpose is in fact different
than not displaying the volume being migrated to the user, we are
attempting to not use a temporary DB entry
ESWAR RAO wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking into taskflow userguide and examples.
http://www.giantflyingsaucer.com/blog/?p=4896
I also started aggregating these on:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow#Blogs.2Ftutorials
If people know of more/others please add :-)
Thanks!
Can anyone
The glance_store release management team is pleased to announce:
Release of glance_store version 0.6.0
Please find the details related to the release at:
https://launchpad.net/glance-store/liberty/0.6.0
Please report the issues through launchpad:
Hi Oleksii,
Thanks for putting together the slides, they are well done and extremely useful!
I find this 0MQ driver redesign proposal a much needed improvement over the
current design.
However it is worth debating the need to keep the proxy server and I would be
interested to hear from others
As part of the work to object-ify the image metadata dicts, I'm looking
at the current way the libvirt driver fetches image metadata for an
instance, in cases where the compute manager hasn't already passed it
into the virt driver API. I see 2 methods that libvirt uses to get the
image
On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote:
I haven’t seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we’d be
interested as well — we have done quite a bit of work on this in the
past, including dealing with the Designate
That works for me.
Is that OK for everyone else?
- Sent from my phone
On 28 May 2015 8:39 pm, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com wrote:
On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote:
I haven’t seen any responses from my
For Share Migration, I am looking into integrating it with Private Driver
Storage as Valeriy mentioned. The purpose is in fact different than not
displaying the volume being migrated to the user, we are attempting to not
use a temporary DB entry at all. I am not sure how this will play out,
Btw, if u *do not* want to do a spec (using [1]) or blueprint let me
know and I'll probably make a spec so that we can ensure (and agree on)
the semantics of this because the specifics of what 'cancel' or 'abort'
means start to matter.
[1]
Hi, Sean,
A plugin cannot modify Fuel UI but it actually can change a segmentation
type after deployment. On UI it's still GRE but in fact it will be VxLAN. I
know, it's ugly, but should work.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
VxLAN support cannot be
On May 28, 2015 2:51:56 PM EDT, Andrey Danin ada...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi, Sean,
A plugin cannot modify Fuel UI but it actually can change a
segmentation
type after deployment. On UI it's still GRE but in fact it will be
VxLAN. I
know, it's ugly, but should work.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:47
This thread is awesome :) I love the conversation we've kicked off,
and it's touching on all the considerations we had in mind when we put
this together to begin with.
Regarding vision: I agree with a lot of what Monty, Kevin (and others)
have said. For me, what I want to see is the pace to go
I’m moving this whiteboard to the ML so we can have some discussion to refine
it, and then go back and update the whiteboard.
Source: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/mesos-bay-type
My comments in-line below.
Begin forwarded message:
From: hongbin
German,
Thanks for the initiative. From a Rackspace perspective, we would love to
participate and provide inputs on the use cases. As discussed during the
meeting at the summit (and as you alluded to in your email), it's about user
experience and clear separation of use cases between FWaaS and
On 29/05/15 06:41, Haïkel wrote:
Here's the main script to rebuild a RPM package.
https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean/blob/master/scripts/build_rpm.sh
The script basically uses rpmbuild to build packages, we could have a
build_deb.sh that uses
sbuild and add dockerfiles for the
On 05/26/2015 03:13 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:00:32AM +0200, Géza Gémes wrote:
Hi,
When someone calls nova volume-attach or the block-device-mapping parameter
at boot, it is possible to specify a device name for the guest. However I
couldn't find any guest OS
Kunal and I discussed and we think following time suggested by Doug should
work for most of us.
So lets plan to meet on Tuesday at 1600UTC (9am PST). We will use the
lbaas meeting slot in #openstack-meeting-4.
Thanks,
Vivek
On 5/28/15, 12:37 PM, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com wrote:
Hi folks,Just drafted a blueprint on this topic so that we can all be on the same page. Its quite long, but hopefully you will take some time to read through it and provide some meaningful feedback. In the mean time, I will do some more investigation and keep you all posted. If you have questions
+1
2015-05-28 22:42 GMT+09:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com:
Folks, I'd like to propose Assaf Muller to be a member of the Neutron core
reviewer team. Assaf has been a long time contributor in Neutron, and he's
also recently become my testing Lieutenant. His influence and knowledge in
At the summit we found time to squeeze in a revamp of the way we
manage requirements.txt, global-requirements and the versions of
packages we use in the CI system.
https://review.openstack.org/186635 is a cross projects spec, and
hopefully comprehensable :) There's a bunch of work being done
Hi Thai,
Thanks for writing that up! As I can tell the blueprint only has the
whiteboard which is kinda yuck, so here's my comments:
I'm already on the record for preferring markup approach 3 so we can avoid
having to write our own implementation of a translation engine. I really,
really don't
First of all a reminder to everybody doing code reviews:
Avoid sarcasm and jokes
Those travel poorly across TCP/IP and don't translate well in different
languages. Just don't use them.
If you get a negative vote or comments you don't like/understand ask for
more explanations. Offer a place and
On 5/28/15, 18:01, Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to nominate Serge (svg on IRC) for the
os-ansible-deployment-core team. Serge has been involved with the greater
Ansible community for some time and has been working with the OSAD
project for the last couple of
Hi Sean,
We have a *lot* of configuration knobs in DevStack for Neutron. I am not
a smart man, so I think we may need to wrap our arms around this and
simplify.
I agree with you. I want to fix the confused configure too.
PHYSICAL_NETWORK is a option in order to setup L2 public network only
Nicola, i would add some words to Alexandre repsonse.
We (standalone ec2api project guys) have filed some bugs (the main is [1]),
but we don't know how to fix them since the way Nova's device names are
moved on is unclear for us. Neither BP, nor wiki you've mentioned above
don't explain what was
Great Work!
New meetings or meeting changes would be proposed in Gerrit, and
check/gate tests would make sure that there aren't any conflict.
--Will this tell upfront, that in any given day of week, which are all
meeting slots (time and irc meeting channels) are available? this could
bring down
On 05/28/2015 09:25 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 05/26/2015 03:13 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:00:32AM +0200, Géza Gémes wrote:
Hi,
When someone calls nova volume-attach or the block-device-mapping parameter
at boot, it is possible to specify a device name for the
I want to mention that there is another mesos framework named as chronos:
https://github.com/mesos/chronos , it is used for job orchestration.
For others, please refer to my comments in line.
2015-05-29 7:45 GMT+08:00 Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com:
I’m moving this whiteboard to the ML
On 05/28/2015 11:25 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 05/26/2015 03:13 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:00:32AM +0200, Géza Gémes wrote:
Hi,
When someone calls nova volume-attach or the block-device-mapping
parameter
at boot, it is possible to specify a device name for the
Hi Vivek,
Per our discussion about the migration of an in-use volume, I have done
the following tests:
I took KVM as the hypervisor and LVM as the backend for cinder.
Configure two c-vol nodes.
Create the image in glance.
Create a volume from this image.
Boot a VM from this volume, so the
Oh, on the wiki page I read that The liaison should be a core reviewer
for the project, but does not need to be the PTL.. I'm not a core
reviewer for nova. Is it an issue?
On the wiki page, I see that John Villalovos (happycamp) is the Nova
liaison for Oslo, not Joe Goron. I don't understand.
Hi Nikhil,
Thanks for the opinion, actually I was in different time-zone and was not aware
about this LogWG. I will certainly approach them in next meeting.
Thank you,
Abhishek Kekane
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 May 2015 12:34
To:
Hi! ;)
On Thursday, 28 de May de 2015 at 9:03, Gal Sagie wrote:
Hello All,
The session talk was mainly about merging the Security Group API and the
FWaaS API to the same one or to keep them separate,
Which i don't think we reached agreement (or did we? :) )
I can’t tell either ;)
On 05/28/2015 09:35 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote:
On 05/28/2015 01:10 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:54, Richard Raseley wrote:
Zane Bitter wrote:
One solution proposed was to do a yum update first but specifically
exclude any packages that Puppet knows about (the --excludes flag
appears
Hi,
We have reverted the problematic patch (I suggest that you all add the word
balagan to your lexicons).
Anyways, the plan forwards is as follows:
1. To update the nova code to use the correct exceptions and to ensure that
it will not break moving forwards
2. To clean up the exceptions
Hi,
We had some issues with jenkins/devstack so i updated both the jenkins
version and the devstack.
When starting nodepool it tries to create a new image but it fails after ~5
minutes:
2015-05-28 10:49:21,509 ERROR nodepool.image.build.local_01.d-p-c: + sudo
puppet apply --detailed-exitcodes
+1
But we should answer the following question before switching libvirt to
utils.get_image_from_system_metadata.
Some differences of utils.get_image_from_system_metadata from
compute.utils.get_image_metadata are:
1) Instance metadata has a restriction of property length: long data is
stripped to
Thanks for the info!
I think for the migration use case this would definitely solve the issue,
but for the image cache we would need more as we would be creating volume
objects and need to track them in the Cinder database. We could use a
system like that to essentially put a 'hidden' flag in the
Victor, reproducing John 's liason message. Copied John.
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 3:10 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Ironic] Large number of
Hello everyone,
We keep putting our best efforts to hit Hard Code Freeze goals. Latest
test results are 68% pass rate for Ubuntu and 65% for CentOS. Once the
remaining bugs are closed, we will be able to hit 70% target for sure.
Based on the feedback from Engineering leads, with current
Hello All,
I wanted to very briefly share my thoughts and a suggestion regarding the
Neutron design summits (maybe only for the next one, but still..)
I would first like to say that i was amazed by the number of people that
attended the summit, it was really great to see it and it was very nice
On 05/28/2015 10:25 AM, Martin Mágr wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:35 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote:
On 05/28/2015 01:10 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:54, Richard Raseley wrote:
Zane Bitter wrote:
One solution proposed was to do a yum update first but specifically
exclude any packages that
Hi Devs,
Thank you for your opinions/thoughts.
However I would like to suggest that please give +1 against the solution which
you will like to propose so that at the end it will be helpful for us to
consolidate the voting against each solution and make some decision.
Thanks in advance.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:59:10PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
As part of the work to object-ify the image metadata dicts, I'm looking
at the current way the libvirt driver fetches image metadata for an
instance, in cases where the compute manager hasn't already passed it
into the virt
I have now submitted the patch to do the html shenanigans as a new step in
the current ngReorg pipeline (inserted because it should fix a test failure
popping up in the dashboard-app move final step).
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186295/
Ryan's API reorg should probably depend on this patch
Hello All,
The session talk was mainly about merging the Security Group API and the
FWaaS API to the same one or to keep them separate,
Which i don't think we reached agreement (or did we? :) )
I personally think (And few people approached us in the summit to express
that they feel the same)
On 28/05/15 09:20 +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
Oh, on the wiki page I read that The liaison should be a core
reviewer for the project, but does not need to be the PTL.. I'm not a
core reviewer for nova. Is it an issue?
This was more like a general recommendation, I guess. I don't think
the
On 05/28/2015 01:10 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:54, Richard Raseley wrote:
Zane Bitter wrote:
Steve is working on a patch to allow package-based updates of overcloud
nodes[1] using the distro's package manager (yum in the case of RDO, but
conceivable apt in others). Note we're
Victor -- error on my part for filling wrong table.
I put your name instead of John's. Thanks to Tan Lin for pointing out my error.
All the best.
Regards
Malini
-Original Message-
From: Bhandaru, Malini K [mailto:malini.k.bhand...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 1:05 AM
To:
Derek,
Thanks for what you wrote.
On 05/27/2015 11:26 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
4. For deb packages you can create new repositories along side the
rdorpm-* repositories
My intention is to use deb-* as prefix, if Canonical team agrees.
5. Add deb support to delorean, I know of at least one
Did you get to talk with anyone in the LogWG (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LogWorkingGroup )? In wonder what kind
of recommendations, standards we can come up with while adopting a cross
project solution. If our logs follow certain prefix and or suffix style
across projects, that would help a
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
I'd say, tools that utilize OpenStack, like the knife openstack plugin,
are not something that you would probably go to the catalog to find. And
Many thanks Julia for the quick fix!
Is it possible to update my fuel master to test this patch? w/o download a
new ISO and avoid to reinstall my env ?
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Julia Aranovich jkirnos...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
That's an issue of course. Settings definitely should
Thanks for the feedback. What to discuss at the summit has always been an
issue.
The only issue I see with your proposal is that you assume we can agree on
high-level things on the mailing list. One of the reasons to discuss
high-level things at the summit is that its a great place to get
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:55:59AM +0300, Feodor Tersin wrote:
+1
But we should answer the following question before switching libvirt to
utils.get_image_from_system_metadata.
Some differences of utils.get_image_from_system_metadata from
compute.utils.get_image_metadata are:
1) Instance
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
