Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead

2015-05-31 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, I would like to ask about the user-facing notifications part of the list. Do you have a roadmap for this? Is this driven by the Zaqar team? What are the next steps? Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó -Original Message- From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] Sent: May 27,

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [ceph] Managing a ceph cluster's lifecycle with puppet

2015-05-31 Thread David Moreau Simard
Hey Bryan, The configuration is done through a provider - you can use it in your composition layer, your site.pp or wherever else you want - a bit like this: ceph_config { 'osd/osd_journal_size', value = '16384'; 'osd/osd_max_backfills', value = '1'; # ... 'client/rbd_cache':

[openstack-dev] [akanda] meeting time change

2015-05-31 Thread sean roberts
Starting tomorrow, the akanda project will be meeting on #openstack-meeting at 11:00 PDT. Agenda is in the usual place https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/akanda See you there ~ sean __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum

2015-05-31 Thread Jay Lau
+1! 2015-05-31 23:30 GMT+08:00 Hongbin Lu hongbin...@huawei.com: +1! *From:* Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:std...@cisco.com] *Sent:* May-31-15 1:56 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Does Bay/Baymodel name should be a required option when creating a Bay/Baymodel

2015-05-31 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Jay 513 +1 on mandatory name requirement. From: Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.commailto:jay.lau@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 2:38 PM To:

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Meeting Reminder - Wednesday, June 3rd, 2200 UTC

2015-05-31 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Hey folks, Since this is our first odd week meeting and the time is different from our original time, I’d like to remind folks interested in Kolla to attend our IRC meeting in openstack-meeting-4 at 2200 UTC on Wednesday, June 3rd. Agenda is here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] IRC meetings on BGP VPN interconnection API

2015-05-31 Thread Mohammad Hanif
Hi Thomas, The time reserved for the weekly IRC is 1600 UTC on Tuesdays (http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Neutron_VPNaaS_Meeting). The IRC channel might not be available on any other time (1500 UTC is taken by the libvirt team meeting). Thanks, —Hanif. On 5/29/15, 12:57 PM, Vikram

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-05-31 Thread Alan Pevec
2015-05-29 18:30 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org: On 2015-05-29 16:30:12 +0100 (+0100), Dave Walker wrote: This is generally my opinion as-well, I always hoped that *every* commit would be considered a release rather than an arbitrary tagged date. [...] If we switch away from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Does Bay/Baymodel name should be a required option when creating a Bay/Baymodel

2015-05-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me as well On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: Jay 513 +1 on mandatory name requirement. From: Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Does Bay/Baymodel name should be a required option when creating a Bay/Baymodel

2015-05-31 Thread Haiwei Xu
+1 for Jay's suggestion. xuhaiwei -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dava...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 8:26 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Does Bay/Baymodel name should be a required

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Does Bay/Baymodel name should be a required option when creating a Bay/Baymodel

2015-05-31 Thread Jay Lau
Just want to use ML to trigger more discussion here. There are now bugs/patches tracing this, but seems more discussions are needed before we come to a conclusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/magnum/+bug/1453732 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181839/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181837/

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-05-31 Thread Matthew Thode
On 05/31/2015 05:50 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: 2015-05-29 18:30 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org: On 2015-05-29 16:30:12 +0100 (+0100), Dave Walker wrote: This is generally my opinion as-well, I always hoped that *every* commit would be considered a release rather than an arbitrary

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-05-31 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On 05/29/15 18:25, Matthew Thode wrote: On 05/29/2015 10:18 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: What about release notes? How can we now communicate some changes that require

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum installation problem with devstack kilo

2015-05-31 Thread Baohua Yang
Hi, all I am following http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/magnum/tree/doc/source/dev/dev-quickstart.rst to install magnum with openstack kilo version. At the end, there are error messages like python update.py /opt/stack/magnum ... Syncing /opt/stack/magnum/requirements.txt

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum

2015-05-31 Thread Hongbin Lu
+1! From: Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:std...@cisco.com] Sent: May-31-15 1:56 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu's nickname) has really done

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum installation problem with devstack kilo

2015-05-31 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
I have this same problem with devstack master. I’m not sure what it is other then it involves the requirements repo possibly not containing oslo.versionedobjects on my system. Dims has a suggestion to do something about it, but I didn’t get back to it. Try joining channel

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum

2015-05-31 Thread Madhuri Kumari
+1 for Kennan. Thanks Regards Madhuri Kumari From: Steven Dake (stdake) [std...@cisco.com] Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 11:26 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-05-31 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Good for me - Tuesday at 1600UTC -Original Message- From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:37 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend

[openstack-dev] Does one keytone have multiple identity providers?

2015-05-31 Thread cmcc.dylan
Hi,all. I have a question about keystone federation. Does one keystone have multiple identity providers? For examle, there are 3 keystone - A, B and C. Can I configure B and C as the A‘s identity provider at the same time? If it's OK, so what's the sequence if we send a request to keystone A?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

2015-05-31 Thread Deepak Shetty
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 May 2015 at 13:03, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Isn't this similar to what cinder transfer-* cmds are for ? Ability to transfer cinder volume across tenants So Manila should be implementing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum

2015-05-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me! On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: Hi core team, Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug fix or not?

2015-05-31 Thread Xu, Hejie
Replied in line with prefix [alex] -Original Message- From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 8:05 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug fix or

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug fix or not?

2015-05-31 Thread Xu, Hejie
I also learn that from Sean! -Original Message- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 2:58 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug fix or not? On 05/29/2015 05:04 AM, John

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][sahara]

2015-05-31 Thread lu jander
hi Rob thx for your information, i have updated my horizon master, but it seems the issue still exists, do you running this well after update the master? 2015-05-29 17:35 GMT+08:00 Rob Cresswell (rcresswe) rcres...@cisco.com: This was a known bug with the modals, which was fixed yesterday.

[openstack-dev] [neutron] ip netns exec creates new filesystem namespace

2015-05-31 Thread Chris Friesen
As a public service announcement I thought I'd mention something that we recently spent quite a few hours tracking down. When neutron runs ip netns exec to run dnsmasq or neutron-ns-metadata-proxy, this causes the creation of a new filesystem namespace (in addition to setting the network