[openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

Hi, all Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance. GET v2.1/tenant_id/servers/server-id/migrations/migration-id I need to support the new cell API to get a migration of a specified instance.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API code in favor of ec2-api project

Davanum Srinivas wrote: Dear Nova cores, Sorry this did not make into the Nova weekly meeting agenda yesterday. Is it time for dropping the EC2/ObjectStore REST API Since we've told folks since Kilo that we will be removing this code and we dropped the entries api-paste.ini in Liberty?

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

joehuang wrote: Only api-wg, openstack-user-stories, opos-tools-contrib, opos-tools-generic, opos-tools-monitoring are listed in http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=openstack-others Many OpenStack other projects are disappeared. We should take the opportunity to rename those from

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] All the projects you are mentioning are hosted on the OpenStack infrastructure (in the space formally known as Stackforge) but are not official OpenStack projects. I meant "formerly" :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate

Hongbin, I belive most failures are related to containers tests. Maybe we should comment only them out and keep Swarm cluster provisioning. Thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 06:37, Hongbin Lu > wrote: Done:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On 01/08/2016 12:56 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Jim Rollenhagen wrote: >>> [...] >>> Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was >>> previously removed from OpenStack (or at least people said "pls no", I >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On 08/01/16 04:49 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Jan 07 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: OK, I just watched that. Sorry, still don't see the value that Mimic provides over unit testing the client interfaces and mocking out the HTTP payloads so you have strict control over the expectations. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Adding "IPv6" bracket handling utilities in openstacklib.

Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got an input from a fellow worker[1]. Basically, transparently > transforming user data in puppet is opening a big can of worms. > > He came up with a rather contrived example, but it's definitively worth > discussing it. > > So in the vncproxy

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Seeking FFE for "Support single disk image OVA/OVF package upload"

On 08/01/16 17:03 +, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: Hello Glance Team! Hope you had a wonderful vacation and wishing you health and happiness for 2016. Would very much appreciate your considering https://review.openstack.org/194868 for a feature freeze exception. I believe

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] [Glance] New v2 Image Import Specification Discussion

-Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: January 8, 2016 at 11:16:35 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sam Matzek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin >>> wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's >>> different

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >[...] > >Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was > >previously removed from OpenStack (or at least people said "pls no", I > >don't know the full history). We didn't intend to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal for new metrics-threshold-filter

Hi John, Thanks for the reply! Originally, I had uploaded the code for review on 2nd Dec [1]. As I did not receive any review/feedback on the same, I thought having a blue-print/spec may help people review the same. So I had put the bp/spec up for review on 14th Dec [2]. As it is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

I signed up for the week before the Nova Midcycle meeting. Even though I'm still new, I feel capable of at least getting the tags mostly right. When I'm not quite sure which tag it would fall under, I search for similar bugs and see how they were tagged. I did have one clarifying question,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:39:51PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/08/2016 02:52 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > >>On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >snippity snip snip > > > >>>We haven't made it a dep for anything yet,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Openstack version changes affects Fuel-CI

Hi, We finished the maintenance a while ago. Please rebase your patches to respin CI. Thank you everyone for your patience... -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote: > Hi crew, > > Igor

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Nominating Mariam John to Trove Core

Looks like we have a consensus from the team and I’d like to welcome Mariam John to the Trove Core Team! I look forward to continuing to work with Mariam! Thanks, -Craig On Jan 7, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Nikhil Manchanda > wrote: +1 from me as

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-07 11:09:32 -0800: > Hi all, > > A change to global-requirements[1] introduces mimic, which is an http > server that can mock various APIs, including nova and ironic, including > control of error codes and timeouts. The ironic team plans to use

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: snippity snip snip > >We haven't made it a dep for anything yet, only added to g-r. > > According to Dims, not to g-r, but to u-c, right Dims? Not sure if that > makes functionally any

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

Cool. And how or where did you sign up for this skimming duty? thanks and have a nice weekend, anthony. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > On 2016-01-08 11:27, Anthony Chow wrote: > >> There is an URL for the duty: >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

I think I just answered my own question ;) I looked at the blog post Markus provided in another part of this thread and it looks like "Skimming Duty" means both tag the bugs and the triaging step of confirming them such that they should no longer be in "New" status after you've touched them. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

thanks so much. :) On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > I think I just answered my own question ;) I looked at the blog post > Markus provided in another part of this thread and it looks like "Skimming > Duty" means both tag the bugs and the triaging

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

On 01/08/2016 04:44 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > On 01/07/2016 05:55 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: > >> but also even if you're under something like >> mod_wsgi, you can spawn a child process or worker thread regardless. >> You always have a Python interpreter running and all the things it can >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [celery][taskflow] Reg. celery and task-flow

So actually they are quite different, (although similar at some level), Given that celery isn't really a replacement for taskflow although one could say, from what I've heard from others, that taskflow is a super-set of what celery is so taskflow likely can replace parts of celery (but not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 07:50:47AM PST, Chris Dent wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Gary Kotton wrote: > > >The commit https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186- > >b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 may break the decomposed plugins that make > >use of the method _get_tenant_id_for_create >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

On 2016-01-08 11:27, Anthony Chow wrote: There is an URL for the duty: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Weekly_bug_skimming_duty [3] Right, I read the wiki and it wasn't clear to me. Here's what the wiki says: "Since Nova is such an active project with a high number of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 11:52:51 -0800: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > snippity snip snip > > > >We haven't made it a dep for anything yet, only added to g-r. > > > > According to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:13:15PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 11:52:51 -0800: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > snippity snip snip > > > > > >We haven't

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 12:30:33 -0800: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:13:15PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 11:52:51 -0800: > > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > > On 01/07/2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On 01/08/2016 02:52 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: snippity snip snip We haven't made it a dep for anything yet, only added to g-r. According to Dims, not to g-r, but to u-c, right Dims?

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Tracking jenkins jobs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey folks, I've been chasing down some annoying gate failures in kilo and I put together a script to populate a spreadsheet[1] with information about our gate jobs. Within a few seconds of a gate job completing, you'll see a new line pop on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

yes Jay, i have -W on the bot proposed merge, pending this discussion: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263592/ -- Dims On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:18:15PM -0500, Jay Pipes

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:39:52PM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > yes Jay, i have -W on the bot proposed merge, pending this discussion: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263592/ Note that this doesn't actually block mimic from being in g-r, or being used. It's already in g-r. You'd need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 09:56:46 -0800: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > >[...] > > >Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was > > >previously removed from OpenStack (or at least

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [celery][taskflow] Reg. celery and task-flow

I also updated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/DistributedTaskManagement to denote that said wiki is no longer active (it was an attempt to back a taskflow engine[1] with celery); although if u are interested in continuing down this path feel free. Hopefully that clears up some 'confusion'

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [celery][taskflow] Reg. celery and task-flow

ESWAR RAO wrote: Hi Joshua, Thanks for the response. As you mentioned, I went through below which has taskflow as celery front end: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TaskFlowWorkerBasedEngine https://blueprints.launchpad.net/taskflow/+spec/distributed-celery I think the idea way-back-when

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] [api] Vision and changes for OpenStack API Guides

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > Hi all, > > With milestone 2 coming next week I want to have a chat about API guides, > API reference information, and the http://developer.openstack.org site. > We have a new tool, fairy-slipper [1], yep you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [celery][taskflow] Reg. celery and task-flow

Hi Joshua, Thanks for the response. As you mentioned, I went through below which has taskflow as celery front end: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TaskFlowWorkerBasedEngine https://blueprints.launchpad.net/taskflow/+spec/distributed-celery I guess if we have a job = task1 + task2 ; if we

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest January 2-8

Permalink: http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/01/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20160108/ SuccessBot Says === * russellb: Ported OVS to Python 3. * notmyname: Removed the beta tag on the swift erasure code docs. * AJaeger: OpenStack configuration reference has been migrated

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] [api] Vision and changes for OpenStack API Guides

On 01/08/2016 04:39 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: Join me next week at the first pop-up Cross Project meeting, Tuesday at 1700, in #openstack-meeting-cp. Feel free to add to the agenda at i'll definitely be there Anne, i'm very curious about this topic but sadly have not had the extra cycles to

[openstack-dev] [doc] [api] Vision and changes for OpenStack API Guides

Hi all, With milestone 2 coming next week I want to have a chat about API guides, API reference information, and the http://developer.openstack.org site. We have a new tool, fairy-slipper [1], yep you read that right, that can migrate files from WADL to Swagger as well as serve up reference info.

Re: [openstack-dev] [celery][taskflow] Reg. celery and task-flow

I'm opinionated because I work with/on Taskflow and had mostly bad experiences with Celery, but here's my $0.02. It's possible that the codebase I inherited just made bad use of Celery or things have improved a lot in the last 18 months, but all I can speak from is my own experience. Taskflow

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][upgrade] Grenade multinode partial upgrade

Just a quick update where we are: Increasing the verbosity of the SSH session into the instance that is created during the cinder portion is showing that we are actually connecting to the instance successfully. We get the dropbear SSH banner, but then the instance hangs. Eventually SSH terminates

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

I'm fine with #2 or #1 The oslo automaton lib also uses pretty table to generate state-machine tables (a useful feature to have, but not a necessity). https://github.com/openstack/automaton/blob/master/requirements.txt#L14 So I'd def help keep prettytable going, of course another option is

[openstack-dev] [telemetry] mitaka virtual meetup follow-up

hi folks, just to recap the meeting item[1], we won't have a meetup this cycle as we all have our tasks and there doesn't seem to be any items that are controversial. we've agree that going forward, if something does require quicker feedback than ML/irc, we'll set up a conference and promote

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Nominating Mariam John to Trove Core

Thank you for all the support. I am humbled to be part of a truly great team and I look forward to working with all of you and continuing to contribute to OpenStack Trove. Thank you. Mariam. From: "Vyvial, Craig" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Deprecating the live_migration_flag and block_migration_flag config options

On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:11 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 09:07:00PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 12:23 +0100, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:12:06PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:18:15PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/07/2016 06:42 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:32:39PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/07/2016 03:01 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

There is an URL for the duty: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Weekly_bug_skimming_duty BTW: how or where do you sign up? Have a nice weekend and happy bug hunting. anthony. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > I signed up for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

On 01/07/2016 06:55 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 01/07/2016 11:02 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/07/2016 09:56 AM, Brant Knudson wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Clayton O'Neill > wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Roman Podoliaka

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

On 01/07/2016 05:44 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 01/07/2016 07:39 AM, Clayton O'Neill wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote: Linux gurus please correct me here, but my understanding is that Linux kernel queues up to $backlog number of connections

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Adding "IPv6" bracket handling utilities in openstacklib.

Cody Herriges writes: Sorry I didn't see you reply before. Comments below. > Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There are a few places where I would like to be able to check for IPv6 >> address and add bracket to the parameters. I think that would be a nice >> addition

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] kilo and liberty is blocked on bug 1532048

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: January 7, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] DocImpact vs. reno

On 08/01/16 21:15, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/07/2016 06:21 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: On 7 Jan 2016, at 2:09 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/06/2016 09:02 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-01-06 07:52:48 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: [...] I think auto openning against a

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Nominating Mariam John to Trove Core

Congratulations Mariam, I look forward to continuing to work with you on Trove. -amrith > -Original Message- > From: Vyvial, Craig [mailto:craig.vyv...@hpe.com] > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 4:27 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [celery][taskflow] Reg. celery and task-flow

Thanks Joshua for the clear explanation. On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > ESWAR RAO wrote: > >> Hi Joshua, >> >> Thanks for the response. >> >> As you mentioned, I went through below which has taskflow as celery >> front end: >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

Anthony Chow wrote on 01/07/2016 07:02:04 PM: > From: Anthony Chow > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Date: 01/07/2016 07:04 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

On 01/07/2016 05:55 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: but also even if you're under something like mod_wsgi, you can spawn a child process or worker thread regardless. You always have a Python interpreter running and all the things it can do. Actually you can't, reliably. Or, more precisely, you really

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Thu, Jan 07 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: > OK, I just watched that. Sorry, still don't see the value that Mimic provides > over unit testing the client interfaces and mocking out the HTTP payloads so > you have strict control over the expectations. > > The problem that Glyph noted in the video about

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

Jim Rollenhagen wrote: [...] Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was previously removed from OpenStack (or at least people said "pls no", I don't know the full history). We didn't intend to stealth-introduce twisted back into g-r, but it was pointed out to me that it may

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] deprecation and removal of old branches

Hi, Good point, i will talk to infra and figure out how to properly push these eol tags to the last commits of the branches before we remove them. Since i only got positive feedback on this, i will also go ahead and ask them to help me with the cleanup. Cheers, Jan > On 07 Jan 2016, at

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

On 01/07/2016 09:49 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote: Actually we already do that in the parent process. The parent process: 1) starts and creates a socket 2) binds the socket and calls listen() on it passing the backlog value (http://linux.die.net/man/2/listen) 3) passes the socket to the eventlet

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API code in favor of ec2-api project

Thierry, The ec2-api project is in gating and totally functional. We'll apply for it to become OpenStack project very shortly. Next week in fact. Best regards, Alex Levine On 1/8/16 9:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Davanum Srinivas wrote: Dear Nova cores, Sorry this did not make into the

[openstack-dev] [nova] config options: IRC meeting at Jan. 11th

First things first, I'd like to thank those people who are contributing to this task very much! It's good to see the progress we already made and that the knowledge of this area is now spread amongst more people. The second thing I'd like to talk about is the next steps. It would be great if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Seeking FFE for "Add CIM namespace metadata definitions"

O 04/01/16 20:46 +, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: Hello Glance Team! Hope you had a wonderful vacation and wishing you health and happiness for 2016. Would very much appreciate your considering https://review.openstack.org/259694 for a feature freeze exception. Thank you to

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] [sahara] Adding support for HBase in Trove

As Kevin suggests, I'm adding [sahara] to the subject line. Others in sahara who now see this thread, apologies for sending you a delayed invitation to the party. There's still lots of food and beer so come on in! -amrith > -Original Message- > From: Fox, Kevin M

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/08/2016 07:06 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > I'm saying all the above because we now need to find a home for it in > OpenStack. > > I've identified 2 possible places: > > 1) Oslo, as we maintaing cross-project libraries and some of them are >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

On 24/12/15 16:49 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's different from the others. I want to declare that there is a set of commits, that make Nova version agnostic and allow to work with both glance apis. The idea of the solution is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's different from the others. I want to declare that there is a set of commits, that make Nova version

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate

Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/ Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

IMHO I think it's a great way to fix the URI problem. +1 Belmiro On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > > Le 08/01/2016 15:10, Andrew Laski a écrit : > >> On 01/08/16 at 12:43pm, John Garbutt wrote: >> >>> On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

Hi, The commit https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 may break the decomposed plugins that make use of the method _get_tenant_id_for_create It would have been nice if there was a deprecation warning. Options: 1. Decomposed plugins fix this

[openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

Greetings, As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are unmaintained and perhaps going away. One of these projects is PrettyTable. This point was raised by Erno in this patch[0] from jd__. PrettyTable

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

#2 please :) Thanks, Dims On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some > projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are > unmaintained and perhaps going

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Openstack version changes affects Fuel-CI

Hi crew, Igor and I are about to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238846/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235254/ These patches are destructive to our CI. They require to upload a new ISO to CI slaves. However, the process takes 2-3 hours to roll our a new ISO. Please do not submit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor tables > in the API DB. > > I noted that those table definitions include the soft-delete columns > (deleted and deleted_at), which at the YVR

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] DocImpact vs. reno

On 01/07/2016 06:21 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > >> On 7 Jan 2016, at 2:09 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> On 01/06/2016 09:02 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> On 2016-01-06 07:52:48 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: >>> [...] I think auto openning against a project, and shuffling it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:01:45AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin > >wrote: > >>Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's > >>different from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

Thank you very much. . And Andrew Laski has answer my second question. 2016-01-08 20:33 GMT+08:00 John Garbutt : > On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: > > Hi, all > > > > Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. > > The new api defines

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Adding "IPv6" bracket handling utilities in openstacklib.

Hi all, I've got an input from a fellow worker[1]. Basically, transparently transforming user data in puppet is opening a big can of worms. He came up with a rather contrived example, but it's definitively worth discussing it. So in the vncproxy example, if the user does this:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: > Hi, all > > Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. > The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance. > GET v2.1/tenant_id/servers/server-id/migrations/migration-id > > I need to support the new cell API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove][Outreachy] Add configuration groups for CouchDB

Having passed more than a week an this task not being claimed by anybody, Sonali will take this task. The spec is already up for review in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263980/. Thanks! Victoria 2016-01-04 9:32 GMT-03:00 Victoria Martínez de la Cruz < victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com>: >

[openstack-dev] centos6.5 libvirt 1.2.14 virsh hang

hi all： my environment is centos6.5 libvirt version is 1.2.14-1 qemu version is 1.7.0-1 I use openstack create a windows guest about two days later I run virsh list but the the process is hang virsh list can not return any thing it hang then I run

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Xenplugin + Glance_v2 = Hate

On 4 January 2016 at 12:55, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/24/2015 08:51 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >> Hello! As you may know there is a big initiative to adopt glance v2 api >> in Nova and the important part is making related changes in xenglugin. >> Unfortunately xenplugin doesn't

[openstack-dev] [celery][taskflow] Reg. celery and task-flow

Hi All, Please let me know whether celery is replacement for taskflow. As per my understanding, task-flow can break jobs into tasks and execute them. >From celery wiki, it also does almost similar behaviour. I guess in most of openstack components taskflow is widely used. Any places where its

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

Hi Thierry, Does this mean big tent projects = TC approved ? My understanding was that for those project migrated from stackforge to OpenStack infra now, is OpenStack big tent projects but not TC-approved OpenStack projects. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Thierry Carrez

Re: [openstack-dev] RDO, packstack, Keypair creation is failing

Hey Thales, This is not a support mailing list but a development one. To have support on RDO specific matters, I recommend you to join the RDO mailing list[0]. You can also join the openstack one[1]. [0] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

2016-01-08 21:53 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > On 01/08/16 at 12:33pm, John Garbutt wrote: > >> On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: >> >>> Hi, all >>> >>> Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. >>> The new api defines migrations is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

still a question in line. Thanks. 2016-01-08 21:53 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > On 01/08/16 at 12:33pm, John Garbutt wrote: > >> On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: >> >>> Hi, all >>> >>> Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. >>> The new api

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API code in favor of ec2-api project

> -Original Message- > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dava...@gmail.com] > Sent: 07 January 2016 23:04 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API > code

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API code in favor of ec2-api project

Alexandre Levine wrote: The ec2-api project is in gating and totally functional. We'll apply for it to become OpenStack project very shortly. Next week in fact. Great to hear! Thanks Alex. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal for new metrics-threshold-filter

On 7 January 2016 at 18:49, SURO wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have proposed a nova-spec[1] for a new scheduling filter based on >> metrics thresholds. This is slightly different than weighted metrics filter. >> The rationale and use-case is explained in detail in the spec[1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

On 01/08/16 at 12:33pm, John Garbutt wrote: On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: Hi, all Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance. GET v2.1/tenant_id/servers/server-id/migrations/migration-id

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

On 01/08/16 at 12:43pm, John Garbutt wrote: On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor tables in the API DB. I noted that those table definitions include the soft-delete columns (deleted

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Deprecating the live_migration_flag and block_migration_flag config options

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 09:07:00PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 12:23 +0100, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:12:06PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > commit 8ecf93e[1] got me thinking - the live_migration_flag config > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

Le 08/01/2016 15:10, Andrew Laski a écrit : On 01/08/16 at 12:43pm, John Garbutt wrote: On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor tables in the API DB. I noted that those table

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

Gary Kotton wrote: > commit > https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 > may > break the decomposed plugins that make use of the method > _get_tenant_id_for_create Note that this is a private method. Plugins should avoid using

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2016-01-08 09:56:53 -0600: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > > 2) OpenStack Client team as they maintain cliff already and it'd > > perhaps make more sense to have this library there. > > > > I would support

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove][Outreachy] Add configuration groups for CouchDB

Sound good to me Victoria. Thanks, -Craig On Jan 8, 2016, at 7:35 AM, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz > wrote: Having passed more than a week an this task not being claimed by anybody, Sonali will take this task. The spec is

  1   2   >