Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > Let me clarify a few things regarding the V2.0 removal: > > * This has been planned for years at this point. At one time (I am > looking for the documentation, once I find it I'll include it on this > thread) we

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

Ok. Cool. Didn't know that. Sounds like all due diligence was done then (and maybe plus some :). Thanks for the background info. Kevin From: Morgan Fainberg [morgan.fainb...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 5:16 PM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

In addendum, the final v2.0 (EC2-API) path will eventually be removed (mitaka +7, the "T" release). The v3 versions (where they exist) will continue to be maintained and not removed. On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > Let me clarify a few things

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [elections] Technical Committee Election Results

Hi All, With the election behind us it's somewhat traditional to look at some simple stats from the elections: +--+---+---+---+ | Election | Electorate (delta %) | Voted (delta %) | Turnout % (delta %) |

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

Let me clarify a few things regarding the V2.0 removal: * This has been planned for years at this point. At one time (I am looking for the documentation, once I find it I'll include it on this thread) we worked with Nova and the TC to set forth a timeline on the removal. Part of that agreement

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [elections] Technical Committee Election Results

Congratulations to our new TC members! :) Best Regards, Ildikó > On 2017. Oct 21., at 1:59, Kendall Nelson wrote: > > Hello Everyone :) > > Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the Technical > Committee (TC)! > > Colleen Murphy (cmurphy) >

[openstack-dev] [all] [elections] Technical Committee Election Results

Hello Everyone :) Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the Technical Committee (TC)! Colleen Murphy (cmurphy) Doug Hellmann (dhellmann) Emilien Macchi (emilienm) Jeremy Stanley (fungi) Julia Kreger (TheJulia) Paul Belanger (pabelanger) Full results:

Re: [openstack-dev] Do you hate the new gerrit thing where the cursor jumps all over?

OMG yes! I can actually search when looking at a diff now! Thanks Matt. Tim > On Oct 20, 2017, at 9:02 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > When you're lower in a change trying to expand comments and it always jumps > you back up to the top? > > Since not everyone might know

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

No, I'm not saying its the TC teams job to bludgeon folks. I'm suggesting that some folks other then Keystone should look at the impact of the final removal an api that a lot of external clients may be coded against and since it effects all projects and not just Keystone. And have some say on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Kolla] Concerns about containers images in DockerHub

Sam, Agreed this matches my experience. Building one by one though will result in massive image size sprawl. Regards -steve From: Sam Yaple Reply-To: "s...@yaple.net" , "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr][devstack][qa] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2017-10-20 13:14:13 -0700: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 07:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > It sounds like the

[openstack-dev] [All][Elections] Vote Vote Vote in the TC election!

Hello! We are coming down to the last hours for voting in the TC election. Voting ends 23:45 October 20th, 2017. Search your gerrit preferred email address[0] for the following subject: Poll: Queens TC Election That is your ballot and links you to the voting application. Please vote. If you

[openstack-dev] [qa] Proposing changes to 17UTC team meeting

Dear all, The current schedule for QA meetings and office hours is as follows (alternating weeks): Week1: - Tue 9:00 UTC Office hours in #openstack-qa - Tue 17:00 UTC Meeting in #openstack-meeting Week2: - Tue 8:00 UTC Meeting in #openstack-meeting Since the 17:00 UTC as a rather low

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr][devstack][qa] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2017-10-20 13:14:13 -0700: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 07:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > It sounds like the PyPI/PyPA folks are planning some major changes to > > > pip internals, soon. > > > > >

[openstack-dev] [neutron] - are you attending the Sydney summit?

Hi, If you are a Neutron developer attending the Sydney Summit, please add your name to the following etherpad so we can plan a team social event and easily coordinate in person meetings: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-sydney-summit-attendees Safe travels and see you Down Under!

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 07:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It sounds like the PyPI/PyPA folks are planning some major changes to > > pip internals, soon. > > > > I know pbr uses setuptools, and I don't think it uses pip, but if > > someone

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Short gerrit / zuul outage 2017-10-20 20:00UTC

On 10/20/2017 03:46 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: We plan a short outage (<30 minutes) of gerrit and zuul on 2017-10-20 20:00UTC to facilitate project rename requests. Note this has been postponed to a future (TBD) date Thanks, -i

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Support for single OpenStack system supporting VM and Baremetal Instances simultaneously ?

Hey, We are in the process of integrating OpenStack Ironic into our own OpenStack Distribution. Is there support for a single OpenStack system supporting VM and Baremetal Instances simultaneously ? ( in NEWTON ? in PIKE ? ) I BELIEVE the answer is yes. BUT can someone confirm ? And then, if

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 07:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It sounds like the PyPI/PyPA folks are planning some major changes to > > pip internals, soon. > > > > I know pbr uses setuptools, and I don't think it uses pip, but if > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 07:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > It sounds like the PyPI/PyPA folks are planning some major changes to > pip internals, soon. > > I know pbr uses setuptools, and I don't think it uses pip, but if > someone has time to verify that it would be helpful. > > We'll also want

Re: [openstack-dev] Do you hate the new gerrit thing where the cursor jumps all over?

Indeed it helps. Thanks! On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Jeremy Freudberg wrote: > > I don't wanna turn this into a complaint session about new Gerrit. But > > three little notes since the upgrade: > > > > - I can't

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

On 2017-10-20 17:15:59 + (+), Fox, Kevin M wrote: [...] > I know the TC's been shying away from these sorts of questions, > but this one has a pretty big impact. TC? [...] The OpenStack Technical Committee isn't really a bludgeon with which to beat teams when someone in the community

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

On 2017-10-20 10:59:36 +0800 (+0800), Yaguang Tang wrote: > Should this kind of change be discussed and have an agreement of > the TC and User committee? [...] Looks like this thread has split since bouncing back in from the operators ML, but I replied in the "other" dev ML thread for this topic

Re: [openstack-dev] Do you hate the new gerrit thing where the cursor jumps all over?

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Jeremy Freudberg wrote: > I don't wanna turn this into a complaint session about new Gerrit. But > three little notes since the upgrade: > > - I can't push the "e" key to go into editing mode anymore > - Cherry-picks change the gerrit topic (that's probably a

Re: [openstack-dev] Do you hate the new gerrit thing where the cursor jumps all over?

I don't wanna turn this into a complaint session about new Gerrit. But three little notes since the upgrade: - I can't push the "e" key to go into editing mode anymore - Cherry-picks change the gerrit topic (that's probably a feature) - The patch I'm already looking at shows up under "Same Topic"

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

That is a very interesting question. It comes from the angle of OpenStack the product more then from the standpoint of any one OpenStack project. I know the TC's been shying away from these sorts of questions, but this one has a pretty big impact. TC? Thanks, Kevin

[openstack-dev] [docs] Docs meeting time? (was: Documentation meeting Thursday)

Great! I have indicated my time preference and hopefully we can get a time for all of us. :P Thanks， Chason > 在 2017年10月21日，上午12:33，Petr Kovar 写道： > > Chason, > > Thanks for bringing this up. I definitely don't want contributors from Asia > to feel excluded. We discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all][tc] v2.0 API removal

I am not saying keystone team don't follow the policy. Just want to express my concern for this big action. it's a cross project thing, so want to have a widely agreement. from the user's aspect, I want to ask the keystone team to keep the V2 API for a long time if we don't have to spend to much

[openstack-dev] [docs] Docs meeting time? (was: Documentation meeting Thursday)

Chason, Thanks for bringing this up. I definitely don't want contributors from Asia to feel excluded. We discussed it in the docs meeting yesterday and it's clear that finding a meeting time that would work for Asia, Europe and America is a bit difficult, to say the least. Anyhow, I went ahead

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [docs] Documentation meeting Thursday

Below are the meeting minutes from yesterday's docs team meeting. Because we ran out of time (too many items to cover!), the conversation about site map automation continued in #openstack-doc after the meeting:

[openstack-dev] Do you hate the new gerrit thing where the cursor jumps all over?

When you're lower in a change trying to expand comments and it always jumps you back up to the top? Since not everyone might know about the solution, it's: 1. Go into settings 2. Diff Preference 3. Change "Render" from Fast to Slow. 4. Save Get back to reviewing stuff without losing your

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] avoid rechecks

Hi Arnaud, Apologies for not following up with that email, things should be okay now and we've mostly patched up our CI for Zuul v3 :) Thanks, Mohammed On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Arnaud MORIN wrote: > Hi Mohammed and all, > > Can we help with the puppet CI? > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [policy] AWS IAM session

I just sent a calendar invite to everyone who responded to this thread or voted in the agenda. The session will be recorded if you are unable to make it. Thanks! On 10/18/2017 10:10 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Now that we have some good feedback on the doodle, it looks like we > have two

[openstack-dev] [tc] Technical Committee Status update, October 20th

Hi! This is the weekly summary of Technical Committee initiatives. You can find the full list of all open topics (updated twice a week) at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Technical_Committee_Tracker If you are working on something (or plan to work on something) that is not on the tracker, feel

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [Distutils][pbr] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

It sounds like the PyPI/PyPA folks are planning some major changes to pip internals, soon. I know pbr uses setuptools, and I don't think it uses pip, but if someone has time to verify that it would be helpful. We'll also want to watch out for breakage in normal use of pip 10. If they're making

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] Core reviewers change proposal

Hi, Unless anyone objects, I'll remove the following people from the list of networking-midonet core reviewers. - Joe Mills - Michael Micucci They made great contributions in the past (thank you!) but have not reviewed any patches in the last 6 months. [2] [1]

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [stadium] Tempest plugin split goal for stadium projects

Hi neutrinos, to follow up on the community goal efffort to split tempest plugins in separate repos [1], I started the work for networking-sfc [2], aiming for a new "networking-sfc-tempest-plugin" repository. Armando had an interesting question that I am bringing to the wider audience: for

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] core reviewer proposal

Hi, Unless anyone objects, i'll add the following people to neutron-vpnaas core reviewers. [1] - Cao Xuan Hoang - Akihiro Motoki - Miguel Lavalle Hoang is the most active contributor for the project these days. I don't bother

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all][tc] v2.0 API removal

On 2017-10-20 10:52:36 +0800 (+0800), Yaguang Tang wrote: > Keystone is one project that all other OpenStack projects use, so > personally I think the change to remove the API which are widely > used should be discussed at TC meeting . [...] The OpenStack Technical Committee ceased holding

[openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] resource providers update 39

This is update 39 for resource providers and placement. # Most Important This week we had spec freeze, so now it is time to get rolling with the making and the doing. Most of the specs that are related to placement already had code in progress, so there's lots of stuff ready to review. Given

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] avoid rechecks

Hi Mohammed and all, Can we help with the puppet CI? Cheers, Arnaud. On 1 October 2017 at 17:27, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As the Puppet modules CI is still in the process of getting plumbed > properly with Zuul v3, you'll notice many of your checks

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Deployment workflow changes for ui/client

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:56 PM James Slagle wrote: > I've been looking at how we can hook up the deployment changes for > config-download[1] with the existing deployment workflows in Mistral. > > However, it seems we have not sufficiently abstracted the logic to do > a

[openstack-dev] [nova] next week notification subteam meeting is canceled

Hi, The next notification subteam meeting is canceled. Cheers, gibi __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe