Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Fast-track: Remove Stable branch maintenance as a project team

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:54:52PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/26/2018 4:37 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > I'd be curious to hear more about why you don't think that tag is > > maintained. > > Are projects actively applying for the tag? > > > > > For projects that assert they follow

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Fast-track: Remove Stable branch maintenance as a project team

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:42:01AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/25/2018 3:07 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > > Hi everyone: > > > > This email is just to notify everyone on the TC and the community that > > the change to remove the stable branch maintenance as a project > > team[1] has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Fast-track: Remove Stable branch maintenance as a project team

On 7/26/2018 4:37 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: I'd be curious to hear more about why you don't think that tag is maintained. Are projects actively applying for the tag? For projects that assert they follow stable policy, in the relase process we have extra scrutiny that nothing is being

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] PTL Candidacy for Stein cycle

I'd like to nominate myself for the Cyborg PTL role for the Stein cycle. Thank you Howard for starting this new project in the community couple year ago. He led the project the beginning and helped the project ramping up on the right track. Now the project is in a fanatic state after a couple

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-4, July 30 - August 3

As the client deadline and milestone 3 day winds down here, I wanted to do a quick check on where things stand before calling it a day. This is according to script output, so I haven't actually looked into any details so far. But according to the script, the follow cycle-with-intermediary

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Fast-track: Remove Stable branch maintenance as a project team

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:06:01PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/26/2018 12:00 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > I wouldn't think so. Nothing is changing with the policy, so it is still of > > interest to see which projects are following that. I don't believe the > > policy > > was tied in any

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Summit Berlin - Community Voting Closing Soon

Hi everyone, Session voting for the Berlin Summit closes in less than 8 hours! Submit your votes by July 26 at 11:59pm Pacific Time (Friday, July 27 at 6:59 UTC). VOTE HERE The Programming Committees will ultimately determine the

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for os-vif 1.11.1

On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:01:18 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: On 18-07-26 10:43:05, melanie witt wrote: Hello, I'd like to ask for an exception to add os-vif 1.11.1 to stable/rocky. The current release for rocky, 1.11.0, added a new feature: the NoOp Plugin, but it's not actually usable (it's not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder][Tempest] Help with tempest.api.compute.servers.test_device_tagging.TaggedAttachmentsTest.test_tagged_attachment needed

Thx :) > Wiadomość napisana przez Matt Riedemann w dniu > 26.07.2018, o godz. 18:32: > > On 7/23/2018 4:20 AM, Slawomir Kaplonski wrote: >> Thx Artom for taking care of it. Did You made any progress? >> I think that it might be quite important to fix as it failed around 50 times >> during

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Fast-track: Remove Stable branch maintenance as a project team

On 7/26/2018 12:00 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: I wouldn't think so. Nothing is changing with the policy, so it is still of interest to see which projects are following that. I don't believe the policy was tied in any way with stable being an actual project team vs a SIG. OK, then maybe as a

[openstack-dev] [keystone] PTL Candidacy for the Stein cycle

Hey everyone, I'm writing to submit my self-nomination as keystone's PTL for the Stein release. We've made significant progress tackling some of the major goals we set for keystone in Pike. Now that we're getting close to wrapping up some of those initiatives, I'd like to continue advocating for

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky milestone 3 was released!

Kudos to the team, we just release our third Rocky milestone! As usual, I prepared some numbers so you can see our project health: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RV30OVxmXv1y_z33LuXMVB56TA54Urp7oHIoTNwrtzA/edit#slide=id.p Some comments: 1) More bugs were fixed in rocky milestone 3 than

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [tripleo-validations] using using top-level fact vars will deprecated in future Ansible versions

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:30 PM John Fulton wrote: > Do we have a plan for which Ansible version might be the default in > upcoming TripleO versions? > > If this is the thread to discuss it then, I want to point out that > TripleO's been using ceph-ansible for Ceph integration on the client >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for os-vif 1.11.1

On 18-07-26 10:43:05, melanie witt wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an exception to add os-vif 1.11.1 to stable/rocky. The > current release for rocky, 1.11.0, added a new feature: the NoOp Plugin, but > it's not actually usable (it's not being loaded) because we missed adding a > file to

[openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for os-vif 1.11.1

Hello, I'd like to ask for an exception to add os-vif 1.11.1 to stable/rocky. The current release for rocky, 1.11.0, added a new feature: the NoOp Plugin, but it's not actually usable (it's not being loaded) because we missed adding a file to the setup.cfg. We have fixed the problem in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Fast-track: Remove Stable branch maintenance as a project team

> > Only question I have is will the stable:follows-policy governance tag [1] > also be removed? > > [1] > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/tags/stable_follows-policy.html > I wouldn't think so. Nothing is changing with the policy, so it is still of interest to see which projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Fast-track: Remove Stable branch maintenance as a project team

On 7/25/2018 3:07 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: Hi everyone: This email is just to notify everyone on the TC and the community that the change to remove the stable branch maintenance as a project team[1] has been fast-tracked[2]. The change should be approved on 2018-07-28 however it is beneficial

[openstack-dev] Subject: [all][api] POST /api-sig/news

Greetings OpenStack community, We had a short but sweet meeting today, as all four core members were around for the first time in several weeks. The one action item from last week, reaching out to the people working on the GraphQL experiment, was done, but so far we have not heard back on

Re: [openstack-dev] Lots of slow tests timing out jobs

On 7/25/2018 1:46 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: As per avg time, I have voted (currently based on 14 days avg) on ethercalc which all test to mark as slow. I taken the criteria of >120 sec avg time. Once we have more and more people votes there we can mark them slow.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder][Tempest] Help with tempest.api.compute.servers.test_device_tagging.TaggedAttachmentsTest.test_tagged_attachment needed

On 7/23/2018 4:20 AM, Slawomir Kaplonski wrote: Thx Artom for taking care of it. Did You made any progress? I think that it might be quite important to fix as it failed around 50 times during last 7 days:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [tripleo-validations] using using top-level fact vars will deprecated in future Ansible versions

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:48 AM Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > > Hello Sam, > > Thanks for the clarifications. > > On 07/25/2018 07:46 PM, Sam Doran wrote: > > I spoke with other Ansible Core devs to get some clarity on this change. > > > > This is not a change that is being made quickly, lightly, or

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE request for config-download-ui

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:31 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to request a FFE for [1]. Current status of TripleO UI patches > is here [2] there are last 2 patches pending review which currently depend > on [3] which is close to land. > > [1]

[openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] compute nodes use of placement

HTML: https://anticdent.org/novas-use-of-placement.html A year and a half ago I did some analysis on how [nova uses placement](http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/110953.html). I've repeated some of that analysis today and here's a brief summary of the results. Note

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] keypair quota usage info for user

On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:19:38 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: On 07/25/2018 06:21 PM, Alex Xu wrote: 2018-07-26 0:29 GMT+08:00 William M Edmonds mailto:edmon...@us.ibm.com>>: Ghanshyam Mann mailto:gm...@ghanshyammann.com>> wrote on 07/25/2018 05:44:46 AM: ... snip ... > 1. is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] keypair quota usage info for user

On 07/25/2018 06:22 PM, Alex Xu wrote: 2018-07-26 1:43 GMT+08:00 Chris Friesen mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com>>: Keypairs are weird in that they're owned by users, not projects. This is arguably wrong, since it can cause problems if a user boots an instance with their

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] keypair quota usage info for user

On 07/25/2018 06:21 PM, Alex Xu wrote: 2018-07-26 0:29 GMT+08:00 William M Edmonds mailto:edmon...@us.ibm.com>>: Ghanshyam Mann mailto:gm...@ghanshyammann.com>> wrote on 07/25/2018 05:44:46 AM: ... snip ... > 1. is it ok to show the keypair used info via API ? any original

Re: [openstack-dev] Should we add a tempest-slow job?

On 5/13/2018 9:06 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: +1 on idea. As of now slow marked tests are from nova, cinder and neutron scenario tests and 2 API swift tests only [4]. I agree that making a generic job in tempest is better for maintainability. We can use existing job for that with below

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Setting swift as glance backend

It looks like Glance defaults to Swift, so you shouldn't need to do anything: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/master/puppet/services/glance-api.yaml#L96 On 07/26/2018 12:41 AM, Samuel Monderer wrote: Hi, I would like to deploy a small overcloud with just one

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack-dev] [trove] Considering the transfter of the project leadership

> > > > A good news is recently a team from Samsung R Center in Krakow, Poland > > joined us, they're building a product on OpenStack, have done improvments > > on Trove(internally), and now interested in contributing to the community, > > starting by migrating the intergating tests to the tempest

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multi-backend

I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple backend support (multi-store) feature [0]. The only remaining work is a versioning patch to flag this feature as experimental and should be completed early next week. ​[0]

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multihash

I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for the glance-side work for the Secure Hash Algorithm Support (multihash) feature [0]. The work is underway and should be completed early next week. cheers, brian [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack-dev] [trove] Considering the transfter of the project leadership

Hello All, as a member of Samsung R Center in Krakow, I would like to confirm that we are very interested in Trove development. We also notices that Trove project has a small team now and that community around Trove becomes smaller with each release which is a shame since it is a great

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][release][election][adjutant] Welcome Adjutant as an official project!

On 07/17/2018 08:19 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote: Thanks! As the current project lead for Adjutant I welcome the news, and while I know it wasn't an easy process would like to thank everyone involved in the voting. All the feedback (good and bad) will be taken on board to make the service as suited

[openstack-dev] [sdk] PTL Candidacy for the Stein cycle

Hi everybody! I'd like to run for PTL of OpenStackSDK again. This last cycle was great. os-client-config is now just a thin wrapper around openstacksdk. shade still has a bunch of code, but the shade OpenStackCloud object is a subclass of openstack.connection.Connection, so we're in good

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-4, July 30 - August 3

Hey, I thought you guys might be interested in this release countdown info. ;) Development Focus - The R-4 week is our one deadline free week between the lib freezes and Rocky-3 milestone and RC. Work should be focused on fixing any requirements update issues, critical bugs, and

[openstack-dev] [QA][PTL][Election] Quality Assurance PTL Candidacy for Stein

Hi Everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy to continue the Quality Assurance PTL role for Stein cycle. I have served as QA PTL in Rocky cycle and as first time being PTL role, it was great experience for me. I have been doing my best effort in Rocky and made sure that we continued

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova] Running NFV tests in CI

On 24 July 2018 at 19:47, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 10:21 AM, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > > >> Hey all, > > >> > > >> tl;dr Humbly requesting a handful of

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] ptl non candidacy

Thanks for your work as PTL during the Rocky cycle Jeffrey Cheers, zhubingbing 在 2018-07-25 11:48:24，"Jeffrey Zhang" 写道： Hi all, I just wanna to say I am not running PTL for Stein cycle. I have been involved in Kolla project for almost 3 years. And recently my work changes a little,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] network isolation can't find files referred to on director

Hi James, I understand the network-environment.yaml will also be generated. What do you mean by rendered path? Will it be "usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/network/ports/"? By the way I didn't find any other place in my templates where I refer to these files? What about custom nic

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE request for config-download-ui

Hello, I would like to request a FFE for [1]. Current status of TripleO UI patches is here [2] there are last 2 patches pending review which currently depend on [3] which is close to land. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/config-download-ui/ [2]