Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Stepping down as coordinator for the Outreachy internships

2018-08-17 Thread Nisha Yadav
Hey all, Victoria you are an inspiration! Going through your blog when I embarked on the OpenStack journey gave me a lot of motivation. It was a pleasure working with you. Thanks for all your support and hard work. Good luck Samuel, great to hear. Cheers to Outreachy and OpenStack! Best

Re: [openstack-dev] [goal][python3] more updates to the goal tools

2018-08-17 Thread super user
The problem was fixed. Nguyen Hai On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:47 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > I was not able to reproduce the problem. Please test the fix in > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593068/ to see if that helps. > > Which version of Python are you using to run the tools? And on which

[openstack-dev] [Freezer] Reactivate the team

2018-08-17 Thread Trinh Nguyen
Dear Freezer team, Since we have appointed a new PTL for the Stein cycle (gengchc2), I suggest that we should reactivate the team follows these actions: 1. Have a team meeting to formalize the new leader as well as discuss the new direction. 2. Grant PTL privileges for gengchc2 on

[openstack-dev] networking-vpp 18.07 for VPP 18.07 is now available

2018-08-17 Thread Naveen Joy (najoy)
Hello Everyone, In conjunction with the release of VPP 18.07, we'd like to invite you all to try out networking-vpp 18.07 for VPP 18.07. As many of you may already know, VPP is a fast userspace forwarder based on the DPDK toolkit, and uses vector packet processing algorithms to minimize the CPU

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down as coordinator for the Outreachy internships

2018-08-17 Thread Rodrigo Duarte
Thanks for everything, Victoria. On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 1:07 PM Victoria Martínez de la Cruz < victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone for your words! > > I really love the OpenStack community and I'm glad I could contribute back > with this. > > Samuel has been a great mentor

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] fedora28 python3 test environment

2018-08-17 Thread Alex Schultz
Ahoy folks, In order to get to a spot where can start evaluate the current status of TripleO under python3 I've thrown together a set of ansible playbooks[0] to launch a fedora28 node and build the required python-tripleoclient (and dependencies) These playbooks will spawn a VM on an OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

2018-08-17 Thread Kendall Nelson
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:15 AM Tobias Urdin wrote: > Hello Kendall, > > I went through the list of projects [1] and could only really see two > things. > > 1) puppet-rally and puppet-openstack-guide is missing > > I had created the projects, but missed adding them to the group. They should be

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down as coordinator for the Outreachy internships

2018-08-17 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
Thanks everyone for your words! I really love the OpenStack community and I'm glad I could contribute back with this. Samuel has been a great mentor for Outreachy in several rounds and I believe he will excel as coordinator along with Mahati. Thanks for volunteer for this Samuel! All the best,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Tom Barron
On 17/08/18 14:09 -0500, Jay S Bryant wrote: On 8/17/2018 1:34 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: Has there been a discussion on record of how use of placement by cinder would affect "standalone" cinder (or manila) initiatives where there is a desire to be able to run cinder by itself (with no-auth) or

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Jay S Bryant
On 8/17/2018 12:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote: The subject of using placement in Cinder has come up, and since then I've had a few conversations with people in and outside of that team. I really think until placement is its own project outside of the nova team, there will be resistance from some to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Tom Barron
On 17/08/18 13:34 -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: Has there been a discussion on record of how use of placement by cinder would affect "standalone" cinder (or manila) initiatives where there is a desire to be able to run cinder by itself (with no-auth) or just with keystone (where OpenStack style

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Jay S Bryant
On 8/17/2018 1:34 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: Has there been a discussion on record of how use of placement by cinder would affect "standalone" cinder (or manila) initiatives where there is a desire to be able to run cinder by itself (with no-auth) or just with keystone (where OpenStack style

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread melanie witt
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:41 -0500, Sean Mcginnis wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:47:10PM -0500, Ed Leafe wrote: On Aug 17, 2018, at 12:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote: Splitting it out to another repository within the compute umbrella (what do we call it these days?) satisfies the _technical_

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:47:10PM -0500, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 17, 2018, at 12:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > > > Splitting it out to another repository within the compute umbrella (what > > do we call it these days?) satisfies the _technical_ concern of not > > being able to use placement

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Sean McGinnis
> > Has there been a discussion on record of how use of placement by cinder > would affect "standalone" cinder (or manila) initiatives where there is a > desire to be able to run cinder by itself (with no-auth) or just with > keystone (where OpenStack style multi-tenancy is desired)? > > Tom

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2018-08-17 10:30:41 -0700: > > The subject of using placement in Cinder has come up, and since then I've > > had a > > few conversations with people in and outside of that team. I really think > > until > > placement is its own project outside of the nova

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down as coordinator for the Outreachy internships

2018-08-17 Thread Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz
Hi all, As someone who cares for this cause and participated twice in this program as a mentor, I'd like to candidate as program coordinator. Victoria, thanks for all your lovely work. You are awesome! Best regards, Samuel On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 6:51 PM Kendall Nelson wrote: > You have done

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Ed Leafe
On Aug 17, 2018, at 12:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Splitting it out to another repository within the compute umbrella (what > do we call it these days?) satisfies the _technical_ concern of not > being able to use placement without installing the rest of the nova code > and dependency tree.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Dan Smith
> The subject of using placement in Cinder has come up, and since then I've had > a > few conversations with people in and outside of that team. I really think > until > placement is its own project outside of the nova team, there will be > resistance > from some to adopt it. I know politics

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Tom Barron
On 17/08/18 11:47 -0500, Jay S Bryant wrote: On 8/17/2018 10:59 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Aug 17, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Chris Dent wrote: One of the questions that has come up on the etherpad is about how placement should be positioned, as a project, after the extraction. The options are: * A

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread melanie witt
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:51:10 +0100 (BST), Chris Dent wrote: Earlier I posted a message about a planning etherpad for the extraction of placement http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-August/133319.html https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-extract-stein One of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Jay S Bryant
On 8/17/2018 10:59 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Aug 17, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Chris Dent wrote: One of the questions that has come up on the etherpad is about how placement should be positioned, as a project, after the extraction. The options are: * A repo within the compute project * Its own

[openstack-dev] [Searchlight] Reaching out to the Searchlight core members for Stein

2018-08-17 Thread Trinh Nguyen
Dear Searchlight team, As you may know, the Searchlight project has missed several milestones, especially the Rocky cycle. The TC already has the plan to remove Searchlight from governance [1] but I volunteer to take over it [2]. But due to the unresponsive on IRC and launchpad, I send this email

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:59:47AM -0500, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 17, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > > One of the questions that has come up on the etherpad is about how > > placement should be positioned, as a project, after the extraction. > > The options are: > > > > * A repo

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 04:51:10PM +0100, Chris Dent wrote: > > [snip] > > One of the questions that has come up on the etherpad is about how > placement should be positioned, as a project, after the extraction. > The options are: > > * A repo within the compute project > * Its own project,

[openstack-dev] [Release][PTL] cycle-with-intermediary reminder

2018-08-17 Thread Sean McGinnis
Just reminding folks with deliverables following the cycle-with-intermediary release model that next Thursday is the final deadline to get those out. There are a handful of deliverables that have not done a release yet in Rocky. If we do not get a release request from these teams we will need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Ed Leafe
On Aug 17, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > One of the questions that has come up on the etherpad is about how > placement should be positioned, as a project, after the extraction. > The options are: > > * A repo within the compute project > * Its own project, either: > * working

[openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

2018-08-17 Thread Chris Dent
Earlier I posted a message about a planning etherpad for the extraction of placement http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-August/133319.html https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-extract-stein One of the goals of doing the planning and having the etherpad was to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how nova should behave when placement returns consumer generation conflict

2018-08-17 Thread Eric Fried
gibi- >> - On migration, when we transfer the allocations in either direction, a >> conflict means someone managed to resize (or otherwise change >> allocations?) since the last time we pulled data. Given the global lock >> in the report client, this should have been tough to do. If it does >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Broken pep8 job

2018-08-17 Thread Slawomir Kaplonski
Thx, I just did similar patches for stable/rocky [1] and stable/queens [2] in Neutron repo: [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593075/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593078/ > Wiadomość napisana przez Doug Hellmann w dniu > 17.08.2018, o godz. 16:34: > > Excerpts from Slawomir

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][Edge][FEMDC] Edge clouds and controlplane updates

2018-08-17 Thread Jiří Stránský
On 14.8.2018 15:19, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: On 8/13/18 9:47 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: Hello, I'd like to get some feedback regarding the remaining work for the split controlplane spec implementation [1] Specifically, while for some services like nova-compute it is not necessary to update the

Re: [openstack-dev] [goal][python3] more updates to the goal tools

2018-08-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
I was not able to reproduce the problem. Please test the fix in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593068/ to see if that helps. Which version of Python are you using to run the tools? And on which OS? Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-08-17 10:30:29 -0400: > I will work on fixing this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Broken pep8 job

2018-08-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Slawomir Kaplonski's message of 2018-08-17 10:16:35 +0200: > Hi, > > It looks that pep8 job in Neutron is currently broken because of new version > of bandit (1.5.0). > If You have in Your patch failure of pep8 job with error like [1] please > don’t recheck as it will not help. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [goal][python3] more updates to the goal tools

2018-08-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
I will work on fixing this today. Has the designate team agreed to go ahead with their migration, or are you still testing the scripts? Doug Excerpts from super user's message of 2018-08-17 15:37:03 +0900: > Hi Doug, > > I'm Nguyen Hai. I proposed the python3-first patch set for > designate

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Puppet weekly recap - week 33

2018-08-17 Thread Tobias Urdin
Hello all Puppeteers! Welcome to the weekly Puppet recap for week 33. This is a weekly overview of what has changed in the Puppet OpenStack project the past week. CHANGES Changes in all modules --- *

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Keystone Team Update - Week of 13 August 2018

2018-08-17 Thread Colleen Murphy
Forgot the [keystone] tag. On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > # Keystone Team Update - Week of 13 Auguest 2018 > > ## News > > Relatively quiet week with minimal fires. Prepare for the PTG by adding > topics to the etherpad[1]. > > [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

2018-08-17 Thread Tom Barron
On 17/08/18 09:05 -0500, Jay S Bryant wrote: On 8/16/2018 4:03 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hello :) On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:47 PM Jay S Bryant > wrote: Hey, Well, the attachments are one of the things holding us up along with reduced participation

[openstack-dev] Keystone Team Update - Week of 13 Auguest 2018

2018-08-17 Thread Colleen Murphy
# Keystone Team Update - Week of 13 Auguest 2018 ## News Relatively quiet week with minimal fires. Prepare for the PTG by adding topics to the etherpad[1]. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-stein-ptg ## Recently Merged Changes Search query: https://bit.ly/2IACk3F We merged 27

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

2018-08-17 Thread Jay S Bryant
On 8/16/2018 4:03 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hello :) On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:47 PM Jay S Bryant > wrote: Hey, Well, the attachments are one of the things holding us up along with reduced participation in the project and a number of other

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptg] Denver PTG on-site or virtual

2018-08-17 Thread Adam Harwell
Yeah, definitely! Worst case, we spend some time huddled around a table by the bar, and that isn't too bad in my book. ;) --Adam On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 20:59 Mark Goddard wrote: > Whether there is a physical PTG session or not, I'd certainly like to meet > up with other folks who are using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] A multi-cell instance-list performance test

2018-08-17 Thread Dan Smith
> We have tried out the patch: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592698/ > we also applied https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592285/ > > it turns out that we are able to half the overall time consumption, we > did try with different sort key and dirs, the results are similar, we > didn't try out

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptg] Denver PTG on-site or virtual

2018-08-17 Thread Mark Goddard
Whether there is a physical PTG session or not, I'd certainly like to meet up with other folks who are using and/or contributing to Kolla, let's be sure to make time for that. Mark On 17 August 2018 at 12:54, Adam Harwell wrote: > As one of the other two in the etherpad, I will say that I was

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptg] Denver PTG on-site or virtual

2018-08-17 Thread Adam Harwell
As one of the other two in the etherpad, I will say that I was looking forward to getting together face to face with other contributors for the first time (as I am new to the project), but I guess the majority won't actually be there, and I understand that we need to do what is best for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] How to mount NFS volume?

2018-08-17 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi Clay, Unfortunately, local-attach doesn't support NFS-based volumes due to the security reasons. We haven't the good solution now for multi-tenant environments. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Chang, Clay (HPS OE-Linux TDC) < cl...@hpe.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptg] Denver PTG on-site or virtual

2018-08-17 Thread Mark Goddard
As one of the lucky three kolleagues able to make the PTG, here's my position (inline). On 17 August 2018 at 11:52, Eduardo Gonzalez wrote: > Fellow kolleages. > > In september is Denver PTG, as per the etherpad [0] only 3 contributors > confirmed their presence in the PTG, we expected more

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][Edge][FEMDC] Edge clouds and controlplane updates

2018-08-17 Thread Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
Hi, Some comments inline. From: Alan Bishop Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 7:09 PM On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:20 AM Bogdan Dobrelya mailto:bdobr...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 8/13/18 9:47 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to get some feedback regarding the remaining > work for the

[openstack-dev] [kolla][ptg] Denver PTG on-site or virtual

2018-08-17 Thread Eduardo Gonzalez
Fellow kolleages. In september is Denver PTG, as per the etherpad [0] only 3 contributors confirmed their presence in the PTG, we expected more people to be there as previous PTGs were full of contributors and operators. In the last kolla meeting [1] with discussed if we should make a virtual

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how nova should behave when placement returns consumer generation conflict

2018-08-17 Thread Balázs Gibizer
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Eric Fried wrote: Thanks for this, gibi. TL;DR: a). I didn't look, but I'm pretty sure we're not caching allocations in the report client. Today, nobody outside of nova (specifically the resource tracker via the report client) is supposed to be mucking

[openstack-dev] glance 17.0.0.0rc2 (rocky)

2018-08-17 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Rocky cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be formally

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Keystone Team Update - Week of 6 August 2018

2018-08-17 Thread Colleen Murphy
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018, 23:47 Colleen Murphy wrote: > > > # Keystone Team Update - Week of 6 August 2018 > > > > ## News > > > > ### RC1 > > > > We released RC1 this week[1]. Please try it out and be on the lookout for > > critical bugs.

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] How to mount NFS volume?

2018-08-17 Thread Chang, Clay (HPS OE-Linux TDC)
Hi, I have Cinder configured with NFS backend. On one bare metal node, I can use 'cinder create' to create the volume with specified size - I saw a volume file create on the NFS server, so I suppose the NFS was configured correctly. My question is, how could I mount the NFS volume on the bare

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky blueprint burndown chart

2018-08-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
melanie witt wrote: [...] If you have feedback or thoughts on any of this, feel free to reply to this thread or add your comments to the Rocky retrospective etherpad [4] and we can discuss at the PTG. That is great data, thanks for compiling and publishing it ! As far as burndown charts go,

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Denver PTG

2018-08-17 Thread Dougal Matthews
Hey all, I wanted to reach out and see who is interested in attending the Mistral sessions at the Denver PTG. Unfortunately I wont be able to make it but Renat Akhmerov may be able to go and run the sessions. Most of the other Mistral cores wont be able to attend unfortunately. Please reply as

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Broken pep8 job

2018-08-17 Thread Slawomir Kaplonski
Hi, It looks that pep8 job in Neutron is currently broken because of new version of bandit (1.5.0). If You have in Your patch failure of pep8 job with error like [1] please don’t recheck as it will not help. I did some patch which should fix it [2]. Will let You know when it will be fixed and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] need help triaging a vmware driver bug

2018-08-17 Thread Radoslav Gerganov
Hi, On 17.08.2018 04:10, melanie witt wrote: Can anyone help triage this bug? I have requested more info from the person who submitted this and provided some tips how to correlate nova-compute logs to vCenter logs in order to better understand what went wrong. Would it be possible to

[openstack-dev] [charms] Deployment guide stable/rocky cut

2018-08-17 Thread Frode Nordahl
Hello OpenStack charmers, I am writing to inform you that a `stable/rocky` branch has been cut for the `openstack/charm-deployment-guide` repository. Should there be any further updates to the guide before the release the changes will need to be landed in `master` and then back-ported to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

2018-08-17 Thread Tobias Urdin
Hello Kendall, I went through the list of projects [1] and could only really see two things. 1) puppet-rally and puppet-openstack-guide is missing 2) We have some support projects which doesn't really need bug tracking, where some others do.     You can remove puppet-openstack-specs and

Re: [openstack-dev] [goal][python3] more updates to the goal tools

2018-08-17 Thread super user
Hi Doug, I'm Nguyen Hai. I proposed the python3-first patch set for designate projects. However, I have met this error to designate and designate-dashboard: === ../Output/designate/openstack/designate @ master === ./tools/python3-first/do_repo.sh ../Output/designate/openstack/designate master