Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Core team changes / proposing Dharmendra Kushwaha

+1 for both. Regards Bharath T Imaginea Technologies Inc. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:19 PM, HADDLETON, Robert W (Bob) < bob.haddle...@nokia.com> wrote: > +1 > > Thanks Stephen! And welcome aboard Dharmendra! > > Bob > > > On 1/24/2017 6:58 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > >> Tackers, >> >> I'd

[openstack-dev] [Tacker] Abstract interface for VNFC

Hi Tackers, As per this week meeting logs, regarding VNFC BP, I came to know that we need to add abstract interface which is invoked by infra_driver. But as we decided to go with SoftwareDeployment option in this cycle, most of the heat template changes are done by heat translator [1]. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Yong Sheng Gong for Tacker core team

+1 From: jankih...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 22:37:09 +0530 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Yong Sheng Gong for Tacker core team +1 On 23-Aug-2016 10:36 pm, "HADDLETON, Robert W (Bob)" wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam to Tacker core team

+1 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org From: bob.haddle...@nokia.com Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:12:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam to Tacker core team +1. Kanagaraj will be a great addition to the team. Bob

[openstack-dev] [heat] Unable to launch nova instance with the new flavor

Hi, With the master branch, I couldn't launch heat stack with the following template, giving the error "ERROR: No Flavor matching {'name': u'flavor_1'}. (HTTP 404)" heat_template_version: 2015-04-30 description: Simple template to deploy a single compute instance resources: ins1: type:

[openstack-dev] [tacker]Automatic Resource Creation

Hi Tackers, I have uploaded a new patchset for the automatic resource creation spec[1]. I haven't addressed some comments and as I am unable to attend to mitaka midcycle meetup, I am sharing below few thoughts on this spec. Image Creation: In the latest patchset, image creation at the time

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker]Automatic Resource Creation

HOT conversion to achieve them and not go directly to Nova and Neutron for this purpose. thanks,Sridhar [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/2016/tacker.2016-01-26-17.00.log.html On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 AM, bharath thiruveedula <bharath_...@hotmail.com> wrote: Hi Tackers

[openstack-dev] Mesos Conductor

Hi, As per the discussion in [1], I have pushed patchset [1]. Can you please review the patch. I want to take comments on this patch before I push test cases and container-list operation because there was a discussion on this topic whether to have this or not. (from my previous experience :)

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Mesos Conductor patch for review

Hi,As per the discussion in [1], I have pushed patchset [1]. Can you please review the patch. I want to take comments on this patch before I push test cases and container-list operation because there was a discussion on this topic whether to have this or not. (from my previous experience :) ).

Re: [openstack-dev] Mesos Conductor using container-create operations

[1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252789/ From: bharath_...@hotmail.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:10:17 +0530 Subject: [openstack-dev] Mesos Conductor using container-create operations Hi, As we have discussed in last meeting, we cannot continue with

[openstack-dev] Mesos Conductor using container-create operations

Hi, As we have discussed in last meeting, we cannot continue with changes in container-create[1] as long as we have suitable use case. But I honestly feel to have some kind of support for mesos + marathon apps, because magnum supports COE related functionalities for docker swarm

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Mesos Conductor

ope it is > OK. ;-) > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:48 AM, bharath thiruveedula < > bharath_...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry I was off for some days because of health issues. >> >> So I think the work items for this BP[1] are: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Mesos Conductor

a lump of JSON or YAML) to the Bay's native API. That approach strikes a balance that’s appropriate. Adrian On Nov 19, 2015, at 10:01 AM, bharath thiruveedula <bharath_...@hotmail.com<mailto:bharath_...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi, At the present scenario, we can have mesos cond

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Mesos Conductor

Follow your heart. You are miracle! bharath thiruveedula ---19/11/2015 10:31:58 am---@hongin, @adrian I agree with you. So can we go ahead with magnum container-create(delete) ... for From:bharath thiruveedula <bharath_...@hotmail.com> To:OpenStack Development Mailin

[openstack-dev] [tacker] Automatic flavor creation

Hi tackers, I am working on automatic flavor creation RFE[1]. I have written my thoughts on implementing on it. I would like to see your comments on it. Due to time differences, I was not able to directly ping core members in IRC. [1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1516193 RegardsBharath

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Mesos Conductor

Hi all,I am working on the blueprint [1]. As per my understanding, we have two resources/objects in mesos+marathon:1)Apps: combination of instances/containers running on multiple hosts representing a service.[2]2)Application Groups: Group of apps, for example we can have database application

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Mesos Conductor

ve tool already offers. However, if you can point out a valid > use case to wrap the API, I will give it more thoughts. > > Best regards, > Hongbin > > [1] https://docs.mesosphere.com/using/cli/marathonsyntax/ > > From: bharath thiruveedula [mailto:bharath_...@ho

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Sripriya Seetharam to Tacker core

+1 On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Stephen Wong wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy > wrote: > >> I'd like to propose Sripriya Seetharam to join the Tacker core team. >> Sripriya >> ramped up quickly in early Liberty

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Coe components status

+ 1 to vikas. As we have monitor framework only to docker swarm COE at present and we are pushing other COE drivers in future. So it is better to have component status for one COE at first and will push other COEs support later. Correct me if I am wrong. Regards Bharath T On Wed, Oct 21, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker] Proposing Bob Haddleton to core team

+1 -Bharath T On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Stephen Wong wrote: > +1 > > - Stephen > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy > wrote: > >> I would like to nominate Bob Haddleton to the Tacker core team. >> >> In the current

Re: [openstack-dev] New PyCharm License

Hi Andrew, My Launchpad ID is "bharath-ves" Regards Bharath T On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Andrew Melton wrote: > Hi devs, > > > I've got the new license for the next year. As always, please reply to > this email with your launchpad-id if you would like a

[openstack-dev] Debug tool for neutron

Hi, We have some troubleshooting guides for openstack neutron. But many people who are new to neutron find it difficult to follow the guides, as they are not aware of what is happening behind the scenes. So is there any tool which tracks the packet flow from the VM to debug issues like why the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] unable to reproduce bug 1317363‏

of the mailing list. That way the person who reported it and the ones who triaged it can see this information and respond. They might not be watching the dev mailing list as closely. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:17 AM, bharath thiruveedula bharath_...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I am Bharath

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] unable to reproduce bug 1317363‏

Hi, I am Bharath Thiruveedula. I am new to openstack neutron and networking. I am trying to solve the bug 1317363. But I am unable to reproduce that bug. The steps I have done to reproduce: 1)I have created with network with external = True2)Created a subnet for the above network with CIDR