On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> I personally think proposing patches to an openstack-api repository is the
> most effective way to make those proposals. Etherpads and wiki pages are fine
> for dumping content, but IMO, we don't need to dump content -- we already
> have plenty o
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/API_Working_Group
This is the start of the API Working Group (API WG).
To avoid bike shedding over the name of the working group, I decided to title
the wiki page API Working Group. Simple, to the point, and avoids loaded terms
like standards, best practices, gu
On Sep 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
> Seems like there is some overlap with the end user (i.e. consumer) working
> group at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/End_User_Working_Group
>
> Sounds like it would be worth discussing with them on how to focus on these
> needs. The scope of the
On Sep 24, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> I'll bring an API consumer's perspective.
+1
I’d bring an API consumer’s perspective as well.
Looks like there’s lots of support for an API WG. What’s the next step?
Form a WG under the User Committee [1] or is there something more appropria
On Aug 28, 2014, at 3:08 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Unfortunately, as Nataliia mentioned, we can't just get rid of it in
> v1.1 because that implies a major change in the API, which would require
> a major release. What we can do, though, is start working on a spec for
> the V2 of the API.
+1
For anyone following along this will be discussed in the OpenStackClient and
SDKs and project libraries sessions [1] [2].
Everett
[1] http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/ae9afc77278abb98f0fc35a540a1bb0b
[2] http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/9c99888fba09c643834d4ef9241cc90a
On May 7,
On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:20 AM, Dean Troyer
mailto:dtro...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want to open the discussion of an OpenStack Client Tools program proposal to
a wider audience. It would initially consist of OpenStackClient and eventually
add the existing SDK projects as they are ready to join. The
On Mar 5, 2014, at 8:16 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> I think SDK support is critical for the success of v3 long term. I
> expect most people are using the APIs through one of the major SDKs, so
> v3 won't take off until that happens. I think our top priority in Nova
> to help ensure this happens
On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> This seems like a reasonable and well thought out approach but It feels
> like we are removing our ability to innovate. I know we are worried about
> maintaining multiple APIs, but I’m still leaning towards putting the v3
> API out and just
Hi Sean,
Could 1.1.1 "Every Inbound WSGI request should be logged Exactly Once" be used
to track API call data in order to discover which API calls are being made most
frequently?
It certainly seems like it could but I want to confirm. I ask because this came
up as B "Get aggregate API call da
On Dec 18, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> I guess there are 3 options:
>
> 1. Require diversity for incubation, but find ways to bless or recommend
> projects pre-incubation so that this diversity can actually be achieved
>
> 2. Do not require diversity for incubation, but require it
On Nov 21, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> I’ve spoken to Everett and others about discussions had at the summit around
> ideas like developer.openstack.org - and I think the idea is a good start
> towards improving the lives of downstream application developers.
Blueprint started by T
On Sep 13, 2013, at 6:10 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Because inevitably people ask for copies of other folks configs to duplicate
> things, and a single file is easier to pass around than a tree. But that
> would mean a unique parser to handle the top level stanza.
+1
I share localrc files all the
This topic came up at the last summit in Portland at [1] and [2].
Yehia and another colleague of his from HP had a design that was discussed and
it seemed like they were going to start work on it. Another developer from CERN
expressed interest too. I'm not sure if anything ever really got starte
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
