unchpad.net/oslo
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped with reviews and patches to make this
> release possible!
>
> Thanks,
> dims
wt, another step forward!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenSta
;> 2100 UTC on Wednesdays?
>>
>> Also, when will we meet this week? Perhaps we should keep things the same
>> one more time while we get the new schedule finalized here on the ML.
>>
>> On 7/17/14, 11:27 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
>>
>>> O
On 07/16/2014 06:31 PM, Malini Kamalambal wrote:
>
> On 7/16/14 4:43 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
>
>> On 07/15/2014 06:20 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
>>> Hi folks, we¹ve been talking about this in IRC, but I wanted to bring it
>>> to the ML to get broad
On 07/17/2014 04:56 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 02:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> Greeting,
>>
>> I'd like to announce that we finally got the glance.store repo created.
>>
>> This library pulls out of glance the code related to stores. Not many
still relies on `i18n.install`
which registers `_` as a builtint. This is on its way of being
deprecated, which means we need to move glance away from that and use
explicit imports.
Keep an eye on the reviews queue, the patch is coming soon.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
edback is obviously very welcome,
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
y the policy on PPAs.
Agreed. FWIW, the work on devstack is on the works but it's being held
off while we clarify the policy on PPAs.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
d like a good day/time/idea to
folks?
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
's
>> under Gerrit control so we can review the changes properly.
>>
>> Please take a look and leave feedback as appropriate. Thanks!
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenSta
his, but hopefully the glance team can sort this out quickly since
> it's going to impact our elastic search cluster.
>
Hey Matt,
Thanks for the heads up, I'll take a look into this.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
ject without any impact on the final user that are
spec/blueprint worthy to explaining the motivation, expected results and
drawbacks.
To put it in another way. Developers are consumers of project's code,
therefore the changes affecting the way developers interact with the
code are also bluepr
devstack as well.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
n begin to understand how
> exactly asyncio could be adopted and whether that makes sense. The
> thread raises some interesting viewpoints, but I don't think it moves
> our understanding along all that much. The initial mail was simply about
> unlocking one very small piece of the pu
ere this
deadlock thing is coming from.
> I did create https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1339735 for the
> deadlock issue (which is the core failure), so that we could track it in
> elastic recheck.
>
> However the logging issu
On 07/09/2014 04:12 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 07/09/2014 10:01 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> On 07/09/2014 01:32 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> Recently looking at a gate failure, which was a 500 error from glance.
>>> So I expected that glance would have a pretty clear trace
eal errors in the logs is something that's just as problematic
> as logging things that aren't error as errors.
Thanks for spotting this and bringing it up. Did you file a bug for this
issue?
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
_
ted in your contributions, you can
take a look here[0] and see if you like the project.
Welcome,
Flavio
[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Marconi/
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
lly common code for OpenStack. I would
> much rather have all the projects running the same oslo code, even if it
> meant a few compat interfaces in there, than having the wild divergence
> of olso code in the current model.
This would be the ideal scenario but I don't believe
I don't see how syncing the code until those modules are graduated
> can harm, while possible benefits are quite significant.
There are folks that volunteered to be liaisons[1] for Oslo integration.
I'd expect folks on that list to do part of the job you mentioned.
-1 for having an a
patches to make this
> release possible!
w0t, and now:
GRADUATE ALL THE THINGS
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
https://world.mongodb.com/mongodb-world/session/virtualizing-mongodb-cloud-ec2-openstack-vmsor-dedicated
There were other good talks too: https://world.mongodb.com/schedule
[0]
http://www.mongodb.com/presentations/mongodb-world-2014-keynote-eliot-horowitz
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Pe
retry=0 v. retry=1
is the reverse of what I would intuitively expect.
Sounds reasonable. Would you like to submit a patch? Quick turnaround is
important, because if Ceilometer starts using this retry parameter
before we rename it, I'm not sure it'll be worth the hassle.
+1
Flavio
oting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101709/ ;)
---
Kurt Griffiths (kgriffs)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Pe
other-monitoring-resource that
we'll have to go to in order to figure out what's going on.
FWIW, the above could also be done for our Jenkins.
Overall, +1 for the email and idea.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpwpRJnlxUen.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
sqlalchemy as a message store, the less confused
people will be.
As for the viable non-AGPL alternative, I'll start a new thread with a
list of possible options.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpgDC1EqRwtD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Open
system to
test your project with but the development will slow down for sure. We
started on stackforge right away, then had a 2 days hackathon on a
github fork which was not a good idea because we had to submit al
those patches for review after the hackathon. :(
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flav
do so too.
Added myself too.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpaRrlczsyh2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
reads their default pipeline (pipeline:glance-api).
Does that sounds reasonable to everyone?
+1, it sounds like a good idea. I don't think we need to maintain 2
separate config files, especially now that the registry service is
optional.
Thanks for working on this.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Pe
ps,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp4OUU3wgtyX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
enstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
On 11/06/14 18:01 +, Janczuk, Tomasz wrote:
Thanks Flavio, some comments inline below.
On 6/11/14, 5:15 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
1. Marconi exposes HTTP APIs that allow messages to be listed without
consuming them. This API cannot be implemented on top of AMQP 0.9 which
rmance test plan at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/marconi-benchmark-plans we talked about
yesterday.
Thanks,
Tomasz
On 4/29/14, 2:52 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
On 28/04/14 17:41 +, Janczuk, Tomasz wrote:
Hello,
Have any performance numbers been published for Marconi? I have asked
this question
soon as the benchmark tool is ready,
the code and results will be shared here.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgphwCjVfz4g3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin
them a bit and this thread is showing how urgent it is to figure
that out.
On 6/12/14, 4:56 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
On 11/06/14 16:26 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Flavio Percoco
wrote:
Against:
€ Makes it hard for users to create ap
On 11/06/14 16:26 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Against:
• Makes it hard for users to create applications that work across
multiple
clouds, since critical functionality may or may not be available in a
given
deployment
On 11/06/14 13:42 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 06/11/2014 01:28 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
There are three things that I consider really valuable:
1. Sharding support: It allows admins to have separate clusters/nodes
of stores and configure marconi to use them all based on
pre-configured rules
On 11/06/14 13:01 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 06/11/2014 12:31 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 06/10/2014 09:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Now why is there a desire to implement these requirements using
traditional message brokers?
[...]
There are 2 main reasons that I don't believe are s
like them. Lets learn
from their experiences and do the changes that we consider best for
the final user.
Flavio
[0] https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg25385.html
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpFuB6Zpo3Yl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
API which is quite different to Marconi's API.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpS1d8EJXiYB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
k.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpTe9lXrjjsY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
for the great feedback.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgppKMk5h8tFc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
ailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Pe
hieved and what won't be
supported. We should come back here with that sub set of features
considered core.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp71RUP6R5vZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openst
oject I'm working on.
Hey Roland,
No, oslo.messaging is a different project and Marconi doesn't rely on
it.
Cheers,
Flavio
Thanks --Roland
On 6/4/14, 3:06 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
On 02/06/14 07:52 -0700, Keith Newstadt wrote:
Thanks for the responses Flavio, Roland
this communication in error, notify us
immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii)
delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openst
viously use them. It'd be really nice to see
some work going on that area as an external driver.
Thanks,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp60Zq_sr0E2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.
argets are very similar, we should
probably take a deeper look at the utility. Unfortunately, as
mentioned above, it'll be hard to support this on the AMQP driver.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpWtYRog7Qj_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
will be used. Oslo notifier
is on its way of deprecation. Instead, oslo.messaging[0] should be used.
[0] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpeiIRc4K8iq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev
ing like the shortcut you propose is
present in safe_encode(), so I'm not sure what benefit a new function
brings?
+1
Flavio
P.S: I'm working on graduating strutils from the incubator. I'm glad
you brought this up. I'm almost done
ome
part of the growth process for newly incubated projects.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpo7p14uzTKX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
e based
on his ideas.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpSS6u4GnOtj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hey Folks,
Just a heads up. I went ahead and create the pads for Glance sessions.
You can check them out here[0]:
[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Juno/Etherpads#Glance
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpLUI9SEeyKv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
team are dedicated to working on this and producing
results asap. The details and results will be shared as soon as
possible.
Thanks a lot for your interest, I'll make sure you're in the loop as
soon as we have them.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpb60aS9m0UE.pgp
Description: PGP
k.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpHFf7jIDQ1s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
clock/converted.html?iso=20140414T16&p1=0&p2=2133&p3=195&p4=224
Yeah, that should work for me most of the time.
Idem, it should work most of the time!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpFsw1qjmlx5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenS
Greetings,
I'd like to announce my candidacy as a TC member
I'm Flavio Percoco. I'm a Software Engineer working for Red Hat and
I've had the pleasure to be part of this community for more than a
year already.
During this time, many things have happened that I summarized in
e config sample. I think Zhi Yan's patch
could be moved forward: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83327/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpkIroB1NVRj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@list
ion.
All the above sounds amazing to me! You've done an amazing work so
far!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpN9lAprsvWv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-
apocalypses,
I call for a vote to change the name of the OpenStack Marconi project
to OpenStack Macaroni. The vote should probably be held after OpenStack Summit,
so that we can discuss the potential name change in a Summit session.
... We'll see... We'll see...
Flavio.
--
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpDmaTg3ecZ9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStac
say the config file could be generated for each milestone cut and
live in the milestone branch.
As Tom pointed out, referring to the sample configs is very useful
from many points of view (operations, support, development etc).
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp5FItgZgpGb.pgp
Descri
rticipated in the mailing
list discussions, she's contributed with thoughtful reviews and
participated in the project's meeting since she first joined the
project.
Folks in favor or against please explicitly +1 / -1 the proposal.
Thanks Malini, it's an honor to have you i
roviding such important feedback in this process. We look forward
to see Marconi graduating from incubation.
Bests,
Marconi's team.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpEsy1SvKMQF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-
p will allow some
limited sort of divergence when it comes to the technology
requirements.
I'm sure there's more to consider here. For instance, CI issues, CD
issues etc.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpPria2zbe5i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
l dedicate time and effort to provide the necessary information on
the open questions in this thread and I'll then come back with a more
detailed FAQ that we can go through again.
Cheers,
Flavio
P.S: In case you're interested, I'll be presenting Marconi on March
27th in a Hangout sessi
nversations with Kurt and Flavio in Hong Kong about adding
features to Pecan to support the Marconi team, and Ryan prototyped some of
those changes shortly after we returned home. Was any of that work considered
in the evaluation?
There was a collaboration between Balaji and
On 19/03/14 11:20 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
My only concern in this case - I'm not sure if this has been discussed
or written somewhere - is to define what the boundaries of that
divergence are. For instance, and I know
t* of wsgi
frameworks. To be fair, there's already a set since currently
integrated projects use webob, swob and Pecan.
The point I'd like to get at is that as a general rule we probably
shouldn't limit the set of supported libraries to just 1.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio
one. There's also support for redis.
As already mentioned, we have plans to complete the redis driver and
write an amqp based one and let them both live in the code base.
Having support for different storage dirvers makes marconi's sharding
feature more valuable.
Side Note:
Wh
patch is pretty small and it looks quite good
already.
To be fair, it actually fixes a bug. What makes this change worth
asking for a FFE is the fact that it adds 2 new configuration options
and makes it possible to run the registry with both versions enabled.
Cheers,
Flavio.
--
@flaper87
ud.
markwash
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpNRSIcQwpNw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing lis
tempt to fix this issues without reverting the patch.
Feedback appreciated.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79935/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp99JsUDXYp3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStac
On 12/03/14 07:18 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/12/2014 06:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/03/14 16:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi. I asked in #openstack-glance a few times today but got no response,
so sorry for the list spam.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79710/
This change
ing this issue, I didn't think about this corner
case.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpmk_F9F9rJP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
vate,
that could probably be changed.
Flavio.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpyaJHHZv0hN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 06/03/14 11:50 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
I'd like to request a FFE for the oslo.messaging migration in Cinder.
Some projects have already switched over oslo.messaging and others are
still doing so. I think we should switch remaining projects to
oslo.messagi
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpahScKue6hS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
he style and
changes done in Nova, for better or for worse.
The review link is: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/71873/
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpopMOYxazNg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
, please respond with a +1 or –1.
+1 ;)
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpvo4CXSQjoO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/openstack/common/db/sqlalchemy/session.py#L329
Cheers,
Fla
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpHbm4UKm_HE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
).
It's worth noting that you can't upload images to Cinder - meaning,
create volumes by uploading images to Glance - yet.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp64T1frieP4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
:)
Thanks a lot for raising these questions and for reviewing the API
v1.1 spec.
Cheers,
Fla.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpM0AN3lxcQR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
stigating it but
try to make it not nova specific.
[...]
Cheers,
Fla.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpBkffPcCNXX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 03/02/14 12:44 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 17:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/02/14 10:13 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
>On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
>> st
On 03/02/14 10:13 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
store nodes where the image should be downloaded from. That is,
selecting the nearest location from the image locations and
t?
[1] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1255622
[2] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1246200
-Mike Perez
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpaxQeDoq4aT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
tinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpvPFGFDmjyf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@li
penstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpSlE8YddAPK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
On 25/01/14 10:57 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-01-23 16:52:53 +0100 (+0100), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
If so, is it possible to export config files as well?
[...]
Patch functions.sh(cleanup_host) in openstack-infra/devstack-gate to
copy the files of interest into $BASE/logs/ and
_
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://list
Greetings,
I was digging into some test failures in the gate (my fault, nothing
to do with the gate) and I realized that the configuration files of
the projects are exported along with the logs.
Is the above true? Or am I missing something?
If so, is it possible to export config files as well?
tack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpCMoxOfF9LI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
s matter after I-2. Not sure
when it'll happen but it'll be a perfect time to discuss this further.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpv4mSdRVkCi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
man/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp1bpGlNdhXH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 21/01/14 13:14 -0500, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2014-01-16 13:48, John Griffith wrote:
Hey Everyone,
A review cam
r contribution. I commented on Gerrit.
Cheers,
FF
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp6Yc28Gn3BN.
the backtrace of invalid token'
Regard!
Lee Li
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpIWWXjn
ment. FWIW, backwards compatibility is always considered
in all Oslo reviews and if there's a crazy-breaking change, it's
always notified.
Thankfully, this all will be alleviated with the libs that are being
pulled out from the incubator. The syncs will contain fewer module
901 - 1000 of 1147 matches
Mail list logo
