:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
.messaging/+bug/1801011
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
> __________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:uns
a-compute side ? What will you advice ?
>
>
> [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/733766/
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
ed. But I would still be in favour of having some extra
> time to prove that with thorough testing.
>
> @Ben, including the executor via setup.cfg also looks OK to me. I see no
> issues with this approach.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Renat Akhmerov
> @Nokia
> On 18 Oct 2018, 23
__
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:30 PM Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Ken Giusti writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:56 AM Doug Hellmann
> wrote:
> >
> >> Matthew Thode writes:
> >>
> >> > On 18-10-09 11:12:30, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >> >&
prometheanfire)
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.o
ct:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1712399+status:open
Our goal is to land the removal next week.
thanks
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstac
em to address this in launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1792977
> > It's definitely edge cases that we'd be catching here (if any), so I'm
> > personally fine with assuming it will just work. But I wanted to pose the
> > question to the list, as we agree
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+1
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com
questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development
ntegration-rabbit/e7fdc7d/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2018-05-16_05_19_06_332
>> [3]
>> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/.zuul.yaml?h=stable/queens#n250
>> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572193/2/.zuul.yaml
>
> ______
nstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/.zuul.yaml?h=stable/queens#n250
[4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572193/2/.zuul.yaml
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
that test. See the epad for details.
I've started patches for a couple of projects, but if anyone is
willing to help out please use the epad so we don't step on each
other's toes.
thanks,
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
x.ini#n116
[1] https://github.com/r1chardj0n3s/pip-check-reqs
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstac
//docs.openstack.org/oslo.messaging/latest/contributor/supported-messaging-drivers.html
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...
13579.html
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536960/
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
Doug Hellmann wrote:
> I can’t see
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vQpaSSm7Amk9q4sBEAUi_IpyJ4l07qd3t5T_BPZkdLWfYbtSpSmF7obSB1qRGA65wjiiq2Sb7H2ylJo/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000&slide=id.p
>
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Ken Giusti wro
ion might be fairly simple to write now that we have the
>> YAML-based sample config with (ideally) information about all the
>> options available to set in a project. It should be possible to compare
>> the options set in the config file with the ones listed in the sample
>> co
s)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>
> _
hpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1194279
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1555845
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358359/
[4] https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.messaging/latest/reference/server.html
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> Thanks a lot for the analysis, and sorry for the slow reply!
> Comments inline...
>
> Ken Giusti wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > I think there's a couple of problems here.
> >
>
ch for good measure.
The original list included a few items that as best I can tell were not
tagged as deprecated via debtcollector until Pike. IIUC we can't remove
those in Queens, correct?
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
_
@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage question
uch AMQP traffic is
> Control
> > > > related
> > > > (e.g. spinning up VMs) vs how much is telemetry related
> in a
> > > > typical
> > > > openstack deployment.
> > > >
Oop - didn't reply all
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ken Giusti
Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][barbican][sahara] start RPC service
before launcher wait?
To: Adam Spiers
Hi Adam,
I think there's a couple of problems here.
Reg
rg/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
As far as an oslo.messaging server is concerned, the order of operations is:
server.start()
# do stuff until ready to stop the server...
server.stop()
server.wait()
The final wait blocks until all requests that are in progress when stop()
is called
ilure conditions, etc.
[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fog_Edge_Massively_Distributed_Clouds
>
> Thanks,
> Ilya
>
> 2017-06-21 15:23 GMT+02:00 Ken Giusti :
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the
>&
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
>
>> Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the
>> different message bus...
>>
>
> That was a particularly unfortunatey choice of words.
>
yzing messaging - please
feel free to contribute, question, and criticize :)
thanks,
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@list
> [1] https://www.rabbitmq.com/tutorials/tutorial-six-python.html.
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.ope
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/15/2017 01:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2017-05-15
>>>>>> 14:27:36 -0400:
>>>>>>>
>>&g
in Pike, removal in Rocky.
thanks,
[1]
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS_Forum_Oslo.Messaging_driver_recommendations
(~ line 80)
[2] https://github.com/pika/pika
[3] https://github.com/celery/kombu
--
Ken Giusti
Just a head's up: this is an additional session to continue the
discussion from Weds
etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS_Forum_Oslo.Messaging_driver_recommendations
thanks,
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmai
__
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
he reason tho, sorry.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Cheran
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://li
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
ck.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
e questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Develop
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
> On 1 September 2016 at 06:52, Ken Giusti wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
>
>> > I have opinions about other patterns we could use, but I don't want to
>> > push
>>
&
rios defined by the API.
[1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/zmq_driver.html
[2] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/AMQP1.0.html
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us
>> interfaces for communication patterns, and then to encourage people to move
>> to the new ones from the old. (Whether RabbitMQ is involved is neither
>> here nor there, as this is really a question of Oslo APIs, not their
>> implementation.)
>
> I think it'
ions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
OpenStack Development Ma
d at this kind of model. Thus
> instead of having a multi-personality codebase with hidden features like
> this (say in oslo.messaging) instead it gets its own codebase and API
> that is 'just right' (or more close to being 'right') for it's concept
> (vs
Hi,
The 'trace' boolean offered by the AMQP 1.0 driver exposes a debug feature
that is provided by the Proton library. This is specific to the Proton
library - I'm not sure kombu/zmq/etc offer a similar feature.
As Xuanzhou points out, this debug tool merely prints to stdout a summary
of each AM
+1
Yay Dmitry!!
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM Oleksii Zamiatin
wrote:
> My big +1 for Dmitry!
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Doug Hellmann
> wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2016-01-28 09:25:56
>> -0600:
>> > Team,
>> >
>> > Dmitry has been focused solel
+1
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:37 AM Victor Stinner wrote:
> +1 for Brant
>
> Victor
>
> Le 24/09/2015 19:12, Doug Hellmann a écrit :
> > Oslo team,
> >
> > I am nominating Brant Knudson for Oslo core.
> >
> > As liaison from the Keystone team Brant has participated in meetings,
> > summit session
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:27 PM Adam Young wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 10:28 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> >>
> >
> > As promissed: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193804/
> >
> > Cheers,
> You can't deprecate a driver without providing a viable alternative.
>
> Right now, QPID is the only driver that
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:47 PM Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-06-19 08:01:46 -0700:
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:15 AM Flavio Percoco
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 18/06/15 16:37 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > >Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-06-18 12:47
I've already +1'd this patch - timing issues aside - I think this is a Good
Thing from a developer's point of view. Particularly, my own selfish point
of view :) I envision the ability to support multiple different messaging
services via the amqp1 driver. Having to keep devstack updated with an
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:15 AM Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 18/06/15 16:37 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-06-18 12:47:21 -0700:
> >> Hello! I know there's been a lot of churn and misunderstanding over the
> >> recent devstack changes, so I wanted to make
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Ken Giusti wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>> > Ken Giusti wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just to be clear:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Ken Giusti wrote:
>>
>> Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
>> impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
>> the "qpid://" transport
t (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
__
O
m1g79Z
> vCJbcwVpldGiTDRJRDAPPb14UakJbZJGnkRDgYscNlBG+alzLw0MsaqnJ7LS
> 8Yj4YkXSgthpHLF2N8Yem9r7Lh7CbYLKzlhOylgAJTd8gpGGtncwWMwYJvKc
> lsMJNY34PMiNkPk1a+VSlrWcPJpafBl3aOBbrIpmMSpMe9pXC/yHW2nrtGez
> VXxliFpqQ7kA5827AuhPAM8EzeMUDetLhZvLxzqY7f/SlaoQ/s/9VhfemmHv
> d4wT8uiayrWSMdXVUJZcMUdM2XlJDdObokMI0ZQKQYX8OhKQL8LdaHR2xr6B
> OjS4Mp4+/W4Y9wMUFqlRyGnW1LLwCFYWHpyKlhXKmYSSdKTn5L7Pcvmmfw8d
> JzDcMxfKCBnM4mNRzlBqYV4/ysb6FNMUZwu+D1YxCVHmAH2O1/oODujNJFkZ
> gSWAmh9kYawJKbbS0Lh7nkOJs1iOnYxG0IQmz61sffg8T2FrpbH4FNWh1/+a
> mQhmYWH2L5noJIwncVQSloSRuoSWLj9rfeiTIHjq2ZnTUD5tbXK6S5dTvv4m
> 4bij
> =G9oX
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
/bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1330199/comments/8
>
> Personally, I don't like this API, because the behavior difference between
> '__init__' and 'start' is too implicit.
>
That's true, but I'd say that the problem of implicitness re:
os.fork()
his use still result in
sockets being shared across the parent/child processes? Seems
dangerous.
Thoughts?
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1330199
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@list
the AMQP 1.0 driver in the
future. I have yet to spend any time ramping up on the existing
brokerless support implemented by the zmq driver, so forgive my
ignorance, but I'm hoping to leverage what is there if it makes sense.
If it doesn't make sense, and the e
oslo.messaging patch.
>
>Another thing I'll note is that before pulling Ironic in, Nova had an API
>contract test. This can be useful for making sure that changes in the
>upstream project doesn't break drivers, or that breakages could at least
>invoke action by the drive
On Wed Sep 3 19:23:52 UTC 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm proposing a freeze exception for the oslo.messaging AMQP 1.0
>> driver:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75815/
>> Th
P 1.0 support in the openstack
environment. Likewise, easier access to this driver by the openstack
developer community will help us find and fix any issues in a timely
manner as adoption of the standard grows.
Please consider this feature to be a part of Juno-3 release.
Thanks,
Ken
--
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:36:46 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 13:24 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > On 08/27/2014 03:35 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I believe Juno-3 is our last chance to get this feature [1
really has to be merged
first, before I can continue with CI/devstack development.
[1]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/amqp10-driver-implementation
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75815/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115752/
[4] https:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 11:55 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
>> Good to hear about epel's availability. But on the Ubuntu/Debian
>> side - is it possible to add the Qpid project's PPA to the config
>> project? From a quick '
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:14:51 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>On 2014-07-30 14:59:09 -0400 (-0400), Ken Giusti wrote:
>> Thanks Daniel. It was my understanding - which may be wrong - that
>> having devstack install the 'out of band' packages would only help in
>>
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:04:41 -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>On 7/30/2014 11:59 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:25:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:01AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
>>>> Greetings,
>> At this p
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:25:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:01AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Apologies for the cross-post: this should be of interest to both infra
> > and olso.messaging developers.
> >
> &
kages to the
common slave configuration. Does this make sense? Are there any
better alternatives?
[0]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/amqp10-driver-implementation
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75815/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110431/
--
Ken G
replication of every queue and every message.
>
>
> >
> > [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1338732
> > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109373/
> > [2]
> > https://github.com/noelbk/oslo.messaging/commit/960fc26ff050ca3073ad90eccbef1ca95712e82e
> > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109143/
>
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
ing for some early feedback on whether or not this is the correct
approach.
thanks!
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 07/15/2014 10:58:50 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>On 07/15/2014 07:16 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
>>>
>>> These packages may be obtained via EPEL for Centos/RHEL systems
>>> (qpid-proton-c-devel
/pypi/pyngus
[2] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-qpid-proton/0.7-0
[3] https://launchpad.net/~qpid
[4] http://qpid.apache.org/download.html
--
Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.op
76 matches
Mail list logo
