Hi folks
I think this thread is still mixing topics. I feel we can archive 1000 mails :P
so let me name it and let me write my thought on this.
[Topic1] Nova parity priority
I do understand concern and this is highest priority.
However, group based policy effort won't slower this effort.
Bec
Hi Russell
Thanks. I got it.
2014-07-22 14:21 GMT-07:00 Russell Bryant :
> On 07/21/2014 04:10 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi nova folks
>>
>> QQ: Who uses migrate_instance_start/finish, and why we need this rpc call?
>>
>> I greped code but I couldn't f
Hi nova folks
QQ: Who uses migrate_instance_start/finish, and why we need this rpc call?
I greped code but I couldn't find implementation for it.
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/372c54927ab4f6c226f5a1a2aead40b89617cf77/nova/network/manager.py#L1683
Best
Nachi
___
QQ: do you have __init__.py in the directory?
2014-07-16 11:43 GMT-07:00 Julio Carlos Barrera Juez <
juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.net>:
> I am fighting with this for months. I want to develop a VPN Neutron
> plugin, but it is almost impossible to realize how to achieve it. this is a
> thread I open
Hi folks
Thank you for your starting this topic.
Let me share some of my ideas
(1) Improve security_group_rules_for_devices
In current implementation, we are generating rules per port in server side.
It is something like this.
port1[SG_Rule1, SG_Rule2, SG_Rule3] .. port2, port3
This can be imp
Hi Paul
I think this flavor bp is related.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90070/
By using flavor, you can specify the flavor for routers ( high
bandwidth or low bandwidth ) such as VM (vCPU vMemory etc).
I don't see any bp for flavor based scheduling yet, but IMO it is
great we could have such s
> Yamamoto
Cool! OK, I'll make ryu based bgpspeaker as ref impl for my bp.
>Yong
Ya, we have already decided to have the driver architecture.
IMO, this discussion is for reference impl.
2014-06-05 0:24 GMT-07:00 Yongsheng Gong :
> I think maybe we can device a kind of framework so that we can plu
Hi folks
ExaBGP won't suit for BGPVPN implementation because it isn't support vpnv4.
Ryu is supporting it, however they have no internal api to binding
neutron network & route target.
so I think contrail is a only solution for BGPVPN implementation now.
2014-05-30 2:22 GMT-07:00 Mathieu Rohon
Hi folks
Today, we are can change allow overlapping ips or not by configuration.
This has impact of database design, and actually, this flag complicate the
implementations.
Whey we have this flag is a historical reason. This was needed when many OS
don't support namespaces, however Most of OS sup
I like the idea
2014-05-29 8:33 GMT-07:00 Yuriy Taraday :
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>>
>>> (2) Avoid duplication of works
>>> I have several experience of this. Anywa
Hi Zang
Since, SSL-VPN for Juno bp is approved in neturon-spec,
I would like to restart this work.
Could you share your code if it is possible?
Also, Let's discuss how we can collaborate in here.
Best
Nachi
2014-05-01 14:40 GMT-07:00 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi folks
>
>> Clint
>
comment for
requesting bug report.
Best
Nachi
2014-05-27 16:54 GMT-07:00 Joe Gordon :
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ben, Joe
>>
>> Thank you for your reply
>>
>> (2) Avoid duplication of works
>> I have s
at 4:02 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks
>>>
>>> I believed we should link bug or bp for any commit except automated
>>> commit by infra.
>>> However, I
Hi folks
I believed we should link bug or bp for any commit except automated
commit by infra.
However, I found also there is no written policy for this.
so may be, I'm wrong for here.
The reason, we need bug or bp linked , is
(1) Triage for core reviewing
(2) Avoid duplication of works
(3) Relea
Hi Salvatore
Thank you for your posting this.
IMO, this topic shouldn't be limited for Neutron only.
Users wants consistent API between OpenStack project, right?
In Nova, a server has task_state, so Neutron should do same way.
2014-05-22 15:34 GMT-07:00 Salvatore Orlando :
> As most of you pr
+1!
Carl is doing great contribution for the community.
He is really active on reviews with very high quality comments.
His input based on large scale deployment is also very valuable for
the community.
2014-05-21 13:59 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> I would like to propose a few changes to the Neut
Hi folks
I could deploy it on openshift
http://reviewstat-nachi.rhcloud.com/
2014-05-19 20:36 GMT-07:00 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi Boris
>
> Ya, I know this stats.
> The primary usecase for this patch is helping reviewer assignment for
> each patch.
>
> 2014-05-19 18:50 GMT-07:00 B
ntribution/neutron/30
>
> Best regards,
> Boris Pavlovic
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> As per neutron discussion, we agreed there is really important to
>> distribute
>> core-review
Hi folks
As per neutron discussion, we agreed there is really important to distribute
core-reviewer loads.
so we got an idea to specify primary/secondary reviewers for each reviews.
IMO, this is almost impossible without some helper tool.
so, I wrote it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouS5h5
Hi Barbican folks
I'm trying to rewrite existing ssl-vpn bp with integration with barbican.
so I'm really appliciate if I can get your input.
In original proposal, we have vpn credential resource who has followings
- id
- ca (PEM encoded)
- server_certificate (PEM encoded)
- server_key (PEM enco
enVPN process download key to memory
>> >> directly from Babican?
>> >>
>> >> 2014-05-01 9:42 GMT-07:00 Clark, Robert Graham :
>> >> > Excuse me interrupting but couldn't you treat the key as largely
>> >> > ephemeral, pull it down f
u treat the key as largely
>> > ephemeral, pull it down from Barbican, start the OpenVPN process and
>> > then purge the key? It would of course still be resident in the memory
>> > of the OpenVPN process but should otherwise be protected against
>> > filesys
ican, start the OpenVPN process and
> then purge the key? It would of course still be resident in the memory
> of the OpenVPN process but should otherwise be protected against
> filesystem disk-residency issues.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nachi Ueno [mailto
ig file. If the config files are generated and
> can be stored, then storing the whole config file in Barbican protects the
> private key (and any other settings) without having to try to deliver the
> key to the OpenVPN endpoint in some non-standard way.
>
>
> Jarret
>
> On 4/
> Jarret
Thanks!
Currently, the config will be generated on demand by the agent.
What's merit storing entire config in the Barbican?
> Kyle
Thanks!
2014-04-30 7:05 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Clint
>>
>&g
of 2014-04-29 10:58:53 -0700:
>> Hi Kyle
>>
>> 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> >> Hi Zang
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for your contribution on this!
>> >> The p
Hi Kyle
2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Zang
>>
>> Thank you for your contribution on this!
>> The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
>>
> Has the idea of
Hi Zang
Thank you for your contribution on this!
The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
[1] We are depending DB security, anyway
When we get stolen the private key in the DB, it means we are also
stolen ID/PW for DB.
If we stolen the key, even if we keep the private k
Hi folks
I'm +1 for "Review Hour" on IRC because it shorten communication round
trip time.
As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but we can improve it
Best
Nachi
2014-04-21 9:20 GMT-07:00 Akihiro Motoki :
> Hi,
>
> Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members made themselv
Hi folks
My bad,, Issue (1) was my mistake, and fixed
2014-04-16 15:16 GMT-07:00 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi folks
>
> I submitted a wip patch which has diagram examples for both of ascii
> flow and blockdiag.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88095/1
>
> This is both ou
Hi folks
I submitted a wip patch which has diagram examples for both of ascii
flow and blockdiag.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88095/1
This is both output from ascii flow and blockdiag.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/File:Screenshot.png
I faced two issue in ascii flow. May be, I'm missing
Hi folks
I don't think to use ASCII digrams is good idea because it is hard to
maintenance & update
diagrams..
so I would like to recommend Blockdiag & Netdiag which are plugins for sphinx.
Blockdiag
http://blockdiag.com/en/blockdiag/
blockdiag {
A -> B -> C -> D;
A -> E -> F -> G;
}
wil
+10 !
2014-04-15 15:07 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> Given the success the Nova team has had in handling reviews using
> their new nova-specs gerrit repository, I think it makes a lot of
> sense for Neutron to do the same. With this in mind, I've added
> instructions to the BP wiki [1] for how to
Hi Thomas
Great! Do we have a doc how to use these packages?
2014-04-11 0:00 GMT-07:00 Thomas Goirand :
> Hi,
>
> it's with a great joy that I can announce today, that TripleO is now
> fully in Debian [1]. It is currently only uploaded to Debian
> experimental, like for all Icehouse (I don't thi
Hi Julio
Unfortunately, we couldn't get forward about VPNaaS much in Icehouse.
We will discuss this design in next summit, so let's get this progress in
Juno.
2014-04-10 10:51 GMT-07:00 Julio Carlos Barrera Juez <
juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.net>:
> Hi.
>
> After 8 months of the patch creation a
Hi Jarda
Congratulations
This release and the demo is super awesome!!
Do you have any instruction to install this one?
2014-04-10 1:32 GMT-07:00 Jaromir Coufal :
> Dear Stackers,
>
> I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged
> branch 0.1.0 for Icehouse release [0]
Hi Zane
Thank you for your very valuable post.
We should convert your suggest to multiple bps.
2014-04-07 17:28 GMT-07:00 Zane Bitter :
> The Neutron API is a constant cause of pain for us as Heat developers, but
> afaik we've never attempted to bring up the issues we have found in a
> cross-proj
Hi Salvatore
2014-03-25 17:57 GMT-07:00 Salvatore Orlando :
> I hope we can sort this out on the mailing list IRC, without having to
> schedule emergency meetings.
Russel requested to have a conf call on this, so let him decide it.
> Salvatore
>
> On 25 March 2014 22:58, Na
Hi Nova, Neturon Team
I would like to discuss issue of Neutron + Nova + OVS security group fix.
We have a discussion in IRC today, but the issue is complicated so we will have
a conf call tomorrow 17:00 UST (10AM PDT). #openstack-neutron
(I'll put conf call information in IRC)
<-- Please let me k
./run_test.sh or ./run_test.sh -d package_name is working?
2014-03-03 21:28 GMT-08:00 Paul Michali :
> Hi,
>
> I'm stuck and can use some guidance here...please!
>
> I have a change set out for review that used the VPN Service Type Framework
> ( https://review.openstack.org/74144). Everything work
Hi folks
I wrote an bookmarklet for neutron gerrit review.
This bookmarklet make the comment title for 3rd party ci as gray.
javascript:(function(){list =
document.querySelectorAll('td.GJEA35ODGC'); for(i in
list){if(!list[i].innerHTML){continue;};if(list[i].innerHTML &&
list[i].innerHTML.search(
Hi folks
Good news. 74882 is merged.
I'm still not sure the current UT failure rate yet with 1280035,
so I think we should wait to see the failure rate.
so please check current gating status when you approve codes.
Best
Nachi
2014-02-19 16:59 GMT-08:00 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi Neutron core&
Hi Neutron core's
We should wait approving code due to bug 1280035.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1280035
Unittest fails very high rate in the gating and blocks gating queue.
Salvatore is working on the issue.
At first, we skip the failing unit test.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73
Hi Paul
Sorry, I have missed this mail.
The reason for putting -1 was the gating issue, so it is OK now.
PS
Thank you for your rebasing this one
2014-02-16 16:43 GMT-08:00 Sumit Naiksatam :
> Hi Paul,
>
> Our plan with FWaaS was to get it to parity with LBaaS as far as STF
> is concerned. That w
+1
2014年2月12日水曜日、Mayur Patilさんは書きました:
> +1
>
> *--*
> *Cheers,*
> *Mayur*
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
ad String in the
> database, I assumed we need to give string as input.
>
> I guess, the neutron client will convert the file to string and then call
> the API. That should work. Thanks for the clarification.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Rajesh
May I ask why we need single line representation of PEM format?
For CLI, we will use file_name as same as nova keypair-add.
We won't specify PEM on the URL.
2014-01-27 Rajesh Mohan :
> Thanks John.
>
> My initial approach is similar to Keystone's. This is mainly to unblock me
> from
Thanks! Kyle
2014/1/16 Kyle Mestery :
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
>> Hi Bob, Kyle
>>
>> I pushed (A) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67281/.
>> so could you review it?
>>
> Just did, looks good Nachi, thanks!
>
>> 2014/1/16
Hi Bob, Kyle
I pushed (A) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67281/.
so could you review it?
2014/1/16 Robert Kukura :
> On 01/16/2014 03:13 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Amir
>>>
>>> 2014/1/
nfiguration, then update vif_security based on
this value.
> Thanks,
>
> Amir
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
>> Hi Mathieu, Bob
>>
>> Thank you for your reply
>> OK let's do (A) - (C) for now.
>>
>> (A) Re
, but those values may need to depend on the value of
> enable_security_group from proposal 1.
>
> -Bob
>
>> Once OVSfirewallDriver will be available, the firewall drivers that
>> the operator wants to use should be in a MD config file/section and
>> ovs MD could bind
Hi folks
Security group for OVS agent (ovs plugin or ML2) is being broken.
so we need vif_security port binding to fix this
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21946/)
We got discussed about the architecture for ML2 on ML2 weekly meetings, and
I wanna continue discussion in here.
Here is my propos
Hi Russell
Thanks. I got it
2014/1/13 Russell Bryant :
> On 01/13/2014 05:26 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I get Embrane CI comment in my review about 10 times in min.
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58897/
>>
>> Embrane CI looks like broken
2014/1/13 Clint Byrum :
> Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-13 10:35:07 -0800:
>> Hi Clint
>>
>> 2014/1/10 Clint Byrum :
>> > Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-10 13:42:30 -0700:
>> >> Hi Flavio, Clint
>> >>
>> >> I agree with you guys.
>> >> sorry, may be, I wasn't clear. M
Hi folks
I get Embrane CI comment in my review about 10 times in min.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58897/
Embrane CI looks like broken, and we should stop it now.
Best
Nachi
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://l
Hi Anita
Location: I am about to sign the contract for Salle du Parc at 3625 Parc
> avenue, a room in a residence of McGill University.
^^^ Let's me confirmed the room number?
2014/1/7 Anita Kuno :
> On 01/08/2014 03:10 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Anita
>>
>> Le
Hi Clint
2014/1/10 Clint Byrum :
> Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-10 13:42:30 -0700:
>> Hi Flavio, Clint
>>
>> I agree with you guys.
>> sorry, may be, I wasn't clear. My opinion is to remove every
>> configuration in the node,
>> and every configuration should be done by API from c
+1 but fixing this looks like take not small time
2014/1/10 Maru Newby :
> I recently saw a case [1] where a misspelled assertion method
> (asoptt_called_once_with vs assert_called_once_with) did not result in a test
> failure because the object it was called on was created by mock.patch()
> wi
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2014-01-09 12:21:05 -0700:
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks
>> >
>> > Thank you for your input.
>> >
>> > The key difference from external configuration s
01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
>> > > > On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800
2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Oleg
>>
>> 2014/1/9 Oleg Gelbukh :
>> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2014/1/9 Jeremy Hanmer :
>&
Hi Oleg
2014/1/9 Oleg Gelbukh :
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> 2014/1/9 Jeremy Hanmer :
>>
>> > How do you see these interactions defined? For instance, if I deploy
>> > a custom driver for Neutron, does that mean I also hav
Hi Jay
2014/1/9 Jay Pipes :
> Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
I'll never mind to discuss with you :)
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy
>>
>> Don't you think it is burden for operators if we should choose c
Hi Bob
2014/1/9 Robert Kukura :
> On 01/09/2014 02:34 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Doug
>>
>> 2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks
>>>
n point for me, and it's get more worse
if the env is heterogeneous.
I have also some experience to run openstack clusters, but it is still
pain for me..
My experience is something like this
# Wow, new release! ohh this chef repo didn't supported..
# hmm i should modify chef recipe.. hmm debug..
Hi Doug
Thank you for your input.
2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Doug
>>
>> 2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nach
Hi Doug
2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> Thank you for your input.
>>
>> The key difference from external configuration system (Chef, puppet
>> etc) is integration wi
information in the environment rather than in roles). I
> assume Puppet offers the same. Please don't re-invent this hugely
> complicated wheel.
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:23 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>>
would this new service give us that existing, proven,
> configuration management tools like chef and puppet don't have?
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Flavio
>>
>> Thank you for your input.
>> I agree with you. oslo.config isn&#x
Hi Flavio
Thank you for your input.
I agree with you. oslo.config isn't right place to have server side code.
How about oslo.configserver ?
For authentication, we can reuse keystone auth and oslo.rpc.
Best
Nachi
2014/1/9 Flavio Percoco :
> On 08/01/14 17:13 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi folks
OpenStack process tend to have many config options, and many hosts.
It is a pain to manage this tons of config options.
To centralize this management helps operation.
We can use chef or puppet kind of tools, however
sometimes each process depends on the other processes configuration.
For
Hi Anita
Let's me join this session also.
Nachi Ueno
NTT i3
2014/1/5 Anita Kuno :
> On 01/05/2014 03:42 AM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I finally got over my fear of weather and booked my flight and hotel for
>> this sprint.
>>
>> I am
Hi Salvatore
The metadata server is working well? (or may be timing issue)
I saw similar issue when VM failed to get the certificate from the
metadata server.
Best
Nachi
2013/12/27 Salvatore Orlando :
> Yair,
>
> The 'isolated' mode makes the tempest session more realistic by simulating a
> clou
+1 ! I'll join.
I'm also working on investigating how to use openstack gating system.
(This document is still draft version)
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WJInaSt_H2kVkjnhtPmiATP1F-0BVbuk1eefQalL5Q0/edit#slide=id.p
2013/12/10 Ivar Lazzaro :
> +1 for 1700UTC Thursday on IRC
>
> -Origi
I'm +1 for 'provider'.
2013/12/9 Akihiro Motoki :
> Neutron defines "provider" attribute and it is/will be used in advanced
> services (LB, FW, VPN).
> Doesn't it fit for a distributed router case? If we can cover all services
> with one concept, it would be nice.
>
> According to this thread, w
Hi Yong
NSX have two kind of router.
Edge and distributed router.
Edge node will work as some VPN services and advanced service nodes.
Actually, VPNaaS OSS impl is running in l3-agent.
so IMO, we need l3-agent also for basis of some edge services.
2013/12/9 Yongsheng Gong :
> If distributed
Thanks!
Commented on bp whiteboard.
2013/12/5 Yongsheng Gong :
> ok, My pleasure to help,
> I created a bp for it:
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/vpn-multiple-subnet
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yong
>>
&
Hi Yong
Yes, to support multiple subnet is on the roadmap.
I'll definitely welcome your help :P
2013/12/5 Yongsheng Gong :
> I think we should allow more than subnet_id in one vpnservice object.
> but the model below limits only one subnet_id is used.
> https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/m
Hi folks
OK, It looks like we get consensus on
separate resource" way.
Best
Nachi
2013/12/5 Eugene Nikanorov :
> Hi,
>
> My vote is for separate resource (e.g. 'New Model'). Also I'd like to see
> certificate handling as a separate extension/db mixing(in fact, persistence
> driver) similar to se
2013/12/3 John Griffith :
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> 2013/12/3 John Griffith :
>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>>> On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>>>> HI all,
>>>>>
2013/12/3 John Griffith :
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>> HI all,
>>>
>>> Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
>>> point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So
>>>
Great tool especially for non-native guys such as me!
Thanks Joe
Best
Nachi
2013/12/3 Sylvain Bauza :
> Great tool !
> Just discovered that openstack.common.rpc does have typos, another good
> reason to migrate to oslo.messaging.rpc :-)
>
> -Sylvain
>
>
> 2013/12/3 Joe Gordon
>>
>> HI all,
>>
>
Hi Vijay
I was thinking about we should store this kind of information on the keystone.
However, I changed my mind after checking keystone API.
The keystone api is very generic, so we can't provider application
specific helper method and validations on that.
The form of certificate is different b
1/26 Steve Baker :
> On 11/27/2013 07:16 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
> Hi Summit, Eugene
>
> We have submitted a Heat template for advanced services.
> This is combination of LBaaS, FWaaS and VPN.
> This is a also good demo for how to use neutron services.
>
> https://revie
Hi Summit, Eugene
We have submitted a Heat template for advanced services.
This is combination of LBaaS, FWaaS and VPN.
This is a also good demo for how to use neutron services.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58496/1
It is great if we could get feedback from yours.
FYI, here is existing heat
Hi Keystone guys
I'm going to use keystone credentials API to store SSL-VPN certificate.
However I have a concern about blob attribute.
Since it is really free format. We can't provider validation on the data.
Of course, we can write some helper validation function, but
users can break it...
A
ove to more complex topologies and scenarios.
>
> Thanks,
> Eugene.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Salvatore, Sumit
>>
>> > Salvatore
>> Thank you for your comment. I replied on the google doc.
>>
>&g
sting API)
> for each individual service?
>
> ~Sumit.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sumit, Eugene
>>
>> How about to have one test scenario for services?
>> IMO, we need to combine LBaaS, FWaaS, VPNaaS scenario tests
&
Hi Sumit, Eugene
How about to have one test scenario for services?
IMO, we need to combine LBaaS, FWaaS, VPNaaS scenario tests
because of utilization of test resources.
I wrote my proposal here.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1gu12liw-9el_pR_FDQ7qDRuFpnSXxVzOsp6K0ZzX-_o/edit#slide=id.g295
meeting on this topic 11/19 at 9 p.m. PST ? This is 2 p.m
> in Japan and 6 a.m CET on the 20th.
> It is not ideal but i suspect we will have interest in participating from
> both Europe and Asia.
> I volunteer myself and Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com (the author of the BGP
> MPLS blueprin
Hi GROSZ, Akihiro
Yes, the wiki is only for discussion.
Please see the official API docs.
I updated the wiki page as OUTDATED.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/VPNaaS#OUTDATED
Thank you for your pointing out.
Best
Nachi
2013/10/21 Akihiro Motoki :
> Hi,
>
> The API document is the offic
Hi Phil
2013/10/21 Day, Phil :
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to track down a couple of obsecure issues in network port
> creation where it would be really useful if I could disable the async
> network allocation so that everything happens in the context of a single
> eventlet rather than two (and
Hi folks
This patch was the culprit, so we have reverted it.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53459/1 (Note, this is revert of revert )
However even if it is reverted, the error happens
http://logstash.openstack.org/index.html#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJcIklwQWRkcmVzc0dlbmVyYXRpb25GYWlsdXJlQ2xpZW50OiBObyBtb3
Hi Paul
I rebased the patch, and working on unit testing too
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/
2013/10/23 Paul Michali :
> See PCM: in-line.
>
>
> PCM (Paul Michali)
>
> MAIL p...@cisco.com
> IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
> TW @pmichali
>
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Akihiro Motoki w
Hi Artem
Thank you for your pointing out this.
I'm still thinking about the design. Once I got the draft, I'll share
it in the bp and here..
Best
Nachi
2013/10/10 Artem Dmytrenko :
> Hi Rudra, Nachi.
>
> Glad to see this discussion on the mailing list! The ExtraRoute routes are
> fairly
> limite
2013/10/11 Paul Michali :
> Added several more questions inline…
>
>
> PCM (Paul Michali)
>
> MAIL p...@cisco.com
> IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
> TW @pmichali
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Paul Michali wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and
Hi Paul
2013/10/11 Paul Michali :
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and services in
> general...
>
> Nachi,
>
> 1) You hd a bug fix to do service provider framework support for VPN
> (41827). It was held for Icehouse. Is that pretty much a working patch?
>
Hi Rudra
2013/10/8 Rudra Rugge :
> Hi Nachi,
>
> Please see inline:
>
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
>> Hi Rudra
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Some questions and comments
>>
>> - name and fq_name
>> How we us
Hi Rudra
ExtraRoute bp was designed for adding some "extra" routing for the router.
The spec is very handy for simple and small use cases.
However it won't fit large use cases, because it takes all route in a Json List.
# It means we need to send full route for updating.
As Salvatore suggests, we
omments:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-policy-extensions-for-neutron
>
> Thanks,
> Rudra
>
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge :
>>> Hi Nachi,
>>>
>>> Inline response
>>>
>>
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
