I still think this one
https://wtf.jpg.wtf/0c/10/1479414543-0c1052f7c2f9990b6b0c472076594cb1.jpeg is
the best :).
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:07 AM Jason Rist wrote:
> On 12/06/2016 01:48 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> > >> On 6 Dec 2016, at 20:19, Richard Jones
+1
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:35 AM Thai Q Tran wrote:
> +1 from me. Kenji is also very active in the plugin space.
>
>
> - Original message -
> From: David Lyle
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>
Hi, John,
the code you're looking for is located here:
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/horizon/static/horizon/js/horizon.tables.js#L227-L312
This is bound at
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/horizon/static/horizon/js/horizon.forms.js#L368-L373
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016
Hi, Janki
What do you mean by ListField? A list of arbitrary tags? List of numbers?
List of predefined values that you can choose from? Options may vary widely
depending on your particular needs.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:32 PM Janki Chhatbar wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am working
. Thanks for your continued efforts on bringing it to
> life.
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello, folks!
> >
> > I'd like to ask for a feature-freeze exception for a Horizon Profiler
> &g
Hello, folks!
I'd like to ask for a feature-freeze exception for a Horizon Profiler
feature [1], that has been demoed long ago (during Portland midcycle Feb
2016) and is finally ready. The actual request applies to the 3 patches [2]
that provide the bulk of Profiler functionality.
It is a quite
Can we have a special way (i.e. restricted) of setting Image locations, to
be used by clients like Horizon (where an end-users create images)? It
would be hard to explain different set of Image Sources depending on their
adminness.
Anoher question that I'm asking myself about Horizon is how
I'm not sure if (3) was the thing we agreed upon (and if it will help us to
detect issues in Horizon) but the rest of options definitely make sense to
me.
Also there is
5. Parallelize integration tests.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:28 PM Richard Jones
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
Let's take it before anybody else did :)!
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM Richard Jones
wrote:
> +2 very appropriate
>
> On 17 July 2016 at 11:01, Diana Whitten wrote:
>
>> Dunno if there have been any suggestions, but I'd like to suggest a
Hello, vigilant folks of OpenStack Security team!
The commit(s) I'd like you to take a look at introduces a new Horizon
feature, Create (Glance) Image using CORS (AKA Cross-Origin Resource
Sharing) [1].
The main idea is to bypass Horizon web-server when uploading large local
image and to send it
JFYI, CR [1] which fixes the corresponding bug [2] was merged on Jun 28, so
it may make sense to recheck you perfectly looking commit if it has been
staying in Gerrit for a while.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334582/
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1595938
On Mon, Jun 27,
, 2016 at 4:59 PM Brant Knudson <b...@acm.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The root cause of Horizon issue has been identified and fixed at
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321639/
>> The next ste
, 2016 at 10:57 PM Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Dear Horizon contributors,
>
> The test job dsvm-integration fails for a reason for the last ~24 hours,
> please do not recheck your patches if you see that almost all integration
> tests fail (and only these t
Dear Horizon contributors,
The test job dsvm-integration fails for a reason for the last ~24 hours,
please do not recheck your patches if you see that almost all integration
tests fail (and only these tests) - it won't help. The fix for
django_openstack_auth issue which has been uncovered by the
opt the approach used for
uploading files in Create Image workflow as the standard way for other
interactions (which include file uploads) between Web Clients and OpenStack
services.
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 2:48 AM Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hello, fellow web developers!
>
>
Hello, fellow web developers!
I'd like to share some of my thoughts and findings that I made during
playing with ng-file-upload [1] for file uploads in Swift UI and Create
Image wizard in Horizon (both Angular). Sorry for a long letter, couldn't
put it shorter (TL;DR => go to CONCLUSION section).
> <http://about.me/chao_yan>*
>>
>> *My twitter: @yanchao727 <https://twitter.com/yanchao727>*
>> *My Weibo: http://weibo.com/herewearenow <http://weibo.com/herewearenow>*
>> *--*
>>
>> 2016-04-28 1:51 GMT+08:00 Timur Sufiev
Definitely, yes
See how it's done for Images:
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/dashboards/project/images/views.py#L35
Also, limit of items per table page is set in User Settings
(->Settings at top right corner of the dashboard), it's not
hard-coded. Once you
Weibo: http://weibo.com/herewearenow <http://weibo.com/herewearenow>*
> *--*
>
> 2016-04-19 15:37 GMT+08:00 Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com>:
>
>> Horizon is moving away from showing more than one table on the same
>> page/tab, because it doesn't work we
/weibo.com/herewearenow <http://weibo.com/herewearenow>*
> *--*
>
> 2016-04-19 14:29 GMT+08:00 Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com>:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Judging by
>> https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/horizon/tabs/views.py#L44
>> it
Hello!
Judging by
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/horizon/tabs/views.py#L44
it wasn't designed to have more than 1 class. Why do you need it?
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 at 06:32, 严超 wrote:
> HI, Everyone:
> Document says :
> .. attribute::
+1
Чт, 7 апр. 2016 г. в 14:04, Itxaka Serrano Garcia :
> Im still not sure if non-cores (i.e. peasants like me) can vote but I
> will do it anyway :D
>
> A big +1 from me.
>
> Itxaka
>
> On 04/07/2016 12:01 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm proposing Rob
David,
It's sad news for us, and a well-deserved vacation from bureaucratic
hassles for you! Will try hard to not break Horizon in your absence.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 at 22:46, Doug Fish wrote:
> David, congratulations on a job well done!
>
> Doug
>
> On Mar 14, 2016, at
+1, Diana's contribution to the front-end aspect of Horizon during several
recent release cycles was second to none!
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:15 AM Richard Jones wrote:
> +1 we need Diana's perspective, knowledge and enthusiasm
>
> On 9 March 2016 at 10:03, Tripp, Travis
a root cause is still in progress.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:31 PM Richard Jones <r1chardj0...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ugh, dependencies with breaking API changes in minor point releases :/
>>
>> On 2 February 2016 at 04:53, Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mir
PM Richard Jones <r1chardj0...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ugh, dependencies with breaking API changes in minor point releases :/
>
> On 2 February 2016 at 04:53, Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Maintainers of outside dependencies continue to break our s
Maintainers of outside dependencies continue to break our stuff :(. New
issue is https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1540495 patch is currently
being checked by Jenkins
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 2:28 PM Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Problematic Selenium versions
the same issue locally, was fixed after a downgrade to
> selenium 2.48.
>
>
> Good catch!
>
> Itxaka
>
> On 01/28/2016 10:08 PM, Timur Sufiev wrote:
> > According to the results at
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273697/1 capping Selenium to be not
&g
According to the results at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273697/1 capping
Selenium to be not greater than 2.49 fixes broken tests. Patch to
global-requirements is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273750/
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:22 PM Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com> wrote:
&
Hello, Horizoneers
You may have noticed recent integration tests failures seemingly unrelated
to you patches, with a stacktrace like: http://paste2.org/2Hk9138U I've
already filed a bug for that,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1539197 Appears to be a Selenium
issue, currently
all for getting the totals straight out of the DB - it should be easy
> enough to add.
>
> On 18 December 2015 at 20:35, Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Matt,
>>
>> actually Ivan (Ivan, thanks a lot!) showed me the exact cinderclient call
>&g
|
| server_group_members| 10|
+-+---+
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 5:58 PM Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/18/2015 12:35 PM, Timur Sufiev wrote:
> > Matt,
> >
> > actually Ivan (Ivan, thanks a lot!) showed m
; > Regards,
> > Ivan Kolodyazhny,
> > http://blog.e0ne.info/
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com
> > <mailto:tsuf...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, folks!
> >
> > I'd like
Hello, folks!
I'd like to initiate a discussion of the feature request I'm going to make
on behalf of Horizon to every core OpenStack service which supports Quota
feature, namely Cinder, Nova and Neutron.
Although all three services' APIs support special calls to get current
quota limitations
lt;
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Cc:
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Proposal to add Timur Sufiev to
> > horizon-core
> > Date: Wed, Dec 2, 2015 10:54 AM
> >
> > I propose adding Timur Sufiev[1] to horizon-core.
> >
> > Over th
Hello, folks!
As you probably already know, integration tests were recently made voting
again in Horizon. Next logical step in ensuring Horizon/OpenStack stability
is increasing their coverage. I've reworked initial GoogleDoc version of
tests breakdown (wasn't very popular due to the restricted
Please take a look at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/horizon-glance-large-image-upload
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:21 PM Kyrylo Galanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When a file is uploaded to Glance, Swift through Horizon it is stored
> locally in a temporary
It all depends on Glance support, you'd better ask them.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:08 PM Kyrylo Galanov <kgala...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Looks great. What is the estimated date / release for this feature to be
> delivered?
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Timur Sufiev <
Well, I'm not sure if I'm eligible to chime in (yet), but IMO Richard is
the first candidate here (and me is the second one) :).
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:59 PM Rob Cresswell (rcresswe)
wrote:
> An equally big +1!
>
> On 02/12/2015 18:56, "David Lyle"
Count me in as well.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:53 PM Martin Pavlásek wrote:
> Count with me tomorrow! :-)
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On 20/11/15 01:02, Lin Hua Cheng wrote:
>
> Great, I'll be around next Tuesday.
>
> -Lin
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Rob Cresswell
+1 here. While the exact library choice may still be a topic for the
discussion, unit tests clearly shouldn't hardcode html stings inside, it is
too fragile.
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 at 02:00, Diana Whitten wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I'm absolutely with you ... I've been bitten by
Regards,
> Ivan Kolodyazhny
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Timur Sufiev <tsuf...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> It seems that recent changes in Cinder policies [1] forbade non-admin
>> users to see the disk quotas. Yet the volume creati
Hi all!
It seems that recent changes in Cinder policies [1] forbade non-admin users
to see the disk quotas. Yet the volume creation is allowed for non-admins,
which effectively means that from now on a volume creation in Horizon is
free for non-admins (as soon as quotas:show rule is propagated
ct: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [keystone] [docs] Two kinds
> > of 'region' entity: finding better names for them
>
> > Got it, thanks for the excellent explanation, Timur! Yeah, I think
> > renaming to AVAILABLE_KEYSTONE_ENDPOINTS would be a good solution.
> >
> > Best,
Given that Horizon unit test breakage was introduced simultaneously with
the breakage of 2 integration tests, the latter ones have the same nature.
Thus integration tests are going to fail until the related Neutron patch is
merged.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:50 PM Akihiro Motoki
IMO, if that's impossible to provide Users pagination/indexing for LDAP
from technical point of view, we'd better revise the current UI of
Identity-Users, since most likely production-grade OpenStack installations
will have LDAP instead of MySQL storage. So I'm for gathering more
Morgan,
Your reasoning is perfectly fine from the Keystone point of view. Yet I
believe this approach is harmful for both Horizon and the whole OpenStack
ecosystem.
It is harmful for the ecosystem, because it breaks API uniformity in one of
the few areas where this uniformity could be achieved.
Hello, Keystone folks!
I've just discovered an unfortunate fact that Horizon pagination for
Tenants/Projects list that worked with Keystone v2 doesn't work with
Keysone v3 anymore - its API call simply lacks the 'marker' and 'limit'
parameters [1] that Horizon is relying upon. Meanwhile having
Hello, folks!
A word has come to me that on the recent Keystone mid-cycle summit dynamic
policies have been discussed - as well as the lack of means to edit them in
UX-friendly manner. I had my own share of editing *_policy.json files
inside openstack_dashboard/conf and can hardly state it's
what exactly
in Horizon didn't work well was a puzzling experience.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:37 PM Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2015 08:50 AM, Timur Sufiev wrote:
Hello, folks!
Somehow it happened that we have 2 different kinds of regions: the
service regions inside
Hi folks!
Some of you might had hit the problems with uploading large Glance images
via Horizon, the problem was so well known that it got its own solution
in Horizon settings named HORIZON_IMAGES_ALLOW_UPLOAD. So the exact problem
is that large images being uploaded to Glance via Horizon may
Timur,
If old jQuery code (not AngularJS) is still used for processing 'Create
Image' form, then the spinner is shown just before submitting the form
contents [1] and hidden right after the request completes [2] in case the
form is being redrawn or the whole page is redrawn in case of redirect -
] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-horizon-new-tech
[2]
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Xf9urNOOKIRL8VmvBM1fDVbgPdIbhTFyLdb2AqZYaDw/edit#slide=id.p
[3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-horizon-collab-meetup line 57
--
Timur Sufiev
...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
-v2.1.html
Nova developers, could you please help me on that matter?
--
Timur Sufiev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
The mail being forwarded was originally intended for MIrantis internal
mailing list, but then I've realized that it fits as well to the general
Openstack mailing list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com
Date: Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:22 PM
Subject: How
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
__
OpenStack
)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
inside a modal is
potentially slightly more useful, but looks messy and inconsistent, which I
think outweighs the functionality.
Rob
On 2 Dec 2014, at 12:21, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.commailto:
tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello, Horizoneers and UX-ers!
The default behavior of modals
inside a modal is
potentially slightly more useful, but looks messy and inconsistent, which I
think outweighs the functionality.
Rob
On 2 Dec 2014, at 12:21, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello, Horizoneers and UX-ers!
The default behavior of modals in Horizon (defined in turn
think?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113206/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/23037/
P.S. I remember that I promised to write this email a week ago, but better
late than never :).
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
: [openstack-dev] [UX] [Heat] [Mistral] Merlin project PoC
update: shift from HOT builder to Mistral Workbook builder
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/09/14 05:36, Timur Sufiev wrote:
Hello, folks!
Following Drago Rosson's introduction of Barricade.js
Adding yesterday discussion of JS libs for unit-testing in
#openstack-horizon: http://paste2.org/B9xN1yI4
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello folks!
Discussing the proposed Sinon.js dependency to Horizon on the last meeting
has brought quite
/ajax.html
[5] https://github.com/pivotal/jasmine-ajax
[6] http://sinonjs.org/docs/
[7] http://sinonjs.org/docs/#server search for 'Filtered requests'
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello all!
Recently I've stumbled upon wonderful Sinon.JS library [1] for stubs
let me know.
[1] http://sinonjs.org/
[2]
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113855/2/horizon/static/horizon/tests/tables.js
[3] http://sinonjs.org/qunit/
[4] https://github.com/froots/jasmine-sinon
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack
...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/09/14 05:36, Timur Sufiev wrote:
Hello, folks!
Following Drago Rosson's introduction of Barricade.js and our
discussion in ML about possibility of using it in Merlin [1], I've decided
to change the plans for PoC: now the goal for Merlin's PoC is to implement
Mistral
- and
will certainly announce it in the ML.
[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044591.html
[2]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/044186.html
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
AM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello, Drago!
I'm extremely interested in learning more about your HOT graphical
builder. The screenshots you had attached look gorgeous! Yours visual
representation of Heat resources is much more concise and simple than
I had drawn in Merlin PoC mock
dependencies between resources).
- Allows for direct-editing of the template (via text input) and loading
templates via URLs.
Please, let me know if you would like a demo of the template builder and
Barricade!
Thanks,
Drago Rosson
On 8/18/14, 5:19 AM, Timur Sufiev tsuf
AM, Lyle, David david.l...@hp.com wrote:
On 8/6/14, 1:41 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi, folks!
Two months ago there was an announcement in ML about gathering the
requirements for cross-project UI library for
Heat/Mistral/Murano/Solum [1]. The positive feedback in related
Thanks,
now it is clear that this requirement can be safely dropped.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/08/14 14:01, Timur Sufiev wrote:
Hi!
Here is the link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=5239113
The question is whether
is that it pulls a lot of unneeded deps (like tk, qt,
etc...) which is better avoided.
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Merlin/SampleUI
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Seems we have agreed on increasing minor version of UI markup to 2.1.
I've updated
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/dynamic-ui-specify-no-explicit-name-field
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Also agree with Stan.
I'd like to refrain from
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi, folks!
Recently we had decided to change a bit how Murano's dynamic UI works,
namely do not explicitly specify 'name' field in first 'Add
Application' form, but add it here automatically, since every
component in Murano
-
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
-no-explicit-name-field
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
table manually
What do you think?
P.S. I know that the appropriate Horizon bug exists
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1226003), but decided to ask
here to get a feedback from Neutron team.
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
/edit#
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
/93939/
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Guys,
Ruslan Kamaldinov has been doing a lot of things for Murano recently
(including devstack integration, automation scripts, making Murano
more compliant with OpenStack standards
to the core team.
Murano folks, please say your +1/-1 word.
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://plantuml.sourceforge.net/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83348/
[3]
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/pesyejyjo624o34/fCe1_OM-OH#lh:null-io.murano.Environment.png
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
17, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
It depends on openstack_dashboard, namely on
openstack_dashboard.settings. So it is fine from Murano's point of
view to have openstack_dashboard published on PyPi. Many thanks for
considering my request :).
We are having this issue
the solution suggested by Akihiro and it didn't go
smoothly.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Paul Belanger
paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
It depends on openstack_dashboard, namely on
openstack_dashboard.settings. So
. Please check it.
http://logs.openstack.org/25/68125/16/check/gate-murano-dashboard-python26/8ebc940/console.html.gz#_2014-03-24_11_08_50_917
2014-03-24 11:08:50.917 | Running setup.py install for horizon-2012.2.4
Thanks,
Akihiro
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Murano's community meeting.
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
to openstack_dashboard module.
Am I missing somothing?
Another point we need to consider is that Horizon includes
a lot of Javascirpt files and it fits PyPI.
Thanks,
Akihiro
(2014/03/17 15:12), Timur Sufiev wrote:
Is there any chance of having horizon distribution in its current
state (i.e
environment (and it currently
seems not possible).
Could you please give me a clue why horizon distribution is missing at PyPi?
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
of a
parameter such as DATABASES seems unreliable to me in sense that it can
break other dashboards which failed to set this parameter to the value they
needed.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Radomir,
it looks interesting indeed. I think Murano could
no clue on how
it could be made simpler using pluggable architecture.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Radomir Dopieralski openst...@sheep.art.pl
wrote:
On 15/01/14 15:30, Timur Sufiev wrote:
Recently I've decided to fix situation with Murano's dashboard and move
all Murano-specific django
questions:
1. Should this behaviour be considered as a Horizon bug or a Django bug?
2. What is the sensible approach for customizing settings for some
Horizon's dashboard in that case?
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
config
file.
A full list of changes and much more details can be found in Release
Noteshttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Murano/ReleaseNotes_v0.4 on
the project wiki.
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
as a basis for
Convection and extend it by adding external event sources like timers and
Ceilometer alarms.
--
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
at 12:44 AM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello!
I am an engineer from Murano team. Murano is an OpenStack project built
around Windows components deployment. Currently we (Murano team) are
working on improving Murano architecture to fit better in OpenStack
ecosystem and reuse more
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo