Andrey,
Great news!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Andrey Kurilin <andr.kuri...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Stackers!
>
> Today I am happy to announce great news!
>
> From a historical perspective, Rally is testing (benchmarking)
n
parallel (and generate more realistic load)
-.
So it would be really nice if you can share gaps that you faced that are
blocking you to use directly Rally..
Thanks!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Sam P <sam47pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
&
Hi,
Someone somehow deleted 0.9.* branches from GitHub repo
https://github.com/openstack/rally
A lot of end users are using these branches and are affected by this
change.
Can someone help to restore them?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Chandan,
Not a big expert in Kola, but I have the same task for
containerizing Rally.
The solution is simple, just use ENTRYPOINT like here:
https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/Dockerfile#L38 (but for
tempest)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Chandan
Jay,
OK, I'll bite.
This doesn't sound like a constructive discussion. Bye Bye.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I'll bite.
>
> On 09/13/2017 08:56 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
>
>> Jay,
>&g
However, what's wrong
with Cobol? If you use right architecture and right algorithms it will
definitely work better than implementation of program in any other language
with wrong architecture and bad algorithms... so not sure that I understand
this point/joke...
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On We
upgrade
So basically we are not losing anything even if we do not backward
compatible changes and rethink completely architecture and API.
I know this sounds like science fiction, but I believe community will
appreciate steps in this direction...
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Sep 12, 201
/implementation/hook_and_trigger_plugins.html
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Sam P <sam47pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a follow up for OpenStack Extreme Testing session[1]
> we did in MEX-ops-meetup.
>
> Quick
oo much to fix the real problems
in architecture (in my opinion it's too late), for example creating VM
performs ~400 DB requests... and yep this is going to be slow, and now
what? how can you fix that?..
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Rajul Kumar <kumar.r...@husky
e in
such way that it's easy to extend and provide to end user nice user
experience from both side (shell & python) and nice and stable interface
for client developers .
By the way stevedore is really providing very bad plugin experience and
should not be used definitely.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlov
Rajul,
May I ask why you think so?
Exposed by OSprofiler issues are going to be really hard to fix in current
OpenStack architecture.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Rajul Kumar <kumar.r...@husky.neu.edu>
wrote:
> Hi Boris
>
> Good to hear from y
Rajul,
It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Rajul Kumar <kumar.r...@husky.neu.edu>
wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling
> option for
/1fa653635781cd975a1031e212b35b6c38196ba4
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
t review
3) Maybe few tutorials (how to find some bug, how to test it and where are
the docs, devstack, ...)
That would simplify onboarding process...
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Alexandra Settle <a.set...@outlook.com>
wrote:
> I think this is a good idea
rce information and doing this very very simple and easy placement
selection...
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Edward Leafe <e...@leafe.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> It was from the s
t be able to use plugins that requires admin
role.
This patch finishes works: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/465495/
Thanks to everybody that was involved in this huge effort!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack De
align everybody in community and make it
default for all projects.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Zane Bitter <zbit...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 21/05/17 15:38, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>> One might argue that HA strategies are an operator concern, but in
Hi stackers,
Here are the slides from summit
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1QxsQh8E7Tr46KkLPV7QTwBAbTKFtB6dVEv-pQwg6LUA/edit#slide=id.p4
Here is the video
https://www.openstack.org/videos/boston-2017/project-update-rally
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
he functionality.
If you specify what exactly you want to test I can help with writing Rally
Task for that. (it will use as minimum as possible resources)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/05/2017 10:49 PM,
in HTML report (which makes it work without
internet)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Fernando López <fernando.lo...@fiware.org>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I just started to play with Rally and I wonder if I could get the output
> html file with the res
Jean-Philippe,
> s/COBOL/go/g and it makes your comment even funnier.
It makes it scary =)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard <
jean-philippe.evr...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote:
> s/COBOL/go/g and it makes your comment even funni
be
implemented as a single Rally task which is quite convenient.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Dulko, Michal <michal.du...@intel.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:51 +0300, Timur Nurlygayanov wrote:
> > Hi OpenStack developers and operators,
> >
github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/doc/specs/in-progress/hook_section.rst
You are very welcome to join this effort and help Rally team deliver it
faster.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Jorge Cardoso (Cloud Operations and
Analytics, IT R Division) <j
lly, I would like to see feature
> parity comparison. It's very necessary to understand how much work we need
> to spend to rewrite all our tests in rally way.
Totally agree, let's do it.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Vladimir Kuklin <vkuk...@mirantis.co
way, Rally stores all results to DB (it stored it always) and is
know capable to build performance trends of many runs
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
>
>
>
>
>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Morgan Fainberg <morgan.fainb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:26 PM
Lance,
I share just how it looked from my side.
I really support your idea (no matter what you pick to use your
tooling/rally/jmeter) it is very valuable, especially if it will become
voting job.
This really should be done by someone.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:26
o we are blind and
can't see where is the issue in code
5. They didn't help to develop any Rally plugin or even review the Rally
test cases that we proposed to them
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Br
Nate,
This looks quite strange. Could you share the information from keystone
catalog?
Seems like you didn't setup admin endpoint for keystone in that region.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Nate Johnston <openstackn...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Rally folks,
Yuki,
Sorry for long reply.
Here are the slides:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1g5fd2BJXc40yienjCB0Fuc8NaB0e5pQO0XbUHQ1CY0s
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Yuki Nisiwaki <uckey.1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> To: Mr. Boris
> cc: OpenStacker who i
Great!
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
>
> Le 13/04/2016 19:53, Matt Riedemann a écrit :
>
>> I'd like to propose that we make Andrey Kurilin core on python-novaclient.
>>
>> He's been doing a lot of the maintenance the last several months and a
>> lot
Alex,
I would suggest to call it "dataplane" because it obvious points to
dataplane testing
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Roman Vasilets <rvasil...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Hi all, personally I want to suggest* crossload. *Concept is similar
for large clouds.
Thoughts?
[1] http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/
[2] http://ldapcon.org/2011/downloads/hummel-slides.pdf
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
Hi stackers,
Recently I tried openstackclient and it has amazing UX!
Thanks to everybody involved in this!
You are doing great job keep going!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
, devops, devs,...)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Jordan Pittier <jordan.pitt...@scality.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Vasyl Saienko <vsaie...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Community,
>>
>> W
Hi everybody,
What about if we just create new project for alternative Gerrit WebUI and
use it?
I don't think that with current set of web frameworks it would be too hard.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Andrew Laski <and...@lascii.com> wrote:
>
>
>
that requires db migrations, we will
need to run amount of projects migrations.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> tl;dr;
> I'm writing to request some feedback on whether the cr
ults functionality (CLI and plugins for many systems)
- Disaster cleanup
(be able to cleanup env no matter what happened)
- many other interesting tasks
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u
Xuanzhou,
I am not sure what do you mean by "trace". But if you need something that
allows to do cross service/project tracing then you should take a look at
osprofiler:
https://github.com/openstack/osprofiler
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Xuanzhou
Hi,
It's still not clear for me, why we can't just add Rally jobs with
scenarios related to specific project.
It will work quite fast and it will cover CLI (instantly) with good
integration/functional testing.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Sean Dague &l
give guarantee that we are facing 100% of cases
(however facing most of issues is better then nothing)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Michał Dulko <michal.du...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 04:11 PM, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
> > On 02/03, Ivan Ko
Just making sure that everybody saw this topic.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Boris Pavlovic <bo...@pavlovic.me> wrote:
> Hi stackers,
>
> If you are in Bay Area and you would to work together with your friends
> from community on fixin
(which is actually quite simple task after those change)
and moving that code outside of Nova.
So solutions are quite similar overall.
I hope you'll get more luck with getting them in upstream.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Cheng, Yingxin <yingxin.ch...@intel.
Yingxin,
This looks quite similar to the work of this bp:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-scheduler
It's really nice that somebody is still trying to push scheduler
refactoring in this way.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Cheng, Yingxin
here info in which project you are interested:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OpenStack-Bug-Smash-Mitaka-BayArea
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: ope
Hi,
By the way OSprofiler trace shows how this regression impacts on amount of
DB queries done by Keystone (during the boot of VM):
http://boris-42.github.io/b2.html
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Morgan Fainberg <morgan.fainb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> As
Dims,
Great news! =)
When we address some small issues I'll make demo.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Team,
>
> Oslo folks have voted[1] to be the home for the osprofiler project[2].
> Several pr
Hi stackers,
OSprofiler spec is ready for review.
Please review it, if you are interested in making native profiling/tracing
OpenStack happen:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103825/
Thanks!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Assaf,
We can as well add Rally testing for scale/performance/regression testing.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> Very useful information. Thanks, Assaf.
>
> Fawad Khaliq
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10
on this.
What this context is going to do?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As some of you have already noticed one of the top priorities for Kuryr
> this cycle is to get
> our CI and gate t
Timur,
I hope you are going to use for [1] and [2] Rally verify command?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Timur Nurlygayanov <
tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi Fuel team,
>
> we have a lot of automated integration tests for OpenStack verifi
+1 from me
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> +1 from me :)
>
> Dina Belova wrote:
>
>> Dear performance folks,
>>
>> There is a suggestion to move our meeting time from 15:00 UTC (Tuesdays
>>
Obed,
We are refactoring Rally to make it possible to run it as a deamon.
There is plenty amount of work that should be done, including this spec:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182245/
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Munoz, Obed N <obed.n.mu...@intel.com>
Hi stackers,
I updated OSprofiler spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103825/ reviews
are required.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Boris Pavlovic <bo...@pavlovic.me> wrote:
> Hi stackers,
>
> Intro
> ---
>
> It's not a big secre
join this effort?)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mai
Hi Maty,
Usually in python projects are used next thing:
- cover - for unit test coverage
- pep8 + custom hacking rules - to check code styles
- pylint - to check even more code styles
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 4:41 AM, GROSZ, Maty (Maty) <
maty.gr...@alca
o have Async API, because we have long
running operations.
And basically there are 3 approaches to understand that operation is done:
1) pub/sub
2) polling resource status
3) long polling requests
All approaches have pros and cons, however the "actual" problem will stay
the same and you can'
t regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 10:13 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> > On 4 November 2015 at 14:49, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> >>
it doesn't seem like hard task to collect the numbers.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net>
wrote:
> On 5 November 2015 at 04:42, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote:
> > On 11/04/2015 10:13 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
tains multiple JOINs, e,g for nova vm it's 6
joins).
What if we add new API method that will just resturn resource status by
UUID? Or even just extend get request with the new argument that returns
only status?
Thoughts?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
ting both approaches?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Morgan Fainberg <morgan.fainb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2015 4:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of
nfo:
http://paste.openstack.org/show/477934/ (it has 6 joins)
This is how it looks for glance image:
http://paste.openstack.org/show/477933/ (it has 2 joins)
So the performance/scale impact will be higher.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewb
his AZ, and separated AZ can have own rabbit servers for example
which will allows us to get
horizontal scalability in terms of AZ.
So do we really need Cassandra, Mongo, ... and other Web-scale solution for
such simple task?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Clint Byr
which is good.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-10-11 00:02:39 -0700:
> > 2Everybody,
> >
> > Just curios why we need such complexity.
> >
> >
Morgan,
You should add at least:
sla:
failure_rate:
max: 0
Otherwise rally will pass 100% no matter what is happening.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Tikkanen, Viktor (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
viktor.tikka...@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi Morgan
>
>
Jose,
Rally community provides official docker images here:
https://hub.docker.com/r/rallyforge/rally/
So I would suggest to use them.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Than
eed, which was the pain in neck.
So finally we have auto generated plugin reference:
https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/plugin/plugin_reference.html
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
xes and part of features to
it
*) Stable version - we will port only high & critical bug fixes if it is
possible
Here is the diagram that explains the release cycle:
[image: Inline image 1]
Thoughts?
Best regards,
Boris P
Thierry,
Okay great I will propose patches.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org>
wrote:
> Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> > I have few ideas about the rally tags:
> >
> > - covered-by-rally
> >It mean
.org/#/c/225176/5
which will be the standard way to check whatever cloud is ready for
production based on volume, performance & scale testing.
Thoughts?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
I would like to continue to work as PTL of Rally until we
get all this done.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?
are installed as
upstream versions and some of them breaks. An ugly way is to copy pip list
from old Juno environment and install those properly. I hope there are
better ways to do this work. Anyone has smart ideas?
Install everything in virtualenv (or at least Rally)
Best regards,
Boris
Roman,
well done! ;)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko m...@romcheg.me wrote:
Hi folks!
Today I’m proud to announce that since this moment python-fuelclient has
it’s own python-jobs in OpenStack CI. Thanks to all of you who helped me
making
Pradeep,
Actually this topic is more about osprofiler ceilometer.
Overall it doesn't require this prefix.
However it is used in osproifler lib.
https://github.com/stackforge/osprofiler/blob/master/osprofiler/parsers/ceilometer.py#L129
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7
and adding openstack-ci jobs.
-1 risk.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko
dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote:
One of the requirements for all OpenStack projects is to use the same
Testing
Interface [0]. In response to the Fuel application [1], the Technical
will be less or the same (if everything was
covered before)
Fixing typos in docstrings won't introduce new lines.
Btw job allows you to introduce N (few) new lines that are not covered by
unit tests that are uncovered in some cases.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:46 AM
about 130 (40 at the begging on kilo) patches on review.
*) In IRC +15 online members in average
*) We merged about x2 if we compare to kilo-1 vs liberty-1
*) I see a lot of interest from various companies to use Rally (because it
is *official* now)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015
Sean,
Thanks for quick fix/revert https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191010/
This unblocked Rally gates...
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-06-12 09:42:42 -0700:
On 6/12/15 11:37 AM
, scalability,
load...)
so you are killing two birds with one stone.
P.S. I would imho prefer to keep all high quality plugins inside Rally repo
to simplify operators life..
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-06-10 16:48 GMT+09
Dmitry,
We introduced recently dsvm rally ironic job:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/187997/
Now we are working on Rally tests for Ironic:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186064/
Don't hesitate to join us=)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant
Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 05/06/2015 19:03, Boris Pavlovic a écrit :
Hi stackers,
Seems likes after stackforge/rally - openstack/rally Rally project
started being more attractive.
According recent stats we are on top 3 position
such list.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-06-05 20:03:44 +0300:
Hi stackers,
Seems likes after stackforge/rally - openstack/rally Rally project
started
being more
Hi,
Maybe we should just give a try:
1) I will prepare all modifications out of infra and show demo
2) Get it in Infra as experimental feature
3) Try it in Rally
4) Share experience and if it is worth keep it or get rid of it.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:21 PM
Hi,
+1 for #1 and if patch is not touched for N weeks just finish it using
current active team.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Richard Raseley rich...@raseley.com wrote:
Colleen Murphy wrote:
3) Manually abandon after N months/weeks changes that have a -1
by end of this cycle each component will have own subteam which will
resolve
most of reviewing process scale issues..
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
, stabilize and
document the virt driver API in Nova before any splitting of driver repos
would be feasible.
Imho not only Neutron has this. ;)
Rally support out of tree plugins as well and I saw already some third
party repos:
https://github.com/stackforge/haos
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu
Josh,
Yep let's just make experiment in Rally and I will share experience with
the rest of community.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
S, just some thoughts,
If boris thinks this might help rally, why not just let him
really impact on architecture a lot.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
CI for testing.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/03/2015 08:29 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Guys,
I will try to summarize all questions and reply on them
regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Alexis Lee alex...@hp.com wrote:
Robert Collins said on Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:12:35AM +1200:
So I'd like us to really get our heads around the idea that folk are
able to make promises ('I will only commit changes relevant to the DB
rule 2 cores / review (sometimes even 3,4,5...)...
In ideal work Lieutenants model will work out of the box. In real life all
checks like:
person X today has permission to do Y operation should be checked
automatically.
This is exactly what I am proposing.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed
James B.
One more time.
Everybody makes mistakes and it's perfectly OK.
I don't want to punish anybody and my goal is to make system
that catch most of them (human mistakes) no matter how it is complicated.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:33 PM, James Bottomley
communities.
Plugins are not so hard to review and mostly developed part.
If I would be able to have cores for specific areas that will scale up
code reviewing process a lot
without any trust, process, social, arch, whatever changes in project.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015
mistakes.
My goal on the PTL position is to make such process that stops human
mistakes before they land in master. In other words everything should be
automated and pre not post checked.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote
are speaking about various groups of cores that are
mantaining
only parts of systems. Keeping all this in heads will be hard task (it
should be automated)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 10:34, Jeremy
will be able to merge changes that touch only
files from some specific subdirs.
As a result with proper organization of directories in project we can scale
up review process without losing quality.
*Thoughts?*
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Hi stackers,
For those who don't want to miss anything related to Rally on summit I make
a
small blogpost that covers most interesting things:
http://boris-42.me/rally-on-openstack-summit-in-vancouver/
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Mike,
Thank you for release notes! Nice work!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Mikhail Dubov mdu...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Rally team is happy to announce that we have just cut the new release
0.0.4!
*Release stats:*
- Commits: *87*
- Bug
=( and not just use it.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 08:34, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Maish,
I would support this kind of thing for projects that wish to do
Mike,
Thank you for saying all that you said above.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-05-11 15:44:30 -0700:
On 5/11/15 5:25 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Details: Skip over
Couldn't we just use real image files to do this. IIRC, gerrit supports
displaying image files which are included in a commit. For example, I've
been
planning to copy these images:
+1 for real images
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Matthew Treinish mtrein
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo