Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][devstack][all] ZooKeeper vs etcd for Tooz/DLM

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Yep, jd__ and i confirmed that things work with 3.x > > Though to be clear, what's used in tooz is the v2 HTTP API, not the new > v3 gRPC API. And just to be double

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] revising the core list

and hope to see you > again as Glance contributors: > - Kairat Kushaev > - Mike Fedosin > - Louis Taylor So long, and thanks for all the images! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsu

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Someone showed up in the -stable channel this morning asking for help with > packaging. I gather they were there because the IRC wiki [1] says the > #openstack-stable channel is also for packaging discussions,

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][release][all] Automatic .ics generation for OpenStack's and project's deadlines

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > What you have is a really good start. Thanks for working on this! > How do you feel about importing the repository into gerrit? > > A couple of things I'd like to see added: > > 1. Separate sections for cross-project

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][release][all] Automatic .ics generation for OpenStack's and project's deadlines

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:20:44PM +, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > I'd like to explore the possibility of having .ics generated - pretty > much the same way we generate it for irc-meetings - for the OpenStack > release schedule and project's deadlines. I believe just 1 calendar >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Add Ian Cordasco back into glance-core

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:06:03PM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > Not long ago, Ian Cordasco, sent an email out stepping down from his > core roles as he didn't have the time to dedicate to the project > team's he was part of. > > Ian has contacted me mentioning that he's gotten

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Glance Mitaka Priorities

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: > Hello Glance Team/Flavio > > Would you please provide link to Glance priorities at > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Mitaka/Etherpads#Glance > > [ Malini] Regards > Malini I don't belive there was an etherpad

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] new change management tools and processes for stable/liberty and mitaka

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 03:03:29PM +1300, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Thanks for posting this. I'm working on this for Zaqar now and there is a > question. As for the stable/liberty patch, where does the "60fdcaba00e30d02" > in [1] come from? Thanks. > > [1] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Removing python-swiftclient from requirements.txt

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 07:55:54PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: I replied on both patches, but I'll repeat it here for a broader audience: Please set up an extras entry for each backend instead of just removing the dependencies. That will signal to users that you know what dependencies

[openstack-dev] [glance] Removal of Catalog Index Service from Glance

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:50:55PM +0100, Louis Taylor wrote: Hi operators, In Kilo, we added the Catalog Index Service as an experimental API in Glance. It soon became apparent this would be better suited as a separate project, so it was split into the Searchlight project: https

Re: [openstack-dev] 7/17 state of the gate (you know, fires)

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:51:35PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: We started the day with a mock 1.1.4 release breaking unit tests for a few projects (nova, cinder, ironic at least). The nova blocker was tracked with bug 1475661. We got a g-r change up to block mock!=1.1.4 but that didn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Progress of the Python 3 port

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:39:11AM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, Any update on this release? This has now been released in glance_store 0.7.0 Cheers, Louis signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] Why doesn't Gerrit email me?

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:08:45PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: Apologies if this is an FAQ - I tried a quick search, but that didn't find anything that looked both up to date and authoritative. I keep going back to Gerrit jobs that I've reviewed or commented on, and finding that there have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security][Glance] Design session for image signing/encryption

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 03:01:39PM +, Clark, Robert Graham wrote: Is there a session to discuss the image security proposal? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177948/2/specs/liberty/encrypted-and-authenticated-image-support.rst Yes, it's at 4:30 - 5:10pm on Wednesday. Cheers, Louis

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Glance][Heat][Cinder] Removing the CLI tests from Tempest

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:28:15PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: We're now at the end of the cycle and there are 3 clients that still have CLI tests in tempest. I have pushed the patch up to remove all these tests here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178757/ Hi Matt, This is being

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Last day to elect your PTL!

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:55:20PM -0400, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: Just a quick reminder that elections are closing soon, if you haven't already you should use your right to vote and pick your favourite candidate! Also remember to make sure you voted using the second vote link you were sent (at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 02:25:26PM +, Ian Cordasco wrote: I have no opinions on the matter. Either 1400 or 1500 work for me. I think there are a lot of people asking for it to be at 1500 instead though. Would anyone object to changing it to 1500 instead (as long as it is one consistent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 08:07:33PM +, Nikhil Komawar wrote: So, the new proposal is: Glance meetings [1] to be conducted weekly on Thursdays at 1400UTC [2] on #openstack-meeting-4 +1 It was nice to try out the alternating meeting times. However, I don't think it brought many benefits,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:38:42AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: I'm sorry but no. I don't think there's anything that requires extra patience than 2 (or even more) cycles without provaiding reviews or even any kind of active contribution. I personally don't think adding new cores without

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Cleanout of inactive change proposals from review

Erno Kuvaja wrote: We have almost year old (from last update) reviews still in the queue for glance. The discussion was initiated on yesterday's meeting for adopting abandon policy for stale changes. I'm okay with abandoning old some old reviews which are obviously going nowhere, such as ones

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 01:48:32AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: I've just noticed that oslo.log made it to global-requirements.txt 9 days ago. How come are we still adding some name.spaced oslo libs? Wasn't the outcome of the discussion in Paris that we shouldn't do that anymore, and that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:54:13AM -0700, John Griffith wrote: I'd echo all the points made regarding logging shouldn't be a problem; we're an Open Source project so the idea of our communication being public making anybody nervous and not wanting to participate seems really off to me. Yes

Re: [openstack-dev] Git client vulnerability

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:19:48PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: Please re-read that advisory[1]. GitHub's _servers_ were not affected as this is a client-side vulnerability. What GitHub did was release fixed versions of their GitHub for Windows and GitHub for Mac _client_ tools. Github's

Re: [openstack-dev] How to get openstack bugs data for research?

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:20:45PM +0800, zfx0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, all I am a graduate student in Peking University, our lab do some research on open source projects. This is our introduction: https://passion-lab.org/ Now we need openstack issues data for research, I found the

[openstack-dev] [glance] Deprecating osprofiler option 'enabled' in favour of 'profiler_enabled'

Hi all, In order to enable or disable osprofiler in Glance, we currently have an option: [profiler] # If False fully disable profiling feature. enabled = False However, all other services with osprofiler integration use a similar option named profiler_enabled. For consistency, I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal new hacking rules

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 08:54:35AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: It's not about an equality condition. It's about the message that is produced by testtools.TestCase.assertEqual(), and the helpfulness of that message when the order of the arguments is reversed. This is especially true with large

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] fix latency on requirements breakage

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:32:21PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: I think this idea has come up before, the problem is knowing how to distinguish the sky is falling type bugs from other race bugs we know about. Thinking out loud it could be severity of the bug in launchpad but we have a lot of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] fix latency on requirements breakage

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:46:38AM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote: Maybe a MOTD at the top of http://review.openstack.org could help here? Have a button that the QA/infra people can hit when everything is broken that puts up a message there asking people to stop rechecking/submitting patches.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Translation technical debt

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:46:34PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: In order to enforce our translation policies - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.i18n/guidelines.html - we have added a hacking rule in Neutron. If you wish to jump aboard this effort then please let me know. There are patches

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Poll for change in weekly meeting time.

Thanks for bringing this up, Nikhil. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014, Nikhil Komawar wrote: Here's a poll [0] to find what time-slots work best for everyone as well as for the interest to remove the alternating time-slot aspect in the schedule. Could this poll be expanded with a wider range of times? I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][QA] python-glanceclient untestable in Python 3.4

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:01:22PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: Gah! You'd think *I* would know better at this point--sorry about that... I've now opened https://launchpad.net/bugs/1382582 to track this. Thanks for any assistance you're able to provide! This looks like a continuation of the

Re: [openstack-dev] 2 Minute tokens

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:44:51AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: What are the uses that require long lived tokens? Glance has operations which can take a long time, such as uploading and downloading large images. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 01:32:50PM -0400, Andrew Laski wrote: I've been thinking along very similar lines, but I don't think each current API needs to be replaced. I would very much like to see a unified API project that could be responsible for managing requests to boot an instance with this

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

Thierry Carrez wrote: Note that ZNC is not the only IRC proxy out there. Bip is also working quite well. Note also that an IRC proxy is not the only solution. Using a console IRC client on a server works well for me. Irssi or weechat are both simple to set up. signature.asc Description: