Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] unable to collect compute.node.cpu.* data

2014-11-06 Thread Neal, Phil
Frank, I'd echo Hang Liu's suggestion, but also encourage you to take this question to the general OpenStack mailing list (see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists). - Phil From: Hang H Liu [mailto:hang...@cn.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 7:36 AM To: OpenStack Developme

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding pylint checking of new ceilometer patches

2014-10-03 Thread Neal, Phil
> From: Dina Belova [mailto:dbel...@mirantis.com] > On Friday, October 03, 2014 2:53 AM > > Igor, > > Personally this idea looks really nice to me, as this will help to avoid > strange code being merged and not found via reviewing process. > > Cheers, > Dina > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:40 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] Treating notifications as a contract (CADF)

2014-09-04 Thread Neal, Phil
> On 9/04/2014 Sandy Walsh wrote: > Yesterday, we had a great conversation with Matt Rutkowski from IBM, > one > of the authors of the CADF spec. > > I was having a disconnect on what CADF offers and got it clarified. > > My assumption was CADF was a set of transformation/extraction rules > for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Undercloud Ceilometer

2014-04-23 Thread Neal, Phil
reasonable? Yep, agreed that UI/metering are different use cases. Will work OVERCLOUD_USE_CEILOMETER use case into changes first, then address UI later if someone else hasn't picked it up. - Phil > > On 04/22/2014 06:23 PM, Neal, Phil wrote: > >> From: Ladislav Smola [mailt

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Undercloud Ceilometer

2014-04-22 Thread Neal, Phil
> From: Ladislav Smola [mailto:lsm...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:37 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Undercloud Ceilometer > > No response so far, but -1 on the image element for making Ceilometer > optional. Sorry f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [QA] Slow Ceilometer resource_list CLI command

2014-03-18 Thread Neal, Phil
> -Original Message- > From: Tim Bell [mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch] > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 2:04 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [QA] Slow Ceilometer > resource_list CLI command > > > At CERN, we've had

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-07 Thread Neal, Phil
For multi-node deployments, implementing something like inotify would allow administrators to push configuration changes out to multiple targets using puppet/chef/etc. and have the daemons pick it up without restart. Thumbs up to that. As Tim Bell suggested, API-based enabling/disabling would a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Nomination of Sandy Walsh to core team

2013-12-16 Thread Neal, Phil
+1. Sandy has been both helpful and insightful, plus he happens to have a good handle on the many moving parts that make up this project. :-) -Phil > -Original Message- > From: Lu, Lianhao [mailto:lianhao...@intel.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 5:29 PM > To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [qa] Ceilometer ERRORS in normal runs

2013-10-21 Thread Neal, Phil
Sean, we currently have a BP out there to investigate basic tempest integration and I think this might fall under the same umbrella. Unfortunately I've not been able to free up my development time for it, but I've assigned it out to someone who can take a look and report back. https://blueprint

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Notifications from non-local exchanges

2013-10-15 Thread Neal, Phil
> -Original Message- > From: Sandy Walsh [mailto:sandy.wa...@rackspace.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:20 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Notifications from non-local > exchanges > > > On 10/1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Notifications from non-local exchanges

2013-10-10 Thread Neal, Phil
Greetings all, I'm looking at how to expand the ability of our CM instance to consume notifications and have a quick question about the configuration and flow... For the notifications central agent , we rely on the services (i.e. glance, cinder) to drop messages on the same messaging host as

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Correct way to disable specific event collection by the collector

2013-09-11 Thread Neal, Phil
Greetings team, I'm working on getting a very streamlined set of collections running and I'd like to disable all notifications except Glance. It's clear that the desired event types are defined in the plugins, but I can't seem to work out how to force the collector service to load only specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [ceilometer] Periodic Auditing In Glance

2013-08-13 Thread Neal, Phil
I'm a little concerned that a batch payload won't align with "exists" events generated from other services. To my recollection, Cinder, Trove and Neutron all emit exists events on a per-instance basisa consumer would have to figure out a way to handle/unpack these separately if they needed a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Changing pollster/pipeline parameters

2013-07-08 Thread Neal, Phil
> -Original Message- > From: Eoghan Glynn [mailto:egl...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 3:36 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List; Neal, Phil > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Changing pollster/pipeline > parameters > > > Hi Ph

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Changing pollster/pipeline parameters

2013-07-03 Thread Neal, Phil
A couple of related questions on managing CM pollster behavior via "config" type files: 1. I'm trying to make some modifications to the timing of the Glance (image) polling in a default CM install. It looks like the pipeline interval fields are the way to do it, and that I should tweak it using