Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Removing Support for Drivers with Failing CI's ...

2018-06-07 Thread Peter Penchev
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:40:09PM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > > Our CI has been chugging along since June 2nd (not really related to > > the timing of your e-mail, it just so happened that we fixed another > > small problem there). You can see the logs at > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Removing Support for Drivers with Failing CI's ...

2018-06-04 Thread Peter Penchev
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 06:13:23PM -0500, Jay S Bryant wrote: > All, > > This note is to make everyone aware that I have submitted patches for a > number of drivers that have not run 3rd party CI in 60 or more days.  The > following is a list of the drivers, how long since their CI last ran and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] New image backend: StorPool

2018-03-16 Thread Peter Penchev
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:39:14AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote: > > Can you be more specific about what is limiting you when you use > > volume-backed instances? > > Presumably it's because you're taking a trip over iscsi instead of using > the native attachment mechanism for the technology that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] New image backend: StorPool

2018-03-16 Thread Peter Penchev
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:23:11AM -0700, melanie witt wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:33:30 +0200, Peter Penchev wrote: > > Would there be any major opposition to adding a StorPool shared > > storage image backend, so that our customers are not limited to > > volume-backed

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] New image backend: StorPool

2018-03-16 Thread Peter Penchev
ked instances. > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Peter Penchev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > A couple of years ago I created a Nova spec for the StorPool image > > backend: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137830/ There was some > > discussion, but then our company co

[openstack-dev] [nova] New image backend: StorPool

2018-03-16 Thread Peter Penchev
Hi, A couple of years ago I created a Nova spec for the StorPool image backend: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137830/ There was some discussion, but then our company could not immediately allocate the resources to write the driver itself, so the spec languished and was eventually abandoned.

[openstack-dev] [os-brick][cinder][nova] Reintroduce the StorPool driver

2017-12-01 Thread Peter Penchev
We have just restored and submitted new patchsets for the StorPool block storage driver in the three components: - os-brick: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192639/ - cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220155/ - nova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140733/ Now, while we do realize that

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][third-party] StorPool Cinder CI

2015-09-03 Thread Peter Penchev
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Peter Penchev <openstack-...@storpool.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Peter Penchev > <openstack-...@storpool.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Asselin, Ramy <ramy.asse...@hp.com> wrote: >>> H

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][third-party] StorPool Cinder CI

2015-08-28 Thread Peter Penchev
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Peter Penchev openstack-...@storpool.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Asselin, Ramy ramy.asse...@hp.com wrote: Hi Peter, Your log files require downloads. Please fix it such that they can be viewed directly [1] Hi, and thanks for the fast reply

[openstack-dev] [cinder][third-party] StorPool Cinder CI

2015-08-27 Thread Peter Penchev
Hi, Some time ago I sent http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/third-party-announce/2015-August/000261.html to the third-party-announce list as a reply to a message about the StorPool Cinder third-party CI being disabled. Well, as I wrote in my reply there, I think that we have done what Mike

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][third-party] StorPool Cinder CI

2015-08-27 Thread Peter Penchev
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Asselin, Ramy ramy.asse...@hp.com wrote: Hi Peter, Your log files require downloads. Please fix it such that they can be viewed directly [1] Hi, and thanks for the fast reply! Yes, I'll try to change the webserver's configuration, although the snippet in

[openstack-dev] [nova] StorPool attachment driver approval? [Was: Reminder: July 16 is non-priority feature proposal freeze]

2015-07-29 Thread Peter Penchev
not get enough approval votes. So, yeah, sorry again for posting to the whole list... and thanks in advance for your time! :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Penchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p...@storpool.com https://storpool.com/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[openstack-dev] [nova] Non-libvirt-pool image backend drivers in Liberty?

2015-04-24 Thread Peter Penchev
Hi, During the Juno and Kilo timeframes, there was an idea to use libvirt storage pools for the Nova image backends. I believe that the plan back then was to deprecate image backend drivers that do not use libvirt storage pools in Kilo and them remove them altogether in Liberty. Is this still

[openstack-dev] [tempest][nova][cinder] Tests that try to detach volumes in use

2015-04-24 Thread Peter Penchev
Hi, There are a couple of Tempest volume tests, like test_rescued_vm_detach_volume or test_list_get_volume_attachments, that either sometimes[0] or always attempt to detach a volume from a running instance while the instance could still be keeping it open. Unfortunately, this is not completely

[openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception request for Add the Nova libvirt StorPool attachment driver.

2015-02-10 Thread Peter Penchev
Hi, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the change: https://review.openstack.org/140733/ It's a small, self-contained driver for attaching StorPool-backed Cinder volumes to existing Nova virtual machines. It does not touch anything outside its own bailiwick (adds a new class to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception request for Add the Nova libvirt StorPool attachment driver.

2015-02-10 Thread Peter Penchev
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:28:27PM +0200, Peter Penchev wrote: Hi, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the change: https://review.openstack.org/140733/ It's a small, self-contained driver

[openstack-dev] [nova] request spec freeze exception for Add the StorPool volume attach/detach proposal

2015-01-13 Thread Peter Penchev
Hi, I'd like to request an exception for Add the StorPool volume attach/detach proposal. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115716/ This is a very simple driver that allows Nova virtual machines to use StorPool distributed volumes (already created in Cinder) as additional disks. All that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How should libvirt pools work with distributed storage drivers?

2014-12-17 Thread Peter Penchev
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Peter, Right. So just one more question now - seeing as the plan is to deprecate non-libvirt-pool drivers in Kilo and then drop them entirely in L, would it still make sense for me to submit a spec today for a driver that

[openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal for a StorPool image backend driver

2014-11-27 Thread Peter Penchev
Hi, Hm, looks like I was a bit confused as to the procedure of submitting a blueprint and a spec for a new Glance image backend driver - and yeah, the actual text of the Reviewers section of the spec should have made me at least ask on the list... So here I am, asking, and sorry for the

[openstack-dev] [nova] How should libvirt pools work with distributed storage drivers?

2014-11-26 Thread Peter Penchev
Hi, Some days ago, a bunch of Nova specs were approved for Kilo. Among them was https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/use-libvirt-storage-pools Now, while I do recognize the wisdom of using storage pools, I do see a couple of possible problems with this, especially in the light of my

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How should libvirt pools work with distributed storage drivers?

2014-11-26 Thread Peter Penchev
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi! Some days ago, a bunch of Nova specs were approved for Kilo. Among them was https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/use-libvirt-storage-pools Now, while I do recognize the wisdom of using storage pools, I do see a