Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread John Dickinson
On Dec 30, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > On 30/12/13 13:44 -0600, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: >>> I like the idea of having custom tags. I'm a bit concerned about the >>> implications this might have with cross-project colla

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 30/12/13 13:44 -0600, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: I like the idea of having custom tags. I'm a bit concerned about the implications this might have with cross-project collaborations. I mean, people contributing to more projects will have

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: > I like the idea of having custom tags. I'm a bit concerned about the > implications this might have with cross-project collaborations. I > mean, people contributing to more projects will have to be aware of > the many possible differences

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 29/12/13 19:24 -0800, John Dickinson wrote: On Dec 29, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Michael Still wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:51 AM, John Dickinson wrote: On Dec 29, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Michael Still wrote: [snip] Perhaps step one is to work out what tags we think are useful and at what ti

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-29 Thread John Dickinson
On Dec 29, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Michael Still wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:51 AM, John Dickinson wrote: >> On Dec 29, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Michael Still wrote: > > [snip] > >>> Perhaps step one is to work out what tags we think are useful and at >>> what time they should execute? >> >> I t

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-29 Thread Michael Still
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:51 AM, John Dickinson wrote: > On Dec 29, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Michael Still wrote: [snip] >> Perhaps step one is to work out what tags we think are useful and at >> what time they should execute? > > I think this is exactly what I don't want. I don't want a set of prede

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-29 Thread Peter Portante
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:51 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > > On Dec 29, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Michael Still wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:12 AM, John Dickinson wrote: >>> I've seen several disconnected messages about tags in commit messages. I've >>> seen >>> what is possible with the DocImpa

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-29 Thread John Dickinson
On Dec 29, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Michael Still wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:12 AM, John Dickinson wrote: >> I've seen several disconnected messages about tags in commit messages. I've >> seen >> what is possible with the DocImpact tag, and I'd like to have some more >> flexible tagging >> t

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-29 Thread Michael Still
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:12 AM, John Dickinson wrote: > I've seen several disconnected messages about tags in commit messages. I've > seen > what is possible with the DocImpact tag, and I'd like to have some more > flexible tagging > things too. I'd like to use tags for things like keeping trac

[openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-29 Thread John Dickinson
I've seen several disconnected messages about tags in commit messages. I've seen what is possible with the DocImpact tag, and I'd like to have some more flexible tagging things too. I'd like to use tags for things like keeping track of config defaults changing, specific ongoing feature work, and