Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes-python-client] Failed to get service list

Thanks for the reminder, Michal. I sent the email here because the client library is dependency of several openstack projects, the issue I found may cause potential problems to them, and I also want to get some hints if they already solved that. Cheers, Lingxian Kong (Larry) On Thu, Jan 11,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes-python-client] Failed to get service list

On 01/10/2018 07:40 AM, Lingxian Kong wrote: > I submitted an issue in github[1] the other day but didn't get any > response, try my luck to attract attention here in case someone else has > the same problem or already has a solution I didn't know, or hopefully, I > missed something. > This is

[openstack-dev] [kubernetes-python-client] Failed to get service list

I submitted an issue in github[1] the other day but didn't get any response, try my luck to attract attention here in case someone else has the same problem or already has a solution I didn't know, or hopefully, I missed something. The problem is when I want to get service list(the result should

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][kolla][openstack-helm][magnum] Kubernetes Day at OpenStack Summit NA 2017 announced!

Hello everyone, I'm pleased to announce that the event schedule is published - you may find it at the event page [1]. Please, join us on May 9 at OpenStack Summit venue in Boston! Ihor 1. https://www.cncf.io/event/openstack-north-america-2017 On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Ihor Dvoretskyi

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

- Original Message - > From: "Monty Taylor" <mord...@inaugust.com> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:16:44 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud > Provider for Kubernetes > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

;kubernetes-sig-openstack" <kubernetes-sig-openst...@googlegroups.com> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM > >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud > >>> Provider for Kubernetes > >>> > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

<ch...@openstack.org> >>> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >>> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, >>> "kubernetes-sig-openstack" <kubernetes-sig-openst...@googlegroups.com> >>> Sent: W

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

> On Apr 2, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: >> Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project >> namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull >> requests and create an initial work

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

ot; >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, >> "kubernetes-sig-openstack" <kubernetes-sig-openst...@googlegroups.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud >> Pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: > Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project > namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull > requests and create an initial work list for migrating patches and > fixing existing issues. > > I've started up an

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull requests and create an initial work list for migrating patches and fixing existing issues. I've started up an etherpad where we can track that work[1]. In the longer

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

kubernetes-sig-openstack" <kubernetes-sig-openst...@googlegroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud > Provider for Kubernetes > > Team, > > Repo is ready: > http://git.ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

Team, Repo is ready: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/k8s-cloud-provider I've taken the liberty of updating it with the latest changes in the kubernetes/kubernetes repo: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/k8s-cloud-provider is ready So logical next step would be to add CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 8:46:42 AM UTC-7, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote: >> >> On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> >Folks, >> > >> >As discussed in the etherpad: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

On 03/24/2017 11:22 AM, Graham Hayes wrote: > On 24/03/17 08:46 -0700, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: >> >> >> On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote: >> >>On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>>Folks, >>> >>>As discussed in the etherpad: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

On 24/03/17 08:46 -0700, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote: On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >Folks, > >As discussed in the etherpad: >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote: > > On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >Folks, > > > >As discussed in the etherpad: > >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers > > > >Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, As discussed in the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449641/ This request pulls in the existing code from kubernetes/kubernetes repo

[openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

Folks, As discussed in the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449641/ This request pulls in the existing code from kubernetes/kubernetes repo and preserves the git history too

[openstack-dev] [kubernetes][kolla][openstack-helm][magnum] Kubernetes Day at OpenStack Summit NA 2017 announced!

Hello everyone, On behalf of Kubernetes Community and OpenStack SpeciaI Interest Group [0], I'm happy to announce Kubernetes Day at OpenStack Summit NA 2017. The event will be hosted by CNCF as a part of OpenStack’s Open Source Days in Boston [1]. The CFP process is already open - feel free to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][kolla]

vin M Fox" <kevin@pnnl.gov> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:41:12 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Two issues I can see with that approach. 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes]

nks, Kevin From: Ryan Hallisey [rhall...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:20 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Thanks for the feedback Kevin. The community has been investigation oth

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes]

; To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 11:37:33 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] +1 for using k8s to do work where possible. -1 for trying to shoehorn a feature in so that k8s ca

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes]

+1 for using k8s to do work where possible. -1 for trying to shoehorn a feature in so that k8s can deal with stuff its not ready to handle. We need to ensure Operators have everything they need in order to successfully operate their cloud. The current upgrade stuff in k8s is focused around

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

got it thanks :) On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Zhipeng Huang" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

- Original Message - > From: "Zhipeng Huang" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > Hi Ihor, > > This is a great news ! As a matter of fact at the moment the Tricircle team > from OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

Hi Ihor, This is a great news ! As a matter of fact at the moment the Tricircle team from OpenStack is working with Ubernetes team lead by Quinton to explore features about how OpenStack federation could help K8s federation works better. This SIG seems like a good fit for our ongoing work. Will

[openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

Colleagues, I'm happy to announce within the OpenStack community the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group. Kubernetes Community currently runs to the deeper integration between OpenStack and Kubernetes and one of the main aims now - to work on enabling OpenStack as a platform for running