subject:"\"Re\\\: \\\[openstack\\\-dev\\\] \\\[congress\\\]\\\[Policy\\\]\\\[Copper\\\]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper\""

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-16 Thread Zhipeng Huang

JBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VU&e=>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready
>>>>> with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the
>>>>> other policy-related projects
>>>>>
>>>>> (fault management
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctor&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvU&e=>,
>>>>> resource management
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promise&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30&e=>,
>>>>> resource scheduler
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
>>>>> with Congress experts would be great.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV,
>>>>> the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work
>>>>> in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved 
>>>>> in
>>>>> Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in
>>>>> OPNFV for that. TBD
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com
>>>>> ]
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
>>>>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev]
>>>>> [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and
>>>>> OPNFV Copper
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Zhipeng,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend
>>>>> the LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of
>>>>> people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise,
>>>>> there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course,
>>>>> phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Congress Team,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering
>>>>> deployment policy called Copper
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzY&s=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-w&e=>,
>>>>> in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need
>>>>> to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a 
>>>>> simple
>>>>> openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use
>>>>> cases for policy deployment.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an
>>>>> Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Te

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-16 Thread Zhipeng Huang

,
>>>> resource scheduler
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
>>>> with Congress experts would be great.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV,
>>>> the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work
>>>> in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in
>>>> Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in
>>>> OPNFV for that. TBD
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com
>>>> ]
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
>>>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration
>>>> between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Zhipeng,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend
>>>> the LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of
>>>> people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise,
>>>> there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course,
>>>> phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Congress Team,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering
>>>> deployment policy called Copper
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzY&s=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-w&e=>,
>>>> in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need
>>>> to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple
>>>> openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use
>>>> cases for policy deployment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an
>>>> Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could
>>>> introduce how to best integrate congress with "vanilla" openstack? Will
>>>> some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Standard Engineer
>>>>
>>>> IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
>>>>
>>>> Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
>>>>
>>>> Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
>>>>
>>>> Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (Previous)
>>>>
>>>> Research Assistant
>>>>
>>>> Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
>>>>
>>>> University of California, Irvine
>>>>
>>>> Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
>>>>
>>>> Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __
>>>> OpenStack Developmen

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-16 Thread Sean Roberts

I'm good for either time Tuesday. 

~sean

> On Feb 16, 2015, at 15:45, Tim Hinrichs  wrote:
> 
> Lets default to 3p/7a if we don't hear from Bryan.
> 
> Tim
> 
> P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile. 
> 
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Zhipeng Huang  wrote:
> 
>> 2 - 4 pm Tuesday (which means 6 - 8 am China Wed) should work for me. Let's 
>> see if Bryan is ok with the time slot. And yes you don't need an account :)
>> 
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tim Hinrichs  wrote:
>>> I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday?
>>> 
>>> I'm happy to try out gotomeeting.  Looks like I don't need an account, 
>>> right?
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile. 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Tim,
>>>> 
>>>> Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 
>>>> pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. 
>>>> Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys 
>>>> be ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, "Tim Hinrichs"  wrote:
>>>>> Hi Zhipeng,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the 
>>>>> Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress 
>>>>> team.  We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks 
>>>>> better than Tuesday.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, 
>>>>> I’ll do my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always 
>>>>> have Sean to talk with.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tim
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang  wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> THX Tim!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of 
>>>>>> F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or 
>>>>>> Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they 
>>>>>> met, with specific questions. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Would this be ok for everyone ? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs  
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Bryan and Zhipeng,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s 
>>>>>>> definitely there on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early 
>>>>>>> afternoon if I can.  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L  wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Tim,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if 
>>>>>>>> possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic 
>>>>>>>> understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to 
>>>>>>>> demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of 
>>>>>>>> Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: 
>>>>>>>> https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready 
>>>>>>>> with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and 
>>>>>>>> the other policy-related projects
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> (fault management, resource management, resource scheduler) with 
>>>>>>>> Congress experts would be great.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> Once we understand the gaps in

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-16 Thread Tim Hinrichs

Lets default to 3p/7a if we don't hear from Bryan.

Tim

P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile.

On Feb 15, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

2 - 4 pm Tuesday (which means 6 - 8 am China Wed) should work for me. Let's see 
if Bryan is ok with the time slot. And yes you don't need an account :)

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tim Hinrichs 
mailto:thinri...@vmware.com>> wrote:
I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday?

I'm happy to try out gotomeeting.  Looks like I don't need an account, right?

Tim

P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile.

On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:


Hi Tim,

Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 pm, 
but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. 
Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be ok 
with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?

On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, "Tim Hinrichs" 
mailto:thinri...@vmware.com>> wrote:
Hi Zhipeng,

Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the Copper 
team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.  We’re 
usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday.

If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do 
my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to 
talk with.

Tim




On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

THX Tim!

I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC 
summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and 
then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific 
questions.

Would this be ok for everyone ?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs 
mailto:thinri...@vmware.com>> wrote:
Bryan and Zhipeng,

Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely there 
on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if 
I can.

Tim


On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
mailto:bs3...@att.com>> wrote:

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcases&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VU&e=>

I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault 
management<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctor&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvU&e=>,
 resource 
management<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promise&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30&e=>,
 resource 
scheduler<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
 with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-15 Thread Zhipeng Huang

2 - 4 pm Tuesday (which means 6 - 8 am China Wed) should work for me. Let's
see if Bryan is ok with the time slot. And yes you don't need an account :)

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tim Hinrichs  wrote:

>  I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday?
>
>  I'm happy to try out gotomeeting.  Looks like I don't need an account,
> right?
>
> Tim
>
>  P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile.
>
> On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang  wrote:
>
>   Hi Tim,
>
> Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5
> pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok.
> Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be
> ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?
> On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, "Tim Hinrichs"  wrote:
>
>> Hi Zhipeng,
>>
>>  Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the
>> Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.
>> We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than
>> Tuesday.
>>
>>  If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p,
>> I’ll do my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always
>> have Sean to talk with.
>>
>>  Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
>> wrote:
>>
>>  THX Tim!
>>
>>  I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of
>> F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or
>> Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met,
>> with specific questions.
>>
>>  Would this be ok for everyone ?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Bryan and Zhipeng,
>>>
>>>  Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s
>>> definitely there on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.
>>>
>>>  I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early
>>> afternoon if I can.
>>>
>>>  Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L  wrote:
>>>
>>>   Hi Tim,
>>>
>>>
>>> It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if
>>> possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic
>>> understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at
>>> the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for
>>> the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcases&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VU&e=>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready
>>> with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the
>>> other policy-related projects
>>>
>>> (fault management
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctor&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvU&e=>,
>>> resource management
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promise&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30&e=>,
>>> resource scheduler
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
>>> with Congress experts would be great.
>>>
>>>
>>> Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the
>>> goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in
>>> Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in
>>> Congress to address them, or start a col

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-15 Thread Tim Hinrichs

I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday?

I'm happy to try out gotomeeting.  Looks like I don't need an account, right?

Tim

P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile.

On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:


Hi Tim,

Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 pm, 
but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. 
Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be ok 
with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?

On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, "Tim Hinrichs" 
mailto:thinri...@vmware.com>> wrote:
Hi Zhipeng,

Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the Copper 
team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.  We’re 
usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday.

If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do 
my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to 
talk with.

Tim




On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

THX Tim!

I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC 
summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and 
then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific 
questions.

Would this be ok for everyone ?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs 
mailto:thinri...@vmware.com>> wrote:
Bryan and Zhipeng,

Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely there 
on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if 
I can.

Tim


On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
mailto:bs3...@att.com>> wrote:

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcases&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VU&e=>

I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault 
management<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctor&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvU&e=>,
 resource 
management<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promise&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30&e=>,
 resource 
scheduler<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
 with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-13 Thread Zhipeng Huang

Hi Tim,

Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5
pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok.
Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be
ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?
On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, "Tim Hinrichs"  wrote:

>  Hi Zhipeng,
>
>  Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the
> Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.
> We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than
> Tuesday.
>
>  If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p,
> I’ll do my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always
> have Sean to talk with.
>
>  Tim
>
>
>
>
>  On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang  wrote:
>
>  THX Tim!
>
>  I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of
> F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or
> Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met,
> with specific questions.
>
>  Would this be ok for everyone ?
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs 
> wrote:
>
>> Bryan and Zhipeng,
>>
>>  Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s
>> definitely there on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.
>>
>>  I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early
>> afternoon if I can.
>>
>>  Tim
>>
>>
>>  On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L  wrote:
>>
>>   Hi Tim,
>>
>>
>> It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if
>> possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic
>> understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at
>> the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for
>> the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcases&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VU&e=>
>>
>>
>> I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready
>> with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the
>> other policy-related projects
>>
>> (fault management
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctor&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvU&e=>,
>> resource management
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promise&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30&e=>,
>> resource scheduler
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
>> with Congress experts would be great.
>>
>>
>> Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the
>> goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in
>> Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in
>> Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in
>> OPNFV for that. TBD
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T
>>
>>
>> *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com ]
>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration
>> between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Zhipeng,
>>
>>
>>
>> We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the
>> LF collaboration summit.  B

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-13 Thread Tim Hinrichs

Hi Zhipeng,

Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the Copper 
team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.  We’re 
usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday.

If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do 
my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to 
talk with.

Tim




On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

THX Tim!

I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC 
summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and 
then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific 
questions.

Would this be ok for everyone ?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs 
mailto:thinri...@vmware.com>> wrote:
Bryan and Zhipeng,

Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely there 
on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if 
I can.

Tim


On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
mailto:bs3...@att.com>> wrote:

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcases&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VU&e=>

I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault 
management<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctor&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvU&e=>,
 resource 
management<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promise&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30&e=>,
 resource 
scheduler<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
 with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copper<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzY&s=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-w&e=>,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-12 Thread Zhipeng Huang

THX Tim!

I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F
LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or
Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met,
with specific questions.

Would this be ok for everyone ?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs  wrote:

>  Bryan and Zhipeng,
>
>  Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely
> there on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.
>
>  I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early
> afternoon if I can.
>
>  Tim
>
>
>  On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L  wrote:
>
>   Hi Tim,
>
>
>
> It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible
> at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding
> of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup.
> The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use
> cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcases&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VU&e=>
>
>
>
> I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready
> with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the
> other policy-related projects
>
> (fault management
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctor&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvU&e=>,
> resource management
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promise&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30&e=>,
> resource scheduler
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
> with Congress experts would be great.
>
>
>
> Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the
> goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in
> Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in
> Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in
> OPNFV for that. TBD
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T
>
>
>
> *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com ]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration
> between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
>
>
>
> Hi Zhipeng,
>
>
>
> We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!
>
>
>
> I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the
> LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people
> if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are
> a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google
> hangout/irc are fine options as well.
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang  wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Congress Team,
>
>
>
> As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment
> policy called Copper
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzY&s=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-w&e=>,
> in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need
> to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple
> openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use
> cases for policy deployment.
>
>
>
> Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an
> Copper/Congress interlock meeting, durin

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-12 Thread Tim Hinrichs

Bryan and Zhipeng,

Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely there 
on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if 
I can.

Tim

On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
mailto:bs3...@att.com>> wrote:

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcases&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VU&e=>

I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault 
management<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctor&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvU&e=>,
 resource 
management<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promise&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30&e=>,
 resource 
scheduler<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fscheduler&d=AwMFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcU&s=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9I&e=>)
 with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copper<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzY&s=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-w&e=>,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how to best integrate congress with "vanilla" openstack? Will some of you 
attend LF Collaboration Summit?

Thanks a lot :)

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com<mailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com>
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu<mailto:zhipe...@uci.edu>
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-11 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

Hi Tim,

See one issue I had when installing congress, below. I'm not sure where to 
report this as it seems just a bug in the readme.rst at 
https://github.com/stackforge/congress<https://github.com/stackforge/congress%20and%20in%20the%20prepare_devstack.sh>
 and in the prepare_devstack.sh script.

The readme references creating a localrc and adding the line below to it:
ENABLED_SERVICES=congress,g-api,g-reg,key,n-api,n-crt,n-obj,n-cpu,n-sch,n-cauth,horizon,mysql,rabbit,sysstat,cinder,c-api,c-vol,c-sch,n-cond,quantum,q-svc,q-agt,q-dhcp,q-l3,q-meta,n-novnc,n-xvnc,q-lbaas,ceilometer-acompute,ceilometer-acentral,ceilometer-anotification,ceilometer-collector,ceilometer-alarm-evaluator,ceilometer-alarm-notifier,ceilometer-api,s-proxy,s-object,s-container,s-account

But localrc has been deprecated for local.conf AFAICT, and stack.sh failed with 
errors (urllib3:... connection pool is full, discarding connection...) until I:
-  Moved "enable_service congress" into the [local|localrc] section 
of local.conf
-  Did not include the "ENABLED_SERVICES" line above
(it seems to be redundant, not necessary if you are only enabling the default 
services, and I think caused the errors in stack.sh)

I think prepare_devstack.sh needs to be updated to put "enable_service 
congress" into the [local|localrc] section of local.conf rather than creating 
localrc (at least when there is a local.conf in the devstack directory).

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:04 PM
To: 'Tim Hinrichs'; 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage 
questions)'
Cc: HU, BIN; 'Rodriguez, Iben'; 'Howard Huang'
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases

I would be doing the same with ODL but I'm not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault management<https://wiki.opnfv.org/doctor>, resource 
management<https://wiki.opnfv.org/promise>, resource 
scheduler<https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/resource_scheduler>) 
with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We'd be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don't know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it's 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copper<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzY&s=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-w&e=>,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how to best integrate congress with "vanilla" openstack? Will some of you 
attend LF Collaboration Summit?

Thanks a lot :)

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huang

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-11 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases

I would be doing the same with ODL but I'm not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault management<https://wiki.opnfv.org/doctor>, resource 
management<https://wiki.opnfv.org/promise>, resource 
scheduler<https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/resource_scheduler>) 
with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | AT&T

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We'd be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don't know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it's 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copper<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7s&m=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzY&s=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-w&e=>,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how to best integrate congress with "vanilla" openstack? Will some of you 
attend LF Collaboration Summit?

Thanks a lot :)

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com<mailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com>
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu<mailto:zhipe...@uci.edu>
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-11 Thread Zhipeng Huang

Hi Tim,

Thanks for the quick reply！I also think we should probably have a google
hangout or irc meeting ahead of F2F, do you guys have time before 2/17,
let's have a short session of crash course : )

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Tim Hinrichs  wrote:

>  Hi Zhipeng,
>
>  We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!
>
>  I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend
> the LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of
> people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise,
> there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course,
> phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well.
>
>  Tim
>
>
>
>   On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
> wrote:
>
>  Hi Congress Team,
>
>  As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment
> policy called Copper
> ,
> in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need
> to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple
> openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use
> cases for policy deployment.
>
>  Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an
> Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could
> introduce how to best integrate congress with "vanilla" openstack? Will
> some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit?
>
>  Thanks a lot :)
>
>  --
>  Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
>
>  Standard Engineer
> IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
> Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
> Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
> Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen
>
>  (Previous)
> Research Assistant
> Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
> University of California, Irvine
> Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
> Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402
>
>  OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-11 Thread Tim Hinrichs

Hi Zhipeng,

We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copper,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how to best integrate congress with "vanilla" openstack? Will some of you 
attend LF Collaboration Summit?

Thanks a lot :)

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

14 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information