Sean,
fyi, got it stable now for the moment.
http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiIgYnVpbGRfbmFtZTpcImNoZWNrLXRlbXBlc3QtZHN2bS1kb2NrZXJcIiBBTkQgbWVzc2FnZTpcIkZpbmlzaGVkOlwiIEFORCBidWlsZF9zdGF0dXM6XCJGQUlMVVJFXCIiLCJmaWVsZHMiOltdLCJvZmZzZXQiOjAsInRpbWVmcmFtZSI6IjE3MjgwMCIsImdyYXBobW9kZSI6Im
On 2014-12-10 06:37:02 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote:
> I know that periodic jobs can do this kind of notification, if you
> ask about it in #openstack-infra there might be a solution there.
[...]
E-mail reporting in Zuul is currently implemented pipeline-specific,
so the nova-docker tests would
On 12/09/2014 06:18 PM, Eric Windisch wrote:
>
> While gating on nova-docker will prevent patches that cause
> nova-docker to break 100% to land, it won't do a lot to prevent
> transient failures. To fix those we need people dedicated to making
> sure nova-docker is working.
>
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Eric Windisch wrote:
>
>> While gating on nova-docker will prevent patches that cause nova-docker
>> to break 100% to land, it won't do a lot to prevent transient failures. To
>> fix those we need people dedicated to making sure nova-docker is working.
>>
>>
>
> Wh
>
>
> While gating on nova-docker will prevent patches that cause nova-docker to
> break 100% to land, it won't do a lot to prevent transient failures. To fix
> those we need people dedicated to making sure nova-docker is working.
>
>
What would be helpful for me is a way to know that our tests ar
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ian Main wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
> > On 12/04/2014 05:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/4/2014 4:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> > >> +Eric and Ian
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Matt Riedemann
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> This came up
Sean Dague wrote:
> On 12/04/2014 05:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/4/2014 4:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> >> +Eric and Ian
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Matt Riedemann
> >> wrote:
> >>> This came up in the nova meeting today, I've opened a bug [1] for it.
> >>> Since
On 12/04/2014 05:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>
> On 12/4/2014 4:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>> +Eric and Ian
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Matt Riedemann
>> wrote:
>>> This came up in the nova meeting today, I've opened a bug [1] for it.
>>> Since
>>> this isn't maintained by infra we
On 12/4/2014 4:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
+Eric and Ian
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
This came up in the nova meeting today, I've opened a bug [1] for it. Since
this isn't maintained by infra we don't have log indexing so I can't use
logstash to see how pervasive it
+Eric and Ian
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> This came up in the nova meeting today, I've opened a bug [1] for it. Since
> this isn't maintained by infra we don't have log indexing so I can't use
> logstash to see how pervasive it us, but multiple people are reporting the
10 matches
Mail list logo
