Matt, thanks for catching this.
BTW That's an interesting idea of supporting different tenants.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
thanks for all the feedback folks.. i've registered a bp for this...
andrew,
what about having swift:// which defaults to the configured tenant and
auth url for what we now call swift-internal, and we allow for user
input to change tenant and auth url for what would be swift-external?
in fact, we may need to add the tenant selection in icehouse. it's a
On Jan 24, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
andrew,
what about having swift:// which defaults to the configured tenant and auth
url for what we now call swift-internal, and we allow for user input to
change tenant and auth url for what would be swift-external?
I
what about having swift:// which defaults to the configured tenant and
auth url for what we now call swift-internal, and we allow for user input
to change tenant and auth url for what would be swift-external?
I like the proposal.
Andrew.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Matthew Farrellee
Matt et al,
Yes, swift-internal was meant as a marker to distinguish it from
swift-external someday. I agree, this could be indicated by setting
other fields.
Little bit of implementation detail for scope:
In the current EDP implementation, SWIFT_INTERNAL_PREFIX shows up in
essentially two
Looks like we need to review prefixes and cleanup them. After the first
look I'd like the idea of using common prefix for swift data.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Trevor McKay tmc...@redhat.com wrote:
Matt et al,
Yes, swift-internal was meant as a marker to distinguish it from
thanks for all the feedback folks.. i've registered a bp for this...
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/savanna/+spec/swift-url-proto-cleanup
On 01/24/2014 11:30 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Looks like we need to review prefixes and cleanup them. After the first
look I'd like the idea of using
Matt,
I can easily imagine situation when job binaries are stored in external
HDFS or external SWIFT (like data sources). Internal and external swifts
are different since we need additional credentials.
Thanks,
Andrew.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
what makes it internal vs external?
swift-internal needs user pass
swift-external needs user pass ?auth url?
best,
matt
On 01/23/2014 08:43 PM, Andrew Lazarev wrote:
Matt,
I can easily imagine situation when job binaries are stored in external
HDFS or external SWIFT (like data
