Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Spencer Krum
Here is a docker image that will bring up subway. https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/nibalizer/subway/ On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 07:26 AM, Ryan Brown wrote: > > On 09/03/2014 09:35 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > > Re: ZNC as a service, I think

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Clark Boylan
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 07:26 AM, Ryan Brown wrote: > On 09/03/2014 09:35 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > Re: ZNC as a service, I think it's OK provided the implementation is > > open-sourced with openstack-infra repo group, as for Gerrit, Zuul and > > others. > > The only problem I can see is how to

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:23:41PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Stefano Maffulli wrote: > > On 08/29/2014 11:17 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > >> After moving to use ZNC, I find IRC works much better for me now, but > >> I am still learning really. > > > > There! this sentence has two very important

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Ryan Brown
On 09/03/2014 09:35 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Re: ZNC as a service, I think it's OK provided the implementation is > open-sourced with openstack-infra repo group, as for Gerrit, Zuul and > others. > The only problem I can see is how to provide IRC credentials to this, as > I don't want to share my

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Sylvain Bauza
riginal Message- From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] Sent: 03 September 2014 13:24 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?) Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 08/29/2014 11:17 AM, John Garbut

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Kuvaja, Erno
org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP > approval process broken?) > > Stefano Maffulli wrote: > > On 08/29/2014 11:17 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > >> After moving to use ZNC, I find IRC works much better for me now, but > >

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Louis Taylor
Thierry Carrez wrote: > Note that ZNC is not the only IRC proxy out there. Bip is also working > quite well. Note also that an IRC proxy is not the only solution. Using a console IRC client on a server works well for me. Irssi or weechat are both simple to set up. signature.asc Description: Digi

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Stefano Maffulli wrote: > On 08/29/2014 11:17 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >> After moving to use ZNC, I find IRC works much better for me now, but >> I am still learning really. > > There! this sentence has two very important points worth highlighting: > > 1- when people say IRC they mean IRC + a hac

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

2014-09-02 Thread Ryan Brown
On 09/02/2014 02:50 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > On 08/29/2014 11:17 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >> After moving to use ZNC, I find IRC works much better for me now, but >> I am still learning really. > > There! this sentence has two very important points worth highlighting: > > 1- when people say I